Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 92, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 16 Oct '12

16 Oct '12

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2012:1367 CentOS 6 setup FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2012:1372 CentOS 6 tar FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2012:1371 CentOS 6 kdebase FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:42:28 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1367 CentOS 6 setup FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20121015184228.GA21958(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1367 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1367.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d4257fb7919125c8b4366385c263c105e9284e51d3744077a89f0a7bd5e40f32 setup-2.8.14-20.el6.noarch.rpm x86_64: e919022a28a2da4ce1e0e65ae21a2449f3b4cd8d042fd02519d3023d5edb507b setup-2.8.14-20.el6.noarch.rpm Source: 34b56a659ff50390845fd6f93ca8463df88439f7a4b6f823b540e39bf1f30316 setup-2.8.14-20.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:07:05 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1372 CentOS 6 tar FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20121016110705.GA5880(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1372 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1372.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 009c3119174ae5eb9741aeb48d0d5b2702b33c9b50c7c9473792523a75b24cde tar-1.23-9.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: 1ddfaa60e939880f95a1d5bf178a5950efeb42b431bdaa93bf5e0f5a05d2ca14 tar-1.23-9.el6.x86_64.rpm Source: e6fffbfdc8183b425b18fc66c7cf3db9928710622c50112da6c4a2fd5c85e27f tar-1.23-9.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:07:32 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1371 CentOS 6 kdebase FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20121016110732.GA5969(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1371 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1371.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 155af7e3dfc0a447a1e83d264c3c57b2ca5b9a3e23ed943c088a5c7fe9cdb3b5 kdebase-4.3.4-6.el6.i686.rpm e480abdca79413133b54ccf6bcdb949094270f67b9bfa6f39e79ab300083d36b kdebase-devel-4.3.4-6.el6.i686.rpm 7f7ad9722069383910a94a29334550fbc7e64bee35ad154799d2ad17f2244b82 kdebase-libs-4.3.4-6.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: 80f4d28925b4e94f7fef6bbc3b00d698d28cb5b3543a27198a3a104d7cad7dc1 kdebase-4.3.4-6.el6.x86_64.rpm e480abdca79413133b54ccf6bcdb949094270f67b9bfa6f39e79ab300083d36b kdebase-devel-4.3.4-6.el6.i686.rpm 448a14bfa0a118632cad0424e1c0e9073bf451fb0ec08af1d2e88a9a05115a6c kdebase-devel-4.3.4-6.el6.x86_64.rpm 7f7ad9722069383910a94a29334550fbc7e64bee35ad154799d2ad17f2244b82 kdebase-libs-4.3.4-6.el6.i686.rpm 9233d7bc9f7ad71e6fd3d033203cf1eadd5b5225d6b7750a966b54f88edd3c67 kdebase-libs-4.3.4-6.el6.x86_64.rpm Source: 0b46972d6d2bb165474552a1376ac07de076e95f3c71285aaeb043cbc4fcaf58 kdebase-4.3.4-6.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 92, Issue 11 ***********************************************

1 0

Poor rsync performance after upgrade from 5.8 x86 to 6.3 x64
by Tim Nelson 16 Oct '12

16 Oct '12

Greetings- The subject sums it up... I have a Dell 2950 acting as a general purpose 'storage' machine, handling some NFS work for some local servers, and also pulling in rsync backups of some largish filesystems over SSH. These backups, prior to the upgrade were taking about 6 hours to complete (MANY small files). Now, after the upgrade, the same backups are taking about 16 hours to complete. The actual storage array in question (PERC 5i running RAID5) has not changed in any way, nor the filesystem (ext3). The only hardware change was an upgrade from 2GB to 16GB of RAM. Are there any issues with the filesystem being created by a 32bit OS, now used on a 64bit OS? I find it hard to believe rsync has gotten 'slower' in later versions.. :) All tips, pointers, suggestions, etc welcome. --Tim

3 3

Re: [CentOS] ext3 partition on LVM lost all data
by James B. Byrne 16 Oct '12

16 Oct '12

On Mon, October 15, 2012 05:03, HALAC Matej wrote: > > After I have installed and configured samba I wanted to mount the data > volume so that people could continue their work on Monday. > > Unfortunately the partition was empty. Only the lost+found directory > was present. > > Can you please tell me what went wrong? Or if this can be fixed > somehow? What is in the mount directory when the lv is not mounted? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

Apache, IPv4, IPv6, virtual hosts
by Luigi Rosa 16 Oct '12

16 Oct '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a CentOS 6 box with a single IPv6 and a /64 IPv6 I would like to have on the same box a name-based virtual host of Apache with IPv4 and an IP-based virtual host with IPv6. The only solution I have found so far is to run two instances of Apache, one on IPv4 and the other on IPv6. In your opinion, are there other solutions to this problem? Thanks. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ If you stick your head in the sand, one thing is for sure, you're gonna get your rear kicked. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlB6cvoACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZS57QCbBMVp2TELaOuinaXFQk9hlAxO lyoAnjy7+ztuXcG4kShXatuO16DsG7nS =FLer -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

yum update error
by Michael Simpson 15 Oct '12

15 Oct '12

Hi folks bit of an odd one over the last few days i have been getting [Errno 14] HTTP Error 500: Internal Server error Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=updates error was [Errno 14] HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error (though not just with updates but any mirrorlist from CentOS-Base and also fasttrack) this happens when trying to do a yum update when i try browsing to the mirrorlist address manually i get Sorry, the requested URL 'http://backend/?ra=xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx&&release=5&arch=…' caused an error: the x'd portion represents the boxes network address from my "provider independent" ipv6 space which i recently moved to I am dual-stacked everything else is working and cached mirrors appear to work ok using the baseurl instead also works but isn't something i want to do for long any ideas? mike

1 0

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 and php53
by John R Pierce 15 Oct '12

15 Oct '12

On 10/15/12 10:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > php is not resposible that braindead idiots develop software > without any knowledge - i prove the opposite with more than > 250.000 lines of code brough without pain from PHP 4.1 to > PHP 5.4 without any real problem gee, want to re-implement this site for me? I'll give you 100% of my payment for it.... oh yeah, 100% of nothing is... yeah, nothing. oh well. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

1 0

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 and php53
by John R Pierce 15 Oct '12

15 Oct '12

On 10/15/12 10:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > there are no exposures YOU KNOW about I could say exactly the same thing about *ANY* software, including 6.3.latest. your point? -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

1 0

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 and php53
by John R Pierce 15 Oct '12

15 Oct '12

On 10/15/12 2:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > any application which does not run years after 5.3 was released > and also a long time after 5.4 is released can be considered as > broken and insecure > > "requires a vey complex upgrade" > so you do not upgrade the application and ignore security-issues? get off that 'horse', it is an ass. the upgrade path would be to recreate the website from scratch with a different CMS, spending 100s of hours copying and reformatting old pages. its a hobby site, it works as is and I have better things to do with my time. In this case, the security exposures are purely if you allow untrusted users logins on this particular CMS. I limit authenticated user access strictly to a few trusted users (web editors), there are no exposures. from the perspective of an anonymous user, this particular website is purely static. as the server hasn't been hacked or defaced in 5 years, it appears my assumptions here are valid. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

1 0

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 and php53
by John R Pierce 15 Oct '12

15 Oct '12

>> >does that stand a reasonable chance of not blowing up in my face? > where should be a problem? > your changed configs are saved as .rpmsave as everytime while deal with rpm > I discovered that one of my older websites flat out won't work with php 5.3 and requires a vey complex upgrade. meh. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

3 3

CentOS 6 - Does EFI have an impact beyond the boot sequence?
by Mathieu Baudier 15 Oct '12

15 Oct '12

Hello, I am using an up to date CentOS 6 x86_64 laptop (Thinkpad X220t) and after struggling a bit I could install it a few months ago with a pure EFI boot. However, I am not really satisfied with such things as stability, power consumption, etc. and now that I have a little more time I want to investigate these issues thoroughly. So, my questions are: - Does EFI impacts other things than the boot sequence? (a friend of mine told me that this is a complete replacement of BIOS, and thus impacts "everything") - Could it change (improve?) stability, power consumption, etc. if I would reinstall CentOS 6 using the traditional boot? (or is it just a legacy wrapper around an EFI "BIOS"?) Thanks in advance for your advice or for providing more details about what you know about EFI pro and cons! Cheers, Mathieu

4 6

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss