Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions
by Chris Weisiger 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

I have been reading about software raid. I configured my first software raid system about a month ago. I have 4 500 Gig drives configured in RAID 5 configuration with a total of 1.5TB. Currently I configured the complete individual drivers as software raid, then created a /dev/md0 with the drives I then created a /file_storage partition on /dev/md0. I created my /boot / and swap partitions on a non raid drive in my system. Is the the proper way to configure software raid?

8 17

Centos 6.3 - unsupported video hardware
by Robert Moskowitz 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3. The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine), though a monitor attacked to the VGA port works fine. Although my intension is to use this as a portable test server, it would be nice if the video was available. How might I go about figuring out the Xorg magic to get it working?

3 6

Apache attacks - you can't stop them, or can you?
by Robert Moskowitz 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

So I have this nice, simple web server up running. Its purpose is to allow me external testing with HIP, and to provide some files for external distribution. Of course, there it is sitting on port 80 and the attacks are coming in per logwatch report. Examples from the report include: Requests with error response codes 404 Not Found //phpMyAdmin-2.5.1/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) //phpMyAdmin-2.5.4/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) //phpMyAdmin-2.5.5-pl1/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) //phpMyAdmin-2.5.5-rc1/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) //phpMyAdmin-2.5.5-rc2/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) /muieblackcat: 1 Time(s) /myadmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s) /mysql-admin/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) /mysql/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) /mysqladmin/scripts/setup.php: 2 Time(s) /mysqlmanager/scripts/setup.php: 1 Time(s) Now these are only a few, though I am probably not being hit as hard as others out there. My question is: Is there a way to shut this nonsense down? Or because I am sending the 404, I am doing all that is reasonable to do? I am wondering that if this list starts getting long, that is a lot of logging and I probably don't need to log 404s?

6 5

Google Earth on EL6.x x86_64
by Fred Smith 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

Has anyone gotten 64-bit google earth to run on el6 x86_64? It dies almost immediately, complaining for lack of ld-lsb.so.3. Perusing user forums at google I see a few others with the problem, but no (working) solutions. Thanks in advance! -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart." ---------------------------- Hebrews 4:12 (niv) ------------------------------

5 7

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions
by Chris Weisiger 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

Im not so much concerned about the os not being on a raid system. I am really concerned about my data, music, pictures,docs, etc. I run a minimum os centos 5.9 install anyway so it would take long to reload the os if i had to. -----Original Message----- From: John R Pierce Sent: 3/5/2013 6:45 PM To: centos(a)centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions On 3/5/2013 4:27 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > The question is why are you using raid at all? indeed. the primary justification for the "R" in RAID, Redundant, is high availability. having the OS on a non-raid volume completely violates this. RAID is most definitely NOT a substitute for backups. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 97, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2013:0588 Moderate CentOS 5 gnutls Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2013:0591 CentOS 5 libxml2 Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2013:0587 Moderate CentOS 5 openssl Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:43:03 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0588 Moderate CentOS 5 gnutls Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130305134303.GA27307(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0588 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0588.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d406c1625f60d19b757d3a3b1c3755e8b3d512f39c6b62405c3dfb40e407e106 gnutls-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.i386.rpm b545ba0216af79f830a203ecb36f56c18a4d8f1b3114c680096a1999b428f9e5 gnutls-devel-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 938cad7cb143172b6190a97e4c36f6ec508d86efdac3b6bc8121cd8e958c09c6 gnutls-utils-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.i386.rpm x86_64: d406c1625f60d19b757d3a3b1c3755e8b3d512f39c6b62405c3dfb40e407e106 gnutls-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.i386.rpm bb64f014b99389f570571c073312fca6f07db748a19d8a5f8e9734493fd0329b gnutls-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm b545ba0216af79f830a203ecb36f56c18a4d8f1b3114c680096a1999b428f9e5 gnutls-devel-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 023bf23e98b902bbe2a0f8899d9e567f5f892f0ee355dc321464d5df264ab23e gnutls-devel-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm 54eef63f0b8d0d21847a1798ac1322917f33f0e5f1c3a6668793b776469574bc gnutls-utils-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 8549aa07932fdfb2eaaabfad862ec66f74f1dc153dee55591297b00b86bebb2f gnutls-1.4.1-10.el5_9.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:44:17 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0591 CentOS 5 libxml2 Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130305134417.GA27439(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0591 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0591.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 65bb89c8944962636db78141830c7f69aa4426a2a6e6113cc2b02458074b5a66 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.i386.rpm 85a25609b42b0d9d43508c0b636318f19f77e75f84ff2f5e7f547693798cc1a6 libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.i386.rpm 0e01f0682cfdf5cd0f963895bc3ad90809fd3a6b4e94503d4e3f7e84e8955ffc libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.i386.rpm x86_64: 65bb89c8944962636db78141830c7f69aa4426a2a6e6113cc2b02458074b5a66 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.i386.rpm 0d35a2642461ef969c648b17c8975a853e3a5e9645600fb124d51122dd62a719 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.x86_64.rpm 85a25609b42b0d9d43508c0b636318f19f77e75f84ff2f5e7f547693798cc1a6 libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.i386.rpm 20c1e1ae776ac266e279bd1067087cccdd4cfb53400f4dc47d05fb1a7da33b62 libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.x86_64.rpm 51fd9ad1f3d74f426f1af7c1c5d813bbe819d15b9d07d27cb1f3f8a7b1b70e3b libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 5c100afcfbde58be99b2c4ef94ed959ee163de55f8e3e0379ec174cb2320e767 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.21.el5_9.2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:45:27 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0587 Moderate CentOS 5 openssl Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130305134527.GA27575(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0587 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0587.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b3c9e6759e2b6b562b9d8d7edb48a83ade73d041376f32b223249f7e4bb5db8a openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.i386.rpm e04c5bcf1b3a72831df27f7d089a5698c889acafc8225584d8234b84ad204cd1 openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.i686.rpm 3a8e98ce86754ab28bb9dea2938dd5d4a958cfc87606dbe7518b92c6e785084f openssl-devel-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.i386.rpm e062413c195abe8387e58aaaa0fbcaad830d2b6ba48ccefad5f67c0281cead80 openssl-perl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.i386.rpm x86_64: e04c5bcf1b3a72831df27f7d089a5698c889acafc8225584d8234b84ad204cd1 openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.i686.rpm 6301afe0afe607925b8a2264cb287e9acdc91bf67e01df80e0fa8a56d622bbef openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm 3a8e98ce86754ab28bb9dea2938dd5d4a958cfc87606dbe7518b92c6e785084f openssl-devel-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.i386.rpm 6b9f38a6c7fa5dd9756550e536da72492eeabe4e641f680a5e4e86834c911b6d openssl-devel-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm 8741963c8aeefb148cfcfb92b0c6baa52b513c7503223f8b55cf5a75faf8f6bb openssl-perl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 61018d7eb0442320a0175a1e1bd9863eee5fd3c9334c47631dce14973203a590 openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 97, Issue 2 **********************************************

1 0

fencing nodes with drac under 5.9
by Adam Wead 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

Hi all, A recent update to CentOS 5.9 has broken my cluster's ability to fence nodes. I have two Dell's which are both fenced via their DRAC6 cards. The current configuration in cluster.conf for the fencing devices is: <fencedevice agent="fence_drac5" cmd_prompt="admin1->" ipaddr="192.168.251.11" login="fencer" name="ms1-drac" passwd="[omitted]" secure="1"/> After the updates, when one of the two systems comes online and starts the cman service, it will startup fencing. At that point it contacts the other node and reboots it repeatedly, never allowing the system to come back online. If I disable the cman service and renable it after both systems come back online, when cman starts up, it reboots the other and the process starts over again. Fencing with DRAC devices is not terribly well-documented, so I immagine there was something in the update that changed the way this worked. I originally used system-config-cluster to created the configuration file, but that had to tweak it adding the fence_drac5 agent manually because the configuration tool didn't support it. I also tried recreating the cluster with conga, via luci and ricci, but no success there either. Is anyone out there doing clustering with Dells and DRAC6 cards under CentOS 5.9? Or under CentOS 6 for that matter... I'm willing to update if it fixes this. thanks in advance, ...adam ____________________________________________ Adam Wead Systems and Digital Collections Librarian Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum 216.515.1960 (t) 215.515.1964 (f)

2 5

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions
by Chris Weisiger 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

Im in the process of configuring my data to be backed up to external devices. -----Original Message----- From: John R Pierce Sent: 3/5/2013 6:45 PM To: centos(a)centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions On 3/5/2013 4:27 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > The question is why are you using raid at all? indeed. the primary justification for the "R" in RAID, Redundant, is high availability. having the OS on a non-raid volume completely violates this. RAID is most definitely NOT a substitute for backups. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions
by Chris Weisiger 06 Mar '13

06 Mar '13

I essentially configured the software raid to create a home server and not have to worry about individual drives. I've built a collection of several several gigs of music and pictures. Enough to look into a raid system. Plus it is alot cheaper than a hardware raid setup. Plus I want to do testing with it to possible use it for some of the clients that the business I work for do work for for basic file server services -----Original Message----- From: Mark LaPierre Sent: 3/5/2013 6:27 PM To: centos(a)centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions On 03/04/2013 10:53 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote: > I have been reading about software raid. I configured my first software raid system about a month ago. > > I have 4 500 Gig drives configured in RAID 5 configuration with a total of 1.5TB. > > Currently I configured the complete individual drivers as software raid, then created a /dev/md0 with the drives > > I then created a /file_storage partition on /dev/md0. > > I created my /boot / and swap partitions on a non raid drive in my system. > > Is the the proper way to configure software raid? > _______________________________________________ Hey Chris, What you have done is a totally acceptable way of building a raid array. Software raid on Linux is amazingly flexible. It is able to build arrays on individual matching drives as you have done, drives of different physical sizes, a combination physical drives and partitions on other drives, or a combination of partitions on different drives. It can even build a raid array on several partitions on one physical drive, not that you would ever want to do that. In other words, if you can dream it up, software raid can probably build it. The question is why are you using raid at all? If you are trying to increase access speed or data security then raid makes sense. The appropriate configuration depends on your available resources and the nature of your intent. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ **** _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

New java update?
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 05 Mar '13

05 Mar '13

I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update? <https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/oracle-rushes-emergency-java-update-patc…> mark

8 34

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss