Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Tyan s4985 motherboard and lm_sensors
by Tom Bishop 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

Trying to get cpu temps from lm_sensors for a Tyan s4985 motherboard, just installed centos 5.4. Tyan release some lm_sensors conf files and other information which I have done, but I am not getting any cpu temps. I was wondering if anyone out there was running this board and if you have gotten temps working for your cpu, here is my output...Thanks in advance. w83627hf-isa-0c00 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.52 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) VCore 2: +1.55 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) +3.3V: +3.49 V (min = +2.82 V, max = +3.79 V) +5V: +5.24 V (min = +6.40 V, max = +5.54 V) ALARM +12V: +5.78 V (min = +12.28 V, max = +12.28 V) ALARM -12V: -6.93 V (min = +6.06 V, max = +5.65 V) ALARM -5V: -3.84 V (min = +2.49 V, max = +0.28 V) ALARM V5SB: +5.73 V (min = +6.69 V, max = +5.86 V) ALARM VBat: +3.09 V (min = +1.66 V, max = +0.82 V) ALARM fan1: 0 RPM (min = 10227 RPM, div = 2) ALARM fan2: 0 RPM (min = 6250 RPM, div = 2) ALARM fan3: 0 RPM (min = 2789 RPM, div = 2) ALARM temp1: +41°C (high = -54°C, hyst = -54°C) sensor = thermistor ALARM temp2: +43.0°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor temp3: +45.5°C (high = +80°C, hyst = +75°C) sensor = thermistor vid: +0.000 V (VRM Version 0.0) alarms: beep_enable: Sound alarm enabled

1 0

Re: [CentOS] which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better
by Les Bell 02 Jan '10

02 Jan '10

ann kok <oiyankok(a)yahoo.ca> wrote: >> Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by date? << The book "Perl for System Administration ", (David N. Blank-Edelman, O'Reilly, 2000) has a chapter on using Perl to analyse log files, rotate and compress them, etc. Luckily, this chapter is the "free sample" they provide online - see http://oreilly.com/catalog/perlsysadm/chapter/ch09.html Sorted. I mean, problem solved. Best, --- Les Bell [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 9451 1144

1 0

which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better
by ann kok 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

Hi I have apache log file around 7.6G and record half year Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by date? and finally I can remove that big file and still keep the record. I have problem when using vi and it uses up the server memory Thank you for your help __________________________________________________________________ Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane with All new Yahoo! Mail: http://ca.promos.yahoo.com/newmail/overview2/

4 3

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up
by Jerry Geis 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

lists-centos wrote: > What IPnumbers did you give the two new machines? What does your DNS > look like. > > >From the outside, mail will be delivered to the MX- (or if that > doesn't exist A-) record machine (based on the IPnumber in the DNS > record) for the FQDN on the message. > > - Rick > > ------------ Original Message ------------ > >> Date: Friday, January 01, 2010 02:27:12 PM -0500 >> From: Jerry Geis <geisj(a)pagestation.com> >> To: CentOS ML <centos(a)centos.org> >> Subject: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more >> > servers messes things up > >> Hi all, >> >> I had one server running centos 4.7 i686 everything was fine with >> incoming mail. >> >> I now added two more servers centos 5.4 x86_64 and gave them >> machine names all >> part of the same domain as machine 1. I noticed that incoming >> emails are being >> round robined to all three machines. At this time I really just >> want the one original machine >> to handle my incoming email... The other two new machines are for >> other purposes. >> >> How do I tell the two new machines that all incoming email send to >> machine 1. >> Is there an easy way to do that? At this point I just turned off >> the two new machines >> and all mail is coming into the original machine just like before. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jerry >> > All three machines have the same FQDN. something like A.mydomain.com, B.mydomain.com, C.mydomain.com The IP numbers are X.Y.Z.170, .171 and .172 All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain name. It is a big deal to request changes from the provider so I was hoping there was a way to just tell the two new machines that incoming email to them just send on over to the the first machine. Is there a way to do that - or am I going about this the wrong way? Jerry

6 7

Lost mdadm.conf
by robert mena 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

Hi, I lost my mdadm.conf (and /proc/mdadm shows nothing useful) and I'd like to mount the filesystem again. So I've booted using rescue but I was wondering if I can do a command like this safely (i.e without losing the data previously stored). mdadm -C /dev/md0 --level=raid0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 Where of course the raid devices and the /dev/x are the correct ones

6 18

The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
by Gilbert Sebenste 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

Hey all, I am getting a number of incoming emails flagged as spam this morning. Here's why: X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Report: * 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future. The date of 2010 in the emails is correct. I have typed "sa-update" and restarted, to no avail. Anyone else seeing this? ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** *******************************************************************************

3 4

one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up
by Jerry Geis 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

Hi all, I had one server running centos 4.7 i686 everything was fine with incoming mail. I now added two more servers centos 5.4 x86_64 and gave them machine names all part of the same domain as machine 1. I noticed that incoming emails are being round robined to all three machines. At this time I really just want the one original machine to handle my incoming email... The other two new machines are for other purposes. How do I tell the two new machines that all incoming email send to machine 1. Is there an easy way to do that? At this point I just turned off the two new machines and all mail is coming into the original machine just like before. Thanks, Jerry

2 1

Update via yum fails with "needs libdbus-1.so.3, this is not available."
by Bart van Kuik 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

Hi list, I am running CentOS release 5.2. When I did a "yum -y update", I got a large list of packages to be updated (360 packages). Then I got the following error: Total download size: 499 M Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: Package xulrunner needs libdbus-1.so.3, this is not available. .... cut about 10 similar lines .... What can I do to make the update roll through? Regards, Bart

2 1

missing module dir?
by Michael Klinosky 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

I'm teaching myself about ethernet cards, and found a TLDP page. I have CentOS 5.3. In this section: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Ethernet-HOWTO-2.html#ss2.4 in the 'Driver as module' subsection, regarding PCI cards, it states that there should be a directory "/lib/modules/`uname -r`/net" [mykolas@sr1220 ~]$ uname -r 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5 [mykolas@sr1220 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5]$ pwd /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5 [mykolas@sr1220 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5]$ ls build modules.alias modules.ieee1394map modules.ofmap modules.symbols updates extra modules.ccwmap modules.inputmap modules.pcimap modules.usbmap weak-updates kernel modules.dep modules.isapnpmap modules.seriomap source There's no 'net' directory. I am guessing that the NIC drivers are modules (and not compiled into the kernel) - am I wrong? Or, where are the modules?

2 1

trying to get lm_sensorts to work
by Jerry Geis 01 Jan '10

01 Jan '10

hi all, I am trying to get lm_sensors to work. did the yum install lm_sensors service lm_sensors start sensor -s and it says no sensors found. did lsmod | grep it87 and it87 57061 0 hwmon_vid 35905 1 it87 hwmon 36553 1 it87 i2c_isa 39105 1 it87 i2c_core 56129 5 it87,i2c_isa,i2c_dev,i2c_ec,i2c_piix4 Seems like modules are loaded.... Is the some final trick to getting it to work? centos 5, 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 15 20:57:57 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thanks, jerry ---------------------------- lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 Host Bridge Alternate 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (int gfx) 00:0a.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 5) 00:11.0 SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] 00:12.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:12.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:12.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller 00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 3c) 00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 IDE Controller 00:14.2 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) 00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 LPC host controller 00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge 00:14.5 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI2 Controller 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K10 [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] HyperTransport Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K10 [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K10 [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K10 [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Miscellaneous Control 00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K10 [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Link Control 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Unknown device 9710 01:05.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Unknown device 970f 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) 03:06.0 Ethernet controller: Digium, Inc. Wildcard TDM800P 8-port analog card (rev 11) 03:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link)

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss