Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 90, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2012:1176 CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2012:1177 CentOS 5 kdebase FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2012:1176 CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2012:1181 Moderate CentOS 5 gimp Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CEBA-2012:C001 CentOS 6 redhat-logos Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CEBA-2012:C002 CentOS 6 dhcp Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:15:56 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1176 CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120820111556.GA19670(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1176 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1176.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a6cd4b15ef3e4a0fd758ecbe42a1580d1ea42a55a7f58a167fbc4ef38ede18ad kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm 9d2cde8cca941a0274147b09697db0dac07b5712983a50b627bdd9a24cfc530b kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64: a6cd4b15ef3e4a0fd758ecbe42a1580d1ea42a55a7f58a167fbc4ef38ede18ad kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm 159ca45420765e0df36360d02fe7e38fcf934e4aa24b65191197466aa25d6305 kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 9d2cde8cca941a0274147b09697db0dac07b5712983a50b627bdd9a24cfc530b kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm 66b4211d4731cbf49d96798557018fa23504f17a09a848400222c507b110be4f kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 67d8f9f380da80addb6be75cbbd97da6c6fd723af7785f640f7871d3d2c92cb4 kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:21:36 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1177 CentOS 5 kdebase FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120820112136.GA19807(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1177 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1177.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 11525bb1b720c1d37bfe38f04f4f30262331e3a65c81a0a987bbf99f3cda87cb kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm b0a73645a6f1097dbee51ba4595828dbd103575aca3834933296675210f62569 kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64: 11525bb1b720c1d37bfe38f04f4f30262331e3a65c81a0a987bbf99f3cda87cb kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm 65d20fa7abbe779a15be0dbe363a7bedb53004e8ea2831f065671a35194ca721 kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm b0a73645a6f1097dbee51ba4595828dbd103575aca3834933296675210f62569 kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm a29f8b0c014d36410de09b98e576360a75b82b81791181843f3ece7844569564 kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 0247fc691af88e9a9d76dcbcdd96681df9321b0e2c20222f2bf16fa4220a61ef kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:02:54 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1176 CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120820150254.GA32551(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1176 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1176.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 49c2298279ef173ee6dc62fc0f9fd62ac46ed66848f3c4a0d2d2bb36b167c7a2 qt-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm e340ba08f9edd035ba5495dbc3772d04c74c751ebe0eca2ed508fb012e22206a qt-config-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm e12f73877484ecadabb92835f1981ed74f82769c3786652942120cf25fe83875 qt-designer-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm d20bc6d82d9f361095003c63bed226e956ebad285a8ea81aae7a2f03df1b85ea qt-devel-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm 2f62a8ac941b76e58a2391e1cae312d5ea80106c470805e8bffcb3bf01f3e53f qt-devel-docs-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm b124352b66f4295377a50e5d71d15f72f5dbfffd9ec473984f1b950b889d71a7 qt-MySQL-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm 036c5d427073a280058233cf9e7dd3628a85f8724cfec376b2d67b2fd224c9fc qt-ODBC-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm 96c0802b1c9ae649a86524f9de17bb66b77416d2ed50822a920fe4a5e5f23569 qt-PostgreSQL-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: 49c2298279ef173ee6dc62fc0f9fd62ac46ed66848f3c4a0d2d2bb36b167c7a2 qt-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm e65011594db81cf48f81a4c9fa095985fedd16511601985afad13136204c35cd qt-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm 37793bb00175f854cd890e8a16b39638fb1bffd83fd64eff89402aea8e7fe2e6 qt-config-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm 0fb16765336a1a0537b34e49ff0044346c4ef88d1eb1a8e767ab1fb5564627d7 qt-designer-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm d20bc6d82d9f361095003c63bed226e956ebad285a8ea81aae7a2f03df1b85ea qt-devel-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm 6af5c74db25894400b34abaf9f58fe9dc74c4b25a4cba99216f9bc4feabee597 qt-devel-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm 988bb8c27e76a5bfd29e5a4eef6b680986473dc989363ef8aabbaadbfe89f05d qt-devel-docs-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm 1125fd3d108a5f336f1187d717c0d33b0d89aabba25ccc2957cbc7b10a6784b2 qt-MySQL-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm c2d6f8d72784ace7ca2d49aea436a8f11ca047568085e8face33334fb44683ed qt-ODBC-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm 9d4110c3764ef4e9be1c72b01f8c70b2d70d03d5234a4808587cfcdcaa7f0f94 qt-PostgreSQL-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 6bf19f1a96296d55785d938b6532f6070add6f759b919917824cae44fdc94b99 qt-3.3.6-26.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:14:54 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1181 Moderate CentOS 5 gimp Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120820151454.GA302(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1181 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1181.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c44b76b8d8dc3913934f6196450bb9301d9df6b7aec601384a8268c7f92e90d5 gimp-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm e6c3cd9a0a73365bd85f6d2c009b14bd9a1ac322a96e383496f05cfb98921f17 gimp-devel-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm 25071e1980de80b9c1ff245bf771c3d4146528ec36c7ab563e70e3f44fafe344 gimp-libs-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm x86_64: 89770f7bd126caf4aec4985547cb826369e59fee508ab4762d9491030a285b37 gimp-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm e6c3cd9a0a73365bd85f6d2c009b14bd9a1ac322a96e383496f05cfb98921f17 gimp-devel-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm 6cc4a74f6c4836cd184f1b7d74badb7be5da4f6bdbb76307d994eec1db307acf gimp-devel-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm 25071e1980de80b9c1ff245bf771c3d4146528ec36c7ab563e70e3f44fafe344 gimp-libs-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm f140eca53b571b18ab36f4376925894eb11b1ee67754d4c17cfd2d4b19764076 gimp-libs-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm Source: 5537a6bc1099f8c59a05d79936e885788c3f49b6f6c42e9920149d5cfa75b58e gimp-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:32:05 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:C001 CentOS 6 redhat-logos Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120820153205.GA1854(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:C001 Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5704 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 74dbed48cbd714b3a7debeaebc4a093bbce9976dc76f144b9249e553b7793427 redhat-logos-60.0.14-12.el6.centos.noarch.rpm x86_64: 28de9ed3b8d891044155cdd9c4941a65352b3bd683c8cb008ab598a286b8a805 redhat-logos-60.0.14-12.el6.centos.noarch.rpm Source: b497c0c213c8e030a41ce3effe13d61e98c312756297d8938414d0363f350abc redhat-logos-60.0.14-12.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:33:57 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:C002 CentOS 6 dhcp Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120820153357.GA1967(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:C002 Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5889 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 387a38afe1b53b3f87665b6c7cd2cf0262bdfe18933b65bdc65c342c0d86f08f dhclient-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm 72b8765c4e6742169f67ee0b3441dbacef2331e4769d07807b1d50196f2b246c dhcp-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm c860a224d443cbfd832b730914393e54ff9a08755a9eff71bf8249b2f457baf7 dhcp-common-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm 20cdb4d34b32fc9f4bf61b6810ee61af70cefb2d2f79cffdd728a0d847442061 dhcp-devel-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 47417203c5fbfa436dc44b83c194c3119a7e639b435f57887aac0f2a3c2cdf9a dhclient-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm bf2ca9a40a93bf118e098557c76d0add80f0582df0fb2a0e372c164ffacca89b dhcp-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm 8d425858432225ba39bf903959da431a1da2607a7a060875debd3319d02a42bf dhcp-common-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm 20cdb4d34b32fc9f4bf61b6810ee61af70cefb2d2f79cffdd728a0d847442061 dhcp-devel-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm 952e3ac4cae9c98316c92ff925bddadc34cb9c6e820c93e49973bbe1f14704aa dhcp-devel-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 56b15a8ce8c4efc5e532be1ac83fef183ef5254099d1fca52e1506d39ce26dbb dhcp-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 90, Issue 11 ***********************************************

1 0

Wiki dead links CentOS-Fasttrack
by Leonard den Ottolander 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Hello, The links under the CentOS-Fasttrack paragraph at http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories all refer to non existent pages/files at mirror.centos.org. Where can one find the repo files and readme? Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

4 3

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x
by Joerg.Schilling＠fokus.fraunhofer.de 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote: > > This just verifies that you don't have a vi > > boah how often should we explain it until you > understand taht on CENTOS there is NO vi package > > there is only VIM Nice to see, that you finally realized it too..... Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js(a)cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

1 0

default gateway outside of the LAN
by Boris Epstein 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Hello all, We have a somewhat unique setup whereby our default router is outside of the local network. Let us say our network is 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0 So we have a route-eth0 file that looks something like this: 10.1.1.1 via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0 default 10.1.1.1 dev eth0 The last definition would simply not take - but it has to for the setup to work. And no, 192.168.10.1 does not operate as a full-fledge router due to our setup. When we attempt to add it manually we get the following error: RTNETLINK answers: No such process When we use ifup we get the following: Error: either "to" is a duplicate, or "10.1.1.1" is a garbage. A little discussion of this can be found here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.1/Deployment_Guide/s1-networkscripts-st… and here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/etc-init-d-netwo… It does not help us, however. Any tips much appreciated. Cheers, Boris.

4 5

better securing files on files servers
by Gregory Machin 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Hi. I have a couple of questions : I have inherited a file server that provides Samba and NFS file shares. We use a combination on file system acls and posix permissions . I'm looking to better secure access to the files by trimming some of the permissions etc. 1) What services could break if I change the umask from 022 to 007 thus by default only user and group have rw access to the files and directories ignoring facls ? 2) I have found that using samba and NFS to share the same file system are not so grate as when some windows file permissions are set this cause the file permissions to be more open eg permissions for other get set to rwx, when this is not wanted as over NFS this grants everyone access to the files. Is there a workaround for this ? 3) are there any best practices for configuring file system acls, that will ensure better data security , other then the obvious limiting of write and execute permissions. Any other recommendations around using NFS and Samba together ? Thanks G

1 0

LVM overhead? Does it cripple I/O?
by Smithies, Russell 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

For a high-performance system (64-cores, 512GB RAM, 5TB local disk, 110TB NFS-mounted storage) is there any advantage of dropping lvm and mounting partitions directly? We're not planning on changing partition sizes, but if we did we'd probably do a full rebuild. Has anyone done performance testing to show that lvm isn't crippling I/O? Thanx, Russell ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. =======================================================================

3 2

CentOS with sssd and samba4
by Steve Thompson 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

If you are authenticating your CentOS 6 systems using sssd from a samba4 DC using GSSAPI, I'd like to hear from you. I have been able to get it to work using only cleartext passwords in sssd.conf, and of course I'd prefer to use GSSAPI. Steve

1 1

DNS DoS attack
by Jussi Hirvi 17 Aug '12

17 Aug '12

Looks like one of my name servers (CentOS 5) gets a lot of malicious queries. The cpu load is constantly about 3 %. I put on stricter limits on who is allowed recursive queries, but this does not affect the CPU load. I also updated bind. I temporarily turned on querylog (command: rndc querylog), and noticed that I get over 200 queries like this per second: > Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 205.145.64.200#53: query (cache) 'ripe.net/ANY/IN' denied > Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 204.10.45.5#53: query (cache) 'ripe.net/ANY/IN' denied > Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 78.40.35.212#53: query (cache) 'ripe.net/ANY/IN' denied > Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2 named[6873]: client 207.207.3.126#53: query (cache) 'ripe.net/ANY/IN' denied Are there any ways to mitigate this, or do I just have to wait? - Jussi

5 6

stupid bash question
by Craig White 17 Aug '12

17 Aug '12

the relevant snippet is... NAME="*.mov" cd $IN if test -n "$(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit)" and if there is one file in this directory - ie test.mov, this works fine but if there are two (or more) files in this directory - test.mov, test2.mov then I get an error... find: paths must precede expression So my code is evidently wrong. I just want a test for 1 or more files ending in .mov in the directory? Any one want to toss me a bone here? -- Craig White ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ craig.white(a)ttiltd.com 1.800.869.6908 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ www.ttiassessments.com Need help communicating between generations at work to achieve your desired success? Let us help!

8 11

Software RAID woes due to GRUB
by SilverTip257 16 Aug '12

16 Aug '12

Hello, I recently cloned an old install from one server chassis to another via rsync. The old setup only had one disk and the new one is set up with two disks in a softraid. I managed to solve the problem and thought I'd present it here to benefit others. attempting to add sda3 to md2 says: mdadm: hot add failed for /dev/sda3: Invalid argument dmesg says: md: could not bd_claim sda3. md: error, md_import_device() returned -16 Drive is not mounted or in use by the OS. SMART error logs do not indicate any disk failures. I can boot up to a rescue CD and the array assembles just fine. Go figure the old install used partition labels to determine the boot device. So GRUB grabbed the first disk /dev/sda, on which root was label "/" or device /dev/sda3. So GRUB kept /dev/sda3 busy so that mdadm couldn't add it to the array. Changing the root= device kernel param in grub.conf to the raid device md2 and re-rolling the initial ramdisk cleared up the problem. It boots fine and assembles a healthy softraid now. Maybe it's a stupid item to overlook, but it certainly gave me a head scratcher for a bit. Have a laugh ... I certainly did when things were up and running properly again. ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss