May 2013 - Discuss - lists.centos.org

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 7
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 16 May '13

16 May '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CentOS-6 CVE-2013-2094 Kernel Issue (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2013:0827 Important CentOS 5 openswan Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2013:0827 Important CentOS 6 openswan Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 09:34:53 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CentOS-6 CVE-2013-2094 Kernel Issue To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <51939D0D.3000309(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" There is a kernel security issue that allows unprivileged (normal) users to gain root access on CentOS-6.4 x86_64 machines. The upstream bugzilla entry is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962792 There is a *TESTING* kernel that should mitigate this issue available here: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/c6kernel/2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.cve20132094/ Signing Key: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-Testing-6 This kernel is the current CentOS-6.4 kernel with this one patch added and recompiled: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2441281/ Note: This is signed by the centos-6 test key and it is provided as a best effort option to mitigate the above security issue while waiting for an upstream solution. It has been tested by our QA Team, but it is *NOT* an official CentOS package and needs to be fully tested for fitness by each user before used in production. Please see this mailing list thread: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-May/134726.html And/or this Forum thread: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=42827&forum=59 For more details. Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

How to Automate Centos 5.7 CD bare bones build
by J.W. slone 16 May '13

16 May '13

Does anyone know how to automate a CD Centos 5.7 build.? 1) new bare bones workstation ( PXE enabled) 2) Boot from CD to the boot prompt 3) At the boot: linux ks=http://x.x.x.x/ks/cfg/org/1/label/Centos5.7 The workstation is able to connect to the server and the kick-start works great.! Question: how can I automate linux ks=http://x.x.x.x/ks/cfg/org/1/label/Centos5.7 on the CD? Unattended installation after installing the cd into the workstation

4 4

Slightly OT: Samsung Chromebook
by Timothy Murphy 16 May '13

16 May '13

I'm thinking of buying a Samsung Chromebook, largely for use while travelling. But I'd like to use it at home linked to my CentOS-6.4 server, rather than to the cloud. I'm wondering if this is practicable? I use LaTeX quite a lot, and I don't know if I could (a) download LaTeX to the Chromebook, (b) run LaTeX on the cloud, or (c) run LaTeX on my server from the Chromebook. Has anyone experience of doing this sort of thing? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin

5 6

Shell Scripting Random Delay
by Matt 15 May '13

15 May '13

I have a shell script that's run every 5 minutes I use to call many other shell scripts. Is there a way to wait a random number of seconds before executing each line? Something like this. wait_random 10 - 180 (perl /scripts/my_script.pl) & wait_random 10 - 180 (perl /scripts/my_script5.pl) & wait_random 10 - 180 (perl /scripts/my_script7.pl) & I have many entries in this file and I background them all because most must poll network devices which can take time. None should take over 2 minutes though. When I run them all at once they bog the system and cause some of latency graphs on equipment being monitored to look poor.

7 6

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 6
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 15 May '13

15 May '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2013:0816 CentOS 6 scsi-target-utils Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2013:0820 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2013:0821 Important CentOS 5 thunderbird Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEBA-2013:0824 CentOS 6 corosync Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2013:0821 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2013:0820 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 14:39:41 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0816 CentOS 6 scsi-target-utils Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514143941.GA11667(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0816 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0816.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: caae37f662f6d33e98d10e4cb179ece08a95364f79be5a031fbed19cad23b292 scsi-target-utils-1.0.24-3.el6_4.i686.rpm x86_64: be1ac0a56aaf98089531a68fd3ad3261fcd2b1e256aa2856803b643e00b95f37 scsi-target-utils-1.0.24-3.el6_4.x86_64.rpm Source: c40b30182bd8a8bd8d5e5a7807affa0264513983fc94abed069dfb678d040142 scsi-target-utils-1.0.24-3.el6_4.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 22:39:45 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0820 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514223945.GA6471(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0820 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0820.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 97493f85d0f07b44225728576e12e5cbf3ebc54fca8f499948f159ae06570f1b firefox-17.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm 26a902981a68efd125829a0f6d81a2996474324c4e2d9141c02e6ba1a2efabea xulrunner-17.0.6-1.el5_9.i386.rpm bae31872bc26f892106be348319d1b8154ebe1324eea6762d08310a372f7a6e1 xulrunner-devel-17.0.6-1.el5_9.i386.rpm x86_64: 97493f85d0f07b44225728576e12e5cbf3ebc54fca8f499948f159ae06570f1b firefox-17.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm ea6ad9ebafb7a28241bf348fd92a300c5f93da547dfc575b94277da45557013f firefox-17.0.6-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 26a902981a68efd125829a0f6d81a2996474324c4e2d9141c02e6ba1a2efabea xulrunner-17.0.6-1.el5_9.i386.rpm ad04ed8af2967d0eb5a0337e32766596641a7cf9a30d2ef40ff0dee80cade38c xulrunner-17.0.6-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm bae31872bc26f892106be348319d1b8154ebe1324eea6762d08310a372f7a6e1 xulrunner-devel-17.0.6-1.el5_9.i386.rpm 440cf2e5b71620659ccec6a10d0d82befeb4e2590133e3c5252cbc1fbc234d80 xulrunner-devel-17.0.6-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm Source: 1a2b66fd90f5ef62516fa108ec0d86b8de647e95a5ac6b412a7ab2b05c5e67cc firefox-17.0.6-1.el5.centos.src.rpm d35e1cae0e40754aa4d9c91d0fcf3c633f99d3feb0855d25f807809d35700d6c xulrunner-17.0.6-1.el5_9.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 22:42:14 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0821 Important CentOS 5 thunderbird Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514224214.GA6528(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0821 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0821.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6f5bf77731d4f2c16e7efda3d1733a04ca15dcb95406f63b5c52b2e466c79d94 thunderbird-17.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64: 2dfcef0a5555bc42916d0cb55c8f28f00ff5a96f1e87b230be2512d39258d050 thunderbird-17.0.6-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 40e4dfd9cd3db66cd84342863cbf821e70dea5faac4413a76f8e4694fd956c49 thunderbird-17.0.6-1.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 23:04:42 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0824 CentOS 6 corosync Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514230442.GA19091(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0824 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0824.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 93dc0dcf0d6978ea67e2ecff958ecb3fb756e60e81b9a43ab689184f0921c0fd corosync-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.i686.rpm b2145a1dfeed57ae3cd8291e86dc433b339cd8674f555892a3a02545ef80cdfa corosynclib-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 8bc27813cb4f7c05ccbb9d463a31588c1e3602e1bf57a93e559f1bb043870a1b corosynclib-devel-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 9574b459af3366b8fc2f6ff6fbdc6d511c0e1bc79bf0cbfc907ed7bbb2884a00 corosync-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm b2145a1dfeed57ae3cd8291e86dc433b339cd8674f555892a3a02545ef80cdfa corosynclib-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 1438e76a209567449a9907a2076634af15185f4bec539728b3815dd50441f080 corosynclib-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm 8bc27813cb4f7c05ccbb9d463a31588c1e3602e1bf57a93e559f1bb043870a1b corosynclib-devel-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.i686.rpm b7597e0b01952f7574d8fd65fb8d625de27979510ead52fad9c6ab9a5674ff0d corosynclib-devel-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: b101fd2d389653153fe31b194a8f9390467f3760e32fcfd353255d8a17ee7123 corosync-1.4.1-15.el6_4.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 23:05:02 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0821 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514230502.GA19199(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0821 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0821.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 9e575e7431da985279ff8da501b327d81192643e270a3d2b12b9c5c6666ee2a8 thunderbird-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 6b1672db94b98ff30261c1d77f479c63101e762e153970dccf7e84b901b32fee thunderbird-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: fbbe00f3081a8469041dbbf75d35b860a7a3f886301d2bb5ed123ced6ced2674 thunderbird-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 23:05:23 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0820 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514230523.GA19339(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0820 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0820.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 58cb58c313523b3a4d4c59ca3d88d75897a7b34c34085903826ffa5013cf1a1b firefox-17.0.6-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm 114745141c51efdd53e2359eeae0ff3a530ae9079037b031d12e2d46cae5f3ac xulrunner-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm 2ce0b91cf817ed8c790866cd2af2e39774a48d67174839766654dea26fd1f812 xulrunner-devel-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 58cb58c313523b3a4d4c59ca3d88d75897a7b34c34085903826ffa5013cf1a1b firefox-17.0.6-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm 7b56ac132afaee3bb701492812f6b2d05338b40fc5b69d33cf1253d812b5623e firefox-17.0.6-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm 114745141c51efdd53e2359eeae0ff3a530ae9079037b031d12e2d46cae5f3ac xulrunner-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm ed70a941345c5d2ffa7ac8c7859b1c07d1ce95f6df4d4b067792561ed7e337f9 xulrunner-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm 2ce0b91cf817ed8c790866cd2af2e39774a48d67174839766654dea26fd1f812 xulrunner-devel-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm 827734b72e5ea994d6781c31105050a5d56ce9e11c0b1ccb06718ae094e0257c xulrunner-devel-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 34430e83a078fc493a9d3868a24cb9e3f736cb955b09b7b853502a28a7ad9470 firefox-17.0.6-1.el6.centos.src.rpm eeaa359a123936f921e917cec44ca011e1d12e7fa990d1241d3774b503dbfe2c xulrunner-17.0.6-2.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 6 **********************************************

1 0

Local Privilege Escalation
by Tom Brown 14 May '13

14 May '13

Hi - Looking at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5703758 I have just tried this on a fully patched 6.4 box and it seems vulnerable - Do other see the same? thanks

6 7

What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?
by Rock 14 May '13

14 May '13

Q: What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6? I've been successfully using Pan 0.135 from the RPMForge repository for about a year now: $ yum --noplugins --showduplicates --enablerepo \* --disablerepo c6-media,\*-source,\*debug\* provides "*/pan" ==> 1:pan-0.135-1.el6.rf.x86_64 : The Pan Newsreader ==> Repo : installed $ sudo yum --enablerepo rpmforge install pan -y ==> Package 1:pan-0.135-1.el6.rf.x86_64 already installed and latest version For a good reason (native SSL support), I'm interested in testing out Pan version 0.136 (or above). So, the question arises, how 'best' to find and install Pan 0.136 (or above)? A search at http://rpm.pbone.net failed to find any RPM for 0.136 or above: http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/12878464/img/12878464.png But I do find the later Pan RPMs in later Fedora releases: http://pkgs.org/download/pan (e.g., Fedora 17 & 18 have later RPMs): http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/12878508/img/12878508.png Or, I can compile Pan version 0.139 from source code: http://pan.rebelbase.com/download/ Given these seem to be my choices (and, given that only about half my compiles ever work); may I ask first the basic question: Q: What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?

5 5

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 14 May '13

14 May '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2013:0807 Low CentOS 5 hypervkvpd Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEEA-2013:0810 CentOS 6 libselinux Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2013:0811 CentOS 6 gdb Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2013:0815 CentOS 5 httpd Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2013:0815 Moderate CentOS 6 httpd Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2013:0815 Moderate CentOS 6 httpd Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 01:17:50 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0807 Low CentOS 5 hypervkvpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130510011750.GA2172(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0807 Low Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0807.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1ad59e8b24b9d93d4268c7f539e7dfd0490aa8b3f17f1d13e2176d987f43367c hypervkvpd-0-0.7.el5_9.3.i686.rpm x86_64: 2c03636fb553c4ee620daf1a3dd9ad55d9ef6b43a51a527e4b8c1d93e30ff6ca hypervkvpd-0-0.7.el5_9.3.x86_64.rpm Source: f73527c365b082ff78480bf9a5e47c240937dc77d9465fc62237c95baffc5ede hypervkvpd-0-0.7.el5_9.3.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:07:45 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2013:0810 CentOS 6 libselinux Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130513130745.GA32438(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2013:0810 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0810.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0e74ed33164db1e2442b52b34476a744b29927338db56dab619ee99e1736b75f libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm a053b1c4242c0c0f45618c2ed0fefb9b2c61b6e6648455e24d96641d0ecd4ddf libselinux-devel-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 41d78f2ca86971e01c37f7be8183c3fc4f5c4b9fe78fa60211f2b66c41717299 libselinux-python-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm e3815d181c42848bb36136167ed98f4ce0b35e83b0a0b9cabd98558ba2921c55 libselinux-ruby-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 1ee75a449b641b9cc70382d7d5f85d65f76c54e178ec3fec3b16cfbd51c48638 libselinux-static-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm ebc9944c58f29ee1a61592a002a39f6b021851baa2594aeb4f98407cfdb90f4e libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 0e74ed33164db1e2442b52b34476a744b29927338db56dab619ee99e1736b75f libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm b1d2ca2c6d32b92d4bddeaf55f8618d423bead94752d05e27e1f2b22d6ac7949 libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm a053b1c4242c0c0f45618c2ed0fefb9b2c61b6e6648455e24d96641d0ecd4ddf libselinux-devel-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.i686.rpm cb9a04d45678a3da6ca9edde4b8db40fd72b38b9d0ba176339a9b58efc261e70 libselinux-devel-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm 8c3d0a04532bb764de964412a75df90d2a7fa4d644538175db2da4509e43bba8 libselinux-python-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm a150c42fba192559c5f8f11e37f3aa81d7d8dbcff0f7d31d16c5848aa14aad5f libselinux-ruby-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm dec253a557be691ddc5c89dd89584285f8cf1f819a7ebb5fe90c6866bec8bd1a libselinux-static-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm 1fb417ec5e62f62788b95af385b381740f621ab029f3b34aa8b7f61972c24faf libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 5837a760295de897517ab752b51379a732049fa2c5febcb54ea7a9f0fa6837bd libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:08:27 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0811 CentOS 6 gdb Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130513130827.GA32531(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0811 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0811.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 53521009739567a1520d41c87541c92f335196475f5137bccbde271d38bca38a gdb-7.2-60.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 8ac9e5729e7605c717239d0e48eec47b41b6c7c2f50c8f83457db45ab85e48ac gdb-gdbserver-7.2-60.el6_4.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 3378c578de808cdc3b207646d2a6d646fd6bfc3b3b0589364c94cb78e4040345 gdb-7.2-60.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm fdc706e6d7d11a70fec358b5f4bf5166098105670ec3e56c24aba12df35290b6 gdb-gdbserver-7.2-60.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: ce8f56878616fa4c9b4d01dbbdc72f1cc550e36b6d1a00456919c698535bd786 gdb-7.2-60.el6_4.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 22:32:03 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0815 CentOS 5 httpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130513223203.GA29318(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0815 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0de61eb9464a5fbbb53bb37d24d6bba56a6c6290eb0b1b2687c4a0621a885a1f httpd-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.i386.rpm 8f4a7763c4cc2091d3cbed599afd42ce5df223f5e5eb3344ed1d177557f4c6b6 httpd-devel-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.i386.rpm 01f8715985e71ddcfbc8d45beefa264aaf5d8f8464258665640a457a15a02fcb httpd-manual-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.i386.rpm b125b427b8d1805533852a53039db06bc9731781ff2f008a62610c18026ecb74 mod_ssl-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64: 4ec023a84addeaef73bf26795fd02258d428a3905320b8e76e341a93729763bc httpd-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 8f4a7763c4cc2091d3cbed599afd42ce5df223f5e5eb3344ed1d177557f4c6b6 httpd-devel-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.i386.rpm 972887f8fc97dc9479037d957b4fa75c499c1c041f8c609d3d6810c4e0c53a91 httpd-devel-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm e0f37171362609ac537bdc14bced682605474d4b29f045f8909b23b0bf16ea90 httpd-manual-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 23b6033f279d730f8ad3b94a1260aacc19204f92c895074e2729c786321ca871 mod_ssl-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 81c9cb670921097a9cd3b3614b8838963424ac50bb0591b05ab3fbd2d93db96e httpd-2.2.3-78.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 00:04:29 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0815 Moderate CentOS 6 httpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514000429.GA58270(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0815 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:49:25 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0815 Moderate CentOS 6 httpd Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130514114925.GA938(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0815 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e15436d438dd9e3310517bf332a000bf0a5744aa95b97a85d922735830f630f6 httpd-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.i686.rpm 5b55d8c6900b23e7b81e0af76977c4dfd88f6ec86a856ee8b76b71fd08df415b httpd-devel-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.i686.rpm 4264a4230d12d3ab2a7675eedc285c18c373822289112e530cc0f57228db6dbb httpd-manual-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.noarch.rpm 1af95a6bcec5670487d42f952c64e144f111e9ab1eceefa05ab8fa972118a648 httpd-tools-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.i686.rpm 167e76578c90b87073b52cbf8c0b1ed049ce85957d6e9a04a125ca94f0677344 mod_ssl-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: d61bf1614aa2cf9ef74fabbb9845043bfc0530a8967fadef8e6b426ebeafc89e httpd-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm 5b55d8c6900b23e7b81e0af76977c4dfd88f6ec86a856ee8b76b71fd08df415b httpd-devel-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.i686.rpm b25c1b85c499f8fdc8aab849e147b60108351de061de68e70dccffe59af667a0 httpd-devel-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm 4264a4230d12d3ab2a7675eedc285c18c373822289112e530cc0f57228db6dbb httpd-manual-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.noarch.rpm f8d28f9089433038b69e5d750c80c2ff1f71a13e58920a2c2c6f6134b87b23cb httpd-tools-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm 55c8ffc2a4bae473d22f76f2c0a57d6f2b71a3ea7ec40acd60ec2dac0c43077f mod_ssl-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: fb4fb0f75cd750a3cc2576577cd9b86896bd126833ebe574e0abb9af6b8d2d67 httpd-2.2.15-28.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 5 **********************************************

1 0

still no centos 6.4 live cd dvd available?
by ppse＠web.de 13 May '13

13 May '13

Hello, in the release announcement for centos 6.4 on march 9th, the 6.4-live cd/dvd was supposed to be released a few days after the centos 6.4 release. Meanwhile 6 weeks later i still can't find any live cd/dvd in the mirror repositories. Any hint when there is a 6.4. live cd available? I'd like to test centos 6.4 on several machines (x86_64) without foregoing installation. Thank you in advance

2 1

selinux-policy rpm not signed
by Leon Fauster 13 May '13

13 May '13

Hi, i am seeing an unsigned package here: rpm -K http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/Packages/selinux-policy-3.… http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/Packages/selinux-policy-3.…: sha1 md5 OK i came across this while updating my systems. Just wondering if I am the first that stumbled over this? -- Thanks LF

2 2

CentOS 6.4 Samba 3.6.9 Regression
by Ryan Wagoner 13 May '13

13 May '13

Anyone know the reason RHEL bumped Samba from 3.5.10 to 3.6.9? This version has a regression with BackupExec and Veeam backing up to network shares. I receive access denied errors. Samba is in security=user mode and not joined to a domain. If I downgrade just the Samba packages to the CentOS 6.3 version 3.5.10 everything works again. I've found a couple of bug reports and the one suggested fix "acl check permissions = no" doesn't work. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8414 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918537 Thanks, Ryan

2 2

Looking for a CentOS-friendly online backup company
by Digimer 11 May '13

11 May '13

Hi all. We've got a lot of customers running CentOS 5 and 6 servers. We've been asked by many to provide backup, which is something we don't want to do in house. So we started looking for backup companies to partner with. The problem is that the ones we've found who support RHEL won't support CentOS. So does anyone know of an online backup company that _will_ support CentOS (and Windows)? Any pointers will be much appreciated! digimer -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?

5 7

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a CentOS-friendly online backup company
by Digimer 11 May '13

11 May '13

On 05/10/2013 05:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 10.05.2013 23:41, schrieb Digimer: >> Because CentOS works just fine for them. They've used it going back to >> CentOS 4 days without issue. Suggesting they rebuild long-in-production >> servers for the sake of a backup company is not going to fly. > > who needs to rebuild? > replace the release-packages and you are mostly done > > that is what "binary compatible" means > the only changes in CentOS are release name and logos / trademarks > >> That it is someone else's money doesn't change my responsibility to >> deliver the best bang for the buck > > that is a differnet story as above > > after years of expierience i would recommend let them alone > in case of service you can and will not provide at your own > because you will be resposible for any mistake from the > customers point of view becasue you recommended whatever As I mentioned initially; We don't do backups and we don't want to do it, either. That said, it's a service our clients are (strongly) asking for. We're not looking for a company to simply recommend, but one to partner with or become a reseller of. The goal is that the client maintains a single point of contact, us, and we pay a proper backup company for the support and service. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a CentOS-friendly online backup company
by Digimer 10 May '13

10 May '13

On 05/10/2013 02:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 10.05.2013 20:46, schrieb Digimer: >> We've got a lot of customers running CentOS 5 and 6 servers. We've >> been asked by many to provide backup, which is something we don't want >> to do in house. So we started looking for backup companies to partner >> with. The problem is that the ones we've found who support RHEL won't >> support CentOS > > what needs to be "supported" - CentOS is *binary compatible* > > what sorts of "backup" > a backup can be anything, data, OS-images, snapshots, rsync.... > > if it is only *data* simply setup a SAN storage with a virtual > machine per customer and stup rsnapshot at your own, if it > is not liked inhouse rent a rack whereever > I know that it's binary compatible and that the software that works for RHEL will work for CentOS. What I mean by "supported" is a company who will see the host OS is CentOS and not throw up their hands and say "sorry, not supported!". My fear is that, a year from now, something will go wrong and the company we choose won't help us. We're not a backup company and we have no interest in becoming one, either. So we want to find a company to partner with who will see "CentOS" and still help us. So in short, this is a political, not technical question. As for what to backup; We're just looking for application data backup, not OS data. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?

2 2

cifs mount desktop icon
by Emiliano Mariño 10 May '13

10 May '13

Hi, I am mounting a Windows share on /media/%(USER)/mountpoint via pam_mount and I would like to show the volume desktop icon for every user logged in. The thing is that it works only for the first user that gets logged, when another user logs in, the desktop icon is missing, but the share mount works just fine if you navigate through the /media directory. The share is the same for all the users, but each user mounts it with its own privileges. Could it be something related to the name of the share being the same each time? Is there a way to fix it? Regards, Emiliano

1 0

CentOS 6-6.3 -> no updates and security fixes?
by Rafał Radecki 10 May '13

10 May '13

Hi All. I've found: This directory (and version of CentOS) is depreciated. For normal users, you should use /6/ and not /6.3/ in your path. Please see this FAQ concerning the CentOS release scheme: http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=34 If you know what you are doing, and absolutely want to remain at the 6.3 level, go to http://vault.centos.org/ for packages. Please keep in mind that 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 no longer gets any updates, nor any security fix's. in http://eu-msync.centos.org/centos-6/6.3/readme Is CentOS 6-6.3 really not updated anymore? Why so soon after release of 6.4? Best regards, Rafal.

5 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 4
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 10 May '13

10 May '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2013:0793 CentOS 5 e2fsprogs Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:28:15 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0793 CentOS 5 e2fsprogs Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130509142815.GA2187(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0793 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0793.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d9077a21acda21439b6290db30a3117bd5614facfc242ddad1fbd7d8d81ac6ca e2fsprogs-1.39-36.el5_9.i386.rpm 09225fe053a09fbca43d8543ce32d25d6cbadf4fe5c6bf4f9b1acc04447bc3b2 e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-36.el5_9.i386.rpm 5a59d4de3570bcfa43e6b86e65f590a3365696e5021ad3ad36b55bd589e4dbee e2fsprogs-libs-1.39-36.el5_9.i386.rpm 78b5251bd0a5fadc59c6842574af7e5fd19951e9ac13d8f20a2efa716b23447b uuidd-1.39-36.el5_9.i386.rpm x86_64: 801260fe45b918076bd2db2e09f3495b93a4783cf8a2a66e33e1b74900b70512 e2fsprogs-1.39-36.el5_9.x86_64.rpm 09225fe053a09fbca43d8543ce32d25d6cbadf4fe5c6bf4f9b1acc04447bc3b2 e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-36.el5_9.i386.rpm 9deb9c81c7da4411768e15ac94119275c0fd05c2456d423459e6012d4ca8f989 e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-36.el5_9.x86_64.rpm 5a59d4de3570bcfa43e6b86e65f590a3365696e5021ad3ad36b55bd589e4dbee e2fsprogs-libs-1.39-36.el5_9.i386.rpm e292e46951b6a21531da5ae90b136a3735ccde83b1d0a593e6827aadb75db713 e2fsprogs-libs-1.39-36.el5_9.x86_64.rpm 924d3475d3185077ad662e8987538b924408af037e1751941f54933cccf7e9df uuidd-1.39-36.el5_9.x86_64.rpm Source: 056bbc98b054090eb9cb5b778586a253d92508289d0c2c564b39dca685e61dee e2fsprogs-1.39-36.el5_9.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 4 **********************************************

1 0

Parted Bug? in C 5.9
by Andrew Reis 10 May '13

10 May '13

I'm receiving the following error when trying to repartition and reformat a USB flash drive via parted using a simple script. The bug follows: /sbin/parted -s /dev/sdb mkpart primary fat32 Backtrace has 14 calls on stack: 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] 13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194] 12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d] 11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7] 10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7] 9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65] 8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3] 7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505] 6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23] 5: /sbin/parted [0x804e2ef] 4: /sbin/parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c] 3: /sbin/parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58] 2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc] 1: /sbin/parted [0x804b521] You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do: Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data. Help us to fix this bug by doing the following: Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ Please check this version prior to bug reporting. If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check, please visit the GNU Parted website: http://www.gnu.org/software/parted for further information. Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1) along with the error message below, the output of parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print and additional information about your setup you consider important. Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed. Backtrace has 15 calls on stack: 15: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194] 13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d] 12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7] 11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7] 10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65] 9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3] 8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505] 7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a7a5] 6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23] 5: /sbin/parted [0x804e2ef] 4: /sbin/parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c] 3: /sbin/parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58] 2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc] 1: /sbin/parted [0x804b521] You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do: Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data. Help us to fix this bug by doing the following: Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ Please check this version prior to bug reporting. If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check, please visit the GNU Parted website: http://www.gnu.org/software/parted for further information. Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1) along with the error message below, the output of parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print and additional information about your setup you consider important. Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed. Output of parted /dev/sdb unit co print unit s print: parted /dev/sdb unit co print unit s print Backtrace has 14 calls on stack: 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] 13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194] 12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d] 11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7] 10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7] 9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65] 8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3] 7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505] 6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23] 5: parted [0x804d21b] 4: parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c] 3: parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58] 2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc] 1: parted [0x804b521] You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do: Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data. Help us to fix this bug by doing the following: Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ Please check this version prior to bug reporting. If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check, please visit the GNU Parted website: http://www.gnu.org/software/parted for further information. Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1) along with the error message below, the output of parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print and additional information about your setup you consider important. Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed. parted: invalid token: unit Ignore/Cancel? Model: Kingston DT 100 G2 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 3927MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 4129kB 3927MB 3923MB primary fat32 boot, lba Anyone have any ideas? Andrew Reis Networking/Windows Support DBMS Inc.

3 3

Supermicro & Boot Failures with DVD Centos 6.2
by Gregory P. Ennis 10 May '13

10 May '13

Eve.8ryone, I have had a SuperMicro machine running Centos 5.8 that had been progressively updated with yum-cron from a 5.0 CD install. I upgraded the SuperMicro with more memory, switched out the CD with a DVD and tried to boot to the Centos x64 6.2 dvd. My plan was to test the memory before I added the hard drives, but I could not I could not get the machine to boot from the disc. I also tried some Fedora install discs as well as LiveFedora and the machine would still not boot. I could get it to boot with a dreaded Microsoft install disc. We also updated the bios with the latest version and this did not make a difference. We have not tried to use these disks with the hard drives installed yet because we were in the process of just testing the memory. Has anyone had this problem with SuperMicro's. Is the problem as simple as a requirement to have a hard disc installed. Your help would be appreciated. Thank you, Greg Ennis

8 21

qlogic installer
by John R Pierce 09 May '13

09 May '13

arrrgh, I'm trying to install the QLogic Linux Super Installer on a CentOS 6.4 server that has a QL2532, and getting... # ./qlinstall -i #*********************************************************# # HBA/CNAs Driver Installer for Linux # # Installer Version: 2.2 # #*********************************************************# Kernel version: 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 Distribution: CentOS release 6.4 (Final) Found following QLogic Adapter in the system 1. ISP2532 DISTRO : . Cannot determine the Redhat release wtf. oh geez, I had to edit redhat-release to say Red Hat Enterprise Server instead of CentOS, becuase they were pulling the version number from it positionally. yeesh. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast

1 0

Re: [CentOS] failed exaile install
by Steve 09 May '13

09 May '13

---- SilverTip257 <silvertip257(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Steve <zephod(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: > > > Forgot to put the thread link in: > > > > https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=DESC… > > > > > > ---- Steve <zephod(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: > > > I'm trying to install the exaile package on my newly upgraded CentOS 6.4 > > machine. > > > It fails (see below) with missing dependencies on python-cddb and > > gnome-python2-gtkmozembed. > > > > > > I found this thread but there does not seem to be any resolution. \ > > > Has anyone got this installed? > > > Am I missing a repo? > > > > Did you try searching (with yum) for the unmet dependencies that prevented > you from installing exaile from the RPM Forge repo? > Maybe your system had a hiccup (network or otherwise) at that exact moment > or the mirror you were hitting wasn't fully synced so the deps were missing? > > If RPM Forge doesn't provide those packages (they generally provide > packages for the dependencies), you need to find a repo that has the unmet > dependencies. I looked around and I could only find packages for CentOS 5 http://pkgs.org/centos-5-rhel-5/repoforge-i386/python-cddb-1.4-1.2.el5.rf.i… http://pkgs.org/centos-5-rhel-5/centos-rhel-i386/gnome-python2-gtkmozembed-… nothing for CentOS 6. > > Otherwise report the problem to the RPM Forge maintainers as is hinted in > the CentOS forum thread you linked to. They'll be able for sure. I sent a message to the RPM Forge list. We'll see if I get a response. Steve

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 08 May '13

08 May '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2013:0789 CentOS 5 system-config-kdump Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 20:55:14 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0789 CentOS 5 system-config-kdump Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130507205514.GA10080(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0789 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0789.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 021d9f4df1f3b077f5f6d0da0cb60ceaea1d8bf2a3fa096e42a6634eef7e9171 system-config-kdump-1.0.14-5.el5_9.noarch.rpm x86_64: 021d9f4df1f3b077f5f6d0da0cb60ceaea1d8bf2a3fa096e42a6634eef7e9171 system-config-kdump-1.0.14-5.el5_9.noarch.rpm Source: 235f7f9e880f9e8706823e69cb14eb7f5a51e0d581d582be831ee089a1828e8e system-config-kdump-1.0.14-5.el5_9.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3 **********************************************

1 0

Trying to justify CentOS vs. RHEL
by Bidwell, Christopher 08 May '13

08 May '13

Hi all, I'm in the process of moving all of my RHEL systems over to CentOS but the argument that fires back at me is for critical vulnerabilities for items such as zero-day exploits and such. >From what I've been reading, RHEL releases critical patches much quicker than CentOS which makes sense since CentOS is simply a copy and when changes occur they propagate down to the RHEL clones. My question is what kind of time frame are we looking at when a vulnerability (critical or high) is announced and a patch has been released for RHEL does it get implemented into CentOS? Thanks! Chris

4 4

ECC memory errors
by Peter Peltonen 07 May '13

07 May '13

I started to receive this kind of messages a few days ago on one of my servers: Message from syslogd@ at Mon Apr 29 08:02:55 2013 ... server1 kernel: EDAC MC0: UE row 0, channel-a= 0 channel-b= 1 labels "-": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=0 RDWR=Read RAS=0 CAS=0, UE Err=0x2 (Aliased Uncorrectable Non-Mirrored Demand Data ECC)) I've never had ECC memory to fail on me before, so now I am wondering the following: * The server is running CentOS 5.7 and is acting as Xen dom0. Is there any possibility this could be a kernel issue and upgrading would help, or would upgrading at this point just cause more trouble? * Is there now a possibility that my data can get corrupt: should I shutdown the server as soon as possible or can I keep running until I replace the memories? * This server has been running for several years in a datacenter without problems: what are your experiences, are these kind of problems most likely caused by a failing motherboard or the memories? Regards, Peter

10 20

dual head on centos 5 and ancient Nvidia Quadro NVS280SD card
by Fred Smith 07 May '13

07 May '13

I was just handed a 2nd monitor for my system at work, and using Centos 5 (latest) can't make dual head work. a good bit of googling isn't being particularly helpful either. It's a HP workstation xw4100, with Nvidia Quadro NVS280SD graphics card. Enabling dual head in the "display" app simply configures X so that it (i.e., X) won't start. I haven't found the x log file in /var/log to be helpful, either. This is using the legacy 96.x.x driver from Nvidia. the NvidiaDetect app (from epel) says it should be using a newer driver than the 96.x.x (forgot which one, exactly) but when attempting to install it I get a msg that the card requires a 96.x.x driver. browsing to nvidia.com and entering the model numbers into their driver finder app gives another newer version that also gives the same result. So it looks like I'm stuck with the 96.x.x driver. some googling indicates a few people have made it work, but none of their methods are working for me. I was beginning to wonder if the hardware even supported dual head, so I booted up a Fedora 17 LIVE CD. it initializes both monitors with no action from me at all, with a desktop spanning the two screens, just fine. It must be using the Nouveau driver (which, AFAIK, can't be used on Centos 5), so still the issue could either be spanning/dual head doesn't work with the ancient nvidia driver, or we (neither me, nor the tools on Centos) knows how to configure it. Clues would be appreciated. thanks in advance! -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:9 (niv) -----------------------------

3 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss May 2013