Discuss April 2018

discuss@lists.centos.org

90 participants
61 discussions

Memory vs. Display Card
by Rick 28 Oct '25

28 Oct '25

Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use the memory I bought? Do I need a new display card? Current hardware: Intel D975XBX2 Motherboard VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV505 [Radeon X1550 64-bit] -- http://www.spinics.net/lists/

13 19

SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition
by Keith Roberts 03 Sep '25

03 Sep '25

Has anyone actually used a SSD in a Centos setup? My little experiment with a s/h WD drive for /tmp and SWAP partitions kicked the bucket on Wednesday, when the poor WD drive caught the click-of-death. It was a s/h drive to start with and lasted about 4 months. But that was without the /var/log/ partition being written to it, as I mounted that back onto /var/log from the original drive. So I had to install another (WD) drive, and repartion it and rebuild my RPM package database, from the backed-up Packages file. That seems to be all OK now. I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to use a new SSD for moving all the disk i/o to, that Linux likes to do so often. Plus putting SWAP onto a decent SSD should speed things up somewhat. Here's a short video of a laptop fitted with a SSD drive booting macOS, compared to a similar laptop booting from the standard HDD. The laptop with the SSD boots and loads some apps in 28 seconds. The other one takes twice as long. http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/SSD/OWC/Mercury_Extreme_Pro_6G/?utm_source=t… Kind Regards, Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] -----------------------------------------------------------------

33 96

/boot partition too small
by KM 02 Oct '19

02 Oct '19

First off - let me say I am not an administrator. I need to know if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition. When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size. it's too small and I can't do yum updates. if it's not easy to actually increase it, is it safe to take a chunk in my root filesystem (like /new.boot or something) and just mount it as /boot from now on so it uses the space or is that not a good idea? I am sure I could easily copy the rpms/kernel stuff over to it and then unmounts the real /boot and mount this new area as /boot. Can you administrators let me know what you think of all this? Thanks in advance. KM

27 44

dmarc auth on incoming email
by Fred Smith 23 Jan '19

23 Jan '19

Just reading up on DMARC, toying with setting it up to auth against incoming emails. (but not configure my domain to use dmarc, or at least not yet) ran into an article about opendmarc, which is available on epel. but when I took a look at the opendmarc website and the git pages it doesn't appear to have been updated in several years. while I see that it is still available from epel, I wonder if anyone knows the project status? Is it still active? are there any other viable alternatives? thanks in advance! Fred -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) -----------------------------

2 1

Problem with Digikam and libgphoto2 after latest update
by Nicolas Kovacs 17 May '18

17 May '18

Hi, I have CentOS 7 with KDE on my workstation. I'm using the CR repo. I had to remove Digikam to be able to do the latest update (1 GB of updates... wow). Here's what happens when I try to reinstall it. # yum install digikam ... --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: digikam-4.10.0-6.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgphoto2_port.so.10(LIBGPHOTO2_5_0)(64bit) Available: libgphoto2-2.5.2-5.el7.x86_64 (base) libgphoto2_port.so.10(LIBGPHOTO2_5_0)(64bit) Installed: libgphoto2-2.5.15-1.el7.x86_64 (@cr) ~libgphoto2_port.so.12(LIBGPHOTO2_5_0)(64bit) Error: Package: digikam-4.10.0-6.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgphoto2_port.so.10()(64bit) Available: libgphoto2-2.5.2-5.el7.x86_64 (base) libgphoto2_port.so.10()(64bit) Installed: libgphoto2-2.5.15-1.el7.x86_64 (@cr) ~libgphoto2_port.so.12()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Any suggestions? Just wait until the EPEL maintainers rebuild it against the latest stuff? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : info(a)microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32

5 8

Problem with cr repo.
by me＠tdiehl.org 08 May '18

08 May '18

Hi, I am having a problem with yum update from the cr repo. Below is the output of yum: (vgeppetto2 pts4) # yum update Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * epel: mirror.cogentco.com 171 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package python-urllib3.noarch 0:1.10.2-3.el7 will be updated ---> Package python-urllib3.noarch 0:1.10.2-5.el7 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Updating: python-urllib3 noarch 1.10.2-5.el7 cr 102 k Transaction Summary =================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Upgrade 1 Package Total download size: 102 k Is this ok [y/d/N]: y Downloading packages: python-urllib3-1.10.2-5.el7.noarch.rpm | 102 kB 00:00:00 Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction Updating : python-urllib3-1.10.2-5.el7.noarch 1/2 Error unpacking rpm package python-urllib3-1.10.2-5.el7.noarch error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/urllib3/packages/ssl_match_hostname: cpio: rename Verifying : python-urllib3-1.10.2-5.el7.noarch 1/2 python-urllib3-1.10.2-3.el7.noarch was supposed to be removed but is not! Verifying : python-urllib3-1.10.2-3.el7.noarch 2/2 Failed: python-urllib3.noarch 0:1.10.2-3.el7 python-urllib3.noarch 0:1.10.2-5.el7 Complete! (vgeppetto2 pts4) # Can someone look at this and tell me if this is a packaging problem or a problem with my machine and how to fix it? I ran yum clean metadata before the yum update run but no change. Regards, -- Tom me(a)tdiehl.org

5 5

elrepo kmod-nvidia issue with update
by Chuck Campbell 01 May '18

01 May '18

when I do yum update, elrepo offers kmod-nvifdia, but yum does this: --> Processing Dependency: kernel(sme_me_mask) = 0x17fbce60 for package: kmod-nvidia-390.48-2.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: kernel(reservation_object_add_excl_fence) = 0xea98efc0 for package: kmod-nvidia-390.48-2.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: kernel(drm_vblank_init) = 0xdcd50a49 for package: kmod-nvidia-390.48-2.el7_5.elrepo.x86_64 . . . repeatedly, then says: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Is there a problem on my end or theirs? -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics | (713)993-0671 ph. | and Integrated Interpretation | (713)993-0608 fax 448 W. 19th St. #325| Since 1992 | (713)306-5794 cell Houston, TX, 77008 | Chuck Campbell | campbell(a)accelinc.com | President & Senior Geoscientist | "Integration means more than having all the maps at the same scale!"

4 3

Named log question
by Chuck Campbell 30 Apr '18

30 Apr '18

Is this mis-configuration, or just noise in my log? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.056 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success: 1 Time(s) 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.120 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for 'dlv.isc.org': success: 1 Time(s) -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics | (713)993-0671 ph. | and Integrated Interpretation | (713)993-0608 fax 448 W. 19th St. #325| Since 1992 | (713)306-5794 cell Houston, TX, 77008 | Chuck Campbell | campbell(a)accelinc.com | President & Senior Geoscientist | "Integration means more than having all the maps at the same scale!"

1 0

Network Performance
by Chris Olson 30 Apr '18

30 Apr '18

One of our summer interns has stayed on working part time on weekends during the school year. This schedule presents an opportunity for technical investigations and some needed performance testing. The last weekend assignment included data rate testing on one specific network pathway. Checking out previous network testing was the first assignment. Some five year old, archived SPARC/Solaris and Intel/Solaris network tests included ftp runs like the following: ftp> ftp> put "|dd if=/dev/zero bs=32768 count=8000" /dev/null 200 PORT command successful. 150 Binary data connection for /dev/null (IP Address). 8000+0 records in 8000+0 records out 226 Transfer complete. local: |dd if=/dev/zero bs=32768 count=8000 remote: /dev/null 262144000 bytes sent in 23 seconds (11081.79 Kbytes/s) ftp> There were dozens of examples of such ftp tests with varying block sizes, bidirectional transfers, destination files on RAID storage, and a mix of some system loading programs run independently and during the network performance testing. Also archived were a full complement of network tests with what looks like the original ttcp and possibly newer versions. These utilities looked like they would work on our CentOS 6 systems, but we did not find ttcp and the ftp tests failed. the piping from dd failed with a message indicating that: |dd was not a recognized file. We no longer have available CentOS systems with versions of the OS before CentOS 6. Could there have been a change to ftp that will not allow a source file specified in this way or would this transfer method have never worked on Linux?

3 2

How do I get the kernel srpm?
by Robert Heller 30 Apr '18

30 Apr '18

I tried to follow the work flow shown in https://wiki.centos.org/Sources, but it does not seem to work: I did this: mkdir CentOS pushd CentOS git clone https://git.centos.org/git/centos-git-common.git git clone https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/kernel.git pushd kernel/ git checkout c6 ../centos-git-common/get_sources.sh And I got the message: Missing metadata. Please run from inside a sources git repo What am I missing? -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services heller(a)deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services

4 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss April 2018