Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

8 participants
34745 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working
by TE Dukes 27 Aug '18

27 Aug '18

Third time trying respond! -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working From: Gordon Messmer < <mailto:gordon.messmer@gmail.com> gordon.messmer(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, July 24, 2018 10:31 am To: <mailto:centos@centos.org> centos(a)centos.org On 07/23/2018 03:39 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > Mail has come to an abrupt stop. Running C7, postfix and dovecot. > ... > Crond is no longer send mail. In one terminal: "tail -f /var/log/maillog" or "journalctl -f" In another, "echo test | mail -s test your(a)email.address" What do you see in the maillog at that time? What does the "df" command output? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list <mailto:CentOS@centos.org> CentOS(a)centos.org <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks, Output from tail: Jul 24 10:05:02 ts130 clamd[3226]: SelfCheck: Database status OK. Jul 24 10:15:02 ts130 clamd[3226]: SelfCheck: Database status OK. Jul 24 10:25:02 ts130 clamd[3226]: SelfCheck: Database status OK. Jul 24 10:35:02 ts130 clamd[3226]: SelfCheck: Database status OK. Jul 24 10:35:59 ts130 postfix/qmgr[8283]: C33128410546: from=< <mailto:root@ts130.palmettodomains.com> root(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com>, size=949, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jul 24 10:36:29 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: connect to <http://paalmettodomains.com> paalmettodomains.com[198.105.254.65]:25: Connection timed out Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: connect to <http://paalmettodomains.com> paalmettodomains.com[104.239.198.84]:25: Connection timed out Jul 24 10:36:59 ts130 postfix/smtp[19763]: C33128410546: to=< <mailto:tdukes@paalmettodomains.com> tdukes(a)paalmettodomains.com>, relay=none, delay=13075, delays=13015/0.02/60/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to <http://paalmettodomains.com> paalmettodomains.com[104.239.198.84]:25: Connection timed out) Jul 24 10:45:02 ts130 clamd[3226]: SelfCheck: Database status OK. Jul 24 10:55:02 ts130 clamd[3226]: SelfCheck: Database status OK. Jul 24 11:04:19 ts130 postfix/pickup[19912]: 55271840D734: uid=0 from=<root> Jul 24 11:04:19 ts130 postfix/cleanup[21840]: 55271840D734: message-id=< <mailto:20180724150419.55271840D734@ts130.palmettodomains.com> 20180724150419.55271840D734(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com> Jul 24 11:04:19 ts130 postfix/qmgr[8283]: 55271840D734: from=< <mailto:root@ts130.palmettodomains.com> root(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com>, size=466, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/smtpd[21846]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/smtpd[21846]: 49161841ED92: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/cleanup[21840]: 49161841ED92: message-id=< <mailto:20180724150419.55271840D734@ts130.palmettodomains.com> 20180724150419.55271840D734(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com> Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/qmgr[8283]: 49161841ED92: from=< <mailto:root@ts130.palmettodomains.com> root(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com>, size=951, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/smtpd[21846]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 amavis[423]: (00423-03) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInbound}, [127.0.0.1] < <mailto:root@ts130.palmettodomains.com> root(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com> -> < <mailto:tdukes@palmettodomains.com> tdukes(a)palmettodomains.com>, Message-ID: < <mailto:20180724150419.55271840D734@ts130.palmettodomains.com> 20180724150419.55271840D734(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com>, mail_id: eYD2cL7fZ7rY, Hits: -0.001, size: 466, queued_as: 49161841ED92, 941 ms Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/smtp[21842]: 55271840D734: to=< <mailto:tdukes@palmettodomains.com> tdukes(a)palmettodomains.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1, delays=0.07/0.01/0/0.94, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 49161841ED92) Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/qmgr[8283]: 55271840D734: removed Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 dovecot: lda(tdukes): msgid=< <mailto:20180724150419.55271840D734@ts130.palmettodomains.com> 20180724150419.55271840D734(a)ts130.palmettodomains.com>: saved mail to INBOX Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/local[21847]: 49161841ED92: to=< <mailto:tdukes@palmettodomains.com> tdukes(a)palmettodomains.com>, relay=local, delay=0.09, delays=0.02/0.01/0/0.06, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f "$SENDER" -a "$RECIPIENT") Jul 24 11:04:20 ts130 postfix/qmgr[8283]: 49161841ED92: removed >From df: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/cl-root 97605056 12762640 84842416 14% / devtmpfs 8025676 0 8025676 0% /dev tmpfs 8043100 70176 7972924 1% /dev/shm tmpfs 8043100 59284 7983816 1% /run tmpfs 8043100 0 8043100 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs 262144 0 262144 0% /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming /dev/mapper/cl-home 97605056 34632 97570424 1% /home /dev/sda2 993004 391180 601824 40% /boot /dev/mapper/cl-data 3685467928 1205578432 2479889496 33% /data /dev/sdb1 3845548044 2677536044 972662756 74% /media tmpfs 1608620 56 1608564 1% /run/user/0

12 70

kernel-plus (plus 1?)
by lejeczek 24 Aug '18

24 Aug '18

hi guys did you notice, if you use kernel-plus on 7.5 this CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.1.x86_64) 7 (Core) CentOS Linux (3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.centos.plus.x86_64) 7 (Core) is that "plus.1" a new naming convention or just one off? regards, L

2 3

using lpadmin to add printers in CentOS 7 (v. CentOS 6)
by Zube 24 Aug '18

24 Aug '18

In CentOS 6, I could do: lpinfo -m then pick the model I want and put it as the option to -m in lpadmin (line wrapped): /usr/sbin/lpadmin -p printer -o printer-is-shared=false -o Duplex=None -o Resolution=600dpi -m 'gutenprint.5.2://pcl-g_5e/expert Generic PCL 5e Printer - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.5' -v 'socket://mydomain.edu' Alas, in CentOS 7, no matter what I do, I always get: Unable to copy PPD file! and the error in the cups error log: Returning IPP server-error-internal-error for CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer (ipp://localhost:631/printers/printer) from localhost Bad ppd-name "gutenprint.5.2://pcl-g_5e/simple Generic PCL 5e Printer - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.9 Simplified" (-6)! copy_model: empty PPD file I assumed this was due to the newer version of cups. To make it work (kinda, sorta) the way it used to: 1) mkdir -p /usr/share/cups/model/gutenprint/5.2 2) cups-genppd.5.2 3) lpinfo -m, but choose one that is a file, not a gutenprint.5.2:// URL (?): /usr/sbin/lpadmin -p printer -o printer-is-shared=false -o Duplex=None -o Resolution=600dpi -m 'gutenprint/5.2/stp-hp-lj_4250.5.2.ppd.gz' -v 'socket://mydomain.edu' And this is fine, but I assume the other way should work as well. What am I missing? Thanks for any clues. Cheers, Zube

1 0

selinux question
by Nataraj 23 Aug '18

23 Aug '18

I have a web application which uses sudo to invoke python scripts as the user under which the application runs (NO root access). Is there any reason why sudo would would require sys_ptrace access for this? I only get this violation intermittenly, and not with every call to sudo. Here's the violation: Summary: SELinux is preventing sudo (httpd_t) "sys_ptrace" to <Unknown> (httpd_t). Detailed Description: SELinux denied access requested by sudo. It is not expected that this access is required by sudo and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to require additional access. Allowing Access: You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) against this package. Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:httpd_t Target Context system_u:system_r:httpd_t Target Objects None [ capability ] Source sudo Source Path /usr/bin/sudo Port <Unknown> Host myhost.mydomain.com Source RPM Packages sudo-1.7.2p1-29.el5_10 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-2.4.6-351.el5 Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted MLS Enabled True Enforcing Mode Enforcing Plugin Name catchall Host Name myhost.mydomain.com Platform Linux myhost.mydomain.com 2.6.18-419.el5 #1 SMP Fri Feb 24 22:06:09 UTC 2017 i686 i686 Alert Count 359 First Seen Tue Oct 8 09:24:50 2013 Last Seen Tue Aug 21 10:26:26 2018 Local ID 717eb9a4-cc7f-4ed1-b638-5db1a841abe4 Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages host=myhost.mydomain.com type=AVC msg=audit(1534872386.726:9642): avc: denied { sys_ptrace } for pid=8458 comm="sudo" capability=19 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tclass=capability host=myhost.mydomain.com type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1534872386.726:9642): arch=40000003 syscall=3 success=yes exit=166 a0=1a a1=b7ff4000 a2=400 a3=89cabf0 items=0 ppid=8979 pid=8458 auid=4294967295 uid=48 gid=48 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="sudo" exe="/usr/bin/sudo" subj=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 key=(null) Thank You, Nataraj

4 7

How do I actaully get the current sources from centos-git?
by me＠tdiehl.org 21 Aug '18

21 Aug '18

Hi, I am trying to retrieve the srpm for the latest centos-release pacakge from centos-git by following the instructions @ https://wiki.centos.org/Sources. If I run the following commands: git clone https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/centos-release.git cd centos-release/ git checkout c7 ~/centos-git-common/get_sources.sh Everything completes without error. The problem is that the sources that get downloaded are not for 1804. (vgeppetto2 pts21) $ ll SOURCES/ SPECS/ SOURCES/: total 28 -rw-rw-r--. 1 mock mock 1584 Aug 6 08:19 1000-centos-release-cr.patch -rw-rw-r--. 1 mock mock 264 Aug 6 08:19 85-display-manager.preset -rw-rw-r--. 1 mock mock 2439 Aug 6 08:19 90-default.preset -rw-rw-r--. 1 mock mock 12799 Aug 6 08:20 centos-release-7-1.1503.tar.gz SPECS/: total 8 -rw-rw-r--. 1 mock mock 6471 Aug 6 08:19 centos-release.spec (vgeppetto2 pts21) $grep "define upstream_rel" SPECS/centos-release.spec %define upstream_rel 7.3 (vgeppetto2 pts21) $ So if I am reading things correctly, it looks like the SOURCES are for 1503 and the spec file is for 1611. Can someone please explain to me how to actually get the current SOURCES and SPEC for centos-release-7-5.1804.1 from centos git? To be clear I know I can get the srpm from vault but I would like to understand how to work centos git. Regards, -- Tom me(a)tdiehl.org

3 4

sssd logs
by Ian Diddams 21 Aug '18

21 Aug '18

We have sssd running on a centos 7 box... its logs of course (?!) go into /can't find any info on where this log directory is configured, or whether it is changeable. Anybody know differently? Cheers ian Disclaimer: This message is intended for the addressee only. It may contain information of a confidential or legally privileged nature. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender and destroy the message immediately. All attachments have been scanned for viruses. However D4t4 Solutions Plc cannot accept liability for any loss or damage you may incur as a result of virus infection.

2 1

Packaging a library for 64-bit or multilib
by Kenneth Porter 21 Aug '18

21 Aug '18

How does "make install" with autotools decide which directory libraries should go in? I haven't packaged anything since 32-bit (ie. a few years ago), and I now need to re-package a new version of a library I'd used before with CentOS 6 32-bit on CentOS 7 64-bit. The library is pxlib (http://pxlib.sourceforge.net/) which reads and writes old Borland Paradox database files. I've managed to fix 64-bit issues in the C sources. When I go to package the RPM, it runs configure and make and "make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install". The install step puts the resulting libraries in /usr/lib, not /usr/lib64 where the %files step looks. I'm not familiar with autotools, so I don't know where to look to fix the install step to put the libraries in the correct directory. How does make/configure or whatever figure that out? Do I need to change the %prep step to run autotools to write the correct library directory for configure, or does configure need to be hacked to write the correct directory into the Makefiles? Maybe configure needs to be regenerated with a more recent autotools?

1 1

Using InstallAnywhere with CentOS? ... anyone
by KM 21 Aug '18

21 Aug '18

Hi All,I was wondering if anyone else uses InstallAnywhere to create a multi-platform installer for their products. My company does. However we have an official build server that is running CentOS, obviously because it is opensource and easy to update etc. However after we converted our build from an old RedHat 5 server to CentOS and were using InstallAnywhere we found out that it is not officially supported on CentOS but is officially supported on RedHat. This doesn't really make any sense to me since they are the same (or virtually the same). I guess it has to do with the amount of time a company wants to spend testing products on different platforms. All this being said, the main reason for this email is to encourage anyone using InstallAnywhere on CentOS for the designer and build functionality, to request that Flexera support CentOS officially. I only want this in case we have specific issues that arise due to the platform. Although it is true the RedHat users will most likely see the same results, it would be beneficial to have official support. Note that CentOS is support as a runtime or production execution platform. I am speaking mainly of the build and design functionality. Please also note that Flexera has not refused to help me with any of my issues so far. They have been great, but these issues are not OS related, they had to do with the use of their product. Thanks in advance for any help that you may give.KM

1 0

Unknown Error
by Eugene Poole 21 Aug '18

21 Aug '18

I've a HP 8000 Elite SFF machine with Intel Core 2 Duo Quad and 16 GB RAM. I wanted to create a LAB environment to try new things (like CentOS 7). I installed CentOS 6.10 64-bit with no problems and everything is running fine. I then went to Server World and followed the instructions to install Desktop and Virtualization. The install went fine but I had errors when I attempted to build my KVM virtual machines. I looked at dmesg and found a message stating that virtualization was turned off in the BIOS so I turned if on based on the output of lscpu: Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 4 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model: 23 Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz Stepping: 10 CPU MHz: 1998.000 BogoMIPS: 5652.96 Virtualization: VT-x L1d cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache: 6144K NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-3 There were 2 parameters in the BIOS, VT-x and VT-x with Direct I/O. And as I was told, I powered the machine off. After restarting the machine I went to the instructions to build a virtual machine and that is where I've run into a problem I can't seem to solve. Using virt-manager and entering all of the requested parameters I clicked on the Finish button and immediately I get the Caps Lock and Scroll Lock keyboard lights blinking without stoping and everything locked up. Only the power button seems to work. Any ideas where I can possibly find the issue with this? -- Eugene Poole Woodstock, Georgia

1 0

Missing dependency
by Александр Кириллов 20 Aug '18

20 Aug '18

Hi. Can't install rh-ror42 on C6. Used to be working June 10th. Any ideas? TIA. # yum install rh-ror42 ... Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package rh-ror42.x86_64 0:2.2-7.el6 will be installed ... --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: rh-ror42-2.2-7.el6.x86_64 (centos-sclo-rh) Requires: rh-nodejs4-nodejs You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ... # yum list rh-nodejs4-nodejs ... Error: No matching Packages to list # cat /etc/centos-release CentOS release 6.9 (Final)

1 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss