Discuss August 2012

discuss@lists.centos.org

190 participants
168 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Eth1 problem on CentOS-6.3
by James B. Byrne 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

On Sun, August 12, 2012 12:00, Ned Slider wrote: > On 11/08/12 22:17, James B. Byrne wrote: >> I am trying to transport a dd image between to hosts over a cross >> linked gigabit connection. Both hosts have an eth1 configured to a >> non routable ip addr on a shared network. No other devices exist >> on this link. >> >> When transferring via sftp I received a stall warning. Checking the >> logs I see this: >> >> dmesg | grep eth >> >> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) >> 00:1c:c0:f2:1f:bb >> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection >> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: MAC: 7, PHY: 8, PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: RTL8168d/8111d at 0xffffc9000187c000, >> 00:0a:cd:1d:44:fe, XID 081000c0 IRQ 31 >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: jumbo features [frames: 9200 bytes, tx >> checksumming: ko] >> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready >> device eth0 entered promiscuous mode >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: invalid firwmare >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: unable to load firmware patch >> rtl_nic/rtl8168d-1.fw (-22) >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down >> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link up >> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth1: link becomes ready >> e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: >> None >> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready >> br0: port 1(eth0) entering learning state >> eth1: no IPv6 routers present >> eth0: no IPv6 routers present >> br0: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link up >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down >> r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link up >> >> This may, or may not, be related to this bug: >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411 >> >> Is there some way to confirm whether or not this is the case. Is >> there a work-around for it if it is this bug? If it is not then has >> anyone any idea what is happening and how to fix it? >> > > Elrepo.org has updated drivers for both e1000e and r8169 devices (I'm > guessing it's probably the kmod-r8168 you'd need). You could try these > to see if they resolve the issue. > > If you want more help identifying the correct driver for your > hardware, see FAQ #4 here: > The network card for eth1 seems to have disappeared somehow. On the problem host: # /sbin/lspci -nn | grep -i net 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82567V-2 Gigabit Network Connection [8086:10ce] # On another but nearly identically configured host (same MB and additional NIC: # /sbin/lspci -nn | grep -i net00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82567V-2 Gigabit Network Connection [8086:10ce] 01:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller [10ec:8168] (rev 03) 04:04.0 Serial controller [0700]: NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller [9710:9835] (rev 01) Where did eth1 on the first host go? How do I get it back? A restart? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

3 2

Boot.log Issue
by Cleiton Cipriani 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

I everybody... i need help to enable boot.log at CentOS 5... i have a old server running for a few months, and sometimes when system boots up, a can see FAIL status, but the screen scrools fast and i cant determine which service can not boot up properly... Best Regards Cleiton Cipriani

5 10

Can't access forums
by Yves Bellefeuille 13 Aug '12

13 Aug '12

I've been unable to access the forums as an unregistered user for several hours; I get "Sorry, you don't have the permission to access this area". Yves Bellefeuille -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan(a)storm.ca> "Simply put, E=mc^2 is liberal claptrap." -- Conservapedia.com

3 2

problems with bind update of 9.8.2.0.10
by Gregory P. Ennis 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

Everyone, I have two x86_64 servers with CentOS 6.3 that seem to have some difficulty with the last version of bind : 32:bind-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.2.x86_64 When I run htop I am getting a CPU usage of 70 to 80% all of the time. I am not seeing problems identified in the log files on either machine. This may have been present before the update of 9.8.2.0, but I certainly did not notice it. Has anyone else had this problem. Any solutions?? Greg Ennis

1 2

Eth1 problem on CentOS-6.3
by James B. Byrne 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

I am trying to transport a dd image between to hosts over a cross linked gigabit connection. Both hosts have an eth1 configured to a non routable ip addr on a shared network. No other devices exist on this link. When transferring via sftp I received a stall warning. Checking the logs I see this: dmesg | grep eth e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:1c:c0:f2:1f:bb e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: MAC: 7, PHY: 8, PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: RTL8168d/8111d at 0xffffc9000187c000, 00:0a:cd:1d:44:fe, XID 081000c0 IRQ 31 r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: jumbo features [frames: 9200 bytes, tx checksumming: ko] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready device eth0 entered promiscuous mode r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: invalid firwmare r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: unable to load firmware patch rtl_nic/rtl8168d-1.fw (-22) r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link up ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth1: link becomes ready e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready br0: port 1(eth0) entering learning state eth1: no IPv6 routers present eth0: no IPv6 routers present br0: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link up r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link down r8169 0000:01:00.0: eth1: link up This may, or may not, be related to this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411 Is there some way to confirm whether or not this is the case. Is there a work-around for it if it is this bug? If it is not then has anyone any idea what is happening and how to fix it? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

Strange device labeling in 6.3
by Richard Reina 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

I have just installed 6.3 on a machine that was previously running 5.8. Under 5.8 eth0 was eth0. Now with 6.3 /sbin/ifconfig gives me lo, wlan0 and p4p1 (instead of eth0). I would like to make the ethernet a static IP as I intend to for this to be machine used on my LAN only. However, when I do /usr/sbin/setup -> Network Configuration the device is not listed. Can anyone tell me why this is happening and how I can fix it. Or if not how I can set a static and persistent IP address for the ethernet? Thanks, Richard

7 10

Missing dependency in C6 ISO
by Rajagopal Swaminathan 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

Greetings, I had downloaded c6 64 bits ISO, selected all packages to be installed. One dependency warning relating to Emacs appeared. I chose to continue. Unfortunately I was multitasking and did not note down the package name Twice this issue appeared -- first time around aborted install due to power cut. Did anybody else face this situation? Also is there a better way with just DVDs and not LAN to select all package install. (no Kickstart, NFS server etc.) I have the ISO images though. /ducks I know no sysadmin installs everything on a centos box... But then it is just a single desktop to get legroom in a M$ shop / Home //ducks -- Regards, Rajagopal

6 9

How protect bash history file, do audit alike in server
by Heng Su 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

hello, I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except user 'root' can do it, is that possible? For my server, many users can log in with root from remote through ssh, so I can not trace which guy do wrong things. So I decide to create new account for every users and let them use 'sudo' then I can trace which guy typed which command and what he did. However, even if I create new account for every user, they also can delete the history of them self easily. How should I do. I believe everyone encountered such things normally. I think there is a gracefully solution for it as I am not experience on server manage. So any suggestions for how to trace user like to write down which user did as an audit trail and let it can not deletable exclude root user? Thanks! -- Best Regards, Su Heng

10 23

Repo data lagging behind
by Leonard den Ottolander 11 Aug '12

11 Aug '12

Hello, I just noticed there's a security update for openldap on C6 that's a few days old. However my box is not receiving the update. I've checked both ftp://ftp.plusline.de and ftp://ftp.nluug.nl. Both have the updates in the Packages directory, which has a mod time of 2012-08-08. However, the corresponding repodata directories on both mirrors have a mod time of 2012-08-06. Any reason why the repo data hasn't been updated? Or are those mirrors not syncing correctly for some reason? Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

2 1

About Nagios Mail notification
by jiten jha 11 Aug '12

11 Aug '12

Dear Friends, I have installed Nagios core on my Centos 6.2 server with mailx , postfix. But I do not know how to configure mail notification , check mail notification is working or not . I searched on google but not able to search any good answer so please help me friend -- Thanks & Regards Jitendra Jha +91-7498370550

5 6

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss August 2012