Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

8 participants
34739 discussions

GlusterFS ?
by lejeczek 19 May '25

19 May '25

Hi guys. Are these days Gluster's last- any way of getting it on Centos? Any alternatives for rather small envs/deployments anybody might recommend? many thanks, L.

3 7

cryptsetup luks
by lejeczek 17 May '25

17 May '25

Hi guys. Is this a misbehavior of some sorts? I encrypt: -> $ systemd-cryptenroll --tpm2-device=auto --tpm2-pcrs=0+7 /dev/nvme0n1p3 but unless there is only one keyslot (my even have any ID) or perhaps if it was first - but have not tired it - then 'cryptset' does not open the device @boot. From what I understand 'cryptsetup' tires all keyslots - no matter TPM provider/device is absent - I was thinking of 'timeout' but cryptsetup does not report any such issues, simply boot stops, waiting for a passphrase. I other words: it seems I need to remove all keyslots, old ones, enrolled in the past for which TPMs do not exists any more, except for the one I know is valid, only then system boots with TPM, no passphrase prompt. any thoughts much appreciated. many thanks, L.

1 0

cryptsetup luks
by lejeczek 17 May '25

17 May '25

Hi guys. Is this a misbehavior of some sorts? I encrypt: -> $ systemd-cryptenroll --tpm2-device=auto --tpm2-pcrs=0+7 /dev/nvme0n1p3 but unless there is only one keyslot (my even have any ID) or perhaps if it was first - but have not tired it - then 'cryptset' does not open the device @boot. From what I understand 'cryptsetup' tires all keyslots. I was thinking of 'timeout' but cryptsetup does not report any such issues, simply boot stops, waiting for a passphrase. I other words: I need to remove all keyslots, old ones, enrolled in the past for which TPMs do not exists any more, except for the one I know is valid, only then system boots with TPM, not passphrase. any thoughts much appreciated. many thanks, L.

1 0

module from repos
by lejeczek 10 May '25

10 May '25

Hi guys. 'modules' are no longer, in 'dnf'? I get none. Is there some 'changelog' on v. 10 - where important changes are covered? I searched but failed to find any. thanks, L.

2 1

Dogtag in source repo but binaries absent
by lejeczek 10 May '25

10 May '25

Would this be a bug? thanks, L.

3 4

Fwd: Your confirmation is needed to leave the discuss@lists.centos.org mailing list.
by Rogger Ortega 03 May '25

03 May '25

-------- Mensaje original -------- De: discuss-confirm+6185fff0659e99312e4453bbf2fdac463f19e021(a)lists.centos.org Enviado: 2 de mayo de 2025 4:54:41 p. m. GMT-05:00 Para: roggerortega0405(a)disroot.org Asunto: Your confirmation is needed to leave the discuss(a)lists.centos.org mailing list. Email Address Unsubscription Confirmation Hello, this is the GNU Mailman server at lists.centos.org. We have received an unsubscription request for the email address roggerortega0405(a)disroot.org Before GNU Mailman can unsubscribe you, you must first confirm your request. You can do this by simply replying to this message. Or you should include the following line -- and only the following line -- in a message to discuss-request(a)lists.centos.org: confirm 6185fff0659e99312e4453bbf2fdac463f19e021 Note that simply sending a `reply' to this message should work from most mail readers. If you do not wish to unsubscribe this email address, simply disregard this message. If you think you are being maliciously unsubscribed from the list, or have any other questions, you may contact discuss-owner(a)lists.centos.org

2 1

How is EPEL doing for ver. 10?
by lejeczek 02 May '25

02 May '25

Hi My second question is - how is EPEL doing somebody knows? I wonder is it still early ? or something else is up. I'm asking because it seems that quite a few & useful - to me at least - packages are absent. eg.: lsyncd, monit, probably more, but one whose absence rose my eyebrow is 'certbot' So I guess I wonder: should I go on a "discovery" process & then report to BZ, or perhaps some major changes to "repos" took place while I was absent. thanks, L.

2 1

Is mailing list still active & main communication channel?
by lejeczek 30 Apr '25

30 Apr '25

hi guys, as per the subject, for "regular" users that is? I'm asking after taking a longer break from Centos. thanks, L.

3 3

Palo Alto VM-Series Firewall is based on CentOS Linux
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming 31 Mar '25

31 Mar '25

Subject: Palo Alto VM-Series Firewall is based on CentOS Linux Good day from Singapore, I have discovered that Palo Alto VM-Series Firewall is based on CentOS Linux. How can I find out what version of CentOS Linux is being used? I am interested in the Linux kernel version being used as well. Regards, Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming Targeted Individuals in Singapore GIMP = Government-Induced Medical Problems

1 0

Issues booting centos7 [dracut is failing to enable centos/root, centos/swap LVs]
by Yannis Milios 01 Feb '25

01 Feb '25

Hello, I'm having a strange problem booting a new centos7 installation. Below some background on this. [I have attached the tech details at the bottom of this message] I started a new CentOS7 installation on a VM, so far all good, o/s boots fine. Then I decided to increase VM disk size (initially was 10G) to 13G. Powered off the VM, increased the vhd via the hypervisor, booted from CentOS livecd, selected "recover my centos installation". Then I used the following sequence of commands to make the new vhd size "visible" to the o/s ... - ran fdisk /dev/sda and deleted partition 2. (This is the LVM partition where the o/s is stored. The first partition is /boot [xfs] partition *non lvm*.) - created a new partition with same starting sector as before deleting it, but a different ending sector (to reflect to the increased space). - set partition type to 8e (lvm), saved settings and exit. - ran pvresize and lvresize to make new space visible to the o/s.All good, I can see the space increase on 'lvdisplay centos/root'. - ran 'mount /dev/mapper/centos-root /mnt/root' to temporarily mount the o/s partition. - ran 'xfs_growfs /mnt/root' to resize the o/s fs to the new size. It was successful and I could actually chroot to the o/s and verify new disk size. - rebooted and tried to boot from hdd this time. Grub menu shows up and loads default kernel (3.10.0-862.9.1.el7.x86_64). - after initial kernel boot up process, booting continues to initrd and then it's where the problem starts... - looks like dracut has issues locating/enabling /dev/mapper/centos-root (lv) and as a result it cannot boot to the 'real' root fs (/). - while in dracut shell, I execute the following command sequence: 1. lvm lvchange -ay /dev/centos/root 2. lvm lvchange -ay /dev/centos/swap 3. ln -s /dev/mapper/centos-root /dev/root 4. exit ...and the o/s boots fine...so looks like the pv,vg,lv is detected properly while in initrd, but somehow dracut has difficulties enabling the root,swap LVs ? - While in o/s, I rebuild initrd by using: 'dracut -f -v -a lvm' Note, I have to use '-a lvm' as for some reason, if don't, the lvm utils (lvm,lvm_scan) are not being included to the initrd, not sure why this happens. After rebooting, same thing happens, I have to manually boot the system via dracut shell. I'm a bit stuck at this point, any clues what I'm doing wrong in here ? As I previously said, this is a new installation, so I could simply reinstall the whole thing, but I would rather try to find out some answer to why is this happening ... :-) [curiosity] Some additional details: ================== I've attached /run/initramfs/rdsosreport.txt file [generated while in inird] here: https://privatebin.net/?fdc4052c0c402884#gdB/QYR3IeR55SxUbjfrkZPQfJ7jMxiUxq… o/s ver=CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core) [root@localhost ~]# lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 13G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:1 0 500M 0 part /boot └─sda2 8:2 0 12.5G 0 part ├─centos-root 253:0 0 11.5G 0 lvm / └─centos-swap 253:1 0 1G 0 lvm [SWAP] [root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/default/grub GRUB_TIMEOUT=5 GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)" GRUB_DEFAULT=saved GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT="console" GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=centos/root rd.lvm.lv=centos/swap rd.shell rhgb" GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY="true"

4 11

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss