Discuss April 2013

discuss@lists.centos.org

168 participants
150 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 98, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2013:0732 CentOS 5 glibc Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2013:0734 CentOS 5 esc Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2013:0735 CentOS 6 esc Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:28:49 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0732 CentOS 5 glibc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130410192849.GA25567(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0732 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0732.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4db7f0ddb292c08ee3e380209cdd8308136d6ce30f552b63290e92b80a540a5a glibc-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 9067102b8ac1825ee50ef6fba732507429e8cea968b2747a868fe09da5ac4e2b glibc-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i686.rpm ca59b16a43aa5244fdcb44b14a928101d76d01230f8d614129c4da80cb8990df glibc-common-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 40d8e708341a0ecb2436cbb6b914261726b5377635e6cada32619fc3b74ef30d glibc-devel-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 3060f66eba6a6cea01f0ee24e1b96376062c740c7ec4f368374a6e48924724a9 glibc-headers-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 80ecdd22857d2fb9414852cf0efc93314324ee3e51d77d06e7100c7e7699e04e glibc-utils-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i386.rpm acf033dfb507f86cfc8fd090ae4fe0e9a22088dfb920b0ec68a75f8c1e1923cf nscd-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i386.rpm x86_64: 9067102b8ac1825ee50ef6fba732507429e8cea968b2747a868fe09da5ac4e2b glibc-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i686.rpm 662d1fceee8c2b4cb68304b778ba8900f71003769b79fb02b0be9ae918570be3 glibc-2.5-107.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm f35415a4b902a00ec86e3645a35ac1a8b067c8a51c7a6db90fc2afe840826a83 glibc-common-2.5-107.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm 40d8e708341a0ecb2436cbb6b914261726b5377635e6cada32619fc3b74ef30d glibc-devel-2.5-107.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 5d63400d62a4e5c8994d1d9a773119154790931223f081221337f9766257f293 glibc-devel-2.5-107.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm db23fd79c60e6e3f90acb0319f216a2135fb0c5e25d19b98c77a84590e5669e7 glibc-headers-2.5-107.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm ce0bf37712e3b486c635a3ead465326bdc02335c3a31804a794f687372a6073c glibc-utils-2.5-107.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm 0001647c0dfb7825d2a1ecc32e37c4b10249208b8ed6cdcd77b6612297166009 nscd-2.5-107.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm Source: c7a9bf801cafabcd527bd7619f8389333e9a909c53b9f9bc10fde19ca3e127df glibc-2.5-107.el5_9.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:23:59 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0734 CentOS 5 esc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130410212359.GA31980(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0734 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0734.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1dd83700f6d7dc2c5457475d26810d9c2b03fc828fd01736475170bc24487eb8 esc-1.1.0-14.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm x86_64: 5fb2cd5de0c08fafd15b1992a254e7bb357dc8b02537991cc19f1f2bf1d06eb7 esc-1.1.0-14.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 9487b089d041c395c57dddb0f75142a6249fffe261aea722a7e231a946775619 esc-1.1.0-14.el5.centos.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:47:32 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0735 CentOS 6 esc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130410224732.GA4027(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0735 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0735.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 02774e31c54e68add6b8a0963b4aa3060fb488087da30c400c84bf6a8f339fe2 esc-1.1.0-25.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm x86_64: d56acd10070481335614b5a1bb413f0cf87e2bc62ea0186cb420478644a678e1 esc-1.1.0-25.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 0ca79f8310cdf46508327e3542a284a081b4bbe0167e01950232896c668a59df esc-1.1.0-25.el6.centos.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 98, Issue 5 **********************************************

1 0

Formatting a USB Drive
by Jason T. Slack-Moehrle 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Hi All, I have a Drobo, connected to a CentOS 6.4 box. The box sees it as /dev/sdg. I want to format it ext3 (as they dont support ext4) but when I try I get: # fdisk -u /dev/sdg WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sdg'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted. WARNING: The size of this disk is 17.6 TB (17592186044416 bytes). DOS partition table format can not be used on drives for volumes larger than (2199023255040 bytes) for 512-byte sectors. Use parted(1) and GUID partition table format (GPT). WARNING: DOS-compatible mode is deprecated. It's strongly recommended to switch off the mode (command 'c'). So I run: # parted GNU Parted 2.1 Using /dev/sda Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) select /dev/sdg Using /dev/sdg (parted) print Model: DROBO DroboPro (scsi) Disk /dev/sdg: 17.6TB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags (parted) and looking at an example of creating a partition: (parted) mkpart primary 106 16179 I dont know what to do next since I dont see any partitions listed. I dont know what do to for the start and end point, although the man page says "size in MB". Do I just say 0 to (and convert 16.0TB to MB? Yes, I know it says 17.6 TB but this model drobo can only support partitions up to 16tb without making a second partition. Can anyone provide some advice on that I am missing conceptually? Jason

6 17

What about port 2048 for GRE(47) packaged in ip protocol
by yihect 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Hi, all: I'm playing with Gre Tunnel programming in centos 6. I wrote my program in these steps: a, open /dev/net/tun device and ioctl with TUNSETIFF, get fd to tun device, say "tun0"; b, create one socket and use it to set tun0's ip address, namyly SIOCSIFADDR and SIOCSIFDSTADDR; and then turn it up; c, create one raw socket to send things which got from the tun0 device to other machine, and to receive packages which should be feeded into the tun0 device; Finally, I ran the program in two machines, say MA and MB, synchronously, and set route info in MA and MB too. The last environment is like this: 10.0.3.1/24 192.168.0.31/24 192.168.0.124/24 10.0.4.1/24 ---------- MA ------------------------------------------- MB ---------- tun0 eth0 eth0 tun0 When I ping MB in MA, and tcpdump eth0 in MA, I get: 15:06:39.712390 IP 192.168.0.31 > 192.168.0.124: GREv0, length 88: IP 10.0.3.1 > 10.0.4.1: ICMP echo request, id 28797, seq 1, length 64 15:06:39.713232 IP 192.168.0.124 > 192.168.0.31: ICMP 192.168.0.124 protocol 47 port 2048 unreachable, length 116 15:06:39.713667 IP 192.168.0.124 > 192.168.0.31: GREv0, length 88: IP 10.0.4.1 > 10.0.3.1: ICMP echo reply, id 28797, seq 1, length 64 15:06:39.713754 IP 192.168.0.31 > 192.168.0.124: ICMP 192.168.0.31 protocol 47 port 2048 unreachable, length 116 The 1st and 3rd lines is easy to understand, but what about the 2nd and 4th lines??? Is the raw package been sent up into gre protocol while caught by my program?? I have seen ICMP_PORT_UNREACH stuff been placed in ip_gre.c kernel code, but say it is "Impossible event". So, what's wrong, have I missed something in my program? Any suggestions are appreciated, thanks.

2 3

Virtual Machine Manager error
by Rajagopal Swaminathan 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Greetings, I am getting the following error when I start the Virtual machine manager [root@centos Desktop]# uname -a Linux blah.blah.blah 2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 23 02:21:33 CST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Error polling connection 'qemu:///system': internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/engine.py", line 440, in _tick conn.tick() File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 1414, in tick newNets, self.nets) = self._update_nets() File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 1277, in _update_nets lookup_func, build_class) File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 1209, in _poll_helper if not check_support(): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 501, in is_network_capable virtinst.support.SUPPORT_CONN_NETWORK) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/support.py", line 574, in check_conn_support return _check_support(conn, feature, conn) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/support.py", line 443, in _check_support actual_drv_ver = _hv_ver(conn, uri) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/support.py", line 376, in _hv_ver ret = cmd(*args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 2823, in getVersion if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virConnectGetVersion() failed', conn=self) libvirtError: internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64 any clues? TIA -- Regards, Rajagopal

12 17

About centos fresh install
by Andrei Rolando León Salas 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

Hi, first of all i want to thank you all that do this help. Without this i cold never put my own webserver. Now my question. I know when i have to install some software, they recommend a "fresh" install of centos, but my provider (we have server via internet and webmin) every fresh install says that i need to pay like 50$ ( alittle expensive for me). Im live i Costa RIca and here internet sucks thats why i use panama server. Now my question is: theres any form to restore to "default" a centos server? like windows 8 or like norton goback? i searh a lot via google but not sure if theres no way or i dont know how to search it. Sorry for my bad english. Hope could help me this time

4 3

Problem building powerdns from EPEL
by Nikolaos Milas 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

Hi, I just tried to build using http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/pdns-3.1-2.el6.src.rpm on CentOS 6.4 final (kernel: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64), but it failed when looking for ldap libs: Note: I did not change anything in the original spec file. ... + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc/pdns --libdir=/usr/lib64/pdns --disable-static --with-modules= --with-lua '--with-dynmodules= gmysql gpgsql pipe geo ldap gsqlite3' --enable-cryptopp ... checking for ldap_set_option in -lldap_r... no checking for ldap_set_option in -lldap... no configure: error: ldap library (libldap) not found However, libldap exists at the required place (/usr/lib64): $ ls -la /usr/lib64/ | grep ldap drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Mar 11 16:06 evolution-openldap lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Sep 21 2012 libldap-2.4.so.2 -> libldap.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 781914 Mar 20 15:57 libldapbackend.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1151 Mar 20 15:57 libldapbackend.la -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 379419 Mar 20 15:57 libldapbackend.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 Sep 21 2012 libldap_r-2.4.so.2 -> libldap_r.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Mar 11 16:06 libldap_r.so -> /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.5.6 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Mar 11 16:06 libldap.so -> /lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2.5.6 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 40320 Feb 22 09:49 libsmbldap.so.0 Here is the relevant part from config.log: ... configure:17992: checking for ldap_set_option in -lldap_r configure:18017: g++ -o conftest -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic conftest.cpp -lldap_r -lz >&5 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.7/../../../../lib64/libldap_r.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status ... configure:18033: checking for ldap_set_option in -lldap configure:18058: g++ -o conftest -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic conftest.cpp -lldap -lz >&5 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.7/../../../../lib64/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status .... Am I doing something wrong? Why it can't find the ldap libraries? Please advise. Thanks, Nick

5 5

Audit logs source of account triggering it.
by Gregory Machin 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

Hi. The auditd logs are full of lines referencing 28756E6B6E6F776E207573657229 , but I can't identify this account type=USER_LOGIN msg=audit(1364926580.306:249814): user pid=22565 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=login acct=28756E6B6E6F776E207573657229 exe="/usr/sbin/sshd" hostname=? addr=127.0.0.1 terminal=ssh res=failed' What would typically cause this ? There are no other references in any of the other logs to 28756E6B6E6F776E207573657229 and its to long for our typical UID / GID . Thanks G

2 1

How to determine 64 vs 32 bit processor
by Robert Moskowitz 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

I have been tied up with other work and Holidays. Now back to some server work that is long overdue. I lost an old server yesterday so it is crunch time. I believe my new platform is suppose to be an x86_64. The order form says 64 bit. I booted Centos 6.3 i386 liveCD to check the system out before an install. uname -i reports i386 dmidecode -t processor reports Characteristics of 64 bit capable. The processor is an AMD duo-core Opteron. I thought that in a prior thread I found that booting with an i386 live CD and using uname would confirm the processor type. It seems not. I am going to go with the various evidence and start a x86_64 install, but what is with uname? thanks

5 5

How to patch a CentOS6 kernel
by Michael Mol 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the kernel source[2], but doesn't describe how to apply patches. Instructions I've found apply to CentOS5, and RH has changed their kernel packaging since then. I've been banging my head on this off and on for quite a while, now. I've mucked with Gentoo and Debian packaging, but kernel RPMs are a new one for me... [1] http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6343 [2] http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source

3 6

Re: [CentOS] How to determine 64 vs 32 bit processor
by Robert Moskowitz 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

On 04/10/2013 10:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.04.2013 15:58, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> I believe my new platform is suppose to be an x86_64. The order form >> says 64 bit. >> >> I booted Centos 6.3 i386 liveCD to check the system out before an install. >> >> uname -i >> >> reports i386 > no wonder, you boot a i386 kernel OK. I can 'llive' with this. Just somewhere in some forgotten past I picked up that uname would still recognize that it was on a 64bit system even with the i386 kernel. > simply boot a x86_64 liveCD > hence i have not seen x86 systems since years > > Simply type "grep flags /proc/cpuinfo" and if you see lm > you have a 64 bit CPU based system thanks > > [root@rh:~]$ grep flags /proc/cpuinfo | grep lm > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr > sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc > aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 > x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi > flexpriority ept vpid >

1 0

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss April 2013