Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Updating gtk2
by Matt 19 Jan '13

19 Jan '13

What does this error mean? Updating : gtk2 35/178 g_module_open() failed for /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: undefined symbol: inflateReset /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-64: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: no version information available (required by /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2) Do I really need gtk2 running on a server anyway?

4 4

Thank you
by Leonard den Ottolander 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

Hi guys, Thank you for the release of 5.9. I haven't been following the list much lately, or even realized Red Hat released 5.9 :) Keep up the good work! Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

1 0

Smartd Warning in logwatch report
by Frank Cox 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

I updated the machine that I use for a web/email server last night to 5.9, and I have this in the logwatch report this morning: QUOTE: --------------------- Smartd Begin ------------------------ Warnings: Device: /dev/sda [SAT], WARNING: There are known problems with these drives, - 1 Time(s) **Unmatched Entries** smartd 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [x86_64-linux-2.6.18-348.el5] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net Device: /dev/sda, type changed from 'scsi' to 'sat' Device: /dev/sda [SAT], ST3320613AS, S/N:5SZ0ET3Q, WWN:5-000c50-00e39cdc3, FW:SD22, 320 GB see the following Seagate web pages: http://seagate.custkb.com/seagate/crm/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=207931 http://seagate.custkb.com/seagate/crm/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=207951 http://seagate.custkb.com/seagate/crm/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=207957 ---------------------- Smartd End ------------------------- END OF QUOTE The referenced webpages give me a 404. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!

4 5

Sendmail logs?
by Ashley M. Kirchner 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

I'm baffled ... on a stock 6.3 install, where does sendmail dump its log files sm-mta and sm-msp respectively? Al I can find is the statistics file and maillog. Thanks,

7 14

new errors in /var/log/messages since update to 5.9
by fred smith 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

since updating to 5.9 a little while ago I find a load of these in /var/log/messages, which I've not seen before: Jan 17 22:17:18 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:17:20 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(199.4.29.166) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:17:31 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(129.70.132.37) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:34:22 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:34:23 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(199.4.29.166) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:34:37 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(129.70.132.37) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:51:26 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(199.4.29.166) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:51:28 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:51:41 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(129.70.132.37) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:08:32 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(199.4.29.166) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:08:33 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:08:46 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(129.70.132.37) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:25:35 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(199.4.29.166) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:25:36 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:25:49 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(129.70.132.37) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:42:38 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(199.4.29.166) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:42:39 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 23:42:53 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(129.70.132.37) (fd=22): Invalid argument Is ntp busted in 5.9? Clues appreciated, thanks! -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen." ----------------------------- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -----------------------------

4 5

sogo
by Paul Bijnens 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

Has anybody some experience with Sogo? http://www.sogo.nu/ -- Paul Bijnens, Xplanation Tel +32 16 397.525 Interleuvenlaan 86, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM Fax +32 16 397.552 *********************************************************************** * I think I've got the hang of it now: exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, ^^, * * quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, ~., * * stop, end, ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt, abort, hangup, KJOB, * * ^X^X, :D::D, kill -9 1, kill -1 $$, shutdown, init 0, Alt-F4, * * Alt-f-e, Ctrl-Alt-Del, Alt-SysRq-reisub, Stop-A, AltGr-NumLock, ... * * ... "Are you sure?" ... YES ... Phew ... I'm out * ***********************************************************************

3 2

cr repo and firewalling
by Markus Falb 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I find myself in a complicated situation and would like to ask the oracle (choke!) for help. I would like to install the packages from the continuous release repo and the yum config for this repo says baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cr/$basearch/ well, I definitely do not want to allow worldwide outgoing http so I try to find the IPs # host mirror.centos.org mirror.centos.org has address 93.113.36.66 but! wait... # host mirror.centos.org mirror.centos.org has address 88.198.211.197 dns round robin is not very helpful for me doing firewall rules. How would you solve this yum and firewall thing? - -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD1wuEACgkQYoWFBIJE9eXs9wCghBGc/naF7c0ozZqJIw9huzXy fJQAn2NLrGTz9cy06dp/HIHFufWxgv9N =m2Of -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

7 15

t-bird annoyance
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

Anyone got any clues? I'm running 6.3, t-bird 10.0.12, and KDE. I get emails with .docx attachment, and t-bird has no idea what to do with them (and doesn't even offer me a choice)."Change your preferences... So I open the source of the email, and at the beginning of the doc I see Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; In system settings->advanced->file associations, I see the applications/vnd... is set for libreoffice. T-bird is still clueless. mark

1 0

5.9 logwatch yum filter broken
by Tilman Schmidt 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

After the upgrade to CentOS 5.9, all my CentOS 5 installations report only "Unmatched Entries" in the "yum" section of their daily logwatch mails. It seems the filter script /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/yum got broken: --------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8< [root@dns01 ~]# /usr/sbin/logwatch --print --service yum --debug 5 [...] Processing Service: yum ( cat /var/cache/logwatch/logwatch.kKzXpf19/yum | /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/yum) 2>&1 ################### Logwatch 7.3 (03/24/06) #################### Processing Initiated: Fri Jan 18 09:21:20 2013 Date Range Processed: yesterday ( 2013-Jan-17 ) Period is day. Detail Level of Output: 0 Type of Output: unformatted Logfiles for Host: dns01.pxnet.com ################################################################## --------------------- yum Begin ------------------------ DEBUG: Inside YUM Filter DEBUG(1): Updated: glibc-common.i386 2.5-107 DEBUG(2): Updated: kernel-headers.i386 2.6.18-348.el5 DEBUG(3): Updated: crontabs.noarch 1.10-11.el5 [...] DEBUG(89): Updated: yum-updatesd.noarch 1:0.9-5.el5 **Unmatched Entries** 2.5-107 2.6.18-348.el5 1.10-11.el5 [...] 1:0.9-5.el5 ---------------------- yum End ------------------------- ###################### Logwatch End ######################### [root@dns01 ~]# >8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------- Looking at the script I find the line 22 $ThisLine =~ s/^[^ ]* [^ ]* //; which looks like its intention was to strip the timestamp from the logfile entry, but the DEBUG output shows it has already been stripped at this point. And a minor nit: who came up with the silly idea of enforcing mode 600 for /var/log/yum.log in /etc/logrotate.d/yum? I don't think it increases security if the intern who checks the logs has to work with full root privileges all the time. -- Tilman Schmidt Phoenix Software GmbH Bonn, Germany

1 1

Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
by Dario Lesca 18 Jan '13

18 Jan '13

Hi, on my c6.3 server (guest of a vmware host) I have a strange load average value: w command: > [root@s-doc ~]# w > 11:19:23 up 41 days, 23:15, 1 user, load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT > root pts/2 dodo:S.0 11:15 0.00s 0.02s 0.00s w top command: > top - 12:13:31 up 42 days, 9 min, 1 user, load average: 4.00, 4.01, 4.00 > Tasks: 127 total, 1 running, 126 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.3%id, 0.7%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Mem: 1914596k total, 1783108k used, 131488k free, 86536k buffers > Swap: 2047992k total, 18884k used, 2029108k free, 246504k cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 863 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 0.3 0.0 26:05.07 xfsaild/dm-5 1 root 20 0 21452 1032 780 S 0.0 0.1 0:01.76 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.53 kthreadd 3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 4 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:06.32 ksoftirqd/0 > 5 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 6 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:05.66 watchdog/0 7 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 27:33.90 events/0 8 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cgroup > 9 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper 10 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 netns 11 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 async/mgr 12 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pm 13 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:13.75 sync_supers > 14 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:12.35 bdi-default But none of process still work, top have no process > 0,xx and also iotop value are > 0,xx. This is the vmstat output: > [root@s-doc ~]# vmstat 2 10 > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu----- > r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st > 0 0 18884 131984 86508 246500 0 0 2 10 9 9 1 0 99 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131976 86508 246500 0 0 0 6 126 542 0 0 99 1 0 > 0 0 18884 131976 86508 246500 0 0 0 0 126 546 0 0 100 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131976 86508 246500 0 0 0 0 123 539 0 0 100 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131976 86508 246500 0 0 0 0 122 538 0 0 100 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131976 86508 246500 0 0 0 0 127 538 0 0 100 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131844 86508 246500 0 0 0 2 166 535 5 1 95 0 0 > 4 0 18884 131844 86508 246500 0 0 0 20 122 532 0 0 100 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131844 86508 246500 0 0 0 0 124 538 0 0 100 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131844 86512 246500 0 0 0 12 123 539 0 0 98 2 0 > There is some method to find out what it is that causes the load average >4.0 ? Many thanks for your reply. -- Dario Lesca - sip:dario@solinos.it (Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 17 Gnome3)

3 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss