Discuss January 2014

discuss@lists.centos.org

194 participants
173 discussions

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:55:54PM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> >> Ok, what ever, I am done wasting time on you. > > Excellent. Now if others would stop responding to the trolls it would > be even better. > Can't resist: I think he's trying to get our goat... and everyone knows what happens when a troll runs into a goat.... mark "your folks *did* tell you that story, right?"

1 0

Your opinion about RHCSA certification
by Fabrizio Di Carlo 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

Hello to all, I'm currently studying (and collecting notes here https://github.com/fdicarlo/RHCSA_cs) for RHCSA. My plan is to RHCSA -> RHCE and then RHCSS. What I want to ask you is: - What do you think about it? - Did you find it useful? - Do you have any advices? Best regards, Fabrizio -- "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift." (A. Einstein) "La mente intuitiva è un dono sacro e la mente razionale è un fedele servo. Noi abbiamo creato una società che onora il servo e ha dimenticato il dono." (A. Einstein) Fabrizio Di Carlo

7 9

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
by Always Learning 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 21:09 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red > Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining > forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards > team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation > beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. > Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further > expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is > easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we > maintain the established base. But there is more to Red Hat's de facto "take-over" including the imposition of USA's domestic law on citizens all around the world. The compulsory imposition of USA law on all Centos downloaders creates the possibility of being arrested in one's home country and sent to the USA for a criminal trial. A few people in Britain have been extradited to the USA for criminal trials for matters which are not criminal in Britain. Can anyone remember seeing this on the old Centos .... ? http://www.centos.org/legal/ Export Regulations By downloading CentOS software, you acknowledge that you understand all of the following: CentOS software and technical information may be subject to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (the “EAR”) and other U.S. and foreign laws and may not be exported, re-exported or transferred (a) to any country listed in Country Group E:1 in Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the EAR (currently, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan & Syria); (b) to any prohibited destination or to any end user who has been prohibited from participating in U.S. export transactions by any federal agency of the U.S. government; or (c) for use in connection with the design, development or production of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, or rocket systems, space launch vehicles, or sounding rockets, or unmanned air vehicle systems. You may not download CentOS software or technical information if you are located in one of these countries or otherwise subject to these restrictions. You may not provide CentOS software or technical information to individuals or entities located in one of these countries or otherwise subject to these restrictions. You are also responsible for compliance with foreign law requirements applicable to the import, export and use of CentOS software and technical information. This is a Community mantained site. Red Hat, Inc is not responsible for its content. -------------------------------------- -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here.

9 17

Centos6.5 -- Broadcom BCM4313 -- having trouble connecting
by Johan Vermeulen 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

Dear All, I'm having trouble on 2 laptops Lenovo B580 since upgrading to Centos6.5. ( Because it's a Lenovo I cannot switch the network card for a better supported network card. ) There on the latest kernel : root@jac network-scripts]# uname -a Linux jac.cawdekempen 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 13 13:06:13 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux With the help of the Elrepo Broadcom page I got the driver and that part works fine. The network card works : # vi /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules # PCI device 0x14e4:0x4727 (wl) SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="c0:14:3d:c1:f6:ef", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1" # uname -a eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C0:14:3D:C1:F6:EF inet6 addr: fe80::c214:3dff:fec1:f6ef/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:651 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:17 But I cannot connect to any wireless network with neither of the machines. I click on the gnome-nm-applet and type in the password. [root@jac network-scripts]# tail -f /var/log/messages Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'scan_ssid' value '1' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'key_mgmt' value 'WPA-PSK' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'psk' value '<omitted>' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'group' value 'TKIP CCMP' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Activation (eth1) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: set interface ap_scan to 1 Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: inactive -> scanning Dec 19 11:10:18 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: scanning -> associating Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: associating -> disconnected Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: disconnected -> scanning Dec 19 11:10:29 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: scanning -> associating Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: associating -> disconnected Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: disconnected -> scanning Dec 19 11:10:40 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: scanning -> associating Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1/wireless): association took too long. Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): device state change: 5 -> 6 (reason 0) Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1/wireless): asking for new secrets Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Couldn't disconnect supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012. Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Couldn't disconnect supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012. Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: associating -> disconnected Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): device state change: 6 -> 9 (reason 7) Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1) failed for access point (Clive) Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Marking connection 'Auto Clive' invalid. Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1) failed. Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): device state change: 9 -> 3 (reason 0) Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): deactivating device (reason: 0). googling for "centos6 WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012" I found this bug: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5834 could this be the same issue? Greetings, J. -- Johan Vermeulen IT-medewerker Caw De Kempen johan.vermeulen(a)cawdekempen.be 0479.82.01.41 Opensource Software is the future.

2 4

default gw route has gone?
by Rob Kampen 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Weird behaviour. A couple of days ago I installed another DSL router. During the process I have somehow caused the default gw route to disappear - on system start up the interface comes up fine, I can see and connect to the local subnet but not to the internet. [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 link-local * 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0 is what I get at startup. I need to add sudo route add default gw 192.168.1.1 to get things working properly. [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 link-local * 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0 default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Google shows me a number of responses that all tell me to add a line to /etc/sysconfig/network which I already had. [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=timsws GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 and [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="yes" ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=no IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME="System eth0" UUID=5fb06bd0-0bb0-7ffb-45f1-d6edd65f3e03 HWADDR=00:24:8C:80:0B:15 PEERDNS=yes PEERROUTES=yes LAST_CONNECT=1389583930 So what am I missing? BTW - all other devices are working just fine - just my main CentOS 6.5 WS fails. TIA

5 5

NetworkManger trying to start Supplicant
by david 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Folks In Centos 6.5, I am getting the message in the log file every few minutes: NetworkManager: <info> Trying to start the supplicant... There is no wireless on that computer, but there are two NICs, because it is my home gateway. Is there some tweak that can prevent this message? The installation is a relatively new one, so all packages are "up-to-date". David Kurn

2 1

CentOS on this Laptop
by Steve Clark 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hi List, Just wondering if anyone has tried CentOS on this laptop. HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6 Sam's club is selling it for $699 right now. http://www.samsclub.com/sams/hp-15-6-touch-nb-intel-core-i7-4700qm/prod1161… HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6" Touchscreen Laptop Computer, Intel Core i7-4700QM, 8GB Memory, 750GB Hard Drive Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark(a)netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com

2 2

odd issue with ipmitool
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Got an older server running 6.5. I've been fighting it - I have two webcams for surveillance of the room; one works with motion, but it resizes the picture down Adjusting resolution from 640x480 to 360x296 and the video's dark and bad contrast. So I went back to the camer I'd been using before that worked fine... on CentOS 5.x, and then I remembered why I'd gone to the other camera - the bottom 40% of so of the screen is green - no picture, just green. Doing a *lot* of googling, I saw references to this, and a number of folks suggesting problems with USB messages. Now, I've tried plugging it in both front and back of the server, given the possibility that there was a difference in versions of USB support, but no joy. So this morning, I started wondering if there was something going on, hardware-wise, on the box. Installed OpenIPMI and ipmitools, fired it up, and tried to do a simple ipmitool sel list... and get "unspecified error". Ok, I said to myself, I tried ipmitool sel 1, ditto... but 2 gives me Get SDR 0003 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0005 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0009 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0014 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0017 command failed: Unspecified error and then a record. I tried jumping around - 200 (which I've seen as the limit on other machines), nothing, 150, yes, 156 or so, yes. Not some lower numbers. So, now the question is whether something screwy is going on with the hardware... or if just, for some reason, the SEL is screwed up. Note that ipmitool sdr list works fine.... mark

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 107, Issue 9
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2014:0026 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2014:0027 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:04:23 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0026 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140115110423.GA23069(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0026 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0026.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 23a0398eef38be83195eb0fccc24ebe54b3ca51edd350b09fa6a05d256ee63cc java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm 64371a3e7b476b95f4bfda3f805f237fa431ef21d3e79f786f2ff8e355dfcb82 java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm bb0c14e74121c9c2ca9a28d0f2f4aae69ca9efc151d484c5d2f064bf7dcf1d18 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm f9099825fd1474021c73792e11f06722ae6d2ccaa0fd44bc63bb88624543edde java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.noarch.rpm f7290801eeb6a3b01fe36c973fbaa2131c3ae4dad9d01fc542c9d721b37abb67 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm x86_64: c4314a7f9938f7beb7d106ecd26844a3d883d91077d4bdeec40ce5e9d086b85e java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm b9d76670ba0dc34bace9c995e6b3dc6c17cc8dade24a862243c2d75d18c0329b java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 9440abb63aa7a5bb75e61c5a2e58483aeb302a1dbcac50d72290949783830029 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm f9099825fd1474021c73792e11f06722ae6d2ccaa0fd44bc63bb88624543edde java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.noarch.rpm dac184e8c4d88dbc5da9db40561d08a75f3424b4e9502141a021f3d54e348de5 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm Source: e38afbec2f04dfc0982594724a371805b278a431e0ee9d220f003adda5ef348d java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:16:34 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0027 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140115111634.GA11446(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0027 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0027.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 30812d30d8ede7fa1c21174522d59bf12187bd99006475d1fcaf6bb76cf4e8ed java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 697b27dabe7ea3d0cc7a7b6ad307ce08c35295064dd09958a5516c5afd3d2afb java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm b5f7a2a90818e54abde223abf151907d714971dd7fef5d8b19c1c5743b406ffe java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 30b3270acfd54ff77e9ad50c76b0eb3443ba97f36b702b5bd8b15fb14cb56d9e java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 71acfb7f04742a70a0b905cc677d7cf8b72990b03f0a6f9b27298e78820fc897 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm x86_64: 189f7dd3675dc9fb44e3410deae51340fc05b4ff27379715e8c6f5b9f75776c9 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 73336ebf7af849ec5e54335793fc651a2444f6e0b5362bbd21e30f157862c6ae java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 2e8db52d26a53505cb20eac30147543b9ae6cc6aadd32b2801ff1c6725b56a5f java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm d9cc947dd116121bc0ee7e50780e45f4b7ee64f2eb03960c847801473de221cf java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 0f12680bcb206978475ac6f7b1b724eed7396ec71a04f63ea34177e39e0afdce java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm Source: 7c14457f4849035141a63445e25f650aef4c155e525862117c1bad97ba76725f java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 107, Issue 9 ***********************************************

1 0

Fwd: HA cluster - strange communication between nodes
by Martin Moravcik 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hi, For a testing purposes I'm trying to create two node HA environment for running some service (openvpn and haproxy). I installed two CentOS 6.4 KVM guests. I was able to create a cluster and some resources. I followed the document https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux… But my cluster behaves not as expected: After start of cluster sw on both nodes, they can see each other. ---------------------------------------- [root@lb1 ~]# pcs status Cluster name: LB.STK Last updated: Mon Jan 13 15:34:21 2014 Last change: Mon Jan 13 15:24:47 2014 via cibadmin on lb1.asol.local Stack: cman Current DC: lb1.asol.local - partition with quorum Version: 1.1.10-14.el6_5.1-368c726 2 Nodes configured 2 Resources configured Online: [ lb1.asol.local lb2.asol.local ] Full list of resources: Resource Group: LB LAN.VIP (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started lb2.asol.local WAN.VIP (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started lb2.asol.local ---------------------------------------- After manual shutdown of one node 2 (pcs cluster stop), the node 1 doesn't get this information and still believes node 2 is up and running. In the log of corosync @lb2 these lines are repeating: Jan 13 15:38:43 [1712] lb2.asol.local cib: info: crm_client_new: Connecting 0x25a3810 for uid=0 gid=0 pid=10763 id=2b06a195-11f6-452d-992b-5ea0c69be21a Jan 13 15:38:43 [1712] lb2.asol.local cib: info: cib_process_request: Completed cib_query operation for section 'all': OK (rc=0, origin=local/crm_resource/2, version=0.7.4) Jan 13 15:38:43 [1712] lb2.asol.local cib: info: crm_client_destroy: Destroying 0 events Jan 13 17:24:24 corosync [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 9a 9b 9c The firewall on both nodes is open for incomming traffic from these nodes and stonith-enabled is set to false. I created keys for root user, so I can make ssh back and forth without using password. The pacemaker's version is 1.1.10-14. Do you have any idea, where might be a problem? thanks martin

6 8

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
18
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss January 2014