Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

8 participants
34745 discussions

centos docker which repo (centos or docker)
by ralf.prengel＠comline.de 28 Dec '18

28 Dec '18

Hallo, I planning to migrate ouch dockerfarm from debian to centos. Most of our customers are using redhat or centos and some oft eh books I m using are written for centos too. My question: Should I use docker from the standard repo or the version from the docker-repo? Thanks for hints Ralf Ralf Prengel Teamleiter Customer Care Comline AG Hauert 8 D-44227 Dortmund/Germany ... Telefon: +49 231 97575 157 Mobil: +49 151 10831 157 Fax: +49 231 97575 257 E-Mail: ralf.prengel(a)comline.de ... www.comline.de<http://www.comline.de> Vorstand: Stephan Schilling Aufsichtsrat: Otto Prange (Vorsitzender) HR Dortmund B 14570 USt.-ID-Nr. DE 124727422

3 2

kickstart configuration is working fine but some questions
by ralf.prengel＠comline.de 28 Dec '18

28 Dec '18

Hallo, my kickstart configuration (Centos 7.6) is working fine using pxe now but I ve two little problems: 1) The installation stops in the last screen "installation finished" and doesn't switch to the login-screen. 2) How can I configure the profile for users to answer all question that are asked after the first login. Thanks Ralf Ralf Prengel Teamleiter Customer Care Comline AG Hauert 8 D-44227 Dortmund/Germany Telefon:+49 231 97575 157 Mobil:+49 151 10831 157 Fax:+49 231 97575 257 E-Mail:ralf.prengel@comline.de www.comline.de Vorstand: Stephan Schilling Aufsichtsrat: Otto Prange (Vorsitzender) HR Dortmund B 14570 USt.-ID-Nr. DE 124727422

2 1

recording session
by Ilyass Kaouam 28 Dec '18

28 Dec '18

Hi, Please if you know any opensource tools he can recording session ? Freeipa can do this ? Thank's -- *Ilyass kaouam* *Ingénieur System OpenSource* *Mastère européen Manager de Projets Informatiques*

3 3

compiling fedora srpm on CentOS
by sthustfo 27 Dec '18

27 Dec '18

I tried installing fedora grpc srpm on CentOS and ran into following error when installing srpm. I understand fedora makes use of more recent versions of openssl, glibc etc but why should this happen when installing source rpm? Any pointers/articles on how to go about building fedora srpms on CentOS? Any way out other than building directly using sources? rpm -i grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm warning: grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID cfc659b9: NOKEY error: Failed dependencies: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.28) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libcrypto.so.1.1 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.29) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libprotobuf.so.17 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libssl.so.1.1 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.21) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686

3 2

Docker + ipv6
by Joe 27 Dec '18

27 Dec '18

Hello, i want to use docker with ipv6. i install docker and edit the /etc/docker/daemon.json: { "ipv6": true } Message: [root@froodo network-scripts]# systemctl status docker ● docker.service - Docker Application Container Engine Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/docker.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Do 2018-12-27 12:46:22 CET; 1min 17s ago Docs: http://docs.docker.com Main PID: 15041 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Dez 27 12:46:21 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: time="2018-12-27T12:46:21.570534716+01:00" level=info msg="libcontainerd: new containerd process, pid: 15045" Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.673394351+01:00" level=info msg="Graph migration to content-addressability took 0.00 seconds" Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.674651938+01:00" level=info msg="Loading containers: start." Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.700417054+01:00" level=info msg="Firewalld running: true" Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.903025438+01:00" level=info msg="Default bridge (docker0) is assigned with an IP address 172.17.0.0/16. Daemon option --bip can be used to set a preferred IP address" Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: Error starting daemon: Error initializing network controller: Error creating default "bridge" network: could not find an available, non-overlapping IPv6 address pool among the defaults to assign to the network Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: docker.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: Failed to start Docker Application Container Engine. Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: Unit docker.service entered failed state. Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: docker.service failed. My ip config: [root@froodo network-scripts]# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 96:00:00:17:06:a4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 116.203.40.3/32 brd 116.203.40.3 scope global dynamic eth0 valid_lft 84360sec preferred_lft 84360sec inet6 2a01:4f8:1c0c:7c6c::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::9400:ff:fe17:6a4/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever I tried a lot of things from differnt howtos, but only with no success. What the next steps to running docker with ipv6? Thx. Joe

2 1

Re: [CentOS] You removed Weboob package over political reasons? Whole Internet laughs at you
by Alice Wonder 26 Dec '18

26 Dec '18

On 12/24/18 7:21 AM, vsnsdualce(a)memeware.net wrote: > Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but > instead women. *snip* Can we please ban the person who sent that disgusting rant to the list?

7 8

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 166, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 25 Dec '18

25 Dec '18

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2018:3831 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2018:3833 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 19:07:59 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:3831 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20181221190759.GA3322(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:3831 Critical Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3831 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 429981c764d258970b014425dfe4a26573613bb5941d254e0deac4aa21ed0c91 firefox-60.4.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 429981c764d258970b014425dfe4a26573613bb5941d254e0deac4aa21ed0c91 firefox-60.4.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm 2e436d3c160a06bb442a4caea811f40855a07579a69a4de4d67e3da4ec30a605 firefox-60.4.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 705857e68c4510628e0d571b8dbc702ffee6b512bbd6ad496b19cba8855daed6 firefox-60.4.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 19:08:51 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:3833 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20181221190851.GA3402(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:3833 Critical Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3833 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 9db402dc9f056bf640dc02800014ad688ac988ad10c7359fc66ea2b5538a951a firefox-60.4.0-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm 5553ef981d4841a3041e728e07169aad5a2d4ab0a4cd3fba5cddaefe7c9d0be9 firefox-60.4.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 166, Issue 8 ***********************************************

1 0

Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
by lejeczek 22 Dec '18

22 Dec '18

hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L.

9 11

Gnome-shell memory
by Jerry Geis 21 Dec '18

21 Dec '18

So after much research it seems the only way to "help" the gnome-shell memory leak issue (I still see it on CentOS 7.6) is to do "export DISPLAY=:0.0; gnome-shell --replace" periodically. Perhaps in cron. Is that an OK solution for the LONG haul? Seems to knock the memory back down and box appears to keep running. Thanks, Jerry

2 3

Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
by mark 21 Dec '18

21 Dec '18

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 12/20/18 10:33 AM, mark wrote: >> lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >>> >>> I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than >>> only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in >>> test/production envs. >>> >>> If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it >>> to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. >>> >>> Anybody? >>> >>> >> I would not run it as a server. In a server and workstation >> environment, you do *not* want to have daily multiple updates to >> software, you want stability, or you're likely to have your users >> seriously aggravated by you, for breaking their jobs far too frequently. > > Where do you get that with Fedora server you have to do daily multiple > updates? > I frequently see my manager's fedora box doing updates, multiple times a week. mark

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss