Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

iptables package issue
by Joseph L. Casale 08 Apr '11

08 Apr '11

I just did a test install off a netinstall iso to a mirror repo which left no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file in place. So a quick check: # yum whatprovides /etc/sysconfig/iptables --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=base --enablerepo=updates --disableplugin=\* No Matches found Without that file iptables doesn't start as per the init script. Anyone know what may be awry? Thanks, jlc

3 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 74, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 08 Apr '11

08 Apr '11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2011:0422 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 postfix - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2011:0422 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 postfix - security update (Tru Huynh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:13:18 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0422 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 postfix - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110408121318.GA31417(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0422 postfix security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0422.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/postfix-2.2.10-1.4.el4.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/postfix-pflogsumm-2.2.10-1.4.el4.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/postfix-2.2.10-1.4.el4.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update postfix Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

STOP THIS THREAD NOW!
by Kai Schaetzl 08 Apr '11

08 Apr '11

Folks, it has been asked a few times: PLEASE STOP THE "6 UPDATE" THREAD now! Developers: please just stop responding to that thread. It's not necessary to defend yourselves over a certain point (that has long been reached). Non-devs: if you think you can make a valuable contribution to centos infrastructure/development, please move over to centos-devel and make your serious offer *kindly* there. Any one else: JUST STOP, thanks! I'm really tired of this. Ralph: please unsubscribe everyone who can't shut his mouth. Thanks. A lot of of less-vocal people will thank you. Kai

9 10

Can anyone suggest a SCSI 3 card in either PCI-X or PCI-E x 4 for a Dell Poweredge 2900?
by Kevin Thorpe 08 Apr '11

08 Apr '11

The only PCI-X card I have is an old ICP Vortex RAID controller and the Dell hangs with that installed (BIOS is disabled). It's only for a tape drive so performance isn't really an issue. thanks

7 13

Controlling the order of /dev/sdX devices?
by Cal Sawyer 08 Apr '11

08 Apr '11

Hi CentOS 5.4(final) 2.6.18-164el5PAE. I am trying to prevent removable USB and eSATA devices from occupying /dev/sdX devices ahead of a 3ware RAID controller. For example: at boot, if a USB drive and eSATA HDD (connected to an LSI 1068E onboard controller, reflashed in "IT" mode to handle hotplug devices) were both present, they would occupy devices /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc, ahead of the RAID controller which ends up as /dev/sdd. As these are removable devices, they should normally get handled by custom udev script looking for adds matching KERNEL=="sd[c-z][0-9]" ,SUBSYSTEM=="block", so the volume handled by RAID controller gets grabbed by udev but fails to mount and subsequent udev plug events fails due the slots left empty below /dev/sdd. If no hotplug devices are present while booting, fstab handles mounting of the system and RAID volume: SATA system HDD /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / RAID array LABEL=STORE /store ## mounts == /dev/sdb1 I realise this description is kind of a tangle, but i am essentially looking for a way to hard-map the 3ware RAID controller to /dev/sdb (UUID won't work as there are multiples of this system) before PCI (?) enumeration picks up the USB and LSI-managed devices so that udev can take care of the device at /dev/sdc and above. I've tried blacklisting the mpt and usb-storage modules and short-circuiting SUBSYSTEM=="block" devices in 05-udev-early.rules, all with zero or negative effect. rc.sysinit doesn't appear to be the right place and that's about as deep down as i know how to go. cheers, cs

8 8

Kernel Panic on HP/Compaq ProLiant G7
by Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

Hello Everyone, I recently installed CentOS 5.5 x86_64 on a brand new ProLiant DL380 G7. I have identical OS software running reock-solid on two other DL380 ProLiant servers, but they are G6 models, not G7. On the G7, the installation went perfectly and the machine ran great for about 2 weeks, when it just seemed to "stop". The system stopped responding on the network, and there was no video on the console (or remote console via iLO). It would not reboot or cold boot through iLO, I actually had to hold the power to turn it off and then hit it again to power up. This happened several times within a few days of each other. Each time, there was no evidence in any logs of a problem - the system just seemed to stop or lock up. We did have a CPU problem light appear on the front, so HP came in and replaced the one 4-core CPU. Since then, it has run as long as two weeks, but still crashes randomly. After the last reboot, I left the console in text mode on vt1, and when it crashed again this morning this was displayed on the screen: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff8100dc435cf0 CR3: 000000008a6ca000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Process smbd (pid: 18970, threadinfo ffff81001529e000, task ffff81011f5347a0) Stack: ffff81011e4e71c0 0000000000000000 ffff8100cf12a015 ffffffff80009c41 ffff81011e4e71c0 0000000100000000 000000030027ea9d ffff8100cf12a011 ffff81011e4e71c0 ffff81010d9cf300 ffff81011e4e71c0 ffff8101044099c0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff80009c41>] __link_path_walk+0x3a6/0xf5b [<ffffffff8000ea4b>] link_path_walk+0x42/0xb2 [<ffffffff8000cd72>] do_path_lookup+0x275/0x2f1 [<ffffffff80012851>] getname+0x15b/0x1c2 [<ffffffff800239d1>] __user_walk_fd+0x37/0x4c [<ffffffff80028905>] vfs_stat_fd+0x1b/0x4a [<ffffffff80039fa2>] fcntl_setlk+0x243/0x273 [<ffffffff80023703>] sys_newstat+0x19/0x31 [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Code: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 70 4d 4f 9d 00 81 ff ff 98 e4 4b dc RIP [<ffff8100dc435cf0>] RSP <ffff81001529fd18> CR2: ffff8100dc435cf0 <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception This suggests that something happened in a Samba process. I have the Samba3x packages installed since we are beginning to introduce Win7 clients into our environment. Googling "Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception" and "CentOS" produced many hits, but nothing that seemed to exactly match my problem. Since this is the only G7 server I have here right now, I can't reproduce the problem on another machine. The G6s I have running the identical version of CentOS have no problems. I am trying to determine if this is pointing to a hardware or software issue. Some of the Google results suggested using a Centosplus kernel - is this a good idea? The server is a HP DL380 G7 Server with 4 GB RAM (1 DIMM 1333 MHz), one 4-core CPU (2133 MHz), 4 built-in Broadcom "NetExtreme II BCM5709 II Gigabit Ethernet" NICs, and a P410 Smart Array Controller. The P410 and the system BIOS have both been updated to the latest levels to see if that fixes the crashes, with no change. Any idea where I should look next? Thanks for any help anyone can provide! Best Regards, Dave Windsor Robert Bosch LLC Team Leader, MES Database Infrastructure Group (AdP/TEF7.1) 4421 Highway 81 North Anderson, SC 29621 USA www.bosch.us Tel: 1 (864) 260-8459 Fax: 1 (864) 260-8422 Dave.Windsor(a)us.bosch.com

11 21

Centos 6 Update?
by David Brian Chait 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

All, As much as I hate to ask, how is this project coming along? We are approaching the 4 month post-release point... -David

11 11

centos 5.6 live cd - not installable to " hard drive?"
by Johan Scheepers 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

Good day, Downloaded centos 5.6 live cd from... http://mirror.nexcess.net/CentOS/5.6/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.6-x86_64-LiveCD.i… it is dated 06-04-2011. No option to install on hard disk. Have I missed it somehow? Please some advice. Maybe the address if an installable cd iso please. Thanks Johan

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
by Les Mikesell 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

On 4/7/2011 8:47 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >> Of David Sommerseth >> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:42 PM >> To: centos(a)centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update? >> >> Which is why I'm investigating a migration to Scientific Linux. > > [Lurking on the sideline and watching the argument(s)]: > > Funny how these discussions come up just in time for each new release... They come up every time that the methodology and resources of the developers don't produce the results expected by the users. The fact that this has historically only happened around release times is coincidental. People are (correctly) fearful of putting blind faith in optimistic engineers who say everything will be fine without saying why they believe that or why they reject suggestions for changes that might be improvements. While SL and other distributions are perfectly fine for almost all uses, there's a certain irony in the fact the single advantage of CentOS is the ease of converting from it to a paid/supported RHEL installation, and the RH changes that make the rebuild difficult are driving people away. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

8 13

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
by Hendrik 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

2011/4/6 Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org>: > On 04/06/2011 09:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> That's not hard to do - stop reading them then. >> >> And once again we are avoiding a proper solution. >> > > No, once again you dont understand the issues, the problem or the > efforts going into the solution. > > Really, try stopping reading for a few weeks. You might surprise yourself. Do you notice nothing? Or is that the Indian mentality? -- Hendrik

13 14

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss