Discuss May 2012

discuss@lists.centos.org

193 participants
203 discussions

Request for CentOS stats
by Max Pyziur 31 May '12

31 May '12

Greetings, Are there any summary CentOS numbers available? The number of subscribers to this email list, and the number of server installs? Much thanks, Max Pyziur pyz(a)brama.com

12 21

Feedback for CentOS 6 on a recent Thinkpad X220 Tablet?
by Mathieu Baudier 31 May '12

31 May '12

Hello, I'm considering buying a Lenovo Thinkpad X220 *Tablet*. Does anybody run CentOS 6 on it? Is the multitouch working? Thanks in advance for any hint, Mathieu PS: I have checked thinkwiki.org already

1 0

Warning: Size of service_message struct (8376 bytes) is > POSIX-guaranteed atomic write size (512 bytes).
by Kaushal Shriyan 31 May '12

31 May '12

Hi, I am running Nagios on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). Any clue about the below warning? Please let me know if any one needs any additional information. /usr/sbin/nagios -v /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg Nagios 2.12 Copyright (c) 1999-2007 Ethan Galstad (http://www.nagios.org) Last Modified: 05-19-2008 License: GPL Reading configuration data... Running pre-flight check on configuration data... *Warning: Size of service_message struct (8376 bytes) is > POSIX-guaranteed atomic write size (512 bytes). Service checks results may get lost or mangled!* Checking services... Checked 341 services. Checking hosts... Checked 27 hosts. Checking host groups... Checked 13 host groups. Checking service groups... Checked 3 service groups. Checking contacts... Checked 27 contacts. Checking contact groups... Checked 10 contact groups. Checking service escalations... Checked 0 service escalations. Checking service dependencies... Checked 0 service dependencies. Checking host escalations... Checked 0 host escalations. Checking host dependencies... Checked 0 host dependencies. Checking commands... Checked 77 commands. Checking time periods... Checked 4 time periods. Checking extended host info definitions... Checked 0 extended host info definitions. Checking extended service info definitions... Checked 0 extended service info definitions. Checking for circular paths between hosts... Checking for circular host and service dependencies... Checking global event handlers... Checking obsessive compulsive processor commands... Checking misc settings... Total Warnings: 1 Total Errors: 0 Things look okay - No serious problems were detected during the pre-flight check Regards Kaushal

2 1

need assist with upstart config problem
by James B. Byrne 30 May '12

30 May '12

I am trying, without success, to create an upstart config file to automatically start and restart an ssh proxy. The command sting that I use in the script has been checked and verified from the shell but it fails in the upstart file. The file contents are: . . . # proxy is used to authenticate smtp submissions # so start it before the postfix service starts start on starting postfix # Take down proxy after postfix stops stop on stopped postfix # tell upstart that this script creates a daemon # and have upstart manage PID creation # but it is generally a bad idea to use this with a # script / end script block, use exec() instead # no fork in ssh #expect fork # restart automatically if connection fails respawn # for script debugging with strace # but not available in 0.6.3 of course #debug # use strace -p <pid> -o /tmp/upstart_debug.log -Ff -s 1024 -v # Setup script configuration variables: # localhost means we do not expose proxy to internet env LOCAL_HOST=localhost # port 143 is default IMAP service port for plain text connections env LOCAL_PORT=143 # ports less than 1024 require root privileges to establish # this must be a passwordless login using PKI certificates # requires one time setup of local root user ssh key and cert # and adding this host's root user cert to authorized_keys of # login host's root user. env LOGIN_USER=root # login PKI credentials for LOGIN_USER env LOGIN_IDENT=/root/.ssh/id_rsa # login host, may be different than remote host for port forwarding # must resolve to an address that sshd login server listens on env LOGIN_HOST=inet07.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca # the remote host destination for port forwarding env REMOTE_HOST=inet07.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca # port that remote service listens on env REMOTE_PORT=143 # Locate ssh binary env SSH_BINARY=/usr/bin/ssh # SSH options used: ### -D : "dynamic" app-level port forwarding - not used. ### # -f : run in background without a terminal implies -n # -i : identity file for pki login credentials # -l : login user name # -L local_host:local_port:remote_host:remote_port # : Establishes proxy connection from local port # port on the remote host. # -n : stdin from /dev/null, must be used when ssh is run in bg. # -N : Do not run a command on the remote host. Otherwise an # error results because we are not initiating a session. # -o ExitOnForwardFailure=yes : Wait until connection successfully # completes before daemonizing # -o ServerAliveInterval=15 : Keep connection alive every 15 seconds # -q : Run quietly, do not produce local output. # -T : disable pseudo-tty allocation # SSH options used env SSH_OPTIONS=" -o ExitOnForwardFailure=yes " env SSH_OPTIONS=${SSH_OPTIONS}" -o ServerAliveInterval=15 " # SSH switches used: env SSH_SWITCHES=" -fNqT " exec ${SSH_BINARY} ${SSH_OPTIONS} ${SSH_SWITCHES} -l ${LOGIN_USER} -i ${LOGIN_IDENT} -L ${LOCAL_HOST}:${LOCAL_PORT}:${REMOTE_HOST}:${REMOTE_PORT} ${LOGIN_HOST} # EOF The exec is all one line. I have tried removing -f from the switches but this makes no difference. Whenever I start this job it immediately fails with the following in the syslog: . . . May 30 16:47:06 inet08 init: LOCAL_ssh_imap_proxy main process ended, respawning May 30 16:47:06 inet08 init: LOCAL_ssh_imap_proxy main process (3393) terminated with status 255 May 30 16:47:06 inet08 init: LOCAL_ssh_imap_proxy main process ended, respawning May 30 16:47:06 inet08 init: LOCAL_ssh_imap_proxy main process (3397) terminated with status 255 May 30 16:47:06 inet08 init: LOCAL_ssh_imap_proxy respawning too fast, stopped Is what I am doing wrong obvious to anyone? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?
by Les Mikesell 30 May '12

30 May '12

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 30.05.2012 20:36, schrieb Les Mikesell: >> Fedora doesn't support/recommend in-place upgrades across major >> versions or at least didn't for those versions. My experience was >> that even within a major rev. an update could kill your system. > > then you are doing something wrong Yes, I was running it on an IBM server box that they didn't bother to test. Found out much later that the pre-update kernel worked on the firmware I had installed and the mid-rev update they pushed needed a firmware bios update to run there. > am i really the only one who did some hundret successfull > fedora dist-upgrades in the last 4 years with yum and > no downtime longer than a normal kernel update? Probably. Lots of other things broke in same-major-rev updates until I gave up at FC6. Whether any particular machine runs or not has never been a priority for fedora. Maybe your hardware matches one of the developers. On the other hand, I had 2 4-year uptime runs with a pre-fedora RH 7.3. (had to move it once). For about 6 of those years it was very busy. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

1 0

oVirt on CentOS 6
by John Blaut 30 May '12

30 May '12

Hi Are there any future plans for CentOS to build and directly provide oVirt packages compatible with CentOS 6? If not, has anyone tried the packages available at http://www.dreyou.org/ovirt/ and would these be considered fit for a CentOS-based oVirt production setup? I've heard many great things about oVirt. However I would prefer to use a CentOS-based solution in a production environment rather than Fedora. Thanks in advance.

3 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 87, Issue 17
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 30 May '12

30 May '12

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2012:0699 Moderate CentOS 6 openssl Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2012:0699 Moderate CentOS 5 openssl Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2012:0690 Important CentOS 5 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEBA-2012:0700 CentOS 5 man FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:40:25 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0699 Moderate CentOS 6 openssl Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120529224025.GA30114(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0699 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0699.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8d3ef25c0337371e0e5c67cc73b072aca51d53f31ae80f7fb9f90408b1bbab33 openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.i686.rpm 6ead8335ad780a19e2b504cb0caa21a2b75773327b24c70ed7ff23661015c90e openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.i686.rpm 73ca0a2c9df7c84ed5454597144343d7aa07dddbfeca4a18422a005537dc7e8b openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.i686.rpm 5595c0686d6e844b9159c14bcdf3cc6f47c2a607a15fcff78c29e8d5d7627453 openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.i686.rpm x86_64: 8d3ef25c0337371e0e5c67cc73b072aca51d53f31ae80f7fb9f90408b1bbab33 openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.i686.rpm ef39e30b4920358eb4a00367292b0d12da454e8a7e32074c45d31bf498b8963b openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64.rpm 6ead8335ad780a19e2b504cb0caa21a2b75773327b24c70ed7ff23661015c90e openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.i686.rpm f95432595a901dcc872e62555bdff29e1f23aa545cf5ccf26f913f35ae7c825f openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64.rpm 3d1da5b21dbf55685496c85521cf01f5bb5126c128d3e06b3a9605075971cb6c openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64.rpm b9e992a2092b6ecb48de9bc768160c14f71dfe35f8fe9544fb4970c417b0d2e0 openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.x86_64.rpm Source: f827a3633c6e5d8761bbc6a54d83c7ed544930c8cb4855e6f0f94abaddc0b813 openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:47:32 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0699 Moderate CentOS 5 openssl Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120529224732.GA30269(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0699 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0699.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1abe6f07cd98a4eb5d40b149810a120b1ecb8d4d3c84df388c73889267146670 openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.i386.rpm d666b483226379176f7ae2d65ead16d28cfa42dfec1027e6c09b74253a4c8437 openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.i686.rpm 2a4d1a8cbc1b87aa35daa73baa7534b8abc9ba18350ea86833c783dedbadc994 openssl-devel-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.i386.rpm 691bca461d9707af512d50e038563b568f5df6d40f0c4a814736ffa2c97ede2d openssl-perl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.i386.rpm x86_64: d666b483226379176f7ae2d65ead16d28cfa42dfec1027e6c09b74253a4c8437 openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.i686.rpm a3ed8b08c6de8627f639c7702ef17a073791f9dd1d599a2b2063d2b36940c484 openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.x86_64.rpm 2a4d1a8cbc1b87aa35daa73baa7534b8abc9ba18350ea86833c783dedbadc994 openssl-devel-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.i386.rpm 0106244dac4365aae1387e0c2985b3508ecb3ca47f3bcd093921568389413e35 openssl-devel-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.x86_64.rpm 1203880aa23f227fbc47805efd43c7f2806bb65e81a7634e85b1797410a1df82 openssl-perl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.x86_64.rpm Source: 8578ad86fbb98de85b4082f8b0e00852237186d3d83eb3dc598b88502610bba6 openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:57:55 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0690 Important CentOS 5 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120529225755.GA30597(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0690 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0690.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 2cc215a6ba11c861de08a7eda6ba32d5f44295c35e56741cb73c93cba58e62c9 kernel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm a99e5bafd60df9f56ec4390f5b4e17927ae2eb77aa7c6755bd116b1914dcf7c5 kernel-debug-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 23ef3650613cb636fd22d5bf3402498c0564cbd77adbcf51d4c3403516a77df4 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 446dc927283471666dc1b3c090c85253b0c454c5ec139e4f48df6ea16546a660 kernel-devel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 04229dacb2bd951a0f3961e94a797c71fb627fda6baceaae4ef81add52cb5ad4 kernel-doc-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.noarch.rpm a26a26f6f4a838ddd6e3daa8a705eb3d935513eee097f0735065896a101e0a3e kernel-headers-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i386.rpm 3a105bd65a73703c242cbb0dced5aedf3fbb3d6ed1aba384d0fb0ff2a4611663 kernel-PAE-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm ea244054dde1988039a1a4531143fb623061a6714fd2eaf8154397acb4c3237b kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm 9a83000c8fef08943156e72c144dbb031c2d9fdaa2f6882cd53fcc5e95489c17 kernel-xen-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm f1988b4d919468d421ff4c6003015c55560de0d7f4a14c8af1ec7023cbfac9c8 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.i686.rpm x86_64: e603d6cc067526dfefe39a20bd9e4963cc42db0122a4b21f80d102b2e5d8b2c9 kernel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 804ac02d12178cf23d6517796c22f440f427e702dea8d67651dd28f4888ddb02 kernel-debug-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 3392509f9df013ac139626c545b7a6d685975cff3d1e81a17f690db80cd9ac26 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 266edfa87f272d6939bb89ce8f8084fe363e99f7b2255aa543a1570395200cba kernel-devel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 04229dacb2bd951a0f3961e94a797c71fb627fda6baceaae4ef81add52cb5ad4 kernel-doc-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.noarch.rpm e65d2dce60809116c3fc4f1727c6037630acc1c31bbce9171ec5a0ac67bc3fb1 kernel-headers-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 4f9d4382fd583fd0edfeaeca2908d0ca01e7860ecc147ef817457124f8cac07e kernel-xen-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 8475b45d6c45c22ae3bc21dc0b269f37f6b7351d5a1a6cc2008cb6c5d843f39a kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: a17d449d5dc0f1457647e3179f529194799e364344e789489c840a74faa70c09 kernel-2.6.18-308.8.1.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:50:35 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0700 CentOS 5 man FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120530145035.GA12832(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0700 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0700.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 9bdf30feaac365f5a396a59ff5cde3549cdd0c29e519116b01312b92b7fd2c91 man-1.6d-3.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: e7d3a3ec78e40ea6c51ae94846d1414dba53dbb105c73c6a583747f5e8b907ef man-1.6d-3.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 61e840e26aa2a0dc267b500770cdea6a5f3d1aafe03929bfd09a207064f25bd0 man-1.6d-3.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 87, Issue 17 ***********************************************

1 0

CentOS 4.8 to 4.9
by Jesus del Valle 30 May '12

30 May '12

Hi. Somebody in the Spanish CentOS mailing list is asking how to move from CentOS 4.8 to 4.9. He cannot upgrade to 5 or 6 at this moment. Any Hints / Howto? I would pass the translated answer to the Sp. list. Thanks & Regards, Jesus

4 5

Disk geometry problem.
by Rafał Radecki 30 May '12

30 May '12

Hi all. I have a CentOS server: CentOS release 5.7 (Final) 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5 x86_64 I have two SSD disks attached: smartctl -i /dev/sdc smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: INTEL SSDSA2CW120G3 Serial Number: CVPR13010957120LGN Firmware Version: 4PC10362 User Capacity: 120,034,123,776 bytes Device is: Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall] ATA Version is: 8 ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4 Local Time is: Mon May 28 13:12:18 2012 CEST SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled smartctl -i /dev/sdd smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: INTEL SSDSA2CW120G3 Serial Number: CVPR126101YK120LGN Firmware Version: 4PC10362 User Capacity: 120,034,123,776 bytes Device is: Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall] ATA Version is: 8 ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4 Local Time is: Mon May 28 13:12:35 2012 CEST SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled fdisk shows: fdisk -l /dev/sdc Disk /dev/sdc: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 32 heads, 32 sectors/track, 228946 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1024 * 512 = 524288 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1 3 491 250368 83 Linux /dev/sdc2 492 228946 116968960 fd Linux raid autodetect fdisk -l /dev/sdd Disk /dev/sdd: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System hdparm shows: hdparm -I /dev/sdc > ~/tmp/hdparm_sdc (file attached) hdparm -I /dev/sdd > ~/tmp/hdparm_sdd (file attached) diff hdparm_sd[cd] 2c2 < /dev/sdc: --- > /dev/sdd: 6c6 < Serial Number: CVPR13010957120LGN --- > Serial Number: CVPR126101YK120LGN 85c85 < Logical Unit WWN Device Identifier: 5001517959613b9f --- > Logical Unit WWN Device Identifier: 50015179595b6a83 88c88 < Unique ID : 959613b9f --- > Unique ID : 9595b6a83 hdparm -g /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sdc: geometry = 14593/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0 /dev/sdd: geometry = 14593/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0 sfdisk shows: sfdisk -g /dev/sdc;sfdisk -G /dev/sdc /dev/sdc: 14593 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track !!!! /dev/sdc: 228946 cylinders, 32 heads, 32 sectors/track !!!! sfdisk -g /dev/sdd;sfdisk -G /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: 14593 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track /dev/sdd: 14593 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track I have /dev/sdc{1,2} mounted and used by /dev/md0, /dev/md1 RAID1. I would like to add /dev/sdd{1,2} to these RAID's but sfdisk has problems when I try to make partitions on /dev/sdd. sfdisk -d /dev/sdc | sfdisk /dev/sdd Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK Disk /dev/sdd: 14593 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Old situation: Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls #blocks Id System /dev/sdd1 0 - 0 0 0 Empty /dev/sdd2 0 - 0 0 0 Empty /dev/sdd3 0 - 0 0 0 Empty /dev/sdd4 0 - 0 0 0 Empty Warning: given size (233937920) exceeds max allowable size (233933761) sfdisk: bad input As I see in fdisk's and sfdisk output there is a difference at some level in disk geometry. Could you suggest a solution? Best regards, Rafal.

2 1

LVM superblock version
by Nataraj 30 May '12

30 May '12

Is there an lvm command to print out any kind of version information for the LVM superblock, similar to what "mdmadmin -E" does for raid. How can I tell whether a mountable device with LVMs on it can be safely moved between CentOS 5 and CentOS 6 and/or potentially other Linux distributions? I know that that CentOS 6 supports 'lvconvert -merge'. Is this implementation purely in the lvm software or does it require a different superblock? Can I take an LVM setup created under CentOS 6 and read it on a CentOS 5 system? Thanks, Nataraj

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss May 2012