Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

kde panels not retaining launcher icon
by geo.inbox.ignored 26 Apr '17

26 Apr '17

greetings one and all. new install of centos 6.8. 3 kde panels @ left, top, right sides. left and top panel are for program selection. right panel for active running programs. added 'launcher' icons to left and top panels, but panels are not retaining launcher icons. when i close kde to save ~/.kde file and reopen kde, 1, 2, or all 3 panels will be missing launcher. has anyone else seen such or know of cure? much help appreciated. tia. -- The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Albert Einstein CentOS GNU/Linux 6.8 -- KDE 4.3.4 Firefox 45.7.0 -- Thunderbird 45.6.0 GNUCash 2.4.15 -- zoneminder 1.30.0 peace out. tc,hago. g . =+= Tired of having your microsoft os hacked? Change to Linux os, used by microsoft hackers. =+= in a world with out fences, who needs gates. =+=

1 0

Odd disk automount issue on C7.3.1611
by Lamar Owen 25 Apr '17

25 Apr '17

I'm posting here before going through all the fun to do up a real bug report to see if anyone else has seen this behavior. I have two identical Dynex external USB3 drive enclosures with identical 3TB drives in each enclosure. The dmesg output shows: $ dmesg |grep TOSHIBA [ 59.942546] scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Access TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6 [ 86.301123] scsi 8:0:0:0: Direct-Access TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6 $ HOWEVER, the 'Disks' utility program only sees the first one plugged-in, and not the second one. It doesn't matter which one I plug in first; the second one won't get seen by Disks nor will it get automounted. It doesn't even do the 'USB device inserted' sound, for that matter. As another oddity, one of the drives has a LUKS-encrypted ext4 filesystem; the other has an XFS filesystem; if I plug in the XFS-formatted drive first, the LUKS-encrypted on will no longer automount even if the XFS-formatted drive is unmounted and unplugged first, but the the converse does work (mount LUKS+ext4; unmount and unplug; plug in XFS, it gets automounted). If I plug in the LUKS+ext4 disk first, enter the passphrase, and let it mount, then plug in the XFS drive, I can then manually (from the command line) mount it just fine and both drives work just fine. Both drives work fine when used singly, but not when both are plugged-in. So, has anyone else seen this? I don't mind filing a bug report, but I am at a bit of a loss as to what component to file it under. I haven't dug into too many logs or other files as yet, but I can if I need to do so. I ran into this making an encrypted copy of the contents of the XFS disk, which will be wiped and reformated LUKS+ext4, and I'd like to make these two drives back each other up. If I plug in a different USB3 drive, such as my 4TB Seagate, everything works as expected; it seems to only be the identical drives that confuse whatever process is detecting this. -- Lamar Owen Chief Information Officer Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 828-862-5554 www.pari.edu

1 0

Bonding mode balance-alb (6): How to control the assigned MAC address?
by Frank Thommen 25 Apr '17

25 Apr '17

Hi, we are trying to switch our bonding modes from 1 (active-backup) to 6 (balance-alb). However it seems, that these bond devices are not always getting the MAC address from the same slave. Sometimes the device gets the MAC address of the first and sometimes of the second slave. Since only the MAC address of the first slave device is (can be) registered in DHCP, this breaks connectivity (about) every second time we boot the computer. Is there a way to control which MAC address is assigned to the bonding device w/o configuring it explicitely in the ifcfg file? Cheers frank

2 1

systemd override.conf question
by Robert Moskowitz 24 Apr '17

24 Apr '17

Does the override.conf file need the section headers? For example: # cat /etc/systemd/system/postfix.service.d/override.conf [Unit] After=syslog.target network.target time-sync.target Will it work with just the After line, or is the [Unit] line needed to control the merge function. thanks

2 2

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll - So Long, and Thanks for All the fish.
by James B. Byrne 24 Apr '17

24 Apr '17

On Wed, April 19, 2017 16:22, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Apple has had massively disruptive changes on OS X and iOS. Windows > has had a fairly disruptive set of changes in Windows 10. About the > only things that don't change are industrial OS's. > I have no idea how this reference applies to my earlier post. We do not use Apple or Windows servers and the desktop environment is stabilised at Win7pro. There will be be no Windows 10 here ever. OSX / iOS employment is limited to personal devices, none of which are permitted on premise in any case. > When it comes to breaking user space, there's explicit rules against > that in Linux kernel development. And internally consistent API/ABI > stability is something you're getting in CentOS/RHEL kernels, it's one > of the points the distributions exist. But the idea that Windows and > OS X have better overall API stability I think is untrue, having > spoken to a very wide assortment of developers who build primarily > user space apps. This may be true. It is likely important to software developers. It is also totally irrelevant to a business. Businesses, other than software development houses and consultants, are software users. When a vendor massively rearranges things in their software, deprecates scripting syntax that has existed for years if not decades, and fundamentally changes the way the administration of an operating system is presented it really matter not a wit to a business that the internal kernel level api remains unchanged. It is the accumulated administrative experience that is lost in consequence that concerns a business given that replacing that loss will cost either directly in retraining or indirectly in error and resultant disruption; or both. > > What does happen, in kernel ABI changes can break your driver, as > there's no upstream promise for ABI compatibility within the kernel > itself. The effect of this is very real on say, Android, and might be > one of the reasons for Google's Fuscia project which puts most of the > drivers, including video drivers, into user space. And Microsoft also > rarely changes things in their kernel, so again drivers tend to not > break. > > And this illustrates the point that I attempting to make. A business owner assumes that whatever OS is used it will deal with the various devices that make up its hardware environment. For if it does not then they seek an OS that does. However, vanishingly few firms in my experience (i.e.NONE) have ever had operational programming staff write or even modify a device driver. A business is in existence to make money for its owners not dick around with esoteric computer theory and practice. Red Hat, again in my sole opinion, increasingly appears to me to be emulating another company notorious for shuffling the user interface to little evident purpose other than profit. That is good business for them. It is not good for us. Bear in mind that we have been RedHat/Whitebox/CA-OS/CentOS users since 1998 so it is not like we are moving away from Linux with anything like enthusiasm. But this upgrade treadmill that has developed within RH is simply too costly for us to bear any longer. The idea that one has to rebuild from scratch entire host systems and then laboriously port over data and customised portions to a new host simply to upgrade the underlying OS is absolutely ludicrous. Consider the tremendous labour costs regularly incurred in accomplishing what amounts to maintaining the status quo. We just upgraded a FreeBSD host from 10.3 to 11.0 in situ without problem; and with very little downtime (three reboots in the space of 30 minutes). This was no standalone device either. It was the OS running the metal for multiple BHyve virtual machines, themselves running various operating systems (but mainly FreeBSD-11). One of said vms being our Samba-4 AD-DC. And, had it all gone south then, given we use ZFS in FreeBSD, and that we snapshot regularly, getting back to 10.3 would have been, and still could be, nearly instantaneous. Think about what that would take in terms of man hours to accomplish moving from EL6 to 7. And moving from 5 to 6 was not much better. This is just too expensive to repeat every three years. And allow me to forestall any claims that the chimera that is 'cloud computing' is the answer. All that does is make creating the requisite new platforms marginally less tedious. And that small advantage is purchased at the cost of handling over control of all your data to entities who are thoroughly discredited with respect to security and privacy. I am not anti or pro systemd, upstart, or etc/rc (or any other software although I admit to holding a generally dim view of things from Redmond). I do not really care what is used so long as it works and that introducing it does not greatly diminish the value of existing user skills and knowledge. However, I am past the point of patience with gratuitous changes that offer no appreciable benefit to the parties tasked with dealing them. Systemd is not the problem. It is a symptom of a deeper malaise, indifference. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

6 7

How to PXE kickstart hosts with little memory (Error: "Warning: /dev/root does not exist")?
by Frank Thommen 24 Apr '17

24 Apr '17

Hi, while kickstarting our virtual machines with PXE we often run into kickstart/anaconda failing with [...] [...] dracut-mount[xxx]: Warning: Can't mount root filesystem [...] dracut-mount[xxx]: Warning: /dev/root does not exist [...] dracut-mount[xxx]:/lib/dracut-lib.sh: line 1030: echo write error: No space left on device Starting Dracut Emergency Shell... Warning: /dev/root does not exist Generating "/run/initramfs/rsdosreport.txt" [...] It seems, that this is not related to local disk space - as I initally thought - but to too small memory. It only happens with VMs with little RAM (1024 MB). As soon as we raise the available memory to 2048 MB, kickstarting works fine. The RHEL 7 installation guide states, that the minimal memory requirement is 1 GB, so the network installation /should/ work. Is there a way to install such hosts w/o having to temporarily raise the available memory? Cheers frank

2 2

Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.
by Lamar Owen 24 Apr '17

24 Apr '17

I have an application with is binary-only, does its job well, and is only available for either libc5 (!) or early early glibc2.0 (!!). It has been running on a Red Hat Linux 5.2 (NOT RHEL; RHL) server for a really long time, and it honestly does its job and it's not easily replaced by an open-source solution at the moment. So, I need to do one of the following things: 1.) Run Red Hat Linux 5.2 (or similar vintage) on KVM on CentOS 7; 2.) Build libc5 (!) for CentOS 7 and run it on C7 (if that's even possible). The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is in RHL 6.2, libc-5.3.12. (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability or compatibility). So, I have RHL 5.2 (Apollo) running on KVM on C7, but I'm not getting any networking working. The only two non-virtio NICs are e1000 and rtl8139. As I recall kernel 2.0.36 and rtl8139 were pretty iffy together, and e1000 drivers are not likely available (I couldn't find any). The host's bridge sees the MAC of the guest, but the guest isn't seeing any traffic. So, has anyone tried doing anything this old with modern kvm (I'm using the qemu-ev packages, incidentally)? I've successfully set up the bridging; a CentOS 7 VM on the same host has full connectivity. So it's something about the rtl8139 and the 2.0.36 kernel. What is the oldest distribution you've done on KVM on C7?

3 4

CentOS 7 + HPLIP = blank page
by Nicolas Kovacs 22 Apr '17

22 Apr '17

Hi, I just installed CentOS 7 + KDE on a new workstation in my office. I tried to setup my printer, but the test page is blank. Here's some details. The printer is an HP OfficeJet 8600 Pro. It works perfectly with all other desktop clients running Slackware Linux and HPLIP. I installed hplip and hplip-gui, launched HP Toolbox and then setup the printer - a network printer - which is mainly a matter of confirming OK, OK, OK. The printer shows up OK in HP Toolbox, but when I try to print a test page, the printer ejects a blank page, that's it. Which leaves me clueless. Cheers, Niki Kovacs -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info(a)microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32

3 9

Grub Prompt
by Allan E. Registos 22 Apr '17

22 Apr '17

Hi list, Good day to you all, Please correct me if this is the right list for posting this problem I am having with CentOS, but here is the details of the problem: I have a VMware guest running under Centos 6.5/64-bit. I rarely rebooted this OS, and was using it as my backend for some of my applications, like the A.R.T.(BI tool) and a PostgreSQL server. "But I was not unable to start the server because it now default to the grub prompt, here is what it look like: GNU GRUB version 0.97 (638K lower / 3143616K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename.] grub> _ " I search google but the solutions provided does not solve this issue. Thank you, Allan

1 1

nameserver issue
by Fred Smith 22 Apr '17

22 Apr '17

Hi all! This question is, at best, somewhat peripheral to Centos, but I'm hoping to be forgiven, and that someone here can give me a clue. I've just brought up a nameserver on my household LAN, bind9 on a Raspberry Pi. The connection with Centos is this: my main desktop is C7, and its hardwired network is also manual, not dhcp. I've edited the ipv4 config (in NM) and changed the DNS settings from 192.168.2.1 (the router) to 192.168.2.2 (the RPi). I've also manually tweaked /etc/resolv.conf to contain 192.168.2.2 instead of 192.168.2.1. works fine. until I fire up a vpn. having done that, looking in /etc/resolv.conf (while the vpn is connected) it has reverted to 192.168.2.1. after shutting down the vpn, 192.168.2.1 remains in resolv.conf what am I overlooking here? now the not-so-Centos-related question: I've changed the dhcp settings in my router so it should deliver 192.168.2.2 to the dhcp clients instead of 192.168.2.1. And it does, sorta. all the systems that use DHCP, now are configured with two DNS server addresses, 192.168.2.2, and 192.168.2.1. And I have no clue why 192.168.2.1 is still showing. Both windows and Linux systems are showing this behavior. Clues appreciated! and thanks in advance. -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. ------------------------------- Romans 5:8 (niv) ------------------------------

2 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss