Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34734 discussions

Some questions regarding CEntos
by Max Beerli 13 Dec '04

13 Dec '04

Hello list. I am assigned the task to select a RHEL3 clone operating system for a couple of servers. So far I have found Whitehat Linux, Tao, Scientific Linux and Centos. I like the community developed aspect advantage of Centos compared to the other distros where one or couple people maintain the operating system. - Is this a long term goal project? How does it sustain itself? How much extra money is usually required on a monthly basis for operations? I noticed that developers had to pay for hosting costs when new iso images were released. Wouldn't using bittorrent cut down on downloading costs? - How does Centos compare to other RHEL clones? Are there enough developers to quickly update packages when Redhat makes security announcements? - Do Centos developers have access to RHEL3 machines or is everything done on Centos computers? For that matter do developers compile the Redhat released SRPMS + updates on RHEL computers or are binary RPM packages built on Centos operating system itself? I am asking because it would seem to me that using a full Redhat provided distro to build packages might introduce less erorrs? - What is changed from official RHEL releases besides the copyrighted logos for each Centos release? I am not talking about packages in the addons directories. Just the base os release packages. Many thank yous.Max. _________________________________________________________________ Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen Technology. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=ht… Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.

4 3

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 12 Dec '04

12 Dec '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:651-01 Updated imlib packages fix security vulnerabilities Files available: imlib-1.9.13-4.3.i386.rpm imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.13-4.3.i386.rpm imlib-devel-1.9.13-4.3.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

The package ??? is signed, but with an uknown GPG key.
by Benoit Panizzon 11 Dec '04

11 Dec '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi All Well, it looks like I run into the same problem as many others... Unfortuately the FAQ referenced in the mailinglist archive with the solution does not seam to be online anymore. What I did try: rpm --import /usr/share/rhn/RPM-GPG-KEY* rpm --import /usr/share/doc/centos-release-3.3/RPM-GPG-KEY And also: rpm --import http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3.1/i386/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-3 According to a Bug Report I've seen... Still I'm not able to update a newly installed system. Any other ideas? Regards - -Benoit- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBuvfoCVq2G/yL7/ARAkvPAKC8UGym8ad1ihKOfU2gdoIQgXzVOwCgzpjb vLLz8JTLC4W6Ycz1XruoUhE= =l2fY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

RE: [Centos] VMWare problems on CentOS 3.3 x86-64
by Ryan Rothert 11 Dec '04

11 Dec '04

I ran into this same problem with x86-64 and VMWare GSX server, VMWare does not officially support x86-64 yet. The VMWare binaries are 32bit... Ryan -----Original Message----- From: centos-admin(a)caosity.org [mailto:centos-admin@caosity.org] On Behalf Of Will Dinkel Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 9:55 AM To: Rob Beard Cc: centos(a)caosity.org Subject: Re: [Centos] VMWare problems on CentOS 3.3 x86-64 Your system does have an ld-linux installed, it's just the 64-bit version from glibc x86_64: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Looks like VMWare needs the 32-bit ld-linux.so.2, which comes in glibc i686. Execute "yum install glibc.i686". Hopefully that'll get you going. On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 04:35, Rob Beard wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I'm having getting VMWare > to work on CentOS 3.3 (x86-64). > > I recently downloaded VMWare workstation 4.5 (not sure of exact > version number but its the latest version as of yesterday). I was > hoping to run CentOS as my main OS and then use VMWare to still > support Windows XP machines and run the couple of applications which refuse to work properly under Wine. > > I installed the RPM okay, ran the configuration script fro VMWare, > however when it comes to running VMware I get a message about a > missing libaray - "ld- linux.so.2". > > I did a search on the hard disk and couldn't find it. I also couldn't > find an RPM package (either source or binary) to install. > > Everything else on CentOS seems to be going okay, its really fast > compared to Suse 9.1 which I was running previously (not sure if thats > because I'm running a 64-bit OS or that CentOS doesn't have as much running at once?). > > Could anyone suggest how I can get this library? > > Regards, > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

CentOS-3 errata Updated imlib fixes security vulnerabilities
by Lance Davis 10 Dec '04

10 Dec '04

There are updated imlib packages for CentOS 3.3 (and added to 3.1) https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-651.html refers Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/imlib-1.9.13-13.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.13-13.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/imlib-devel-1.9.13-13.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/imlib-1.9.13-13.4.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3.3/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update imlib' should be sufficient.

1 0

CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - Updated imlib packages fix security vulnerabilities
by Will Dinkel 10 Dec '04

10 Dec '04

New imlib packages are available for x86_64. Refer to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-651.html for more information. RPMS/imlib-1.9.13-13.4.x86_64.rpm RPMS/imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.13-13.4.x86_64.rpm RPMS/imlib-devel-1.9.13-13.4.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/imlib-1.9.13-13.4.src.rpm Execute "yum update imlib" to apply. Will Dinkel Chief Systems Engineer Team HPC, Inc. 785-542-2135 x304 wdinkel(a)teamhpc.com http://www.teamhpc.com

1 0

VMWare problems on CentOS 3.3 x86-64
by Rob Beard 10 Dec '04

10 Dec '04

Hi folks, I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I'm having getting VMWare to work on CentOS 3.3 (x86-64). I recently downloaded VMWare workstation 4.5 (not sure of exact version number but its the latest version as of yesterday). I was hoping to run CentOS as my main OS and then use VMWare to still support Windows XP machines and run the couple of applications which refuse to work properly under Wine. I installed the RPM okay, ran the configuration script fro VMWare, however when it comes to running VMware I get a message about a missing libaray - "ld- linux.so.2". I did a search on the hard disk and couldn't find it. I also couldn't find an RPM package (either source or binary) to install. Everything else on CentOS seems to be going okay, its really fast compared to Suse 9.1 which I was running previously (not sure if thats because I'm running a 64-bit OS or that CentOS doesn't have as much running at once?). Could anyone suggest how I can get this library? Regards, Rob

3 2

Kernel Panic on New Kernel Package
by Joshua Strzalko 10 Dec '04

10 Dec '04

Hey all, I have a P4 2.4 GHz CPU (hyper threading) and have been using the 2.4.21-20.EL.c0smp kernel and it works perfectly. I installed the new kernel-smp (2.4.21-20.0.1.EL) kernel and it installed flawlessly. However, every time I boot I get a kernel panic and I must reboot to the older kernel. The error I am getting is: (it seems to be failing on jbd.o and ext3.o) Kernel requires old insmod, but couldn't run /bin/insmod.old No such file or directory Then it can't find the initrd and Panics. I am running a single partition on my software RAID1, the file system is ext3. [root@admin /]# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/md0 115377576 2014940 107501728 2% / none 512700 0 512700 0% /dev/shm [root@admin /]# I just can't seem to figure it out. I've done some searching online but the fixes people are posting just don't seem logical as my initrd IS there. [root@admin /]# ls -al /boot/*2.4.21-20.0.1.EL* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 48514 Dec 2 18:38 /boot/config-2.4.21-20.0.1.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 306034 Dec 3 16:13 /boot/initrd-2.4.21-20.0.1.ELsmp.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 601959 Dec 2 18:38 /boot/System.map-2.4.21-20.0.1.ELsmp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3523220 Dec 2 18:38 /boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-20.0.1.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1353893 Dec 2 18:38 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.21-20.0.1.ELsmp [root@admin /]# Any help would be greatly appreciated as I would like to put this machine into production soon. Regards, Josh

2 2

Firewire drive support in CentOS 3.3?
by Steve Dussinger 09 Dec '04

09 Dec '04

I just recently downloaded and installed the CentOS 3.3 release, and I'm having a bit of a problem... It appears that no support for firewire drives has been included. I am unable to find the ohci1394 or sbp2 modules anywhere. Are there other packages which must be installed from the distribution to get firewire devices to be recognized? Thanks. --Steve

5 6

Dag's repository?
by WipeOut 09 Dec '04

09 Dec '04

Hi, Just getting into Centos and so far so good.. Since its the same as RHEL and uses YUM I wanted to know if there are any issues using Dag's EL3 packages with Centos 3.3?? This will be for a production server (my web server) so if there are any issues with these packaged I would rather not find out the hard way.. :) Thanks..

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss