Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Problem with dates
by Weplica 07 Dec '11

07 Dec '11

Hello, I am instaling Horde on my CentOS 6, and when I do "webmail-install" I have a lots of this warnings: Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Lima' for 'PET/-5.0/no DST' instead in /usr/share/pear/Horde/Log/Logger.php on line 182 PHP Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Lima' for 'PET/-5.0/no DST' instead in /usr/share/pear/Services/Weather.php on line 166 I don't antdertand what I have to do to fix it, someones can help me please? Ernesto Bustos

2 3

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 82, Issue 4
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 07 Dec '11

07 Dec '11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEEA-2011:1789 CentOS 5 x86_64 tg3-kmod Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEEA-2011:1789 CentOS 5 i386 tg3-kmod Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEEA-2011:1792 CentOS 5 x86_64 igb-kmod Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEEA-2011:1792 CentOS 5 i386 igb-kmod Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:34:14 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1789 CentOS 5 x86_64 tg3-kmod Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20111206183414.GA26027(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1789 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1789.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 085b01a2392f719fb0e7e779971deb99 kmod-tg3-rhel5u7-3.119-2.el5_7.x86_64.rpm 67667e01c4db99e4f9570b81f7faba05 kmod-tg3-xen-rhel5u7-3.119-2.el5_7.x86_64.rpm Source: 1f24c31f4d61bef6648c910ae775b390 tg3-kmod-3.119-2.el5_7.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:34:14 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1789 CentOS 5 i386 tg3-kmod Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20111206183414.GA26012(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1789 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1789.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 19ced15df18da5a3b519127157bd548b kmod-tg3-PAE-rhel5u7-3.119-2.el5_7.i686.rpm 04ef24479aa68979237b14abe0affdd1 kmod-tg3-rhel5u7-3.119-2.el5_7.i686.rpm 3f68a694ca7c6ac7b56abb115e0f82c4 kmod-tg3-xen-rhel5u7-3.119-2.el5_7.i686.rpm Source: 1f24c31f4d61bef6648c910ae775b390 tg3-kmod-3.119-2.el5_7.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 14:07:07 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1792 CentOS 5 x86_64 igb-kmod Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20111207140707.GA19289(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1792 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1792.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 272a5533abed3f43a05c37c61d8dc36a kmod-igb-rhel5u7-3.0.6_k2_1-1.el5_7.x86_64.rpm 832ecad9aa8f1dee80553818085045c2 kmod-igb-xen-rhel5u7-3.0.6_k2_1-1.el5_7.x86_64.rpm Source: d2d76b5a0175f1aca5e29ceab8a9753a igb-kmod-3.0.6_k2_1-1.el5_7.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 14:07:06 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1792 CentOS 5 i386 igb-kmod Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20111207140706.GA19274(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1792 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1792.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 8d7f04d6f5766bf86fbdf0d4d9256cc7 kmod-igb-PAE-rhel5u7-3.0.6_k2_1-1.el5_7.i686.rpm a9bf8cedd22a8c19268b1d730371e97e kmod-igb-rhel5u7-3.0.6_k2_1-1.el5_7.i686.rpm 8fbdd517fd4b3be1926ea9a6a2b1d6b0 kmod-igb-xen-rhel5u7-3.0.6_k2_1-1.el5_7.i686.rpm Source: d2d76b5a0175f1aca5e29ceab8a9753a igb-kmod-3.0.6_k2_1-1.el5_7.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 82, Issue 4 **********************************************

1 0

yum with a proxy
by Philippe Naudin 07 Dec '11

07 Dec '11

Hello, While yum is configured to use a proxy, like this : [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch… #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 proxy=http://proxy.lasb:3128 it still make some attempts to connect directly to Internet (tcp 80). These attempts are denied and logged by the firewall. If I comment out the line mirrorlist= and uncomment the line baseurl= then there is no more direct connexion to Internet. (N.B. : in both cases, yum works well despite the access denied.) I have tried to add a line proxy= to fastestmirror.conf, but it doesn't change anything. I can't put proxy= in /etc/yum.conf because I also have a local repo. Any idea on how to avoid these connexion to Internet ? TIA, -- Philippe Naudin UMR MISTEA : Mathématiques, Informatique et STatistique pour l'Environnement et l'Agronomie INRA, bâtiment 29 - 2 place Viala - 34060 Montpellier cedex 2 tél: 04.99.61.26.34, fax: 04.99.61.29.03, mél: naudin(a)supagro.inra.fr

3 3

6.1 .iso size?
by Beartooth 07 Dec '11

07 Dec '11

I haven't managed to get hold of any DVD-R media, and the machine I particularly want to install on seems not to be able to see double- sided (which I do have). (It's not exactly a new PC.) So I can't get 6.0 onto it in the usual way. But I can wait till 6.1 comes out; it is possible to predict yet whether it will squeeze in under the DVD+R limit? -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.

18 59

Intel SE7210TP1-E giving memory errors
by Rob Kampen 07 Dec '11

07 Dec '11

Hi List, I've been getting the following EDAC memory errors EDAC MC0: CE page 0xeb0dd, offset 0x0, grain 4096, syndrome 0x45, row 3, channel 0, label "": i82875p CE and from this seeing that these errors have been corrected. Checking cat /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow3/ch0_ce_count gives me a count of 4 thus I now know that csrow3 - ch0 is the problem My question is, how does this map to the on board labels DIMM 1A DIMM 1B DIMM 2A DIMM 2B Am I correct in assuming csrow 3 is DIMM 2B? Also I have just discovered that both the OS drives sda and sdb have huge number of errors shown on the SMART records - can this relate to the memory errors?? - I am just really surprised to have two drives show almost identical number of errors at the same time, yet no apparent data errors - Drives are ATA ST380013AS 74.53 GB TIA for your insightful comments

5 9

Design question about VG / LV in a clustered environement
by Nicolas Ross 07 Dec '11

07 Dec '11

Hi ! Since the last couple of months, we had a few problems with the maner we designed our clustered filesystem and we are planing to do a re-design of the filesystems and how they are used. Our cluster is composed of 8 nodes, connected via fibre channel, to a raid enclosure where we have 6 pair of 1-tb drives in mirror, so 6 1tb physical volumes. First of all, our services that are run from the cluster are running inside of directories. For exemple, a webserver for a given application is run from /CyberCat/WebServer/(...) That directory contains all executable (apache, php for exemple) and the related data, except for the databases. /CyberCat being a single GFS partition containing several other services. This filesystem and another one like this containing services for some other clients occupy a single VG composed of 2 PV (total 2tb). The remaining (4) other PV are used in one 1tb VG each, and those VG contains only one LV that is used for databases servers. For availibility reasons, we are planing of spliting the /CyberCat (and the other one like it) FS into several smaller filesystems, one for each service. The reason being that in the event that we need to make a filesystem check, or any other unplaned reason, on any filesystem it won't affect other services. So, now comes the question I have : 1. First of all, is this a bad idea ? 2. Is there any disadvantages of doing a single volume group composed of many physical volumes, enabling us to move the extents of a logical volume from one physical volume to another one, so that load is more balanced in the event we need it. Thanks for the input.

1 0

[OT] posting bounties for rpms compatible with centos?
by Jason Pyeron 07 Dec '11

07 Dec '11

Is there an etiquitte to posting bounties to the centos community for OSS to be packaged in rpm form for centos? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

3 4

Seeing rlimits on CentOS 4
by Stephen Harris 06 Dec '11

06 Dec '11

This is probably something any SA should know... but I don't! On CentOS 5 I can see what a process's current soft and hard limits are; /proc/<pid>/limits However this isn't in the C4 kernel. Is there any easy way of determining what the process rlimit values are? % uname -a ; cat /etc/redhat-release Linux c4 2.6.20.7 #3 Sun May 2 16:30:15 EDT 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux CentOS release 4.8 (Final) (yes, I know this machine should be updated, but...) -- rgds Stephen

3 3

/dev/sda
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 06 Dec '11

06 Dec '11

We're just using Linux software RAID for the first time - RAID1, and the other day, a drive failed. We have a clone machine to play with, so it's not that critical, but.... I partitioned a replacement drive. On the clone, I marked the RAID partitions on /dev/sda failed, and remove, and pulled the drive. After several iterations, I waited a minute or two, until all messages had stopped, and there was only /dev/sdb*, and then put the new one in... and it appears as /dev/sdc. I don't want to reboot the box, and after googling a bit, it looks as though I *might* be able to use udevadm to change that... but the manpage leaves something to be desired... like a man page. The one that appears interesting to me is udevadm --test --action=<string>... and the actual command that would run, but there is *ZERO* information as to what actions are available, other than the default of "add". Clues for the poor, folks? mark

4 16

(no subject)
by Gagan Chohan 06 Dec '11

06 Dec '11

i have tried a lot but not able to get wireless .......................i am using dell 1470 14-r

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss