Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

Centos7 and apachectl
by Robert Moskowitz 15 Mar '17

15 Mar '17

I am looking at: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/index.html I tried: |apachectl -S | And no output. Even stopping httpd, no output. How to we see how apache parsed the config files? thank you

2 2

How do I confirm importing repo key without user intervention?
by Yuri Kanivetsky 15 Mar '17

15 Mar '17

Hi, Sorry for asking it again. I just thought I asked the question the wrong way. Too much unnecessary details. And therefore, got no replies. I'm configuring a server from, say, a script (automatically). I need it to be done without user saying, "Yes, it's okay to import the key." I was told to run the following command: yum makecache -y --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=passenger Can you confirm if this is okay? Any better ways? Thanks in advance. Regards, Yuri

4 7

httpd/sites-available directory
by Robert Moskowitz 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

I just received some advice from a colleague of a colleague over at openssl.org. But they use debian. Please look at this and help me out on how Centos7 handles this: Note the comment of the location of virtualhost config files. Centos7 does not have a "man a2ensite". thanks Rewriterules and https. Actually, looking at what you have doesn't really tell me why it gets applied to everything and not just the webmail. However, I'd say that your roundcubemail.conf is much overworked. We use something like that on openssl.org, but it generally looks like this: <VirtualHost *:80> ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost ServerName ${HOSTNAME} ServerAlias ${HOSTALIASES} Redirect permanent /https://${HOSTNAME}/ </VirtualHost> Since you already know that the host is correct and that's the port 80 virtualhost, there's no point testing that with those RewriteCond you have. Also, Redirect is faster and preferable to RewriteRule for this kind of stuff, seehttps://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/rewrite/avoid.html Also, specifically for virtualhost config files, they should be located in sites-available/ rather than conf.d/, see 'man a2ensite'. conf.d/ is older style configuration of general stuff... or well, that's at least true for Debian, I'm not sure this is specific for Debian distributions and their derivates or if it's a native Apache thing. You'll have to check the manuals to confirm.

2 4

Processing Conflict: speexdsp-1.2-0.9.rc3.el6.x86_64
by James B. Byrne 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

Processing Conflict: speexdsp-1.2-0.9.rc3.el6.x86_64 conflicts speex <= 1.2-0.21.rc1 I am loath to replace things on my primary workstation as I have far too much to do as it is without dealing with self-inflicted injuries. However, I do use Jitsi as a softphone and the latest version has a dependency on a package in EPEL which replaces something from the base distro. Can someone inform me of what issues, if any, would replacing speex with speexdsp likely cause? I have a lot of packages that depend upon speex. Installing speexdsp by itself seems to indicate that it is not considered an upgrade or replacement for speex. One just conflicts with the other. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

Missing something else - pidgin-sipe
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

I installed pidgin-sipe, since my googling seemed to suggest it would give me connectivity with Lync. I now see the SIMPLE protocol... but not Office Communicator. What am I missing here? CentOS 7, updated. mark

2 1

systemd, oh my
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

Ok, folks, I don't get this one at all. I've got a server that I just rebuilt last week, from C5 to C7. It used to export filesystems. Those were moved to another server, and NFS wasn't turned up when I built it. I just turned it down again. And yet, I see Mar 14 10:26:33 <servername> systemd: Job dev-disk-by\x2dlabel-export1.device/start timed out. Mar 14 10:26:33 <servername> systemd: Timed out waiting for device dev-disk-by\x2dlabel-export1.device. Mar 14 10:26:33 <servername> systemd: Dependency failed for File System Check on /dev/disk/by-label/export1. Mar 14 10:26:33 <servername> systemd: Dependency failed for /export/1. Why is this running? The systems' been up for 10 days, and I didn't set up such a job. mark

2 2

i686 packages for httpd and php
by Rajmohan Banavi 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

I do not see any i686 packages (32 bit) for httpd and php on the repositories for CentOS 7. Are they available somewhere? If not, is there a reasonably simple/quick way to build them myself? Thanks.

2 1

Hotel ethernet via nmcli
by Robert Moskowitz 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

Here I sit in my hotel room with my Cubie armv7 server with Centos7. They have an ethernet cable here, so most likely I will not need to resort to putting a WiFi USB dongle and trying to master nmcli. But I have to web authenticate to their portal with my personal information. Is that possible with a text web browser? I seem to recall that Centos has one. What to install? Of course, catch-22 here. How to install it to have the tool to authenticate! Going to have to go down to the conference ethernet cafe. Oh well. Have a fun night, all.

3 2

Problem getting ssh agent forwarding to work
by rainer＠ultra-secure.de 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

Hi, I need to get agent-forwarding working. I have: - a local OpenSUSE 42.1 box, where my key(s) reside (ssh agent running and working) - a remote FreeBSD 10.3 box, where I can login with my key (works) - from the FreeBSD box, I need to get to a CentOS 7 box (without entering a password - does not work) On the FreeBSD box, I can see my keys, when I type ssh-add -l I've enabled ssh agent forwarding locally and on the FreeBSD server (in sshd and ssh config). I've enabled ssh agent forwarding on the CentOS server [root@centos7-server ~]# grep Agent /etc/ssh/sshd_config AllowAgentForwarding yes My public key resides in the authorized_key file on the CentOS server. Still, I get a password-prompt. (I've disabled SELinux). I admit I never use agent-forwarding (I just don't need it). I set a password on the account and when I enter that password, I can login. So, it shouldn't a problem with the account per-se.

2 2

Strange behaviour of yum within %post in kickstart
by Ralph Angenendt 14 Mar '17

14 Mar '17

Hi, (This is happening on CentOS 6) during a machine's kickstart I install several yum repositories which are contained in an RPM. During the %post phase I install an RPM which has a dependency to nodejs. That package with all of its dependencies can be found in EPEL. On the other hand I have the Softwarecollections repository, which also contains nodejs with the same version. Now nodejs has a dependency on libuv: | root@devcma01 ~ # yum deplist nodejs -q --disableexcludes=all | […] | dependency: libuv.so.0.10()(64bit) | provider: nodejs010-libuv.x86_64 1:0.10.30-1.el6 | provider: libuv.x86_64 1:0.10.34-1.el6 | provider: libuv.x86_64 1:0.10.34-1.el6 As you can see, there are two packages satisfying the dependency. First strange behaviour: | root@devcma01 ~ # yum --disableexcludes=all -v -d9 install nodejs | […] | nodejs-0.10.48-3.el6.x86_64 requires: libuv.so.0.10()(64bit) | --> Processing Dependency: libuv.so.0.10()(64bit) for package: nodejs-0.10.48-3.el6.x86_64 | Searching pkgSack for dep: libuv.so.0.10()(64bit) | Building updates object | up:simple updates time: 0.010 | up:obs time: 0.014 | up:condense time: 0.000 | updates time: 1.059 | TSINFO: Marking 1:nodejs010-libuv-0.10.30-1.el6.x86_64 as install for nodejs-0.10.48-3.el6.x86_64 | […] Why is nodejs010-libuv winning over libuv? It has the longer name *and* an inferior version number. Does the amount of "requires" play a role here? | root@devcma01 ~ # repoquery --requires libuv | wc -l | 32 | root@devcma01 ~ # repoquery --requires nodejs010-libuv | wc -l | 15 The solution seems easy: Exclude nodejs010 from softwarecollections: | root@devcma01 /etc/yum.repos.d # grep exclude= * | python27.repo:exclude=nodejs010* Now comes the other strange behaviour. As said: I install that repository during kickstart and then a package gets installed (within %post) that needs nodejs. The installed repo file has the "exclude" line in it. But: | --> Processing Dependency: nodejs for package: is24-statsd-genuine-v0.7.2-677.noarch | ---> Package nodejs.x86_64 0:0.10.48-3.el6 will be installed | --> Processing Dependency: libuv.so.0.10()(64bit) for package: nodejs-0.10.48-3.el6.x86_64 | ---> Package nodejs010-libuv.x86_64 1:0.10.30-1.el6 will be installed It is as if the exclude line isn't even honoured within the %post section of kickstart. Any idea on why that is? Cheers, Ralph

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss