Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Problem starting PostgreSQL-8.4 with SSL
by James B. Byrne 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

I installed PG-8.4 for Redhat from the PG84 repo. Everythign works save only that when I try to enable ssl connections then I get this error: Auto configuration failed 16276:error:0E065068:configuration file routines:STR_COPY:variable has no value:conf_def.c:629:line 207 I have verified that the server key and certificate are present, have the correct ownership (postgres:postgres), permissions (600) and that the certificate is valid. Validity Not Before: Dec 6 17:58:47 2010 GMT Not After : Dec 7 17:58:47 2015 GMT I have checked audit.log and there are no SELinux issues reported. I gather that this is an OpenSSL error of some sort but I have no clue what it means or where to search for the problem. Does anyone here know what this means and how to fix it? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

# chkconfig: kill at run level 3
by Michael D. Berger 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

In the control script of my daemon in /etc/init.d?, I have # chkconfig: 35 97 3 The result of this is that I have links: /etc/rc.d/rc1.d/K03... /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S97... /etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S97... As mentioned in a previous thread, my complex daemon throws an exception when I shutdown. Perhaps things might be better if I had: /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/K03... Might this be a good idea? If so, how can I make it happen automatically? Thanks, Mike.

8 16

2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 NFS4 race conditions?
by Gerhard Schneider 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

Are there any known race conditions with 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 x86_64 and NFS4? Today a user managed to shut down two identical Intel servers by copying a simple text file via NFS4. Reverting back to 17.1 made the error disappear. On other non-identical hardware the error was not reproducible (so it must be a combination of hardware and this special kernel revision). Anybody interested in a kernel dump? It's only 16GB. I could install kernel-debuginfo and try to get something out of the dump.. Gerhard Schneider -- Gerhard Schneider e-Mail:gs@ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Institute of Lightweight Design and Tel.: +43 664 60 588 3171 Structural Biomechanics (E317) Fax.: +43 1 58801 31799 Vienna University of Technology / Austria DVR: 0005886 A-1040 Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29 http://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/

1 0

Centos DS and user password change
by Stanislav Vlasov 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

[stas@ds ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.5 (Final) [stas@ds ~]$ rpm -qa | grep centos-ds centos-ds-admin-8.1.0-9.el5.centos.1 centos-ds-8.1.0-1.el5.centos.2 centos-ds-base-8.1.0-0.14.el5.centos.2 centos-ds-console-8.1.0-5.el5.centos.2 ds installed for: 1) linux workstations authentication 2) mail (accounts & aliases) 3) samba 4) squid acls Exists several r/o replicas. All services and workstations work with replica, not with main server. Now i need some interface for change user's own password by user. Password change must be on main server. I try login by user to main server, and i can't change own password. Added that ACL (via centos-idm-console): (targetattr = "userPassword") (version 3.0; acl "ChangePass"; allow (write) (userdn = "ldap:///self") and (dns="*.neyvabank.ru") ;) No effect. How i can give rights to users for change passwords? -- Stanislav

2 1

DVD drive ownership/permissions group ownership = mail?
by Dave 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

I can change the group ownershipp of the DVD drive, but if I log out & in again it changes back. Is there a way to make a change permanent? How could I figure out what process is changing this back? ls -la /dev/scd0 brw-rw---- 1 root mail 11, 0 Nov 12 15:17 /dev/scd0 mahalo, Dave

3 2

networking printer
by ann kok 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

Hi all I would like to ask linux can do the networking printer as window Share it to office environment If yes, any brand name and concern Any documentation also Thank you so much

6 5

Yum Updates dependencies missing (rpmforge)
by Lanny Marcus 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

There are updates available, for the below multimedia packages (CentOS 5.5, 32 bit), but I'm getting missing dependency errors from yum update for these. ---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.2.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package ffmpeg.i386 0:0.6.1-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package ffmpeg-libpostproc.i386 0:0.6.1-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package gstreamer-plugins-ugly.i386 0:0.10.11-2.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package kino.i386 0:1.3.4-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package libquicktime.i386 0:1.2.1-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package lzo.i386 0:2.04-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package mplayer.i386 0:1.0-0.44.svn20100703.el5.rf set to be updated Probably anyone wanting to update the above packages should wait a day or two and hopefully the dependencies will become available. Lanny http://www.magazines-magazine.com/

5 4

Any chance to get a working, current openldap srpm/rpm for centos 5.5
by Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator 06 Dec '10

06 Dec '10

Hello, is there anyone out there, who has a current 2.4.23 srpm or good how to compile it from src with supported db4? I tried to compile recent source files, but always finding the current (installed) db4 >4.3 fails. Than I tried to compile the LTB Project Files: http://ltb-project.org/wiki/documentation/openldap-rpm May be it is just a small step or option to be set. Would be nice to get it working :-) Thanks and best regards Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reinicke(a)filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. Claudia Hübner Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt

5 7

XFS or EXT3 ?
by Keith Roberts 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

There was a similar thread about which is the best FS for Centos. I'm using ext3, and wondered if XFS would be more 'data safe' than ext3. I had a 100GiB ext3 partition, and it took up 1.75GiB for FS administration purposes. I reformatted it to XFS, and it only used 50.8MB! I now have a fresh new drive to install my root Centos system onto, and wondered about creating the partitions as XFS? What about the XFS admin tools - do these get installed when you format a partition as XFS from anaconda, or are they a seperate rpm package, installed later? Kind Regards, Keith Roberts -- In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they are not. This email was sent from my laptop with Centos 5.5

15 24

Fiddling with software RAID1 : continue working with one of two disks failing?
by Niki Kovacs 04 Dec '10

04 Dec '10

Hi, I'm currently experimenting with software RAID1 on a spare PC with two 40 GB hard disks. Normally, on a desktop PC with only one hard disk, I have a very simple partitioning scheme like this : /dev/hda1 80 MB /boot ext2 /dev/hda2 1 GB swap /dev/hda3 39 GB / ext3 Here's what I'd like to do. Partition a second hard disk (say, /dev/hdb) with three partitions. Setup RAID1 like this : /dev/md0 80 MB /boot ext2 /dev/md1 1 GB swap /dev/md2 39 GB / ext3 I somehow managed to get this far. Here's what I have : [root@raymonde ~]# fdisk -l /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 41.1 GB, 41110142976 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4998 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 11 88326 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hda2 12 134 987997+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hda3 135 4998 39070080 fd Linux raid autodetect [root@raymonde ~]# fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disk /dev/hdb: 41.1 GB, 41110142976 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 79656 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 * 1 156 78592+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hdb2 157 2095 977256 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hdb3 2096 79656 39090744 fd Linux raid autodetect During install, my /dev/md1 and /dev/md2 got somehow mixed up, which doesn't really matter : [root@raymonde ~]# cat /etc/fstab /dev/md1 / ext3 defaults 1 1 /dev/md0 /boot ext2 defaults 1 2 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/md2 swap swap defaults 0 0 I wasn't sure where to install GRUB, so I chose /dev/md0. I was wondering if this setup theoretically enabled me to continue working with one disk failure. So I tried unplugging the power cord of one of my hard disks... which resulted in a "GRUB Disk Error" on boot. Question : is there a way to still run the system with either of the two disks "damaged" (in this case : unplugged)? And if so, how would I have to go about it in my setup? Cheers from the freezing South of France, Niki

3 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss