Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Looking for back versions of centos 3
by Bruce Ferrell 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

so far all the mirrors I've checked have 3.9 in the directory for 3.x Can anyone tell me how to get back versions? I'm looking for 3.4 or 3.5 Thanks in advance Bruce Ferrell

6 7

some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
by Larry Vaden 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:46 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd(a)gerdesas.com> wrote: > issue? I don't get it. You seem to think that money is the end > all be all for OSS. I would suggest that's a mindset you may > wish to change as money doesn't drive OSS. Are you saying there are no OSS folks who have lost their houses, their cars and their Internet connections and therefore have difficulty continuing contributing to OSS projects? I hope that is the truth, but I sincerely doubt that it is. Not substantially different in spirit than OSS is our Community Networking Grant program which supports ~ 300 not-for-profits. When we began in 1995, we offered free Internet connections to each school, library and hospital in our service area of 43 counties in north Texas. The recent downslide in the economy has made that immeasurably more difficult to continue, but we are continuing with it for another year. kind regards/ldv/vaden(a)texoma.net

9 16

Looping Device unmounting problem
by dixan rodriges 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

Dear All, I have created 252 loop devices in my system and i mounted few iso filses into loop devices .when i rebooting the system error showing "faild to umount " how can forcefully umount the loop device -- Thanks and Regards, -------------------------------------- Dixson Rodriges, Sr.Support Engineer, MoB:+91-9388534765,09249500533 Email: dixan23@gmail.com,amdixan@gmail.com

3 2

Flash No Longer Supported on RHEL 4
by Ben Mohilef 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

>From RHSA Announce: [RHSA-2011:0259-01] Critical: flash-plugin - 1-Month End Of Life Notice > The flash-plugin package on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 contains multiple > security flaws and should no longer be used. This is the 1-month > notification of Red Hat's plans to disable Adobe Flash Player 9 on Red Hat > Enterprise Linux 4. > > The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having critical > security impact. Adobe's security caveats apply to Linux as well as Windows. regards, benm

2 1

Can't create mirrored LVM: Insufficient suitable allocatable extents for logical volume : 2560 more required
by Rudi Ahlers 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

I'm trying to setup a LVM mirror on 2 iSCS targets, but can't. I have added both /dev/sda & /dev/sdb to the LVM-RAID PV, and both have 500GB space. [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# pvscan PV /dev/cciss/c0d0p2 VG LVM lvm2 [136.59 GB / 2.69 GB free] PV /dev/sda VG LVM-RAID lvm2 [500.00 GB / 490.00 GB free] PV /dev/sdb VG LVM-RAID lvm2 [502.70 GB / 492.70 GB free] Total: 3 [1.11 TB] / in use: 3 [1.11 TB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# vgscan Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... Found volume group "LVM" using metadata type lvm2 Found volume group "LVM-RAID" using metadata type lvm2 I can add a single LVM volume: [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvscan ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/root' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/swap' [3.91 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/data' [120.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol0' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol1' [10.00 GB] inherit [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvcreate -L 10G LVM-RAID Logical volume "lvol2" created Yet, when I try and add a mirror, I get this: [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvcreate -L 10G -m1 LVM-RAID Insufficient suitable allocatable extents for logical volume : 2560 more required Unable to allocate extents for mirror(s). I can create a stripe though: [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvcreate -L 20G -i2 -I64 LVM-RAID Logical volume "lvol3" created [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvscan ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/root' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/swap' [3.91 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/data' [120.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol0' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol1' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol2' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol3' [20.00 GB] inherit I could even create a large stripe: [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvcreate -L 600G -i2 -I64 LVM-RAID Logical volume "lvol4" created [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvscan ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/root' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/swap' [3.91 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM/data' [120.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol0' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol1' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol2' [10.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol3' [20.00 GB] inherit ACTIVE '/dev/LVM-RAID/lvol4' [600.00 GB] inherit [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# pvscan PV /dev/cciss/c0d0p2 VG LVM lvm2 [136.59 GB / 2.69 GB free] PV /dev/sda VG LVM-RAID lvm2 [500.00 GB / 180.00 GB free] PV /dev/sdb VG LVM-RAID lvm2 [502.70 GB / 172.70 GB free] Total: 3 [1.11 TB] / in use: 3 [1.11 TB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] But, the mirror keeps failing: [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# lvcreate -L 10G -m1 LVM-RAID Insufficient suitable allocatable extents for logical volume : 2560 more required Unable to allocate extents for mirror(s). This is on CentOS 5.5 x64 [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.5 (Final) [root@HP-DL360 by-path]# uname -a Linux HP-DL360 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 18:44:24 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Does anyone know why this happens? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532

1 0

apache 2 and php 5.2
by Paul A 16 Feb '11

16 Feb '11

Hi originally I installed php 4 on centos 5.5 and then a few repos including the remi repo to upgrade to php5, which seems to upgrade/work without any issues. However when I make a change to the /etc/php.ini file it doesn't look like apache is seeing it, for example if I change the post_max_size and upload_max_file to 25M each apache still sees the default 2M. I also removed the /etc/php.ini file and apache is able to start with no problems and it will still see the default 2M. I was wondering if anyone can tell me why apache is not taking the settings from the /etc/php.ini file and it works without that file. Thanks, Paul rpm -qa php php-5.2.17-1.el5.art rpm -qa httpd* httpd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 [root@testip5 html]# httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.3 Server built: Aug 30 2010 12:32:08 Httpd -M php5_module (shared) php --ini PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php/modules/pdo_odbc.so' - /usr/lib/php/modules/pdo_odbc.so: undefined symbol: php_pdo_get_dbh_ce in Unknown on line 0 Configuration File (php.ini) Path: /etc Loaded Configuration File: (none) Scan for additional .ini files in: /etc/php.d Additional .ini files parsed: /etc/php.d/Fileinfo.ini, /etc/php.d/curl.ini, /etc/php.d/dba.ini, /etc/php.d/dbase.ini, /etc/php.d/dom.ini, /etc/php.d/gd.ini, /etc/php.d/imap.ini, /etc/php.d/json.ini, /etc/php.d/ldap.ini, /etc/php.d/mbstring.ini, /etc/php.d/mcrypt.ini, /etc/php.d/mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/mysqli.ini, /etc/php.d/odbc.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_mysql.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_odbc.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_pgsql.ini, /etc/php.d/pdo_sqlite.ini, /etc/php.d/pgsql.ini, /etc/php.d/soap.ini, /etc/php.d/wddx.ini, /etc/php.d/xmlreader.ini, /etc/php.d/xmlrpc.ini, /etc/php.d/xmlwriter.ini, /etc/php.d/xsl.ini, /etc/php.d/zip.ini

4 14

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?
by Gerhard Schneider 16 Feb '11

16 Feb '11

Perhaps I'm a little bit pragmatic, but.. I will upgrade to 5.6 when it's out - BUT I'm not really angry when CentOS 6 would be CentOS 6.1 - if you want to be beta tester for a large distibution you still can shift to Ubuntu.. GS -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs(a)ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Structural Biomechanics (E317) Tel.: +43 664 60 588 3171 Vienna University of Technology / Austria Fax: +43 1 58801 31799 A-1040 Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29 http://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/~gs/

2 1

kmod-e1000e and Intel Network Card
by Soporte Virtual 16 Feb '11

16 Feb '11

Hi list It's my first message here, but I use CentOS from long time ago (sorry my language, I'm spanish from Colombia) I have a Intel board with an Integrated Network Card 82578DC. I've sucessfully installed the driver with the RPM kmod-e1000e; I've found it in ElRepo.org, and I've installed it via Yum. After I've installed the package (see this: http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2010-December/000416.html ), I do: ifdown eth1 modprobe -r e1000e ifup eth1 After these steps, my card works OK and get a valid IP address. However, when I reboot my machine, I must write those commands again. I've tried to put e1000e in /etc/modprobe.d/blachlist; however, it doesn't works. Does anubody knows what must I do to have my network card working from start? Thanks!

3 5

Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
by Larry Vaden 16 Feb '11

16 Feb '11

Hello CentOS Community Members, What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago on the isc.org mailing list. Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current vintage for such important functions as BIND et al? That question is based on the presumption that time is taking us to a more complete and correct implementation of the basic functions like DNS. IOW, is CentOS philosophy of tracking RH so nailed-to-the-wall that it is blasphemy to propose a REPO of current editions of certain very important functions? kind regards/ldv A quote from a long term mentor now at Internet2: "It's fundamentally wrong for RedHat to attempt to backport security patches for such a fundamental service. I'd cuss a blue streak about this point, in fact, except that I don't want to trigger the anti-cuss features at Dr. Vaughn's place of employment." === Reported: 2010-02-03 05:32 EST by Duncan (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561299) Additional info: Works fine in Fedora 4,8,9 and 11, Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 release 4 (Nahant Update 8) and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga) Fails in 5.4 and Fedora 10.

7 14

Authentication Problems
by James Bensley 16 Feb '11

16 Feb '11

Hi List, We have a CentOS VPS running a web site in a DC far away. The chap that dev's this site told me he couldn't SFTP in yesterday, his password was being rejected (I went to his desk to confirm and saw it was telling him the password was incorrect but neither him nor me had changed it and we are the only two with access to this VPS). So I logged in as root and reset his password, be he still couldn't log in (same problem, claiming the password was wrong). [root@server ~]# passwd webdevuser Changing password for user webdevuser. New UNIX password: Retype new UNIX password: passwd: all authentication tokens updates successfully. I tried to SSH in as the web dev user and it wouldn't let me in. Returning back to my root console window; [root@server ~]# su - webdevuser [webdevuser@server ~]# passwd Changing password for user webdevuser. Changing password for webdevuser. (current) UNIX password: passwd: Authentication token manipulation error Firstly; I am stracthing my head as to why his password was no longer working in the first place? Secondly; Why I can't reset it? Googling around many people suggest there is a discrepancy between the /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow files and by deleting /etc/shadow and using pwconv to recreate shadow and the same for /etc/groups, deleting gshadow recreating it with grpconv will solve the problem but I still can't login as the web dev user. Any ideas anyone? -- James. http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand Vigesimal, and J others...?

5 10

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss