Discuss April 2020

discuss@lists.centos.org

90 participants
70 discussions

CentOS 8 and xhost
by Jerry Geis 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

I am trying to run 'xhost +' on CentOS 8 (such that I can grab a screen shot) but its not letting me. On boot of X I run the "xhost +" then later with SSH into hte box - I run export DISPLAY=:0.0 gnome-screenshot -f jj.png and I get the cannot open display message. This works on the older CentOS 7. What is the magic for C8? Thanks, Jerry

3 4

phpMyAdmin for Centos 8
by Ranbir 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

Has anyone seen a phpMyAdmin rpm for Centos 8 out in the wild? I've been using the Centos 7 EPEL package for phpMyAdmin for many years. When I went there to look for the Centos 8 version of the rpm, I couldn't find one. O_O -- Ranbir

1 0

fail2ban firewalld problems with current CentOS 7
by Andreas Haumer 17 Apr '20

17 Apr '20

Hi! I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed. I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration. I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules. Fail2an is configured to use firewalld: [root@server ~]# ll /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/ insgesamt 12 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 356 21. Jan 05:12 00-firewalld.conf -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 610 15. Nov 19:55 apache.local -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 115 15. Nov 19:10 openvpn.local [root@server ~]# cat /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/00-firewalld.conf # This file is part of the fail2ban-firewalld package to configure the use of # the firewalld actions as the default actions. You can remove this package # (along with the empty fail2ban meta-package) if you do not use firewalld [DEFAULT] banaction = firewallcmd-ipset[actiontype=<multiport>] banaction_allports = firewallcmd-ipset[actiontype=<allports>] A few days ago I noticed that on restart firewalld complains about a missing ipset: [root@server ~]# systemctl restart firewalld [root@server ~]# systemctl status firewalld ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Do 2020-04-09 09:25:28 CEST; 5s ago Docs: man:firewalld(1) Main PID: 8324 (firewalld) CGroup: /system.slice/firewalld.service └─8324 /usr/bin/python2 -Es /usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork --nopid Apr 09 09:25:28 server.my.domain systemd[1]: Starting firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon... Apr 09 09:25:28 server.my.domain systemd[1]: Started firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon. Apr 09 09:25:30 server.my.domain firewalld[8324]: ERROR: '/usr/sbin/iptables-restore -w -n' failed: iptables-restore v1.4.21: Set f2b-apache doesn't exist. Error occurred at line: 2... Apr 09 09:25:30 server.my.domain firewalld[8324]: ERROR: COMMAND_FAILED: Direct: '/usr/sbin/iptables-restore -w -n' failed: iptables-restore v1.4.21: Set f2b-apache doesn't exist. Error occurred at line: 2... Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. Indeed there is no ipset named "f2b-apache", there is no set configured at all: [root@server ~]# ipset list There is no error when restarting fail2ban: [root@server ~]# systemctl restart fail2ban [root@server ~]# systemctl status fail2ban ● fail2ban.service - Fail2Ban Service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/fail2ban.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since Do 2020-04-09 09:26:13 CEST; 4s ago Docs: man:fail2ban(1) Process: 8539 ExecStop=/usr/bin/fail2ban-client stop (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 8543 ExecStartPre=/bin/mkdir -p /run/fail2ban (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 8545 (f2b/server) CGroup: /system.slice/fail2ban.service └─8545 /usr/bin/python -s /usr/bin/fail2ban-server -xf start Apr 09 09:26:13 server.my.domain systemd[1]: Stopped Fail2Ban Service. Apr 09 09:26:13 server.my.domain systemd[1]: Starting Fail2Ban Service... Apr 09 09:26:13 server.my.domain systemd[1]: Started Fail2Ban Service. Apr 09 09:26:13 server.my.domain fail2ban-server[8545]: Server ready Fail2ban seems to be running fine: [root@server ~]# fail2ban-client status Status |- Number of jail: 6 `- Jail list: apache, apache-badbots, apache-nohome, apache-noscript, apache-overflows, openvpn No errors loged in fail2ban.log on restart: [...] 2020-04-09 09:26:13,773 fail2ban.server [8545]: INFO Starting Fail2ban v0.10.5 2020-04-09 09:26:13,799 fail2ban.database [8545]: INFO Connected to fail2ban persistent database '/var/lib/fail2ban/fail2ban.sqlite3' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,801 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Creating new jail 'apache-badbots' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,805 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-badbots' uses poller {} 2020-04-09 09:26:13,805 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Initiated 'polling' backend 2020-04-09 09:26:13,838 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO maxRetry: 1 2020-04-09 09:26:13,838 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO encoding: UTF-8 2020-04-09 09:26:13,839 fail2ban.actions [8545]: INFO banTime: 172800 2020-04-09 09:26:13,839 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO findtime: 3600 2020-04-09 09:26:13,840 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log' (pos = 588859, hash = 755a00cfc09ef9b2f76d78cff61ea766) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,840 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/error_log' (pos = 27101, hash = 53ba5e7041d49628af3b86be05de6fa7) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,841 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Creating new jail 'apache-noscript' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,843 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-noscript' uses poller {} 2020-04-09 09:26:13,843 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Initiated 'polling' backend 2020-04-09 09:26:13,851 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO maxRetry: 3 2020-04-09 09:26:13,851 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO encoding: UTF-8 2020-04-09 09:26:13,851 fail2ban.actions [8545]: INFO banTime: 10800 2020-04-09 09:26:13,852 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO findtime: 3600 2020-04-09 09:26:13,853 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log' (pos = 588859, hash = 755a00cfc09ef9b2f76d78cff61ea766) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,854 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/error_log' (pos = 27101, hash = 53ba5e7041d49628af3b86be05de6fa7) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,855 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Creating new jail 'apache-overflows' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,857 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-overflows' uses poller {} 2020-04-09 09:26:13,857 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Initiated 'polling' backend 2020-04-09 09:26:13,863 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO maxRetry: 2 2020-04-09 09:26:13,863 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO encoding: UTF-8 2020-04-09 09:26:13,864 fail2ban.actions [8545]: INFO banTime: 10800 2020-04-09 09:26:13,864 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO findtime: 3600 2020-04-09 09:26:13,865 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log' (pos = 588859, hash = 755a00cfc09ef9b2f76d78cff61ea766) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,865 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/error_log' (pos = 27101, hash = 53ba5e7041d49628af3b86be05de6fa7) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,866 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Creating new jail 'apache-nohome' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,867 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-nohome' uses poller {} 2020-04-09 09:26:13,868 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Initiated 'polling' backend 2020-04-09 09:26:13,872 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO maxRetry: 2 2020-04-09 09:26:13,873 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO encoding: UTF-8 2020-04-09 09:26:13,873 fail2ban.actions [8545]: INFO banTime: 10800 2020-04-09 09:26:13,873 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO findtime: 3600 2020-04-09 09:26:13,874 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log' (pos = 588859, hash = 755a00cfc09ef9b2f76d78cff61ea766) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,875 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/error_log' (pos = 27101, hash = 53ba5e7041d49628af3b86be05de6fa7) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,876 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Creating new jail 'apache' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,878 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache' uses poller {} 2020-04-09 09:26:13,879 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Initiated 'polling' backend 2020-04-09 09:26:13,898 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO maxRetry: 3 2020-04-09 09:26:13,899 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO encoding: UTF-8 2020-04-09 09:26:13,899 fail2ban.actions [8545]: INFO banTime: 10800 2020-04-09 09:26:13,900 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO findtime: 3600 2020-04-09 09:26:13,900 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log' (pos = 588859, hash = 755a00cfc09ef9b2f76d78cff61ea766) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,901 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO Added logfile: '/var/log/httpd/error_log' (pos = 27101, hash = 53ba5e7041d49628af3b86be05de6fa7) 2020-04-09 09:26:13,902 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Creating new jail 'openvpn' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,931 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'openvpn' uses systemd {} 2020-04-09 09:26:13,932 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Initiated 'systemd' backend 2020-04-09 09:26:13,944 fail2ban.filtersystemd [8545]: INFO [openvpn] Added journal match for: '_SYSTEMD_UNIT=openvpn-server(a)xss.service + _COMM=openvpn' 2020-04-09 09:26:13,944 fail2ban.actions [8545]: INFO banTime: 10800 2020-04-09 09:26:13,944 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO maxRetry: 2 2020-04-09 09:26:13,944 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO encoding: UTF-8 2020-04-09 09:26:13,945 fail2ban.filter [8545]: INFO findtime: 3600 2020-04-09 09:26:13,949 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-badbots' started 2020-04-09 09:26:13,952 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-noscript' started 2020-04-09 09:26:13,954 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-overflows' started 2020-04-09 09:26:13,956 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache-nohome' started 2020-04-09 09:26:13,961 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'apache' started 2020-04-09 09:26:13,964 fail2ban.jail [8545]: INFO Jail 'openvpn' started [...] BUT: SELinux complains about fail2ban: type=AVC msg=audit(1586413496.76:53507): avc: denied { read } for pid=1324 comm="f2b/f.apache" name="disable" dev="sysfs" ino=1481 scontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:sysfs_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 So it seems somehow fail2ban does not add the required ip sets correctly. From what I see in firewalld logfile it seems these problems started after the last updates on April 2nd. On this day I did a "yum update" which executed without errors and installed: augeas-libs-1.4.0-9.el7_7.1.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:27 CEST restic-0.9.6-1.el7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:25 CEST python-perf-3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:23 CEST python3-pip-9.0.3-7.el7_7.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:23 CEST borgbackup-1.1.11-1.el7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:19 CEST libgudev1-219-67.el7_7.4.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:18 CEST kernel-tools-3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:16 CEST pcp-4.3.2-5.el7_7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:14:01 CEST kernel-3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:44 CEST systemd-python-219-67.el7_7.4.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:27 CEST systemd-sysv-219-67.el7_7.4.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:26 CEST rsyslog-8.24.0-41.el7_7.4.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:26 CEST python2-certbot-apache-1.3.0-1.el7.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:25 CEST sssd-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:24 CEST firewalld-0.6.3-2.el7_7.4.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:24 CEST sssd-proxy-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:23 CEST sssd-krb5-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:23 CEST sssd-ldap-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:22 CEST sssd-ipa-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:22 CEST sssd-ad-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:22 CEST sssd-krb5-common-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:21 CEST sssd-common-pac-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:21 CEST sssd-common-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:20 CEST http-parser-2.7.1-8.el7_7.2.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:19 CEST python-firewall-0.6.3-2.el7_7.4.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:18 CEST certbot-1.3.0-1.el7.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:11 CEST python2-certbot-1.3.0-1.el7.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:10 CEST python2-acme-1.3.0-1.el7.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:09 CEST python-requests-2.6.0-9.el7_7.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:08 CEST systemd-219-67.el7_7.4.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:05 CEST kmod-20-25.el7_7.1.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:02 CEST binutils-2.27-41.base.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:13:00 CEST pcp-selinux-4.3.2-5.el7_7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:48 CEST libsss_autofs-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:47 CEST kernel-tools-libs-3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:46 CEST python-sssdconfig-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:45 CEST libsss_sudo-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:45 CEST firewalld-filesystem-0.6.3-2.el7_7.4.noarch Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:44 CEST sssd-client-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:43 CEST libsss_nss_idmap-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:42 CEST libipa_hbac-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:42 CEST pcp-libs-4.3.2-5.el7_7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:41 CEST pcp-conf-4.3.2-5.el7_7.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:41 CEST kmod-libs-20-25.el7_7.1.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:40 CEST libsss_idmap-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:39 CEST libsss_certmap-1.16.4-21.el7_7.3.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:33 CEST systemd-libs-219-67.el7_7.4.x86_64 Do 02 Apr 2020 20:12:32 CEST The firewalld errors start exactly after the updates were installed. Does anyone else see similar problems since the last updates? I googled and found some older postings, but nothing matching the problems I see exactly. I have other CentOS 7 servers with fail2ban and firewalld which should be updated soon, but before I do this I first want to solve this issue. Any idea? Thanks! - andreas -- Andreas Haumer | mailto:andreas@xss.co.at *x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/ Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0 A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71

4 6

HPC question: torques replacement
by Valeri Galtsev 17 Apr '20

17 Apr '20

Dear Experts, I know there are many HPC (high performance computing) experts on this list. I'd like to ask your advise. Almost two decades ago I chose to go with OpenPBS (turned down condor and other alternatives for whatever reason) for clusters and number crunchers I support for the Department at the university. It turned out to be not bad, long lived choice. At some point I smoothly migrated to torque which was advertised as open source project (based on PBS, but it was much less hassle to compile...). Torque ceased to be open source two years ago, it is proprietary now. At some point I have to migrate away from torque for this reason. One of the ways would be to switch (back) to open source PBS Pro (pbspro.org) I wonder what other options experts would recommend. Hopefully, not too far from torque (or PBS) from user prospective. Thanks a lot for all your advises! Valeri -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

3 2

Re: [CentOS] Thank You
by david 17 Apr '20

17 Apr '20

At 07:59 PM 4/16/2020, you wrote: >Just reaching out to say thanks to all the folks that keep CentOS, >EPEL, this mailing list, etc running. It is probably partly due to >having used Red Hat for over two decades, but I always have a good >experience with CentOS. The recent servers that I have setup with >CentOS 8 are purring along. Thanks for the work and support. > >Cheers, >Ian Ian It is an absolute delight to see a posting like yours. No questions, no complaints, no "you shouldn't be doing that, and no non-answers. Thank you for confirming my belief that the open-source community is there to help. I, too, started with RedHat Linux when it was 'free', converted to WhiteHat, then Centos. I control servers of x86_64, Raspberry Pi, mostly on Centos 7, all for fun, not as a job. I'm working on the C8.... Now, ... I haven't had as good luck with C8 s you allege. There were several things I had to deal with: - new firewall - new mailer (sendmail -> postfix) - new system management (systemd) - new yum (introduction of software streams, whatever they are) But, it keeps me busy during this lockdown time. David San Francisco

2 1

Thank You
by Ian P. 17 Apr '20

17 Apr '20

Just reaching out to say thanks to all the folks that keep CentOS, EPEL, this mailing list, etc running. It is probably partly due to having used Red Hat for over two decades, but I always have a good experience with CentOS. The recent servers that I have setup with CentOS 8 are purring along. Thanks for the work and support. Cheers, Ian

1 0

A
by MOHD HOMAIDUR RAHMAN 16 Apr '20

16 Apr '20

-- ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' *M*d* H*omaidur* R**ahman *( Research Scholar ) Lab No. 510, Computational Biophysics Lab. Department of Biotechnology Indian Institute of Technology-Madras Chennai-600 036, India *Mobile No = +91- 7845991785* '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

1 0

Asking again: CentOS 7, KDE, logout needed twice
by mark 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

Every single time, no matter if I chose leave->logout from the start menu, or from ctrl-alt-delete, it does *not* log me out, but restarts KDE. The second time, doesn't matter which way I go, it *does* log me out. Anyone got a clue? Googling hasn't found anything.... mark

2 1

bcc tools and bpftrace packages misbuilt?
by Eric Zuck 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

After upgrading to 8.1.1911, bcc-tools and bpftrace seem to be broken. Current package versions I have: bpftrace-0.9-3.el8.x86_64 and bcc-tools-0.8.0-4.el8.x86_64 Both of these seem to be pulling in LLVM version 7, rather than the version 8 that is in 8.1.1911: [root@localhost ~]# bpftrace bpftrace: error while loading shared libraries: libclangFrontend.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root@localhost ~]# /usr/share/bcc/tools/opensnoop Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/bcc/tools/opensnoop", line 19, in <module> from bcc import ArgString, BPF File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/bcc/__init__.py", line 27, in <module> from .libbcc import lib, bcc_symbol, bcc_symbol_option, _SYM_CB_TYPE File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/bcc/libbcc.py", line 17, in <module> lib = ct.CDLL("libbcc.so.0", use_errno=True) File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/ctypes/__init__.py", line 343, in __init__ self._handle = _dlopen(self._name, mode) OSError: libclangFrontend.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Looking through the CentosBug tracker, I see https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16922: qt5-doctools-5.11.1-9.el8 from CentOS CR/8-stream is misbuilt https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16930: rust-1.37.0-1.module_el8.1.0+246+1f1fd47e built against old libLLVM-7.so So, I gather that bcc-tools and bpftrace are not the only packages affected by an LLVM mismatch. Short of downloading and rebuilding the packages, does anyone have any suggestions about workarounds? Regards, -EricZ

1 1

Samba Status code returned 0xc000006d NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE SessSetup = -13
by Ralf Prengel 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

Hallo, perhaps someone hat a hint vor me. My centos 7 samba Server ist working fine using Win10 Clienst with Domaine-Integration. Shares are browseable and access is possible with a sepearte login. My problem: I want to mount this shares from a centos7 client. This fails with the following mesages. I tried several variations in my fstab found in the internet. Can anyone give me a hint to to access an samba-server that is working fine against a Win2016 Domain-Cotroller? Thanks Rakf Apr 15 05:37:47 6805ca01a270 kernel: Status code returned 0xc000006d NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Apr 15 05:37:47 6805ca01a270 kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13 Apr 15 05:37:47 6805ca01a270 kernel: CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -13 Apr 15 05:37:52 6805ca01a270 kernel: Status code returned 0xc000006d NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Apr 15 05:37:52 6805ca01a270 kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13 Apr 15 05:37:52 6805ca01a270 kernel: CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -13 smb.conf [global] Workgroup = COMLINE security = ads encrypt passwords = yes passdb backend = tdbsam realm = comline.de printing = cups printcap name = cups load printers = yes cups options = raw map to guest = bad user [share_gov_srvgovrcpbuild_clients] comment = share für gov projekt rcpbuild clients path = /mnt/raid01/share_volumes_gov_srvgovrcpbuild_clients_smb browseable = yes comment = Share für alle guest ok = yes writeable = yes read only = no force user = root create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 public = yes

3 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss April 2020