Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 165, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 09 Nov '18

09 Nov '18

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2018:3406 Critical CentOS 6 python-paramiko Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2018:3454 CentOS 6 tzdata BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2018:3403 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:49:55 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:3406 Critical CentOS 6 python-paramiko Security Update Message-ID: <20181105184955.GA23857(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:3406 Critical Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3406 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: ba22dc027fdb5a2399c658d74ec55e6efe08225d65e9aaf3ff5837319c0a67eb python-paramiko-1.7.5-5.el6_10.noarch.rpm x86_64: ba22dc027fdb5a2399c658d74ec55e6efe08225d65e9aaf3ff5837319c0a67eb python-paramiko-1.7.5-5.el6_10.noarch.rpm Source: f0e20741d17d1c06461711205d12b0edf44e5011cf15c7173dcb305a4c49e46d python-paramiko-1.7.5-5.el6_10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:51:17 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2018:3454 CentOS 6 tzdata BugFix Update Message-ID: <20181105185117.GA24083(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:3454 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3454 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 687d4198ba7ddcc02ab3e32b7a757e82474c862a77b6f877fe433aedb42f665d tzdata-2018g-1.el6.noarch.rpm 4673a5ff13fc83c51d537c997c7161affb1a94445798c2976d133309cbb70418 tzdata-java-2018g-1.el6.noarch.rpm x86_64: 687d4198ba7ddcc02ab3e32b7a757e82474c862a77b6f877fe433aedb42f665d tzdata-2018g-1.el6.noarch.rpm 4673a5ff13fc83c51d537c997c7161affb1a94445798c2976d133309cbb70418 tzdata-java-2018g-1.el6.noarch.rpm Source: a38862e075a0669152f341ff55a6675b8f1476fdd876d51b408b10011e99f8e8 tzdata-2018g-1.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:57:41 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:3403 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Security Update Message-ID: <20181105185741.GA24387(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:3403 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3403 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8df523679c35149a2785c6056419e4087d991acf7a5415761d5353b5d7612840 thunderbird-60.2.1-5.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 4ba750dbed745049285ca8c7345b4bc8366efd5bda230f8d09a1604e2544c2b3 thunderbird-60.2.1-5.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: fa1c647433cdb857e464a18c595ad567662feb698ff9beb544e3e8b9bca32773 thunderbird-60.2.1-5.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce ------------------------------ End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 165, Issue 1 ***********************************************

1 0

A newbie question about searching an installed packet
by Pierre Malard 08 Nov '18

08 Nov '18

Hi, I’m french and literally one. So I’m not really easy with Sheakespeare language. So, accept my apologies. As write in subject, I’m a newbie about CentOS an all RedHat declines. I wrote a Shell script for ours Debians (all sort of Debian like) which verify which packets are present before running. I thought I had found an equivalent with « yum list installed | grep <packet> » command but I have sometime alerts about a lock because an other instance of « yum » is running. I don’t understand why a simple « yum list » impose that! I suppose, like with « aptitude search », it is an understanding scorie. I’m sure there is an other way to do what I want to do: just verify if a packet is, or not, installed. Help? Thanks -- Pierre Malard « On ne peut pas pousser à fond l'éducation politique et l'éducation tout court de masses sans l'accompagner d'un développement économique, culturel et social parallèle. » Romain Gary - "Les racines du ciel" |\ _,,,---,,_ /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' '---''(_/--' `-'\_) πr perl -e '$_=q#: 3|\ 5_,3-3,2_: 3/,`.'"'"'`'"'"' 5-. ;-;;,_: |,A- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'"'"'-'"'"': '"'"'-3'"'"'2(_/--'"'"' `-'"'"'\_): 24πr::#;y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print' - --> Ce message n’engage que son auteur <--

2 2

Desktop files change?
by david allan finch 08 Nov '18

08 Nov '18

Hi, Does anyone know if they changed the way that desktop files for apps work? It seams that inside your start script you can no longer change your scripts directory. Does it now call some form of restricted shell? Anyone know where you can track these changes? Thanks -- / The whole history of this invention has been a struggle /\|/\ against time - Charles Babbage 1837 on the Analytical Engine | K | All Hail Discordia - Burn all Orange Books! \___/ david.allan at finch.org - http://www.ironfort.co.uk

1 1

command in kickstart file to write disklabel?
by Valeri Galtsev 08 Nov '18

08 Nov '18

Dear All, At some point after release of CentOS 7 (though this thing might have started before, it is just when _I_ noticed it) I discovered that if I stick into machine drive without disk label, and then do kickstart installation, the command in kickstart file clearpart --initlabel does not work. Even worse: if I just use GUI installer the drive is not listed between available disks. If I switch in the same installer to some virtual console Ctrl + Alt + F2 I can see that the kernel installer run under definitely sees the drive: /dev/sda is present. It must be an issue beaten to death, but somehow my search ability fails on this particular one (I am not "googling" but "duckduckgo-ing", though this shouldn't matter the problem as usually must be myself). Can someone suggest something? I know it is trivial to just create disklabel before sticking drive in machine, but once I'm using kickstart, any need in separate manual steps feels really lame. Thanks a lot for all your help in advance! Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Yum and proxy settings
by Vic Chester 08 Nov '18

08 Nov '18

I have configured yum to use a proxy via the yum.conf file by adding: proxy=http://myproxy.com:8080/ What I noticed when running yum check-up date is that some requests are going through the proxy while the system seems to be trying to resolve the domains of other hosts in the repo and trying to establish direct connections to them instead of going through the proxy. Can anyone explain this behavior?

1 0

CentOS Dojo at FOSDEM - Registration now open
by Rich Bowen 07 Nov '18

07 Nov '18

We are pleased to announce the (tentative) schedule of talks for the upcoming CentOS Dojo in Brussels, which will be held on the day before FOSDEM - February 1, 2019 - at the Grand Place Marriott. Details, and the schedule, are now available at https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2019 (Schedule subject to change). Registration is free, but we need to know how many people are coming, for catering and space purposes. You can register today at: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/centos-dojo-at-fosdem-tickets-52306704762 See you in Brussels! -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

OL 7.6 is out
by Rainer Traut 07 Nov '18

07 Nov '18

Hi there, just fyi, Oracle Linux 7.6 is out. The release is available in the repos. Rainer

1 0

Centos 6.9 Ipset broken after installing xtables-addon
by George Travan 07 Nov '18

07 Nov '18

I have managed to break my system by installing xtables-addons-1.37. Now ipset does not work. "Kernel error received: Invalid argument" I built the addon from source on my centos 6.9 system as per instructions for centos 6. It looks to me that xtables-addons has built and installed a ipset-4 extension due to my kernel: 2.6.32-754.6.3.el6.x86_64 I already had ipset v6.11 installed and now both do not work. The README indicated that I need a kernel > 2.6.35 which I presume is the problem. This now has become a major problem for me as I rely on ipset. Anyone suggest what I might do to fix this problem? Thanks, /Geo

1 0

polkit-gnome-0.106 with CentOS 7.5 ???
by Kay Schenk 04 Nov '18

04 Nov '18

What can anyone tell me about the polkit-gnome package that came with CentOS 7.5? Looking at the Fedora pack for the same, it seems like I'm missing pieces of this package. Re: https://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/epel/7/x86_64/Packages/p/polkit-gnome-0.106-0… I start my gui session with startx instead of GDM. I am having a lot of authentication issues at the moment. I am somewhat familiar with dealing with polkit but mostly things are not working well at all. On an older version of openSUSE I once used with systemd, I started up a kde-polkit-integration app as part of my X session init, in a local .xinit file. Should I do the same with the supplied polkit-gnome provided? Any insights much appreciated. Thanks. ------------------------------------------ MzK "Less is MORE."

1 0

reading old dump backups from 2009
by Nataraj 04 Nov '18

04 Nov '18

I have and old dump format backup done under fedora 7 which is stored on disk and has an sha256sum file that indicates there are no data errors in the backup file. When I try to read the file with restore under CentOS 6, I get the following error: cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.10 (Final) restore tvf u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump Verify tape and initialize maps Input is from a local file/pipe Checksum error 20311110402, inode 0 file (null) restore: Tape is not a dump tape I have another copy of the backup on another disk with the same checksum and it gets the same error as well. Here's a log file from when the backup was done back in 2009: DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Apr 29 09:24:36 2009 DUMP: Dumping /dev/md1 (/u1) to u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump DUMP: Label: /u1 DUMP: Writing 10 Kilobyte records DUMP: Compressing output at compression level 2 (bzlib) DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories] DUMP: estimated 95176885 blocks. DUMP: writing QFA positions to u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.qindex DUMP: Volume 1 started with block 1 at: Wed Apr 29 09:25:05 2009 DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories] DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files] DUMP: 0.96% done at 3032 kB/s, finished in 8:38 . . . DUMP: 100.00% done at 4075 kB/s, finished in 0:00 DUMP: Closing u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump DUMP: Volume 1 completed at: Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009 DUMP: Volume 1 took 6:35:04 DUMP: Volume 1 transfer rate: 2146 kB/s DUMP: Volume 1 96607840kB uncompressed, 50878096kB compressed, 1.899:1 DUMP: 96607840 blocks (94343.59MB) on 1 volume(s) DUMP: finished in 23704 seconds, throughput 4075 kBytes/sec DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Apr 29 09:24:36 2009 DUMP: Date this dump completed: Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009 DUMP: Average transfer rate: 2146 kB/s DUMP: Wrote 96607840kB uncompressed, 50878096kB compressed, 1.899:1 DUMP: DUMP IS DONE Have there been any changes to the format of dump files and if so, is there a version available that can read this older backup? Any other suggestions on how to read this backup would be helpful. Thank You, Nataraj

5 7

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss