Discuss July 2020

discuss@lists.centos.org

80 participants
61 discussions

setting kernel IP boot values
by Jerry Geis 02 Jul '20

02 Jul '20

Hi I found this information: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/ht… Specifically: Set the configuration using the ip option on the kernel command line: ip<client-IP-number>:[<server-id>]:<gateway-IP-number>:<netmask>:<client-hostname>:<interface>:{dhcp|dhcp6|auto6|on|any|none|off} dhcp - DHCP configuration dhpc6 - DHCP IPv6 configuration auto6 - automatic IPv6 configuration on, any - any protocol available in the kernel (default) none, off - no autoconfiguration, static network configuration For example: ip=192.168.180.120:192.168.180.100:192.168.180.1:255.255.255.0::enp1s0:off but I am confused. I desire to set IP boot values with DHCP and name of machine say jerry. so I would use ip=::::jerry.domain:eth0:dhcp Is this correct ? Jerry

1 2

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Bacula offsite replication
by Valeri Galtsev 02 Jul '20

02 Jul '20

On 2020-07-02 09:50, Bez Thomas wrote: > Hi Valeri, > > To go off on a tangent, do you use the Bareos community edition, or the paid version? > I use open source - community edition. I work for the department of the university, they do not have much money, thus pretty much everything I set up for them is free as in free bear. I have to invest my time and knowledge - and help of others - instead of paid support, and this way I earn my salary ;-) Suits both myself and my employers. Valeri > Thanks, > Bez Thomas (he/him) > Tech Services, Astronomy/CCAPS > 222 Space Sciences Bldg, Cornell University > 607-255-3434 > > > > > > >> On Jul 2, 2020, at 10:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev(a)kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2020-07-02 08:28, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Il 02/07/20 15:02, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/2/20 3:22 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>>> Il 01/07/20 17:13, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: >>>>>> I realize this shouldn't happen, the file is a tgz and isn't being modified while being transmitted. This has happened maybe three times this year and unfortunately I've just had to deal with it rather than invest the time to do the research. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Harriscomputer >>>>>> >>>>>> Leroy Tennison >>>>>> Network Information/Cyber Security Sp >>>>> >>>>> Hi Leroy, >>>>> >>>>> I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless. >>>>> >>>> >>>> unless you use tape (of that high capacity), it is advantageous to restrict volume size to, say, 50GB. Then when you restore, search for specific files will be faster. And it will help your backup volumes transfers as well. >>>> >>>> Valeri >>> Hi Valeri, >>> thank you for your suggestion. >>> Is bacula the right backup system when I need to replicate data offsite? There are other backup solution that simplify this process? >> >> Bacula is great enterprise level open source backup system. I switched to its fork bareos at some point; I use bacula/bareos for at least a decade. And with this your extra requirement I still would stay with bareos (or bacula). >> >> If I were to have two sets of backup: on site and off site, I would just set up separate bacula/bareos director and storage daemon(s) off site. Add to FDs (file daemons) extra instances of director - offsite one with different passwords for the sake of security. Then there will be a set of everything off site, not only a set of volumes. Of course, if you only have a set of volumes, but everything else has evaporated, you still will be able to restore everything, including database records by scanning set of volumes. Which will take forever. I would alternate dates of backups in offsite/onsite schedules, or define times of backups so that they do not overlap. >> >> Another good news of this vs just rsyncing volumes is: bacula/bareos verifies checksum of every backed up file after receiving it. This will ensure consistency of files in remote volumes, for rsync you will have to at least verify checksum of each volume transferred to destination (unless I miss my wits and rsync does verify checksums of files transferred, I just re-read rsync man and don't see verification - hopefully rsync expert will chime in and correct me if I'm wrong about rsync). >> >> Anyway, that is what I would do. >> >> Valeri >> >>> Thank you in advance >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS(a)centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> >> -- >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Valeri Galtsev >> Sr System Administrator >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >> University of Chicago >> Phone: 773-702-4247 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS(a)centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

How to Mirror CentOS8 repository in CentOS7 Server via reposync
by psuresh 02 Jul '20

02 Jul '20

Hi I'm running CentOS7 server as ImageServer and local repository server. And i need to mirror CentOS8 repository (http://mirror.centos.org/centos-8/8.1.1911/AppStream/x86_64/os/ ) in my CentOS7 Server. If i mirror CentOS8 repository using repo sync command in CentOS7 it did not properly mirror centos8 repository, due to that when i install package from CentOS8 client machine getting following error. No available modular metadata for modular package 'python3-lldb-8.0.1-1.module_el8.1.0+215+a01033fb.x86_64', it cannot be installed on the system The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: No available modular metadata for modular package Can you please suggest proper way to mirror CentOS8 repository in CentOS7 Server? Regards, Suresh PanneerSelvam

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 185, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 02 Jul '20

02 Jul '20

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2020:2662 CentOS 7 selinux-policy BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2020:2659 CentOS 7 systemd BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:57:31 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2020:2662 CentOS 7 selinux-policy BugFix Update Message-ID: <20200630205731.GA9803(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:2662 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2662 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 7565ffd1f3418c04442b5eb731eeccc4cc52f2089938035d4dc04e777568b2b0 selinux-policy-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.noarch.rpm f2dacc5e31de8fa35d3ceb452c4d5203a9cbb96e0aa8f56b599c63f1019cd8b5 selinux-policy-devel-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.noarch.rpm 2fb36e1a13c028ecc1c286681c25e1b1c425c4496493d62e3b764a873120e8ab selinux-policy-doc-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.noarch.rpm afaa647d4aec875a206806a35bc776f8861fa3430e194adddaa342b70883afa2 selinux-policy-minimum-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.noarch.rpm bd3c1accb03bd25d3af8839896c75d2a892ce485713437fda2f249fa00c9f04b selinux-policy-mls-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.noarch.rpm 26d654fb629b24814ed5776e478cc6e9c0b7edb24b3bde1adc0995421da07293 selinux-policy-sandbox-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.noarch.rpm 75493cf7ada339fe000804c858943eed597295053e9164726dc0424986931344 selinux-policy-targeted-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.noarch.rpm Source: 7012c0fedb27556b513cb7d18d1ed0f7c3480febd4f4d016176f16331e1bc01e selinux-policy-3.13.1-266.el7_8.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:58:38 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2020:2659 CentOS 7 systemd BugFix Update Message-ID: <20200630205838.GA10052(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:2659 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2659 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 308539b57a0114a416b08951260b3004a47eea3f0428a9f7e7facf056b58fd53 libgudev1-219-73.el7_8.8.i686.rpm 32ddfd836f86b19e1d7aaa1d4c3a9ce5febefde1fc3d97d333290de0da348c36 libgudev1-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm 963ef1a3d5e79721a0e098a83becbe088b1fc3a651b677ba3132cef1fe0d94f9 libgudev1-devel-219-73.el7_8.8.i686.rpm 10206d79be9585d77ec804594b0b9b7ee1a98c88e6ccc9cdbb97f77b3e28b12a libgudev1-devel-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm 86125d34008aa7e84ef19e51da544bbad7a1b76660fe24e5563fe5dc3069dff1 systemd-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm a371370c6fdaee61698cf6414e70496ff41cca58847d27a25de9864859ae9685 systemd-devel-219-73.el7_8.8.i686.rpm 7034ef244407efdc1c17a14363e50eaa9c589c84bbf886139b9fad7e7a6922d0 systemd-devel-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm 4b420cdb7274ca935f3d283d5808d55c20396930a0765f6d938cf811dc2ba909 systemd-journal-gateway-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm f7940bca479a5a6710d95dcd9e2f5d688caabc3046f9db25dbd56b16fda54d46 systemd-libs-219-73.el7_8.8.i686.rpm ac9cbb53bbc1915e7c6b2d8a08db6e87e2104bb4f2b708d9590ea6430872b9b6 systemd-libs-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm 95feec5d6656b6eaf7802c9ee7be76e019588e7e453b88925738fa2339f5a892 systemd-networkd-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm 5119f092a7841e1ffdffdaffcdc8c33c888df2cef7dab0ef3dc9da9c13b9dd34 systemd-python-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm 9f5887416fd66523d3961064be9b692b5084d028f1bfde7d28ff55dc9a0bad53 systemd-resolved-219-73.el7_8.8.i686.rpm f66fbfc873e73ba8a9679658bff997c549b9bdb807d798f57856a45eee7199cf systemd-resolved-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm 08ae1f4a8af88f1d744999d2c11c6aebff0125abbaf899e7e1067241c3756373 systemd-sysv-219-73.el7_8.8.x86_64.rpm Source: 5f51c2e9b139106137743c153bc1820ec88963eb5f638e4424c109da6465f320 systemd-219-73.el7_8.8.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 185, Issue 1 ***********************************************

1 0

Not getting bootloader installed with CentOS 8 + mdraid
by Chris Adams 01 Jul '20

01 Jul '20

I am trying to use a kickstart to install CentOS 8.2 on a server with a pair of drives with Linux software RAID 1. The install completes, but the resulting system will not boot - I get "Booting from Hard drive C:" from the BIOS (Dell in legacy BIOS mode, not UEFI) and it stops. If I then start the installer in rescue mode and run grub2-install on the two drives, it boots okay. If I take out the RAID config and just install on the first drive, it boots fine - it appears to just be an issue with RAID. I tried my kickstart in a KVM VM with two disks, and it works there (I get RAID and a bootloader). Anybody else run into this? Any ideas? I've been installing from kickstarts for ages, including software RAID, but not CentOS 8 with software RAID until now. -- Chris Adams <linux(a)cmadams.net>

1 1

[OT] Bacula offsite replication
by Alessandro Baggi 01 Jul '20

01 Jul '20

Hi everyone, I have updated my backup server to CentOS 8.2. It runs bacula performing backup on disks. I would like to replicate backups on another offsite machine. I read about the ability to configure a new storage daemon in the offsite location and create a Migration/Copy Jobs. If I'm not wrong, it replicates only volumes but not replicate the catalog. I will try this. Another way to replicate the volumes on another server is using rsync. What is your suggestion about this topic? Thank you in advance. Alessandro.

2 3

virt-manager guest display resize not keep
by Jerry Geis 01 Jul '20

01 Jul '20

Hi All, I have CentOS 7 has host and CentOS 8 as guest. I ran the command: virsh edit CentOS8 and changed the vgamem to 65536. I Now get higher resolutions in the guest - I select the 4K resolution, all works. Then when I reboot I am back to 1024x768. Any thoughts on getting the C8 guest to keep its screen resolution ? Thanks, Jerry

1 1

Force package install using yum?
by Jeffrey Walton 01 Jul '20

01 Jul '20

Hi Everyone, I have a CentOS 7 box that's refusing a rpm update. I suspect it has something to do with SCL enabled. The 'yum update' output is shown below. I need to force this package to install. I don't give a damn about the log files. I need that server patched since it is forward facing. Taking the server offline is not an option. How do I force the package installation? Thanks in advance. ==================== Running transaction Updating : httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 1/2 Error unpacking rpm package httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /opt/rh/httpd24/root/etc/httpd/logs: cpio: rename httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-15.el7.x86_64 was supposed to be removed but is not! Verifying : httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-15.el7.x86_64 1/2 Verifying : httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 2/2 Failed: httpd24-httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.34-15.el7 httpd24-httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.34-18.el7 ==================== My attempt to force it from https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-October/msg02953.html: # yum clean ... # yum install --downloadonly httpd24-httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.34-15.el7.rpm ... # yum localinstall /var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/centos-sclo-rh/packages/httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64.rpm Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Examining /var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/centos-sclo-rh/packages/httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64.rpm: httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 Marking /var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/centos-sclo-rh/packages/httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64.rpm as an update to httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-15.el7.x86_64 Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package httpd24-httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.34-15.el7 will be updated ---> Package httpd24-httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.34-18.el7 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: httpd24-httpd x86_64 2.4.34-18.el7 /httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 4.3 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Upgrade 1 Package Total size: 4.3 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: Y Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction Updating : httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 1/2 Error unpacking rpm package httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /opt/rh/httpd24/root/etc/httpd/logs: cpio: rename httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-15.el7.x86_64 was supposed to be removed but is not! Verifying : httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-15.el7.x86_64 1/2 Verifying : httpd24-httpd-2.4.34-18.el7.x86_64 2/2 Failed: httpd24-httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.34-15.el7 httpd24-httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.34-18.el7 Complete!

2 1

RPMFusion and NVIDIA driver problem
by Alessandro Baggi 01 Jul '20

01 Jul '20

Hi list, I'm on C8.1 and I'm trying to install NVIDIA driver from rpmfusion-nonfree repository but it returns: package kmod-nvidia-3:440.82-2.el8.x86_64 requires kmod-nvidia-4.18.0-147.el8.x86_64 >= 3:440.82-2.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides kernel < 4.18.0-148.el8 needed by kmod-nvidia-4.18.0-147.el8.x86_64-3:440.82-2.el8.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) and uname -r returns: 4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64 Seems that RPMFusion needs an update. Waiting for this there is a way to install this package without fall in problems? Thank you in advance.

2 5

fdisk boot partition
by Jerry Geis 01 Jul '20

01 Jul '20

I am trying to use CentOS 8 host to boot an image (OS X) that I created using dd. First I tried fdisk -l image_file.img - all looks good so I did fdisk image_file.img - this works - but seems in CentOS 8 fdisk there is no longer a toggle bootable flag option. How do I do that ? Thanks, Jerry

4 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss July 2020