Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

8 participants
34745 discussions

http error when updating 7.5 ==> 7.6
by Fred Smith 26 Mar '19

26 Mar '19

Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into this set of errors: ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: polkit x86_64 0.112-18.el7_6.1 updates 168 k polkit-devel x86_64 0.112-18.el7_6.1 updates 42 k polkit-docs noarch 0.112-18.el7_6.1 updates 251 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Upgrade 3 Packages Total download size: 461 k Is this ok [y/d/N]: y Downloading packages: Finishing delta rebuilds of 3 package(s) (461 k) Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.x86_64 FAILED http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/polkit-0.112-18.e…: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. polkit-devel-0.112-18.el7_6.1. FAILED http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/polkit-devel-0.11…: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. polkit-docs-0.112-18.el7_6.1.n FAILED http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/polkit-docs-0.112…: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. Error downloading packages: polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. polkit-devel-0.112-18.el7_6.1.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. polkit-docs-0.112-18.el7_6.1.noarch: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. I then browsed to the mirror shown above and downloaded the files with no trouble. I then did "yum localupdate" for the three downloaded files and they installed just fine. so, anybody know why we're getting the 416 error from yum but not from firefox? a little searching for that error indicates it is some kind of problem on the web host, I think. but it's weird. I don't need help, I'm good, but perhaps someone needs to look at whatever mis-configuration on the host(s) causes that. I originally left the repo file alone so it attempted to use the repolist but every repo failed. I then changed it to use the baseurl but it didn't help. So whatever the problem is, it isn't with just a single host. Fred -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community. --Roger Ebert, December, 1996 ----------------------------- The Boulder Pledge -----------------------------

6 8

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 7
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 26 Mar '19

26 Mar '19

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2019:0633 Important CentOS 7 ghostscript Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:33:17 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:0633 Important CentOS 7 ghostscript Security Update Message-ID: <20190325173317.GA9569(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0633 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0633 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: fed299b46ff9a9a7ade1b8d52a4c6859d0a3ccfd5ba6db1d6739b2cdc70c521b ghostscript-9.07-31.el7_6.10.i686.rpm 0c91be5be0817663c0bffd9c37b569caa5e50b3413d479fa298c6b3fb2102f25 ghostscript-9.07-31.el7_6.10.x86_64.rpm 095f0c811670f0e727c95a2d4226122cd34d97863d68643053225ab0d03a492f ghostscript-cups-9.07-31.el7_6.10.x86_64.rpm 879ef4fb0b05f291ceefde08805694777b770450938a62ba932604e72acd75d7 ghostscript-devel-9.07-31.el7_6.10.i686.rpm 886805349e730d84e31ebec2d10ad24ded7d99a56595112b40a273761d8ab979 ghostscript-devel-9.07-31.el7_6.10.x86_64.rpm b7adc36e61889e9695fe2461e7f0f9416e57d007a6b3df25f01acf4c0191ce29 ghostscript-doc-9.07-31.el7_6.10.noarch.rpm f641f2ba7c4e0f9da1356bc891778dbc87ceeb8fe6fa3f08df9109bdbc32b162 ghostscript-gtk-9.07-31.el7_6.10.x86_64.rpm Source: 2013a61cf7a054412f08b9c18b823b160fb104e04fb0cf7f2ac2197910e49e55 ghostscript-9.07-31.el7_6.10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 7 ***********************************************

1 0

How to specify kernel version when restart kdump
by wuzhouhui 26 Mar '19

26 Mar '19

Hi, Is there a way to specify kernel version when (re)start kdump service? Suppose I have install a new kernel and kdump will generate kdump.img for new kernel in next boot. But I want kdump to generate kdump.img for new kernel immediately, is it possible? Thanks.

1 0

detect agfl count corruption and reset agfl
by Richard Flack 25 Mar '19

25 Mar '19

Hi there, My apologies if this is the wrong place to post this, but I was wondering if anyone had any information on whether or not the following patch has or will make its way into the CentOS Kernel? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10283095/ We are currently experiencing this problem with the latest version of CloudLinux (based on CentOS), so I believe it isn't currently included. Is there any particular procedure to request a patch for future Kernel releases? -- Best Wishes, Richard

3 3

CentOS 7 - AltArch i386 - DVD iso?
by Brendan Brewster 25 Mar '19

25 Mar '19

Just curious. In the two most recent releases of CentOS 7 AltArch i386 there has not been made available a DVD iso (or the live ones) alongside NetInstall/Minimal/Everything. Any plans to make available the DVD variation for the current or future releases? For older 32-bit hardware, it can be nice to be able to burn a single layer DVD. Thanks for your time, -Brendan

5 9

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 6
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 23 Mar '19

23 Mar '19

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2019:0623 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2019:0622 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:50:10 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:0623 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20190322135010.GA8868(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0623 Critical Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0623 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 90ecdbff9c59846eba27ea0639c06c2e49bc42a22d1b163ecc344b3b32cd1c5a firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 90ecdbff9c59846eba27ea0639c06c2e49bc42a22d1b163ecc344b3b32cd1c5a firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.i686.rpm 0db0e7abf3b5f22a4d5f6795c46801f46caec7cae8bcb03875a29de0f171c0ca firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 755c2ec68e20acf81102a1af307545795620b6b8508f703a5fcd82d679ccdea8 firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:54:23 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:0622 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20190322135423.GA9055(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0622 Critical Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0622 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 064bf5f1d2922d5bde8c56499aa6cf44d5f2b69ed0b4caf7a656fa98e6ccbae9 firefox-60.6.0-3.el7.centos.i686.rpm 7355e00a6bcdf41291c388dd9d59b4d785b1d546a2be9cf35a593eafa6d858ca firefox-60.6.0-3.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: cafd3da67a81d0f7376884bcc41d9b4362fd6e45f75d67744e702dae02f4c5a5 firefox-60.6.0-3.el7.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 6 ***********************************************

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 3
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 22 Mar '19

22 Mar '19

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2019:0230 Important CentOS 7 polkit Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 15:46:15 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:0230 Important CentOS 7 polkit Security Update Message-ID: <20190308154615.GA29318(a)bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0230 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 0df2b8477aa99ea7221643459c947b956f387dc010c63b3f1c92ab01c01cab6a polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.i686.rpm b7efc34c3dc4f8d6fb51b0695c4b7225a7767edf64902cacc541a65bcafb5053 polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.x86_64.rpm 19d8382626658664654d7cfb84fad2020d67b1da7ed163126e53773e1cf0dd09 polkit-devel-0.112-18.el7_6.1.i686.rpm 1c83b760d4639e6c68c8ac8ff564b83e8352967c8ca2db31694acd0f775e2299 polkit-devel-0.112-18.el7_6.1.x86_64.rpm 4edbcd1d840915c92917faccaa72f9b6fca911abd73252b37ed8c160a86cfd1a polkit-docs-0.112-18.el7_6.1.noarch.rpm Source: 72043fa864750f6491a5b9fff2bd25a13a4973a2623002caae262e3b2f3f1e45 polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 3 ***********************************************

2 2

RHEL/CentOS 8.x, KDE & EPEL
by Nicolas Kovacs 22 Mar '19

22 Mar '19

Hi, A question to those familiar with third party repository policy. You think there's a real chance KDE's Plasma 5 desktop will be made available by EPEL or some other third party repository for CentOS 8.x? I'm asking because up until recently one of my desktop configurations was based on CentOS 7 and KDE 4. My users really like the KDE desktop (like myself). I rebased most of my desktop configurations on OpenSUSE Leap when Red Hat announced it would drop KDE, but it would be nice to have something that's a bit less of a moving target. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info(a)microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32

1 0

How to install ansible in centos
by Sanjay Walke 22 Mar '19

22 Mar '19

Hi I want to know how to configure yum repo for Ansible. -- Thanks and regards Sanjay Walke 9881091624

3 2

boot issue with latest kernel
by Keith Keller 22 Mar '19

22 Mar '19

Hi all, Has anyone seen this issue before? This afternoon, I tried updating a bare metal CentOS 6 box, and got some odd error messages on the console during booting kernel 2.6.32-754.11.1. (These aren't exact, I forgot to try to get a photo of the console.) sd 0:0:4:0 timed out resetting card 3w-sas timed out resetting card Then the boot would simply hang, with no obvious disk activity on the drives and no other messages on the console. Reverting back to an earlier kernel (2.6.32-431.17.1) was perfectly fine. (Obviously this is quite old hardware, but until today had never had problems.) I noticed in the CentOS 6.10 changelog that 3w-sas has been deprecated, but that it should still be supported. And even if 3w-sas had been removed, I don't think that wouldn't explain timeouts on sd. I have done a bunch of searches on the CentOS forums and on the web, but didn't find anything specific to this issue with various combinations of the error message keywords. If you have any pointers for me I would greatly appreciate it! --keith -- kkeller(a)wombat.san-francisco.ca.us

5 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss