Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Using umask
by Todd Cary 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory attributes is becoming a pain. I understand the fundamentals of the file attributes, though from time to time I have to review the "sticky bit"; what I do not understand is where/how the attributes are set when a user creates or modifies a file/directory. Here is my situation: My /var/www/html files have been manually set by me to apache/apache 774. This allows my PHP applications to access the files, and I assume this is a "good" setting. Now, my server is connected via Samba to my desktop. If I create a file, it is todd/todd 744, so Apache cannot access them. If PHP (Apache) creates or modifies a file, it is apache/apache 755, so I cannot access them (Write/Delete). Is there a way to resolve this? When I FTP to a friend's rent-a-server, I can read/write/delete all of the files I have placed there *and* the same for files touched by PHP (Apache). My Linux Admin books as well as my Linux books do not appear to cover this and/or my experience is lacking. Todd -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 http://www.aristesoftware.com

8 11

Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6
by Keith Roberts 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

So has anyone actually got FF 5 working OK on CentOS 5.6 i686 32 bit yet? If so, is it actually worth taking the trouble to upgrade to FF 5, and what is the recommended way to do this upgrade please? Kind Regards, Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] -----------------------------------------------------------------

3 2

Exporting /dev/shm as NFS share?
by Emmanuel Noobadmin 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

I'm trying to do some network transfer test using NFS. The problem is when I try to eliminate the possibility of the hard disks being the bottleneck. I am unable to export /dev/shm as a NFS share. Initially there was an error about fsid or wrong filesystem. If I use a symbolic such as /home/test -> /dev/shm, on the remote system, this causes the NFS client to see its own /dev/shm If I mount /home/test as a tmpfs on the host and export it, the client also appear to use its own tmpfs rather than the host. Is there anyway to work around this or some other way to test the network speed without being bottlenecked by the sending side?

3 3

/dev/sd and /dev/mapper
by Steve Campbell 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

I've done a little research, and can't really find out why it happens, but on one server I have built, I get the old fashion /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 type partitions and on another server I get the /dev/mapper style partitions. Both machines are hardware raided (before the install) and both machines are Centos 5.5 64 bit, using the same set of CDs to install from. Can someone please explain why this happens? I'm not sure it matters, so this is just a curious bother. The machines are different brands with different raid controllers. Both were partitoned using the "custom layout" when installed. I'm thinking I must have overlooked a checkbox or something during the install. This is not a big deal, not a problem, it's just an itch in my brain. Thanks for any explanation. steve campbell

4 3

No DVD Mirrors - Only Torrent
by Always Learning 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

I love Centos. Have in on my data centre servers, my home servers, my laptop and my netbook. Yes there are serious and continuing security concerns relating to Gnome and KDE but they are not Centos. Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version. However none of the mirrors offer pure DVDs only Torrent versions which involve the possibility of bits being tampered with and things leaving my servers without explicit knowledge and authority. None of the CD / DVD sellers I have contacted can offer Centos 5.6 DVDs because, they say, they can't get a virgin 5.6 DVD only Torrent. FreeBSD 8.2 (the latest) offers a virgin 1 DVD download. The whole distribution is about 4 DVDs. Can Centos offer a virgin 1 DVD download of 5.6 for those of us who are unhappy about slow Torrent, the possibility of tampering and the traffic out of our machines ? BY THE WAY, a very BIG and GRATEFUL THANK YOU to the EXCELLENT TEAM that gave us the wonderful Centos 5.6. Very much appreciated and if KBS and the others ever venture out of Kent and London a bit northwards but south of Watford I would be delighted to buy him and the others several rounds of drinks. It makes me want to write an application for Linux. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU.

5 9

Chicken and egg question: passwd and cronjob
by Fajar Priyanto 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

Hi all, Let's say I activate password expiration for every account (including root) for every 90 days. I understand that cronjob for root will fail when the password expires. The question is, if I setup a cronjob every 90 days to renew the root password like: echo diFficulT123 | passwd --stdin root will it work? I mean at second 1 on the 90th day, which will run first? - The cronjob to renew the password - Or the password expiration, thus preventing the cronjob from running. Pardon me if it's silly. I know it's bad to change password from script, but the root acc is not used at all and has been disabled from logon remotely. I just need it to keep various cronjob to keep running. Any other advise are welcome.

3 4

how to find out what is causing high mysql cpu load
by Peter Peltonen 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

Hi all, I have a CentOS 5.6 xen domU that is used for hosting several Apache virtual hosts that use MySQL. Lately, this domU has been having performance issues and I've noticed web pages loaded from this server opening slower than usual. When I run 'top' I see mysqld constantly consuming 10-60% of CPU. sar reports average of 10-20 for %user, 5 for %system, 0.2 for %iowait and 10-20 for %steal When looking at 'xm top' in dom0 (running also CentOS 5.6) most of the other domUs have CPU(%) near zero and only this domU is reported to consume CPU more than 10%. The strange thing is, that when I run 'mytop', I do not see that many queries: I see avg of 4 users "sleeping" and occasionally some other user running a query. qps is mostly 0. No slow queries. Key efficiency is 97%. Here is my /etc/my.cnf: max_connections = 300 max_user_connections = 300 wait_timeout = 180 Nothing interesting in /var/log/mysqld.log. I tried rebooting both the dom0 and the domU which made no difference. Questions: 1. How to debug further why mysqld is taking so much cpu? 2. If I've understood correctly, the high steal% value reported by sar means that the hypervisor is giving cpu time for some other domU. How to find out why and where this cpu time is stolen to? Regards, Peter

1 0

OT: DHCP address pool for specific MAC manufacturer
by Raymond Lillard 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

Dear CentOS, This is somewhat off-topic, but I do hope to implement this on a CentOS system, so here goes... I would like to be able to setup a dhcpd (or like) daemon to maintain two IP address pools. One for devices whose leading three octets of the client MAC address are specified and the other for all other clients. Both pools would be a defined range on a commmon /24 subnet. There a several static IP devices also on this net (servers, printer, etc...). At no time would there be more than a dozen of the specified MAC range devices active. I considered splitting the /24 block into two /25 blocks and creating a shared-network with two subnets, but that still leaves no way to wild-card the lower 3 octets, which I cannot know in advance. In addition to DHCP, I've looked at DNSmasq and a few others but no joy. I don't see a solution that doesn't require a significant development effort. I'm off to think about possible doing this in perl. I still hope someone has already done this. Thanks, Ray

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 76, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2011:0885 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2011:0885 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CESA-2011:0887 Critical CentOS 5 i386 thunderbird Update (Karanbir Singh) 4. CESA-2011:0887 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 thunderbird Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:42:39 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0885 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110622234239.GA25567(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0885 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0885.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: ad9b56940b4288c3d9dfd0257f5a3dac firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm b0cf54789beb9bfd8170200a4e516e59 xulrunner-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.i386.rpm 70854a93a871dc3395715ab175050c8c xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.i386.rpm Source: 30a953fdffb16d1461326c4e9529d8cd firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.src.rpm 37e522c26a5a1bf7ca174d7b0bfc5d47 xulrunner-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:42:40 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0885 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110622234240.GA25583(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0885 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0885.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: f5376e8ff235069ed23d28580f75bad0 firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm eacf5c7510baa9ba57def0cb65518c23 firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm d997ba15827fe541851af08c61128d77 xulrunner-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.i386.rpm d4fb41dcf248c781a4d8ff0c7744c578 xulrunner-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.x86_64.rpm 32d153ef383452b50ca07f0dd39627d8 xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.i386.rpm 24360facb6006d6dbf47f8a4221b2915 xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.x86_64.rpm Source: 30a953fdffb16d1461326c4e9529d8cd firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.src.rpm 37e522c26a5a1bf7ca174d7b0bfc5d47 xulrunner-1.9.2.18-2.el5_6.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:49:49 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0887 Critical CentOS 5 i386 thunderbird Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110622234949.GA25668(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0887 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0887.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 092ecd00becfd2155a8d42f99b19f9a0 thunderbird-2.0.0.24-18.el5.centos.i386.rpm Source: bf2c5caa5c02b16210d259c8ba03144a thunderbird-2.0.0.24-18.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:49:49 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0887 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 thunderbird Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110622234949.GA25681(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0887 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0887.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: b846bdb7c086d9ac402bd6de4a0652df thunderbird-2.0.0.24-18.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: bf2c5caa5c02b16210d259c8ba03144a thunderbird-2.0.0.24-18.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 76, Issue 5 **********************************************

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Year in log files
by Fajar Priyanto 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:18 AM, lists-centos <replies-lists-b3z2-centos(a)listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > You should set that log to rotate annually. That should address your > issue, in addition to keeping logwatch from picking up year-old > entries. Yes it's rotated annually. That's why I can argue based on common sense, by comparing the CESA date and the occurance in the log file. But if there is year, I don't have to argue at all with the auditor.

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss