Am 25.02.2013 23:36, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 25.02.2013 23:34, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
>> Am 25.02.2013 15:56, schrieb m.roth(a)5-cent.us:
>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>>> Then there is the actual update. I learned long ago NOT to run yum over
>>>> an SSH connection, as WHEN that connection breaks in the middle of an
>>>> update, you can have quite a problem to clean up. All I have done
>>>
>>> That sounds, to me, as though you have very serious communications issues
>>> that need to be solved, and yesterday. We've used ssh here, and at my
>>> previous two? three? contracts, for years, and almost *never* have an ssh
>>> connection break.
>>
>> It does happen. SSH is not as forgiving to network glitches as one
>> would wish sometimes. A firewall that drops idle or long-running
>> TCP connections, a DSL link doing its daily PPPoE disconnect at an
>> inopportune moment, a VPN tunnel dropping, a hole in UMTS coverage,
>> have all killed a SSH connection for me one time or another
>
> and that is why "screen" was invented
Well, not quite. IIRC screen is older than SSH and was actually invented
to switch between multiple screens on a text mode
terminal attached either via a modem or a null modem cable.
But I agree that it comes in handy for this scenario, too.
> everybody doing a yum-upgarde over WAN directly on SSH
> instead use screen is a foll and should not maintain servers
Sure. Whatever a "foll" is supposed to be ... :-)
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany