Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

Returning to - Re: [CentOS] Installing Java 1.4.2
by Robert Moskowitz 20 Feb '06

20 Feb '06

At 12:06 PM 1/16/2006, Jim Perrin wrote: > > How can I be sure of the dependencies? > > What yum command would I run afterwards? > > How do I get updates to this rpm over time? > > > > thanks! > >jpackage offers a yum repository. You'll need to set that up if you >want to update from their packages. As for the java rpm. You're on >your own for that one. Sun has yet to set up a java repository, and >their license is such that we cannot. It SEEMs that jpackage has a java JDK that I can use? http://jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=3319 It is 1.5.0 and the Centos instructions (http://www.scalix.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=516&highlight=centos) recommend 1.4.2, but oh well. So do I put in 2 yum repros in /etc/yum.repos.d? CentOS-Base.repo is currently in there. Can I add: jpackage.repo and install their gpg key? then: yum install java-1.5.0-sun-compat ??? After that, a yum update would first hit the Centos site for updates, then the jpackage? thanks! >-- >Jim Perrin >System Architect - UIT >Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

3 2

Enabling POP3 on CentOS4 / dovecot
by Bart Schaefer 18 Feb '06

18 Feb '06

I'm bringing up a new CentOS 4 machine on my home network. It's intended to replace a crufty machine that has been acting as my mail gateway. The existing machine does spam and virus filtering, and then I let my kids get their mail off it with POP3 from another machine on the home office LAN (so they're not competing with me for the keyboard when I'm working). Dovecot starts up an IMAP4 server but not a POP3 server. Is there a standard configuration (an RPM I've failed to install? an /etc/sysconfig script? somthing I can "chkconfig on" that I'm just not seeing?) for enabling POP3 with dovecot on RHEL4/CentOS4?

2 2

Does your rkhunter do an md5 check?
by Jim Smith 18 Feb '06

18 Feb '06

I rebuilt rkhunter-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm by using the spec and tgz from the rkhunter site (www.rootkit.nl) (I rebuilt it using his instructions.) However rkhunter does not do an md5 check. The box used to have fedora and each time there were updates it would complain that the some of the md5's don't match. I contacted the author using his contact feature on Wednesday but he hasn't replied. I know Karanbir's repo has 1.1.9 (as does fedora development), but i thought I'd have the latest. The box has # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 4.2 (Final) which is supported in the os.dat file in rkhunter. Output from this morning's mail :- Rootkit Hunter 1.2.8 is running Determining OS... Ready Checking binaries * Selftests Strings (command) [ OK ] * System tools Info: prelinked files found Performing 'known bad' check... /bin/cat [ OK ] /bin/chmod [ OK ] /bin/chown [ OK ] /bin/csh [ OK ] /bin/date [ OK ] /bin/df [ OK ] /bin/dmesg [ OK ] /bin/echo [ OK ] /bin/ed [ OK ] /bin/egrep [ OK ] /bin/env [ OK ] /bin/fgrep [ OK ] /bin/grep [ OK ] /bin/kill [ OK ] /bin/login [ OK ] /bin/ls [ OK ] /bin/more [ OK ] /bin/mount [ OK ] /bin/netstat [ OK ] /bin/ps [ OK ] /bin/sh [ OK ] /bin/sort [ OK ] /bin/su [ OK ] /sbin/chkconfig [ OK ] /sbin/depmod [ OK ] /sbin/ifconfig [ OK ] /sbin/ifdown [ OK ] /sbin/ifup [ OK ] /sbin/init [ OK ] /sbin/insmod [ OK ] /sbin/ip [ OK ] /sbin/lsmod [ OK ] /sbin/modinfo [ OK ] /sbin/modprobe [ OK ] /sbin/nologin [ OK ] /sbin/rmmod [ OK ] /sbin/runlevel [ OK ] /sbin/sulogin [ OK ] /sbin/sysctl [ OK ] /sbin/syslogd [ OK ] /usr/bin/chattr [ OK ] /usr/bin/du [ OK ] /usr/bin/file [ OK ] /usr/bin/find [ OK ] /usr/bin/groups [ OK ] /usr/bin/head [ OK ] /usr/bin/kill [ OK ] /usr/bin/killall [ OK ] /usr/bin/last [ OK ] /usr/bin/lastlog [ OK ] /usr/bin/less [ OK ] /usr/bin/locate [ OK ] /usr/bin/logger [ OK ] /usr/bin/lsattr [ OK ] /usr/bin/md5sum [ OK ] /usr/bin/passwd [ OK ] /usr/bin/pstree [ OK ] /usr/bin/sha1sum [ OK ] /usr/bin/size [ OK ] /usr/bin/slocate [ OK ] /usr/bin/stat [ OK ] /usr/bin/strace [ OK ] /usr/bin/strings [ OK ] /usr/bin/test [ OK ] /usr/bin/top [ OK ] /usr/bin/users [ OK ] /usr/bin/vmstat [ OK ] /usr/bin/w [ OK ] /usr/bin/watch [ OK ] /usr/bin/wc [ OK ] /usr/bin/wget [ OK ] /usr/bin/whatis [ OK ] /usr/bin/whereis [ OK ] /usr/bin/which [ OK ] /usr/bin/who [ OK ] /usr/bin/whoami [ OK ] /usr/sbin/adduser [ OK ] /usr/sbin/chroot [ OK ] /usr/sbin/kudzu [ OK ] /usr/sbin/tcpd [ OK ] /usr/sbin/useradd [ OK ] /usr/sbin/usermod [ OK ] /usr/sbin/vipw [ OK ] /usr/sbin/xinetd [ OK ] Performing 'known good' check... Check rootkits * Default files and directories Rootkit '55808 Trojan - Variant A'... [ OK ] ADM Worm... [ OK ] Rootkit 'AjaKit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'aPa Kit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Apache Worm'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Ambient (ark) Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Balaur Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'BeastKit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'beX2'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'BOBKit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'CiNIK Worm (Slapper.B variant)'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Danny-Boy's Abuse Kit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Devil RootKit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Dica'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Dreams Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Duarawkz'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Flea Linux Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'FreeBSD Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Fuck`it Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'GasKit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Heroin LKM'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'HjC Kit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'ignoKit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'ImperalsS-FBRK'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Irix Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Kitko'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Knark'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Li0n Worm'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Lockit / LJK2'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'MRK'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Ni0 Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'RootKit for SunOS / NSDAP'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Optic Kit (Tux)'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Oz Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Portacelo'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'R3dstorm Toolkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'RH-Sharpe's rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'RSHA's rootkit'... [ OK ] Sebek LKM [ OK ] Rootkit 'Scalper Worm'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Shutdown'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'SHV4'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'SHV5'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Sin Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Slapper'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Sneakin Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Suckit Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'SunOS Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Superkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'TBD (Telnet BackDoor)'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'TeLeKiT'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'T0rn Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Trojanit Kit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Tuxtendo'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'URK'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'VcKit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'Volc Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'X-Org SunOS Rootkit'... [ OK ] Rootkit 'zaRwT.KiT Rootkit'... [ OK ] * Suspicious files and malware Scanning for known rootkit strings [ OK ] Scanning for known rootkit files [ OK ] Testing running processes... [ OK ] Miscellaneous Login backdoors [ OK ] Miscellaneous directories [ OK ] Software related files [ OK ] Sniffer logs [ OK ] * Trojan specific characteristics shv4 Checking /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit Test 1 [ Clean ] Test 2 [ Clean ] Test 3 [ Clean ] Checking /etc/inetd.conf [ Not found ] Checking /etc/xinetd.conf [ Clean ] * Suspicious file properties chmod properties Checking /bin/ps [ Clean ] Checking /bin/ls [ Clean ] Checking /usr/bin/w [ Clean ] Checking /usr/bin/who [ Clean ] Checking /bin/netstat [ Clean ] Checking /bin/login [ Clean ] Script replacements Checking /bin/ps [ Clean ] Checking /bin/ls [ Clean ] Checking /usr/bin/w [ Clean ] Checking /usr/bin/who [ Clean ] Checking /bin/netstat [ Clean ] Checking /bin/login [ Clean ] * OS dependant tests Linux Checking loaded kernel modules... [ OK ] Checking files attributes [ OK ] Checking LKM module path [ OK ] Networking * Check: frequently used backdoors Port 2001: Scalper Rootkit [ OK ] Port 2006: CB Rootkit [ OK ] Port 2128: MRK [ OK ] Port 14856: Optic Kit (Tux) [ OK ] Port 47107: T0rn Rootkit [ OK ] Port 60922: zaRwT.KiT [ OK ] * Interfaces Scanning for promiscuous interfaces [ OK ] System checks * Allround tests Checking hostname... Found. Hostname is tim.nsp.robotics Checking for passwordless user accounts... OK Checking for differences in user accounts... OK. No changes. Checking for differences in user groups... OK. No changes. Checking boot.local/rc.local file... - /etc/rc.local [ OK ] - /etc/rc.d/rc.local [ OK ] - /usr/local/etc/rc.local [ Not found ] - /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rc.local [ Not found ] - /etc/conf.d/local.start [ Not found ] - /etc/init.d/boot.local [ Not found ] Checking rc.d files... Processing........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ........................................ ..... Result rc.d files check [ OK ] Checking history files Bourne Shell [ OK ] * Filesystem checks Checking /dev for suspicious files... [ OK ] Scanning for hidden files... [ Warning! ] --------------- /dev/.udev.tdb /etc/.pwd.lock /etc/.java --------------- Please inspect: /etc/.java (directory) Application advisories * Application scan Checking Apache2 modules ... [ Not found ] Checking Apache configuration ... [ OK ] * Application version scan - GnuPG 1.2.6 [ OK ] - Apache 2.0.52 [ OK ] - Bind DNS 9.2.4 [ OK ] - OpenSSL 0.9.7a [ Old or patched version ] - PHP 4.3.9 [ Old or patched version ] - Procmail MTA 3.22 [ OK ] - OpenSSH 3.9p1 [ OK ] Security advisories * Check: Groups and Accounts Searching for /etc/passwd... [ Found ] Checking users with UID '0' (root)... [ OK ] * Check: SSH Searching for sshd_config... Found /etc/ssh/sshd_config Checking for allowed root login... [ OK (Remote root login disabled) ] Checking for allowed protocols... [ OK (Only SSH2 allowed) ] * Check: Events and Logging Search for syslog configuration... [ OK ] Checking for running syslog slave... [ OK ] Checking for logging to remote system... [ OK (no remote logging) ] ---------------------------- Scan results ---------------------------- MD5 MD5 compared: 0 Incorrect MD5 checksums: 0 File scan Scanned files: 342 Possible infected files: 0 Application scan Vulnerable applications: 2 Scanning took 138 seconds ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Do you have some problems, undetected rootkits, false positives, ideas or suggestions? Please e-mail me by filling in the contact form (@http://www.rootkit.nl) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 12, Issue 10
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 18 Feb '06

18 Feb '06

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEEA:2006:0216-001 CentOS 4 ia64 centos-yumconf Enhancement - update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CEEA:2006:0216-001 CentOS 4 axp centos-yumconf Enhancement - update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CEEA:2006:0216-001 CentOS 4 s390(x) centos-yumconf Enhancement - update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:18:33 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)papat.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA:2006:0216-001 CentOS 4 ia64 centos-yumconf Enhancement - update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20060217131833.GJ4576(a)core.upi.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CEEA:2006:0216-001 CentOS 4 i386 centos-yumconf Enhancement - update Due to a request made on the CentOS mailing list, we modified the update system to listen on both port 80 and 81 for mirrorlist.centos.org and serve mirrorlists for updates. The default CentOS-Base.repo file in centos-yumconf has now been modified to connect via port 80 instead of port 81 to retrieve mirrorlists. The following files are updated and syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/centos-yumconf-4-4.5.noarch.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/

1 0

ssh x11 forwarding problem
by Tony Schreiner 18 Feb '06

18 Feb '06

I'm running into an a problem with x11 forwarding over ssh I'm trying to run an application (rasmol - molecule viewing program) which when using the the default setup for x11 forwarding causes the following error: X Error of failed request: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) Major opcode of failed request: 132 (MIT-SHM) Minor opcode of failed request: 1 (X_ShmAttach) Serial number of failed request: 230 Current serial number in output stream: 231 It used to be possible to overcome this by setting X11UseLocalhost no in /etc/ssh/sshd_config This worked in CentOS 3 but does not in CentOS 4 (or Fedora 4 for that matter), and I'm guessing it is a XFree86 vs. Xorg issue. Now, when using X11UseLocalhost no no X applications work ssh myserver # echo $DISPLAY myserver.fqdn:10.0 # xdpyinfo xdpyinfo: unable to open display "myserver.fqdn:10.0". I have X11 forwarding set up on the client side by default. on the other hand if I don't use tunneling, but set DISPLAY=myclient: 0 and xhost +myserver on the client then the application works. I prefer to use tunneling if possible. Thoughts about why X11UseLocalhost doesn't work? Tony Schreiner

4 4

kernel panic: Assertion failure in __journal_unfile_buffer()
by Ulrik S. Kofod 18 Feb '06

18 Feb '06

I was just extracting a 96MB tar file ( tar -xWf backup.tar ), the cpu load was 99% for a long time. I then stopped it and tried again, but this time this popped up in my ssh session: -- Message from syslogd@rock at Sat Feb 18 00:47:05 2006 ... rock kernel: Assertion failure in __journal_unfile_buffer() at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1520: "jh->b_jlist < 9" -- A kernel panic dump is displayed on the servers monitor. Here is what I can remember: Call trace: jurnal_commit_transaction+<something> [jdb] Is the panic dump stored anywhere? When I rebooted, the raid set was dirty and it was re-synced, it did not mark a drive faulty or started using a spare, the raid set still uses the same two disks and now everything seems normal, except this is the second time it does this. It is a fresh install of Cent-OS 4.2 from the DVD image and with the latest updates from yum. The server has 4 80GB software mirrored IDE disks, 2 + 2 spares, one on each channel of a HPT374 controller. I have no idea about what to look for; I have tested the disks many times with the vendor tools and no errors have been found.

1 1

OT: Local Mirror problems, wrong paths to RPMs with yum update
by James Pifer 17 Feb '06

17 Feb '06

This week I set up a local mirror for a few dists, including Centos 4.0 and 4.2, and Fedora Core 3 and 4. I'm using a script called yum-pull. For the most part I really like the script, it automates the setup of your mirrors and tries a bunch of different mirrors when it goes out to get updates, if it fails on one it tries another. It uses the usual suspects, createrepo and repoview, among others. That being said I have it all setup, but I have the following problem. For some reason the paths are not always right when you run yum update from a workstation. I'm installing a fresh copy of centos 4.2 right now so I can test the centos mirror, but I definitely have problems with my FC3 and 4 ones. One example, if I include atrpms in my repo file, it's looking for the RPMs in this directory: http://mirror.myserver.com/repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/atrpms/ BUT it should be looking here: http://mirror.myserver.com/repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/atrpms/packages/ Can anyone tell me where this is screwed up at? The directory structure looks like this: repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/atrpms/headers/ repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/atrpms/packages/ repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/atrpms/repodata/ repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/updates/headers/ repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/updates/packages/ repomirror/fedora/linux/4/i386/updates/repodata/ etc. I just tried my centos4.2 mirror on the new test install and it worked ok. Still, any help understanding this is appreciated. I did some googling on createrepo but have yet to find my answer. Thanks, James

3 7

Problems with IDE RAID on specific motherboard
by Benjamin Smith 17 Feb '06

17 Feb '06

About 9 months ago, I made a policy decision to adopt RAID 1 on all systems I admin. (about 20 systems, all told) It's been a long, slow process. One of the systems is being upgraded from CentOS3 to CentOS4. It's been rock-solid stable for over a year. It's a "frankenserver" with parts from all over the place, maintained over years of active service. Currently, it's got an ASRock "M810LMR" motherboard in it. http://www.ciao.co.uk/ASRock_M810LMR__5410842 When I install the O/S (I've tried CentOS 4.0 and 4.2) with IDE RAID, it bombs, takes hours just to format the drives, and won't reboot, getting stuck at "GRUB". But, when I install the SAME TWO DRIVES without RAID, (eg: some partitions on one drive, some on the other) it works perfectly. I've tried putting both drives on separate IDE cablels, using completely different drives, and trying CentOS 4.0 and 4.2. When I try to set up IDE raid while it's taking a very long time to format the drives, I see lots of errors about DMA on the alternate consoles, and there being only one drive (unable to start RAID array, only 1 drive found) even though the installer and disk druid have no problem reporting both drives. It comes down to something like "/dev/mdN delayed until /dev/mdX is synchronized because they share physical resources"... I'm stumped, and falling back to non-RAID because this system is needed in production. And, I'm not new to using software RAID, I've been using it for years without issue. Any idea what's going on? -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978

3 5

Postgresql 8.1.x on CentOS 3.6
by Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) 17 Feb '06

17 Feb '06

Hello everyone, Does anyone know if there are any Postgresql 8.1.3 RPMs for CentOS 3.6? I've looked at the Postgresql website but I couldn't find anything under RHEL3/CentOS3. I've tried installing the RHEL4 RPMs which seem to work. Unfortunately, I'm getting errors whenever I try to compile PHP5 from source. Thanks and Best Regards, Matt -- Stand before it and there is no beginning. Follow it and there is no end. Stay with the ancient Tao, Move with the present.

4 8

yum update error - helpful advise please
by Robert Hanson 17 Feb '06

17 Feb '06

greetings i have a certain production www and email server when i yum update [root@tst ~]# yum update Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories update 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 addons 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package spamassassin.i386 0:3.0.4-1.el4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin = 3.0.2-1 for package: spamassassin-tools --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin = 3.0.2-1 is needed by package spamassassin-tools i get this and it dies of course... now, i have an decent idea of one way to approach dealing with this yet i wanted to seek the wisdom on the list so that i do not hose the machine "unnecessarily" what does the error mean or tell you experts and.... thanks in advance for advise, different approaches, and pointers! - rh -- Robert Hanson - Abba Communications Computer & Internet Services (509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss