Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

IPtraf not looking right on the console..
by WipeOut 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

I have a CentOS 4 server at home where we store all our data, I wanted to get some idea of the amount of traffic going into and out of the server by protocol so I installed IPtraf.. When I run it from an ssh session it looks fine but when I run it directly on the server console its doesn't look right at all.. It doesn't seem to layout correctly.. Is there something I need to do differently on the console to run it? Thanks..

5 10

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 12, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 3 ia64 mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2006:0200 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 firefox - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CENTOSPLUS CESA-2006:0200 Critical CentOS 3 ia64 firefox - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 3 i386 mozilla - security update (Tru Huynh) 6. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 mozilla - security update (Tru Huynh) 7. CESA-2006:0200 Critical CentOS 3 i386 firefox - security update (CENTOSPLUS only) (Tru Huynh) 8. CESA-2006:0200 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 firefox - security update (CENTOSPLUS only) (Tru Huynh) 9. CESA-2006:0191-01: Important CentOS 2 i386 kernel security update (John Newbigin) 10. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 3 s390(x) mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 11. CESA-2006:0199-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386 mozilla security update (John Newbigin) 12. CESA-2006:0200 Critical CentOS 4 i386 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 13. CESA-2006:0200 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 14. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 mozilla - security update (Johnny Hughes) 15. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 4 i386 mozilla - security update (Johnny Hughes) 16. CESA-2006:0200 Critical CentOS 4 axp firefox - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 17. CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 4 axp mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:17:59 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)papat.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2006:0199 Critical CentOS 3 ia64 mozilla - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20060202181758.GC4576(a)core.upi.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006:0199 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0199.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-chat-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-devel-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-dom-inspector-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-js-debugger-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-mail-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-nspr-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-nspr-devel-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-nss-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/mozilla-nss-devel-1.7.12-1.1.3.4.centos3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/

1 0

CentOS 3 sound intermittently goes out
by Bart Schaefer 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

I'm running CentOS 3.6. The hardware is an Intel D865GBF motherboard, but I also have a generic soundblaster-compatible PCI card installed, because back when I installed CentOS 3.1 I had problems getting the onboard sound to work. The PCI sound card worked fine until about the time I installed CentOS 3.5. Since then, however, it has failed intermittently. Once it fails, it's generally out for several days, then might come back for a while, then go out again. Lately it's off more than it's on. The state following a reboot or power cycle is unpredictable; usually there's no sound after reboot, but sometimes that revives it. I've tried changing configurations, including fiddling with alsa as suggested in a some postings on this list, and starting up and exiting from various different sound apps, etc. None of it seems to make any difference; when the sound comes back on, it's for no reason that I can discern. Does anyone have any ideas how to diagnose/fix this? Could the card itself be going bad, and if so how can I tell?

1 1

postfix+sasl error logs
by spart cus 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

i have these errors on my postfix logs. ive just installed postfix+sasl.what seems to be the problem ? mail postfix/smtpd[26307]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available Feb 1 17:37:27 mail postfix/smtpd[26333]: sql_select option missing --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.

2 10

Mbox Problems Dovecot
by José Albornoz_ViaBcp 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

Hi all, Is anybody have this problem with Centos 4.2, postfix-2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4, dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1 In the log /var/log/maillog have: Feb 2 08:44:44 net02 pop3(user01): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user01: LF not found where expected Feb 2 08:45:14 net02 pop3(user01): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user01: LF not found where expected Feb 2 08:45:14 net02 pop3(user01): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user01: LF not found where expected Feb 2 11:48:11 net02 pop3(user02): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user02: LF not found where expected Feb 2 11:48:11 net02 pop3(user02): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user02: LF not found where expected Feb 2 11:49:11 net02 pop3(user02): Error indexing mbox file /var/mail/user02: LF not found where expected I know it´s a bug of dovecot ( http://wiki.dovecot.org/MboxProblems ) there is a new version or patch of dovecot any suggestions? Thanks. José Albornoz.

1 0

rsh/rlogin on CentOS4.2
by Scott Taylor 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

Hello all, I'm not quite sure what has changed in the recent rsh commands, but I can't seem to get around the password promting. I need a clnk rsh between two machines in order to run my backup script. I added all the usual .rhosts with the proper permissions et al added the xinetd.d confilg files, opened ports 543 and 544 in my firewall, yet when I use the rsh commands, I get either a password prompt or some Kerberos stuff that I don't use. ie: rexec intrbase ls password: and connect to address 192.168.99.211: Connection refused Trying krb4 rlogin... connect to address 192.168.99.211: Connection refused trying normal rlogin (/usr/bin/rlogin) Last login: Thu Feb 2 07:47:37 from spare As you can see this is for an internal network, so I'm not freaked out about security here. I can't seem to find anything in the help files about it. How can I configure rsh to use the old, normal way of auth? I'm using the latest CentOS4.2 Cheers. -- Scott

4 8

Postfix + Cyrus + AD Windows 2003
by Cleber P. de Souza 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

Has someone here successfully implemented Postfix Postfix + Cyrus authentication against a Windows 2003 Active Directory? If there are, have some suggestion about this environment, tips or recommendations? -- Cleber P. de Souza

1 0

SV: SV: [CentOS] usernames with capitals
by Claus Derlien 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

--NoDisclaim-- Karanbir Singh wrote: >Can we not top post ? I really hate posting when the content is just >going around and around in circles. >Anyway, just so that everyone knows - this is a known issue. Expect a >fix in U7 CentOS-3, or move to CentOS-4. what does U7 means here ? >There is specific policy in place that prevents Uppercase logins from >being created. Sorry about my posting style. I have fixed my problem by hacking shadow-4.0.3 so it now suits my needs. :-) Its not pretty but now it works, according to my own policy :-) we have never had any problems with capital usernames, not even when we mail enabled the systems years ago. best regards Claus Derlien Frie Funktionærer - faglig organisation og tværfaglig a-kasse - www.f-f.dk *************************************************************************************************************************************** Denne email og alle filer vedlagt som bilag kan indeholde fortroligt materiale, der kun er beregnet for adressaten, og maa ikke udleveres eller kopieres til uvedkommende. Har De ved en fejltagelse modtaget denne email, bedes De venligst omgaaende meddele os dette pr. telefon : 6313 8550. Paa forhaand tak. *************************************************************************************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information intended for the addressee(s) only. The information is not to be surrendered or copied to unauthorised persons. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone: +45 6313 8550. Thank you. ***************************************************************************************************************************************

2 1

SV: [CentOS] usernames with capitals
by Claus Derlien 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

--NoDisclaim-- I cant use an editor to mass update and change usernames as this is a part of an automatic useradd routine written in an ancient legacy application which calls useradd and usermod, we have been using this software for more than 15 years, so its hard for me to argue for a rewrite, so im forced to bend the OS instead it isnt a problem on redhat 8.0, so somewhere in the patches for shadow utils. there must be a change to this behaviour.. up until now i have created the useradds with lower case and manually converted them to upper case I am aware that it is a no no to use upper case usernames, but we have been doing it for years without problems so... thanks for the answers so far best regards claus derlien -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org]På vegne af Les Mikesell Sendt: 1. februar 2006 18:06 Til: CentOS mailing list Emne: Re: [CentOS] usernames with capitals On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 08:45, Barry Brimer wrote: > > If it is just for a set of existing users, I'd add them in > > lowercase, then edit > > /etc/passwd > > /etc/shadow > > /etc/group > > /etc/gshadow > > and mv the /home/ directory to names you want (making sure > > everything matches). > > You might choose to use vipw and vigr to edit the above files as well. > > If you use local mail spools, you will need to rename /var/spool/mail/user > to /var/spool/mail/USER That's actually a different problem and a good reason by itself not to ever use uppercase in a user login name. Mailers on unix-like systems usually want to lowercase the address. I've always avoided doing this myself so I'm not sure about the details or how to work around it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos **************************************************************************** Denne mail er blevet scannet af http://www.virus112.com **************************************************************************** Frie Funktionærer - faglig organisation og tværfaglig a-kasse - www.f-f.dk *************************************************************************************************************************************** Denne email og alle filer vedlagt som bilag kan indeholde fortroligt materiale, der kun er beregnet for adressaten, og maa ikke udleveres eller kopieres til uvedkommende. Har De ved en fejltagelse modtaget denne email, bedes De venligst omgaaende meddele os dette pr. telefon : 6313 8550. Paa forhaand tak. *************************************************************************************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information intended for the addressee(s) only. The information is not to be surrendered or copied to unauthorised persons. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone: +45 6313 8550. Thank you. ***************************************************************************************************************************************

3 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss