Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2012:0332 Critical CentOS 4 samba Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2012:0331 CentOS 6 dracut Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:06:51 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0332 Critical CentOS 4 samba Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120224000651.GA4108(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0332 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0332.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: eef838fd9f66259aafeea6ed7376d513e6250ee62a390fd83190a90d7b8f6f87 samba-3.0.33-0.35.el4.i386.rpm eaab76dcd77a43b1e9fcfdbec8ff28f7978e6ad1e0162a9fb41f93d44b4faf03 samba-client-3.0.33-0.35.el4.i386.rpm 3d346c31a0f665b5548fd1126a9efb853e11dbe71f2bad1209b61f65d7871338 samba-common-3.0.33-0.35.el4.i386.rpm cd6ed45383313b5cd7fe035a7763246bffb94f9769df6cd48a81f7b3f9cb9d53 samba-swat-3.0.33-0.35.el4.i386.rpm x86_64: 42c141d895c9324d0f0d7d7e9714b00a432d88fcdac7440bd0756319920f09be samba-3.0.33-0.35.el4.x86_64.rpm f2f1b1e29c1f4ef856669ddd0d168ce6087bc74bb7d12b08dc24cdf3e309faec samba-client-3.0.33-0.35.el4.x86_64.rpm 3d346c31a0f665b5548fd1126a9efb853e11dbe71f2bad1209b61f65d7871338 samba-common-3.0.33-0.35.el4.i386.rpm f86c928d7116c34e9f18ccde896d4dd940fd0e4f6c91372789248d80e74665ad samba-common-3.0.33-0.35.el4.x86_64.rpm a8e3b785a2e942fc94f69e7d994803d9c9f30d6217f8471bde27fa5b39b08c45 samba-swat-3.0.33-0.35.el4.x86_64.rpm Source: 7232acd7cf5322b45c443ae6cac3ebdb12fef4fb171708aab40da4f13f58422f samba-3.0.33-0.35.el4.src.rpm -- Tru Huynh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: tru_tru, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:48:23 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0331 CentOS 6 dracut Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20120224024823.GA13321(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0331 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0331.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: cecfd9b8427f00a86396d3fe17192e80fe09c947eb5a9c32fffc30c097182cca dracut-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm c6258e549bd9c48bbc9453d331937e8feb6fa40139cf54868a59fdc0b672b3f1 dracut-caps-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 382564b6e9c2b76ee796c7d13a1d5cdb6c43be74977dada058216ca0abab9772 dracut-fips-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 3e853d7402191f0ef76b6feca9028672737f4ee85b91f19b70574641ac8a5a93 dracut-fips-aesni-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm bfdfb1cdadec54fa484c1accbab4328be3884c5a006ba700ba7b61af1caf8ec9 dracut-generic-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm aeb51dba14a384787f8ff6d4e263fa9d36976761c43e255deee1d43abfeaca6d dracut-kernel-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 49d9dda9b63d506745d07b9f66723a4aea41cde301358f0367c4382a68cf1c80 dracut-network-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 3e552d946e0ef1e39cd302cd216a27b5580a858cef517d32d2389bf9140f014b dracut-tools-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm x86_64: df18d1bdff238fcc7d7b33081e5b39caa2706bd54831d5b6fde992340a010b68 dracut-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 9a602d3d1a14e09ee7ca1e52b145b962ec1e1385a9d611fbc4f0cb10b9d52101 dracut-caps-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 55ea9376a1af09b96d930eb3376c2c3964bc0c7025a7aed62d12c2657b381f44 dracut-fips-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm b31629da3faabac2cd90d259c06f7c93daca90900c543411467c925cb2bd0222 dracut-fips-aesni-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 7ddb49f44882230ea004e5b5c2cdb5159bf4beb25d996532111535bf13621b5e dracut-generic-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 0b8c0fa7bbaeb8b9b45deb3027622cddf3ebf4ce4410e7f7de39bae8d1722def dracut-kernel-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm afd038b19b96a733ae114afd11f7c8baceb89675f65fcccf96836cc6da4ff7db dracut-network-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm 335c04602a1e74042f8851087d895c87d85609968c94d1af9612e0f0c6880d5b dracut-tools-004-256.el6_2.1.noarch.rpm Source: eaad09304508655c3428ba753a0a586dfff0c9bdd2180eb28d51b83c79c64eb0 dracut-004-256.el6_2.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 84, Issue 13 ***********************************************

1 0

Strange queries in httpd log
by Jussi Hirvi 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

How is it possible that I get this kind of queries on my webserver (extract from httpd access log): 58.218.199.250 - - [22/Feb/2012:15:23:06 +0200] "GET http://financeande.com/feed/feed.php HTTP/1.1" 404 291 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)" ...when the DNS shows that the domain financeande.com is hosted elsewhere? What kind of query can they have used? - Jussi

3 4

Re: [CentOS] Please I'd like to install 2 websites on my un managed VPS on CentOS6
by John R Pierce 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

On 02/23/12 12:54 PM, Wuxi Ixuw wrote: > Really thanks a lot for your reply. > Please is it possible if you have a little time to talk in messenger > or use team viewer to connect to my computer? > Thanks a lot :) I wouldn't do that sort of thing for less than US$1000/day. I'm way to busy to be doing your job too. (you can find much cheaper systems adminstrators, I'm an engineer). -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

3 2

e2fsprogs 1.42 EXT4 > 16TB RAID
by Steve Brooks 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

Hi All, I was thinking of using ext4 on a new raid system of 20TB. I had read the article (halfway done the page) titled "Linux File System Fsck Testing -- The Results Are In" https://www.ultimateeditionoz.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=26180 They used CentOS 5.7 (2.6.18-274 kernel) and they state "The stock configuration was used throughput the testing except for one component. The e2fsprogs package was upgraded to version 1.42, enabling ext4 file systems larger than 16TB to be created." I have looked for an "el6" version of "e2fsprogs 1.42" with no joy. Any ideas anyone? Cheers, Steve

1 0

Pam problems
by Steve Campbell 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

I'm having problems with what I think is PAM. Seems that ever since Centos 5, proftpd has had problems using pam, and with Centos 6.2 64 bit, I had to quit using it altogether with proftpd. Now I'm trying to set up SMTP AUTH using PAM as the pwcheck parm to saslauthd, and I can't setup new email accounts on my port submission (587) to work at all. We use this port of sendmail so outside users can send through our own email server. The crazy thing is that users that were setup previously before my migration from an older Centos 3 box to the new box can still use the port fine on the new server. But I can't get a new account to work. I'm not seeing any errors anywhere, but when trying to configure an account manually in Thunderbird, it fails whenever I use port 587. I've got a similar host on using old Centos 3 that still works fine and I'm using it as a model along with the settings on the original Centos 3 host that was replaced for most of my parameters. Anyone had any experience with sendmail and this sort of thing on Centos 6.2? I've stared at this thing for days and tried about everything I can think of. The yum says pam is up to date. I have at the least the same pam packages, if not more, on the new server as the old ones. Any help would be appreciated. steve campbell

5 21

centos 6 - 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other
by fakessh ＠ 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

hu guys I regularly read this list I can usually find me in the excellent documentation apache. I'm in front of a very strange problem I possess two desktop machines which works with the Apache server with centos 6 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other. I use the apache config file here that provides standard distribution any help for me sincerely -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting https://lists.fakessh.eu/mailman/ This list is moderated by me, but all applications will be accepted provided they receive a note of presentation

3 5

Really bad KVM disk performance
by Bob Puff 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

Hi Gang, I recently rented a server at a datacenter with Centos 5.7 X64, Q9550 Processor, 8GB Ram, and dual 250GB SATA HDs (with 16mb cache). They had loaded it with KVM, and installed a 30-day trial of Virtualizor as the front-end for KVM. I was so impressed with how fasts the guests ran that I want to build a few of these machines for myself. I just installed one: same Q9550 processor, 4GB ram, and dual 250GB SATA HDs (with 32mb cache). I installed Centos 6.2 X64, and installed Webmin's Cloudmin as the front-end. Immediately when I was installing stuff, I could tell this new system I just built was not nearly as fast as the first one. I ran some CPU and disk benchmarking programs, and saw that while the CPU stuff tested similarly, the disk thruput was much different... Down-right poor in one of the guests! On both systems, /dev/md2 is a LVM reserved exclusively for KVM guests. So each guest is running in its own logical volume, in software raid. Thinking there may be something wrong with the HDs, I ran Bonnie ( http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ ) and compared both host machines. They tested fairly similar (within 10%). Yet comparing their guests is like night and day. Example: On good machine's Centos 5.7 x32 guest install: # hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads: 26760 MB in 1.99 seconds = 13417.10 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 388 MB in 3.01 seconds = 128.86 MB/sec On my machine's Centos 5.7 x32 guest install: # hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads: 1864 MB in 2.16 seconds = 863.87 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 358 MB in 3.08 seconds = 116.17 MB/sec On one of my machine's Mandrake 8.2 x32 guest install: # hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing buffer-cache reads: 27000 MB in 2.00 seconds = 13500.00 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 12 MB in 3.66 seconds = 3.28 MB/sec On that system, the hdparm's -i output shows: # hdparm -i /dev/hda /dev/hda: Model=QEMU HARDDISK, FwRev=0.12.1, SerialNo=QM00001 Config={ Fixed } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=32256, SectSize=512, ECCbytes=4 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=256kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=73400320 IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 DMA modes: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5 AdvancedPM=no Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-5 published, ANSI NCITS 340-2000: * signifies the current active mode The bonnie numbers show for sequential output: Good Machine Host: 76,857K/Sec My Machine Host: 72,561K/Sec Good Machine Centos 5.7 Guest: 66,266K/sec My Machine Centos 5.7 Guest: 20,623K/sec My machine Mandrake Guest: 1,365K/sec Where should I look? I realize I do have two different front-ends to KVM, and perhaps they are passing different parameters to it. I am also running the KVM from Centos 6.2 on my machine, vs the other server is running on 5.7, but I would have thought that "newer is better". Also note that my hard drives have a larger cache. On a side note, I'm not thrilled with the Virtualizor's tech support, but the product seems easy to use, once it actually works. Cloudmin seems to be buggy, and not let you do things like change cd images on the fly, access the console before the machine fully boots (!)... Any suggestions on other, preferably open-source options? I'm a definite newbie to this virtualization stuff. Bob

5 4

System reboots automatically more or less every two days
by fabio.pugnaghi＠tiscali.it 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

Good Evening, I have a problem with CentOS 6.2. On December 2011 I installed CentOS 6.1 on a HP ProLiant DL 165 G7 server. Recentely I upgraded to CentOS 6.2 but at reboot the system didn't startup. So I removed new kernel kernel-2.6.32-220.4.2.el6 and CentOS was again able to startup with original kernel-2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64. But now every two days the system automatically reboots as you can see below: reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Wed Feb 22 22:53 - 17:10 (18:16) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Wed Feb 22 20:04 - 17:10 (21:06) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Fri Feb 17 22:55 - 17:10 (5 +18:14) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Fri Feb 17 07:05 - 17:10 (6 +10:04) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Wed Feb 15 15:02 - 17:10 (8 +02:08) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Mon Feb 13 00:33 - 17:10 (10 +16:36) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Sun Feb 12 16:08 - 17:10 (11 +01:02) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Sun Feb 12 15:00 - 17:10 (11 +02:09) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Thu Feb 9 18:06 - 17:10 (13 +23:03) reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Tue Feb 7 01:22 - 17:10 (16 +15:47) In log file /var/log/messages there are no particular events happened before system halt down. Have you some idea of how I can resolve these problems? Do you think they are correlated? Thank you for the attention. Fabio E' nata indoona : chiama, videochiama e messaggia Gratis. Scarica indoona per iPhone, Android e PC

6 8

Re: [CentOS] Please I'd like to install 2 websites on my un managed VPS on CentOS6
by Wuxi Ixuw 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

I'd like to learn indeed but feel like lost in a very big ocean. please if you may give any outline that would be awesome or even a title for a good book to start with. On 23/02/2012 09:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > and where is the difference between a real server and a VPS > in the context of a webserver -> hint: there is none! > > you have two choices: > > * read many manuals and learn the needed things > * to not use VPS at all and switch to a maintained hosting > > there is no easy way for " i have no technical knowledge but i > want to have simple instructions for making a secure root-server" > > if you have not the knowledge, not the time to learn > and not the money to let do people who can simply > do not such things! > > Am 23.02.2012 20:05, schrieb Wuxi Ixuw: > > Please suggest a one as I am keep goggling and all result bring books > dealing with linux as a real server and not a vps. > > On 23/02/2012 07:01 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Wuxi Ixuw<w7u64xi7(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> I am afraid if I get hacked and do not know what should i do to setup >>> the whole vps the right way. >> There are many large books on the subject. If you don't want to spend >> your life staying ahead of the game: >> Use popular software >> Don't change defaults you don't understand >> Keep it up to date >> Use good passwords >> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >

1 0

ViSpan
by Steve Campbell 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

I was looking for the old Vispan stuff, and it seems to have disappeared from the web. Now I realize it was old, but it did provide some details that I liked on my old servers. I've got mailscanner-mrtg running, but that only provides a view of what mailscanner sees. Does anyone know of a good replacement for vispan that might give complete stats on what the mail server is doing instead of just what MailScanner is doing? thanks steve campbell

5 8

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss