Discuss July 2012

discuss@lists.centos.org

166 participants
157 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 89, Issue 14
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2012:1119 CentOS 5 aide FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:10:59 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1119 CentOS 5 aide FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120727101059.GA20399(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1119 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1119.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 170c254c937e7ed9b0fe1ce450b9f7e0db7ed7a1b7cf059c9b8e6d801b10a8f9 aide-0.13.1-8.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: 32362740882bf8eb526da3e9fec84404de95dc1fc4cad2acdcd7b43a9cd82cfc aide-0.13.1-8.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 80d60ca7746e0af430591d4730f6d404e489ea1b345d968b4855278a6261aaf8 aide-0.13.1-8.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 89, Issue 14 ***********************************************

1 0

CentOS 6.x - /proc/ide ?
by TFML 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

I was curious, why was /proc/ide removed and was it moved to another directory to obtain ide drivers information?

2 2

RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2108 [Liberator] (rev 05)
by Kaushal Shriyan 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Hi, Are there CLI utility for RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2108 [Liberator] (rev 05) for CentOS 5.8? Regards, Kaushal

2 1

system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf
by Fernando Cassia 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ?? Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not really if all you want to do is configure eth0 from the command line... FC

7 12

No tengo red despues de instalar
by Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Que tal amigos: Resulta es que no tengo red despyes de instalar centos 6.2, sigo la ruta: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ y no me aparece el archivo ifcfg-eth0 e visto cosas similares de otros usuarios de centos.... donde si encuentran ifcfg-eth0 y tienen que modificar el Onboot a yes, pero ami no me aparece? realice la instalacion minimal. -- Rodrigo Isaias Pichiñual Norin Ingeniero en Computación 87272971 rodrigo.pichinual(a)gmail.com

4 5

EXT4-fs: Can't allocate: Allocation context details
by Aji 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Hi, I'm using centos 5.8 running as a production system, my system suddenly crash because the /var/log/kern.log have a huge file size, and make the disk full. this is the message from kern.log 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120185+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: EXT4-fs: Can't allocate: Allocation context details: 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120256+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: EXT4-fs: status 1 flags 3104 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120263+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: EXT4-fs: orig 399/15394/64@44765, goal 399/15392/2048@43008, best 0/0/0@44765 cr 3 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120269+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: EXT4-fs: 0 scanned, 0 found 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120273+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: EXT4-fs: groups: 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120277+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 400: 32254/0 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120281+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 401: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120285+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 402: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120288+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 403: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120293+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 404: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120296+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 405: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120300+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 406: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120303+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 407: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120307+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 408: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120311+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 409: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120315+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 410: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120319+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 411: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120323+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 412: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120326+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 413: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120330+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 414: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120334+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 415: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120337+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 416: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120341+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 417: 32253/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120345+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 418: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120348+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 419: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120352+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 420: 32254/1 2012-07-26T05:36:39.120355+02:00 NL50-ND019 kernel: 421: 32254/1 Does anyone have same problem like me?, I only find this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758935 I'd appreciate any suggestions any of you may wish to make. thanks in advance, Fazrie Setyadi

1 0

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf
by Karanbir Singh 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

On 07/26/2012 11:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > i do not install every day a Fedora/CentOS > the is a minimal or whatever option My apologies. I expected you to have done due diligence before posting on the subject. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

DNS lookup delay with centos & postfix
by Steve Lindemann 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas... background: two DNS servers (ns1 & ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8) one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & postfix 2.3.3) one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & nagios 3.3.1) situation: - all servers configured to use both DNS servers for lookups - ns1 server down for hardware problem - nagios alerts that smtp on email server taking longer than 2 seconds to respond - nagios alert for smtp on email server clears when ns1 returns to service - when I use dig from the email server command line there is no problem or delay when ns1 is offline. It worked without a hitch using ns2. Anyone have any ideas for why nagios would have trouble testing smtp on the email server when the primary dns goes offline? I'm not even sure where to look or who else would make sense to ask the question of on this one. I'd appreciate any insight anyone out there has on this. -- Steve

9 12

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf
by Karanbir Singh 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

On 07/26/2012 06:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 26.07.2012 19:27, schrieb Karanbir Singh: >> On 07/26/2012 04:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >>> My opinion after this experience is that it'd help for CentOS to >>> include system-config-network-tui as part of the base install. >> >> Can you be a bit more specific about what you mean by a 'base install' ? >> Its not actually possible to get a minimalist @base only install without >> kickstarting the installer instance - at which point you might as well >> +<package> whatever you need. > > > says who? erm, have you looked at the anaconda setup group selections ? None of them default to an @base only install. > you get a completly stripped down setup which > no network, no editors like nano and have to > do your first network config with echo to the > config files which takes around 30 seconds Are you saying here that even when you select a Desktop or Workstation install profile you end up with a minimalist install ? I find that pretty hard to believe. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

using ip address on bonded channels in a cluster
by Steve Campbell 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

I'm creating a firewall HA cluster. The proof of concept for the basic firewall cluster is OK. I can bring up the cluster, start the iptables firewall, and move all of this with no problem. I'm using Conga to do all of this configuration on Centos 6.3 servers. To extend the "HA" part of this, I'd like to use bonded channels instead of plain old NICs. The firewall uses the "IP address" service for the outside firewall IP addresses. Each server behind the firewall is NATted to one of these external IPs on the firewall's external interface. I'm not seeing how I can use bonded channels anywhere for these "IP address" services. Part of the problem is that Conga will "guess" at which interface to place the ip address service upon. In the case of bonded channels, I don't think Conga is even aware of the "bondx" interface, and Conga only uses interfaces like eth0, eth1, etc. I realize that the sysconfig network scripts will come into play here as well, but that's another problem for me to tackle. Does anyone have any experience with bonded channels and Conga? I could sure use some help with this. Thanks, steve campbell

2 5

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
16
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss July 2012