Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

CENTOS . and WEBSENSE ENTERPRISE Compatibility
by "Juan Manuel Cárdenas N." 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

Dear CentOSMailing List. We have a problem with Linux CentOS and Websense Enterpise Vers. 611., I would Like about to it, anyone was experience Installing CentOs and Websense Enterprise with Integration Squid Proxy ?. The following is my Installation Summary: LINUX KERNEL: Linux proxy 2.6.9-34.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Mar 8 00:27:03 CST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Linux version 2.6.9-34.ELsmp (buildcentos@build-i386) (gcc version 3.4.5 20051201 (Red Hat 3.4.5-2)) #1 SMP Wed Mar 8 00:27:0 3 CST 2006 HARDWARE: HP Proliant ML110/800 HT Proccesor: Pentium IV de 2.8 GHz Memory: 512 MB Hard Disk: 80 GB INTEGRATION WITH SQUID: squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.12 When I Try installing the Websense Suite the Installation Show follow display Welcome to the Websense Enterprise v6.1 installer. InstallShield Wizard Inicializando InstallShield Wizard... Buscando la Java(tm) Virtual Machine... ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Setup could not determine Redhat Linux release. Websense does not support the operating system on this machine. There may be difficulties installing and running Websense on this operating system. Consult the Deployment Guide for the supported operating systems. : NOTE: I changed my Old Linux RED HAT 9 for my new Platform . the old installation worked very well but now I have problems for work. I'll appreciate your Help. -- Juan Manuel Cárdenas Tech. Support Director Atlantic Pacific Intl. Corp.- Colombia PBX: 571-315-0484 Direct: 571-221-3872 Mobile: 57-310-229-4995 »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of Atlantic Pacific Intl. Corp. or Atlantic Pacific Ltda. If you are not the intended recipient be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any unauthorized use,dissemination, forwarding, disclosure, printing, quoting or copying is strictly prohibited and may be un- lawful, so please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message. »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» Este mensaje es confidencial y enviado solo para el uso de la persona a la cual esta dirigido y puede contener información confidencial. Cualquier opinión expresada es solo aquella del autor y no necesariamente representa aquella de Atlantic Pacific Intl. Corp. ó Atlantic Pacific Ltda. Si Ud. no es el destinatario, favor tenga en cuenta que Ud. ha recibido este mensaje por error, y que cualquier uso no autorizado, distribución, reenvio, mención, publicación, impresión o copia de este mensaje esta estrictamente prohibido y puede ser ilegal, por tanto por favor contacte a quien lo envía y destruya todas las copias del mensaje original. »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

3 2

First SSH now VSFTP
by John Hinton 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

Seems the script kiddies are now hitting vsftp with dictionary attacks. I had three boxes showing around 12000 attempts from one IP yesterday. My thoughts are that there should be an upstream solution for this which is then supported by the upstream vendor. Yes, I know there are several 'other' solutions, but I'd really like to stay mainstream and use a supported method for dealing with these issues. I can't help but view them as security issues. Best, John Hinton

3 2

identd removed in Centos4.3?
by Dave Hatton 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

Hi all, Has identd been removed from the upstream release? If so what replaces it? I see an oidentd rpm on DAG, but I'm curious about what I should be using? Many Thanks Daveh

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 14, Issue 3
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2006:0279-5: Low CentOS 2 i386 glibc enhancement update (John Newbigin) 2. CESA-2006:0282-6: Low CentOS 2 i386 tzdata enhancement update (John Newbigin) 3. CEBA-2006:0410-001 CentOS 4 i386 yumex - bugfix update (EXTRAS only) (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEBA-2006:0410-001 CentOS 4 x86_64 yumex - bugfix update (EXTRAS Only) (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:19:14 +1000 From: John Newbigin <jnewbigin(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2006:0279-5: Low CentOS 2 i386 glibc enhancement update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <4439DCC2.8020806(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHEA-2006:0279-5 glibc enhancement update Files available: glibc-2.2.4-32.25.i386.rpm glibc-common-2.2.4-32.25.i386.rpm glibc-devel-2.2.4-32.25.i386.rpm glibc-profile-2.2.4-32.25.i386.rpm nscd-2.2.4-32.25.i386.rpm glibc-2.2.4-32.25.i686.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:19:19 +1000 From: John Newbigin <jnewbigin(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2006:0282-6: Low CentOS 2 i386 tzdata enhancement update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <4439DCC7.8050503(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHEA-2006:0282-6 tzdata enhancement update Files available: tzdata-2006a-2.EL2_1.3.noarch.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:05:15 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2006:0410-001 CentOS 4 i386 yumex - bugfix update (EXTRAS only) To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <1144667115.9603.46.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CEBA-2006:0410-001 CentOS 4 i386 yumex - bugfix update (EXTRAS only) A new Yum Extender (yumex) has been released by the developer. Here is the upstream changelog: http://yumex.python-hosting.com/wiki/ReleaseHisory The following files are updated and syncing to the mirrors: i386: yumex-0.99.15-1.0.c4.noarch.rpm src: yumex-0.99.15-1.0.c4.src.rpm

1 0

change grub default boot in windows
by dennis 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

hello to all gurus, How can I change my grub install if I want to make the windows partition the default boot option? Im running Centos 4.3, any suggestion,recommendation will appreciated thank you.. - = [ d E n N i s ] = -

2 2

Jyran Glucky is out of the office.
by jglucky＠blueware.net 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

I will be out of the office starting 04/10/2006 and will not return until 04/30/2006. If you need immediate assistance, please call BlueWare at (231) 779-0224. For technical support, please call BlueWare at (231) 779-0224 ext 130.

1 0

CentOS 4 and multi TB storage solutions
by Avtar Gill 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

Hi, I am currently searching for storage solutions to use in an environment with two CentOS servers. Both are web/MySQL servers hosting several web applications that forward HTTP requests for files to storage servers (all with 3ware cards offering RAID5 arrays) that collectively serve 10TB of images. The data grows by 2TB every year. This has been working so far but this current implementation is facing growing pains so I'm looking at more scalable options. Something that will offer 12TB of storage and room to grow by adding more storage as needed. Currently the Apple Xserve RAID 7TB offerings connected to a QLogic SANbox 5200 fibre switch looks very appealing. Especially considering the Xserve RAIDs are listed in Red Hat's RHEL HCL and Google searches have revealed successful RHEL & Xserve implementations . But since this is still preliminary research having more options for comparison would be nice. Has anyone here had previous experience with the following two products (with CentOS servers of course): http://www.storcase.com/infostation/16bay3u_scsi.asp http://www.aberdeeninc.com/ABCATG/KITX525.htm Any opinions about these vendors and/or products would be greatly appreciated. Also feel free to suggest similar products. Thanks, Avtar Gill

1 0

RE: [CentOS] redirecting some addresses with sendmail
by Mike Kercher 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

centos-bounces(a)centos.org <> scribbled on Sunday, April 09, 2006 3:14 PM: > I have a fully working cyrus+sendmail mail server hosting all > users for foo.com. Company foo has been acquired by company > bar and it has been decided that bar.com is the new domain of > choice. The administrator of bar.com has added a pile of > redirects to send various user(a)bar.com addresses so they come > up to my server at foo.com. My users have changed their From: > addresses to user(a)bar.com and we have a basic working system. > > However, if one user in former company foo mails another user > in the same office their mail now goes offsite to bar.com's > mail server and is then redirected back in again, which works > but is bad for bandwidth. > > Ideally I'd like to teach sendmail that a subset of bar.com > users are now local. However if I try this in the > /etc/aliases file, I get the warning "cannot alias non-local names". > > Has anyone got any better ideas how to do this- or a better > suggestion as to where I should ask this question again? Did you try the virtusertable instead of aliases yet? Mike

1 0

RE: [CentOS] Several problems upgrading CentOS 4.1 to 4.3
by Mike Kercher 09 Apr '06

09 Apr '06

centos-bounces(a)centos.org <> scribbled on Sunday, April 09, 2006 12:43 AM: > I had a CentOS 4.1 installation (LVM over RAID1), and tried > to do an update to the 4.3 release. > Nothing too fancy, I did all the partitions with the > graphical installer for the > 4.1 Version. %<-----snip > > I'm not a newbie, I have quite a while working with linux, > and I just want to aware people who are going to perform an > update, skipping some version in between or perhaps moving to > 4.3 to be very carefull in the process. > I think this was a experience that was worth telling and > researching to find out what really happend. > Why did you not just 'yum upgrade' to go from 4.1 to 4.3? Mike

4 5

Warm reboot failure
by Tarun Reddy 09 Apr '06

09 Apr '06

I recently bought a new Compaq Presario sr1710nx with 64-bit Sempron and last week installed Centos 4.3 64-bit on it. Worked like a champ until I attempted a reboot (using "init 6") and the computer hung after finishing the shutdown. Rebooting from cold worked, but without a warm reboot I was hesitant to use Centos. Since FC5 (64-bit as well) came out recently, I tried it and warm reboots work great. So it would seem that it is a kernel/driver issue, but I have no idea where to begin. Also I'm not if additional grub boot parameters might help. I won't be in front of the machine until this weekend, but since everyone else will be gone by them, I'd thought I'd ask you guys if you had any ideas. I really would like to get back the package stability of Centos. Fedora 5's updates are driving me nuts (too many, too often and too major). Any suggestions? (I'm going to try 32-bit Centos this weekend first) Thanks ahead of time, Tarun

1 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss