Discuss December 2012

discuss@lists.centos.org

146 participants
122 discussions

Cannot build custom locale with utf-8 charset
by James B. Byrne 16 Dec '12

16 Dec '12

I am trying, without success, to compile a custom locale for the utf-8 character set. I have issued this command: localedef --no-archive -f UTF-8 -i /usr/share/i18n/locales/en_CA@yyyy-mmm-dd en_CA(a)yyyy-mmm-dd.utf8 which produces the requisite files without reporting an error but which none-the-less insists on using the iso-8859-1 charset: LC_ALL=en_CA@yyyy-mm-dd locale charmap ISO-8859-1 So, I tried this variant: localedef --no-archive -f /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/UTF-8 -i /usr/share/i18n/locales/en_CA@yyyy-mmm-dd en_CA(a)yyyy-mmm-dd.utf8 character map file `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps/UTF-8' not found: No such file or directory no output file produced because warnings were issued Missing UTF-8 file? ll /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/UTF-8* . . . -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 240800 Aug 27 09:28 UTF-8.gz . . . Ok, let us try again: localedef --no-archive -f /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/UTF-8.gz -i /usr/share/i18n/locales/en_CA@yyyy-mmm-dd en_CA(a)yyyy-mmm-dd.utf8 /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/UTF-8.gz:1: syntax error in prolog: invalid definition /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/UTF-8.gz:2: syntax error in prolog: invalid definition memory clobbered past end of allocated block Aborted OK, fine, be that way. cd /usr/share/i18n/charmaps gunzip UTF-8.gz ll UTF-8* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1432559 Aug 27 09:28 UTF-8 localedef --no-archive -f /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/UTF-8 -i /usr/share/i18n/locales/en_CA@yyyy-mmm-dd en_CA(a)yyyy-mmm-dd.utf8 LC_ALL=en_CA@yyyy-mm-dd locale charmap ISO-8859-1 Ok, I give up. What little tid-bit of information am I overlooking or just not understanding correctly. How do I get this thing built with the UTF-8 character set? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

Ralink Corp RT5390 Wireless
by Mark LaPierre 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

Hey All, In looking for a solution for the subject wireless on my friend's Asus A54C laptop I found this entry: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=39054&forum=55 rt2860-firmware-26-1.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm kmod-rt5390sta-2.5.0.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm This solution appears to have worked for the RT3090. Would these be the right rpm's for my friend to install to get his RT5390 working? No wait, I found this using the Add/Remove software tool. The rt2860 rpm says, "This package contains the firmware required by Ralink RT28XX/RT30XX". I don't see a package for the RT53XX. What now Charley Brown? -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****

4 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 94, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEEA-2012:1574 CentOS 6 lvm2 Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:41:35 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:1574 CentOS 6 lvm2 Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20121214224135.GA20599(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:1574 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1574.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: ba24fc9095930435187b10b930490ce71db6886c1f52b08f8d6610823368a34f cmirror-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm d70e3e087de028bec162f52b7a96f9a88553a4750f573a5c9a16ec40ffdb44a6 device-mapper-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 15f66f41e661f44d143b961c73b2bcb1fc8a062cfd6a60e2d60ea2590df3b30b device-mapper-devel-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm a95f783972e1947dc249374c4c01054987b3f9349cdfd1b83694f8c871499143 device-mapper-event-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 2ac7c8ae745e5eef5778da3b652e115c923c79ad400cc16800a754f6556b290a device-mapper-event-devel-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm a750e6a9373248e59609fff40fdee368c9f25ddc4f26fe8dac63d6d1705abaf6 device-mapper-event-libs-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm ab13af5ccdc1d7a4b20b6c9352a0307ed2f9da3b88874c26eac50c48b8880cf3 device-mapper-libs-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 044eea11becb1bacb3436462bb35e0ae0e8c738c54378c5fd434f18ee7647aad lvm2-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 45e5d8fa1618ccb6d1798f9ed861356bf7bb59baea0091953f979757fb0c7909 lvm2-cluster-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm e3afb23a244b5485918bea9098c5f4d9b869e726be625c23e22f14b75606897a lvm2-devel-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm dad61c6a16de262f2140c9fdcd0e686109f0ca2817219d9bbdf618d353506040 lvm2-libs-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm x86_64: 3b453125427048216a9347fa6c61ff739137905ac9c2212e2ae7a1bb63a7b2f3 cmirror-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm daf65bba025ded2fad20df08d8a4db6740a45180cd2ee70f2e5f4d1fe9058f2d device-mapper-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm 15f66f41e661f44d143b961c73b2bcb1fc8a062cfd6a60e2d60ea2590df3b30b device-mapper-devel-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm e97b9210b321c9db8487f55a4bda2e9b4cb9d058af38398c6a7d01c826f68d20 device-mapper-devel-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm 73115ca23eb4060db6aae0de3fa3a15efecc6fbfe17e8c3ddff57ccd386375a2 device-mapper-event-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm 2ac7c8ae745e5eef5778da3b652e115c923c79ad400cc16800a754f6556b290a device-mapper-event-devel-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 7fd8cf699f1ed1591b9588e5115e60a1763c50c96e0cca44183cc30863b8a851 device-mapper-event-devel-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm a750e6a9373248e59609fff40fdee368c9f25ddc4f26fe8dac63d6d1705abaf6 device-mapper-event-libs-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm e1333c24983b50574ca9dc3c6c247f9c6a3afffd1cf381032c7682159fc1d693 device-mapper-event-libs-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm ab13af5ccdc1d7a4b20b6c9352a0307ed2f9da3b88874c26eac50c48b8880cf3 device-mapper-libs-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 087f6cd7debd0d9d6cbd1299b1a264dc4619a8af0d2b934c814e9b0d5882ef31 device-mapper-libs-1.02.74-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm bf21b8b4c0a0c383fd78f8295079bc68ddccbcca60ac34920da3525a7574dc07 lvm2-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm 615ed84db76d65af442436ddfb40868980a440ceee64194da707fdc0da9b8e57 lvm2-cluster-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm e3afb23a244b5485918bea9098c5f4d9b869e726be625c23e22f14b75606897a lvm2-devel-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 4f851ea3fddfebf2b4f8504c8d0a0eb86352ad0111d8f7147451115615be915a lvm2-devel-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm dad61c6a16de262f2140c9fdcd0e686109f0ca2817219d9bbdf618d353506040 lvm2-libs-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.i686.rpm 08577a92a0b10158d07a0249edd85dff1171ba82989329ee487204fe054984bb lvm2-libs-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm Source: 0a805019fb956d3ad0cb8bc76fd70802d93232eaf1abbfdfcd5a8fa883104a20 lvm2-2.02.95-10.el6_3.3.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 94, Issue 8 **********************************************

1 0

KVM on Centos version 6.3
by Kaushal Shriyan 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

Hi, I dont see wiki or manuals to setup KVM on Centos 6.3. http://docs.centos.org/ just have for version 4 and 5. Any specific reason? Please suggest. Regards Kaushal

2 1

Building a C5 chroot on a C6 machine
by Stephen Harris 14 Dec '12

14 Dec '12

I'm trying to do something slightly silly; rather than having a C5 machine and a C6 machine around for compiling and testing, I want to create a C5 chroot area. Something similar to "mock" but using lvm snapshots and some local config specific stuff. (Potentially even using Linux Containers to enter the chroot environment). So I thought I'd build out the chroot... % cat /etc/yum.repos.d/c5.repo [c5] name=CentOS-$releasever - Media baseurl=http://repo/CentOS/DVD/CentOS-5-x86_64/ gpgcheck=0 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 enabled=0 [c5-update] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates local baseurl=http://repo/CentOS/updates/centos5/x86_64/ gpgcheck=0 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 enabled=0 Now I can do yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c5* -y --installroot=$ROOT install $rpms (where $rpms is derived from what anaconda left behind on an old install) So far so... "ok". Some issues with post-install scripts breaking, but it mostly works. Verifying : 3:traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.x86_64 235/237 Verifying : setup-2.5.58-9.el5.noarch 236/237 Verifying : at-3.1.8-84.el5.x86_64 237/237 Installed: MAKEDEV.x86_64 0:3.23-1.2 SysVinit.x86_64 0:2.86-17.el5 acl.x86_64 0:2.2.39-8.el5 [etc etc] EXCEPT... test2.pts/0% chroot /mnt5 /bin/sh sh-3.2# ls bin dev home lib64 media opt root selinux sys usr boot etc lib lost+found mnt proc sbin srv tmp var sh-3.2# rpm -qa rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: unsupported hash version: 9 error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Invalid argument (22) error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm The rpm database is in the format of C6, so the C5 programs can't read it! Anyone have any ideas on how I can work around this problem? It's a little annoying! Thanks, -- rgds Stephen

4 6

home directory server performance issues
by Matt Garman 14 Dec '12

14 Dec '12

I’m looking for advice and considerations on how to optimally setup and deploy an NFS-based home directory server. In particular: (1) how to determine hardware requirements, and (2) how to best setup and configure the server. We actually have a system in place, but the performance is pretty bad---the users often experience a fair amount of lag (1--5 seconds) when doing anything on their home directories, including an “ls” or writing a small text file. So now I’m trying to back-up and determine, is it simply a configuration issue, or is the hardware inadequate? Our scenario: we have about 25 users, mostly software developers and analysts. The users login to one or more of about 40 development servers. All users’ home directories live on a single server (no login except root); that server does an NFSv4 export which is mounted by all dev servers. The home directory server hardware is a Dell R510 with dual E5620 CPUs and 8 GB RAM. There are eight 15k 2.5” 600 GB drives (Seagate ST3600057SS) configured in hardware RAID-6 with a single hot spare. RAID controller is a Dell PERC H700 w/512MB cache (Linux sees this as a LSI MegaSAS 9260). OS is CentOS 5.6, home directory partition is ext3, with options “rw,data=journal,usrquota”. I have the HW RAID configured to present two virtual disks to the OS: /dev/sda for the OS (boot, root and swap partitions), and /dev/sdb for the home directories. I’m fairly certain I did not align the partitions optimally: [root@lnxutil1 ~]# parted -s /dev/sda unit s print Model: DELL PERC H700 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 134217599s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 63s 465884s 465822s primary ext2 boot 2 465885s 134207009s 133741125s primary lvm [root@lnxutil1 ~]# parted -s /dev/sdb unit s print Model: DELL PERC H700 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 5720768639s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 34s 5720768606s 5720768573s lvm Can anyone confirm that the partitions are not aligned correctly, as I suspect? If this is true, is there any way to *quantify* the effects of partition mis-alignment on performance? In other words, what kind of improvement could I expect if I rebuilt this server with the partitions aligned optimally? In general, what is the best way to determine the source of our performance issues? Right now, I’m running “iostat -dkxt 30” re-directed to a file. I intend to let this run for a day or so, and write a script to produce some statistics. Here is one iteration from the iostat process: Time: 09:37:28 AM Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 44.09 0.03 107.76 0.13 607.40 11.27 0.89 8.27 7.27 78.35 sda1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sda2 0.00 44.09 0.03 107.76 0.13 607.40 11.27 0.89 8.27 7.27 78.35 sdb 0.00 2616.53 0.67 157.88 2.80 11098.83 140.04 8.57 54.08 4.21 66.68 sdb1 0.00 2616.53 0.67 157.88 2.80 11098.83 140.04 8.57 54.08 4.21 66.68 dm-0 0.00 0.00 0.03 151.82 0.13 607.26 8.00 1.25 8.23 5.16 78.35 dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dm-2 0.00 0.00 0.67 2774.84 2.80 11099.37 8.00 474.30 170.89 0.24 66.84 dm-3 0.00 0.00 0.67 2774.84 2.80 11099.37 8.00 474.30 170.89 0.24 66.84 What I observe, is that whenever sdb (home directory partition) becomes loaded, sda (OS) often does as well. Why is this? I would expect sda to generally be idle, or have minimal utilization. According to both “free” and “vmstat”, this server is not swapping at all. At one point, our problems were due to a random user writing a huge file to their home directory. We built a second server specifically for people to use for writing large temporary files. Furthermore, for all the dev servers, I used the following tc commands to rate limit how quickly any one server can write to the home directory server (8 Mbps or 1 MB/s): ETH_IFACE=$( route -n | grep "^0.0.0.0" | awk '{ print $8 }' ) IFACE_RATE=1000mbit LIMIT_RATE=8mbit TARGET_IP=1.2.3.4 # home directory server IP tc qdisc add dev $ETH_IFACE root handle 1: htb default 1 tc class add dev $ETH_IFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate $IFACE_RATE ceil $IFACE_RATE tc class add dev $ETH_IFACE parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate $LIMIT_RATE ceil $LIMIT_RATE tc filter add dev $ETH_IFACE parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst $TARGET_IP flowid 1:2 The other interesting thing is that the second server I mentioned—the one specifically designed for users to “torture”—shows very low IO utilization, practically never going above 10%. That server is fairly different though: dual E5-2340 CPUs (more cores, but lower clock), 32 GB RAM. Disk subsystem is Dell PERC 710 (LSI MegaRAID SAS 2208), and drives are 7200 RPM 1GB (SEAGATE ST1000NM0001) in RAID-6. The OS is CentOS 6.3, NFS partition is ext4 with options “rw,relatime,barrier=1,data=ordered,usrquota”. Ultimately, I plan to rebuild the home directory server with CentOS 6 (instead of 5), and align the partitions properly. But as of now, I don’t have a rational reason for doing that other than the other server with this config doesn’t have performance problems. I’d like to be able to say specifically (i.e. quantify) exactly where the problems are and how they will be addressed by the upgrade/config change. I’ll add that we want to use the “sec=krb5p” (i.e. encrypt everything) mount option for the home directories. We tried that with the home directory server, and it became virtually unusable. But we use that option on the other server, with no issue. For now, as a stop-gap, we are just using the “sec=krb5” mount option (i.e., no encryption). The server is still laggy, but at least usable. Here is the output of “nfsstat –v” on the home directory server: [root@lnxutil1 ~]# nfsstat -v Server packet stats: packets udp tcp tcpconn 12560989 0 12544002 17146 Server rpc stats: calls badcalls badclnt badauth xdrcall 12516995 922 0 922 0 Server reply cache: hits misses nocache 0 0 12512316 Server file handle cache: lookup anon ncachedir ncachedir stale 0 0 0 0 160 Server nfs v4: null compound 86 0% 12516096 99% Server nfs v4 operations: op0-unused op1-unused op2-future access close commit 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 449630 1% 1131528 2% 191998 0% create delegpurge delegreturn getattr getfh link 2053 0% 0 0% 62931 0% 11210081 29% 1638995 4% 275 0% lock lockt locku lookup lookup_root nverify 196 0% 0 0% 196 0% 557606 1% 0 0% 0 0% open openattr open_conf open_dgrd putfh putpubfh 1274780 3% 0 0% 72561 0% 618 0% 12357089 32% 0 0% putrootfh read readdir readlink remove rename 160 0% 1548999 4% 44760 0% 625 0% 140946 0% 4229 0% renew restorefh savefh secinfo setattr setcltid 134103 0% 1157086 3% 1281276 3% 0 0% 133212 0% 143 0% setcltidconf verify write rellockowner 113 0% 0 0% 4896102 12% 196 0% Let me know if I can provide any more useful information. Thanks in advance for any pointers!

11 18

centos 6 + hardened php
by Eero Volotinen 14 Dec '12

14 Dec '12

Hi list, Is there suhosin patched php 5.2+ available for centos 6? -- Eero

2 1

fixing partition alignment ?
by Laurent Wandrebeck 14 Dec '12

14 Dec '12

Hi there, I've discovered that most of the hard drives used in our cluster got misaligned partitions, thus crippling perfs. Is there any way to fix that without having to delete/recreate properly aligned partitions, then format it and refill disks ? I'd be glad not to have to toy with moving several 10s of TB disk by disk :D (most disks are JBOD as we're using a fault tolerant network FS, moosefs not to name it). <insert your favorite search engine> wasn't helpful, unfortunately. Drives are ext4, driven by C6 x86_64. Thanks, Laurent.

4 4

Re: [CentOS] trying to get the debug version of httpd so I can use it in conjunction with gdb. [SOLVED]
by Zippy Zeppoli 13 Dec '12

13 Dec '12

Marking thread as solved. On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Markus Falb <markus.falb(a)fasel.at> wrote: > On 11.12.2012 10:15, Leon Fauster wrote: > > Am 11.12.2012 um 03:24 schrieb Zippy Zeppoli: > >> I am trying to get the debug version of httpd so I can use it in > >> conjunction with gdb. I am having a hard time getting them, and they > don't > >> seem to be in the standard epel-debuginfo repository. What should I do? > > > > > > http://debuginfo.centos.org/ > > yes, and there is also an yum repo for it, but disabled > $ yum --enablerepo=debug list httpd-debuginfo > -- > Kind Regards, Markus Falb > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >

1 0

How does Firefox work? Really?
by James B. Byrne 13 Dec '12

13 Dec '12

I have, to me, perplexing situation. I am attempting to run Firefox on a CentOS-6.3 virtual machine to which I am connected using an SSH link with X-Forwarding enabled. (ssh -Y userid(a)host.domain.tld) The reason I wish to do this is that the vm is used for development an my code coverage analysis tool produces a html format report which is read via the file:// protocol. I thought that if I ran Firefox on that host then the Firefox window would open on my local machine, which it does. I also thought that since that Firefox window was actually running as an instance on the remote vm that the file:// protocol for that Firefox would seek out files on the vm's filesystem, which it does not. Instead that Firefox instance searches the local machine's filesystem and not that of the vm from which it was launched. This seems counter-intuitive to me. What is going on? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

3 4

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
13
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss December 2012