Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

Ordering rich rules with firewalld
by Jeff White 26 Oct '16

26 Oct '16

Is there any way to order rich rules in firewalld? If I remove all rules and add them back in firewalld seems to put them in whatever order it feels like. Alternatively, how can I change the default policy of a firewalld zone? At the moment I don't see any way to have a zone accept traffic by default other than adding a rich rule allowing 0.0.0.0/0. -- Jeff White HPC Systems Engineer Information Technology Services - WSU

5 4

CVE-2016-5195
by aswathi.ok＠accenture.com 26 Oct '16

26 Oct '16

Hi Team, Could you please help us to know about the CVE-2016-5195 on CentOs. I have server running with CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) , will this be effected? Thanks Aswathi ________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. ______________________________________________________________________________________ www.accenture.com

3 2

"Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?
by Sorin Srbu 26 Oct '16

26 Oct '16

Hello all, Testing stuff virtually over here before taking it to the physical servers. I found a shortcut for creating a software RAID 10 ("--level=10"), device in CentOS 6. Looking at the below, I don't see anything about a shortcut for RAID 60. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/htm l/Storage_Administration_Guide/s1-raid-levels.html Is RAID 60 an uncommon RAID-configuration, as compared to RAID 10, and this might be why it's missing? Not too cumbersome to first create two RAID 6-arrays, then add them to a RAID 0, but it does take some extra time. Besides, I haven't found any way to fail a member disk, as is possible to do when using RAID level 10. Am I missing something here? -- BW, Sorin ----------------------------------------------------------- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry # Div of Org Pharm Chem # Box 574 # SE-75123 Uppsala # Sweden # # Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 # Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b # Web: http://www.orgfarm.uu.se ----------------------------------------------------------- # O< ASCII ribbon campaign - Against html E-mail # http://tinyurl.com/ascii-ribbon-campaign # # This message was not sent from an iProduct! # # Please consider the environment before printing this email. # Join the campaign at http://thinkBeforePrinting.org # # MotD follows: Pogo sticks make people jumpy.

3 7

Shutdown/Poweroff
by Chris Olson 25 Oct '16

25 Oct '16

Is there a good source of information about how Linux distributions and installers identify and interact with the hardware devices in a system? We are particularly interested in the shutdown process that leads to complete power-off. Thanks.

3 2

Problems with VPN Connection
by Macmor Mach 25 Oct '16

25 Oct '16

Good afternoon Best regard I'm having trouble with a CentOS server release 5.10, so that my users connect via VPN Intranet type, I could not find a solution, if I can collaborate appreciate them, attached logs when it worked and now. Log running: Mon Oct 10 13:50:02 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Re-using SSL/TLS context Mon Oct 10 13:50:02 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 LZO compression initialized Mon Oct 10 13:50:02 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Control Channel MTU parms [ L:1543 D:163 EF:66 EB:3 ET:3 EL:0 ] Mon Oct 10 13:50:02 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Data Channel MTU parms [ L:1543 D:1453 EF:43 EB:133 ET:3 EL:0 AF:3/1 ] Mon Oct 10 13:50:02 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Local Options hash (VER=V4): '31aebcbb' Mon Oct 10 13:50:02 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Expected Remote Options hash (VER=V4): '3ebe1e45' Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 CRL CHECK OK: /C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWE ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=OpenVPN-CA/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 VERIFY OK: depth=1, /C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWE ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=OpenVPN-CA/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 CRL CHECK OK: /C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=S ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=imawebs_common_cert/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 VERIFY OK: depth=0, /C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=S ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=imawebs_common_cert/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 TLS: Username/Password authentication succeeded for username 'usuario6' Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Data Channel Encrypt: Cipher 'DES-EDE-CBC' initialized with 128 bit key Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Data Channel Encrypt: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Data Channel Decrypt: Cipher 'DES-EDE-CBC' initialized with 128 bit key Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Data Channel Decrypt: Using 160 bit message hash 'SHA1' for HMAC authentication Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 Control Channel: TLSv1, cipher TLSv3/SSLv3 DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, 1024 bit RSA Mon Oct 10 13:50:03 2016 193.60.90.72:23683 [imawebs_common_cert] Peer Connection Initiated with 193.60.90.72:23683 Log no Operating: Mon Oct 24 10:46:31 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 Re-using SSL/TLS context Mon Oct 24 10:46:31 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 LZO compression initialized Mon Oct 24 10:46:31 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 Control Channel MTU parms [ L:1543 D:163 EF:63 EB:3 ET:3 EL:0 ] Mon Oct 24 10:46:31 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 Data Channel MTU parms [ L:1543 D:1453 EF:43 EB:133 ET:3 EL:0 AF:3/1 ] Mon Oct 24 10:46:31 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 Local Options hash (VER=V4): '31aebcbb' Mon Oct 24 10:46:31 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 Expected Remote Options hash (VER=V4): '3ebe1e45' Mon Oct 24 10:46:32 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 CRL CHECK OK: /C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWE ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=OpenVPN-CA/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 24 10:46:32 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 VERIFY OK: depth=1, /C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWE ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/L=CALI/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=OpenVPN-CA/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 24 10:46:32 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 CRL CHECK OK: /C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=S ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=imawebs_common_cert/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 24 10:46:32 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 VERIFY OK: depth=0, /C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=S ... mawebs.com </C=CO/ST=Valle/O=IMAWEBS_-_IMAWEBS/OU=Sistemas/CN=imawebs_common_cert/emailAddress=tecnologico(a)imawebs.com> Mon Oct 24 10:46:34 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 WARNING: Failed running command (--auth-user-pass-verify): external program exited with error status: 1 Mon Oct 24 10:46:34 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 TLS Auth Error: Auth Username/Password verification failed for peer Mon Oct 24 10:46:34 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 Control Channel: TLSv1, cipher TLSv3/SSLv3 DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, 1024 bit RSA Mon Oct 24 10:46:34 2016 193.60.90.72:60903 [imawebs_common_cert] Peer Connection Initiated with 193.60.90.72:60903 -- MAch

2 1

Re: [CentOS] links browser update, now needs xWindows?
by Leonard den Ottolander 24 Oct '16

24 Oct '16

Hello Richard, On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 03:39 -0400, Richard Beels wrote: > The new update for links in EPEL takes it from 2.8-2 to 2.13-1. But > yum includes 21 xWindows dependencies that weren't required before. > > I'd rather not install them - it's a headless server. Was this intentional? Very valid question but you should direct your question at the EPEL maintainer of this package: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraprojec… Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

1 0

Re: [CentOS] CentOS on new Dell
by Michael B Allen 23 Oct '16

23 Oct '16

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:18 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(a)hogranch.com> wrote: > On 9/29/2016 5:55 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: >> >> It seems optical drives are gone. Do I boot the iso from USB or what's >> the procedure now? > > yup, put iso on USB, go to town. Mmn, that didn't work. I dd'd the latest Fedora Live iso onto a USB drive, put it into a brand spanking new Dell Latitude E7470, hit F12 at Dell logo and got "Selected boot device failed". Do I need to make it bootable using fdisk or some such? Mike

5 5

I added my user to a group last week, and now the user isn't in the group
by Xuwen Fang 23 Oct '16

23 Oct '16

Hello everyone, I added my user account to a group called "www-pub" for easier manipulations on web files on my server. And today I found that my account was not in the group "www-pub" any longer..... What I did to add my account to the group is like "sudo usermod -a -G www-pub myaccount". Is there anything wrong? Thanks for any suggestions. Sincerely, Xuwen

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 140, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 22 Oct '16

22 Oct '16

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2016:2093 Important CentOS 6 bind Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2016:2096 CentOS 6 tzdata BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2016:2096 CentOS 7 tzdata BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2016:2093 Important CentOS 5 bind Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2016:2094 Important CentOS 5 bind97 Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CEBA-2016:2096 CentOS 5 tzdata BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:24:40 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:2093 Important CentOS 6 bind Security Update Message-ID: <20161021212440.GA50006(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:2093 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2093.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 26593a0bc69f60721bfbe602702fed0b1b6a9052689c8a38c205d7990bcef96f bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm 9fdf51a04607a7ae65ee4c1c6fd66baa8731dd46568cac59142dd058a2de36c3 bind-chroot-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm 06815b94fb05c3aba8a7b46ceaf5d90cd9d7f218069e0692e657616976bf34e0 bind-devel-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm ffd6cac5b2e46c019c85a7d542d0697bf1f879fb98220fccb63df83a287bee18 bind-libs-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm 12ee83e91fc71dd47fee86b28919b3be06cbdd0c9b788aafd1616d4d64e60653 bind-sdb-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm 32208e49b5afc026bb1c370aee1f19c76be6290b54ddfa530d9d1619f64b12d8 bind-utils-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm x86_64: 80e27194242661a3531d16838ff345e8614418ead4367d74e8386f0a47eec445 bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.x86_64.rpm 415c2f5ca5d5699973739f86bd7fc06dc3c05631c75fd3890acba9f3c48b7132 bind-chroot-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.x86_64.rpm 06815b94fb05c3aba8a7b46ceaf5d90cd9d7f218069e0692e657616976bf34e0 bind-devel-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm 647c07e08b0d72a9e272dbb2193c47e9f2a0402b9b4191bbeeef4b196f744919 bind-devel-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.x86_64.rpm ffd6cac5b2e46c019c85a7d542d0697bf1f879fb98220fccb63df83a287bee18 bind-libs-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.i686.rpm 9253860386f45cdb54a64f06b8622a0773923732993ccc0a75d23e1eb48d30e0 bind-libs-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.x86_64.rpm 2d7c635a0b0d89d7802d6658397513fc949a739713be929ed8e7110869ddacb0 bind-sdb-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.x86_64.rpm 312bbcea824c1bfe24d85dc0ba93cab754e516c726844a6fecbc83b44cff54e6 bind-utils-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 2b06618b10b7afb41bd17f9c270f45254cfe447ba815187915caed02dc07399c bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:25:01 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:2096 CentOS 6 tzdata BugFix Update Message-ID: <20161021212501.GA50096(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:2096 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2096.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0052e3c0edefe1f8915fc34e779b24606c127af41012674831c14f87d51f7e16 tzdata-2016h-1.el6.noarch.rpm ddbc1f33f59568dd99138f53deb8eb029383ec68d015461eeb63903afd05267e tzdata-java-2016h-1.el6.noarch.rpm x86_64: 0052e3c0edefe1f8915fc34e779b24606c127af41012674831c14f87d51f7e16 tzdata-2016h-1.el6.noarch.rpm ddbc1f33f59568dd99138f53deb8eb029383ec68d015461eeb63903afd05267e tzdata-java-2016h-1.el6.noarch.rpm Source: b0fb605d1e065f012f89b608e61a6ef121c5a73552f6dbce2be2c448b3370944 tzdata-2016h-1.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:58:06 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:2096 CentOS 7 tzdata BugFix Update Message-ID: <20161021215806.GA50572(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:2096 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2096.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 81adad4d2e47225ac0063c0cb9cd0466fc625cb76098c9427ade10b6ad2b4ada tzdata-2016h-1.el7.noarch.rpm 6502b4d41d55440d0f706c6bb31b56e2bf480cfc9a0a207c190d7f1b22c5771c tzdata-java-2016h-1.el7.noarch.rpm Source: 9dc0352fae7e07c4c56cc878ee3abef747ec79f67c837089ea6dfba607dbca9d tzdata-2016h-1.el7.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:00:43 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:2093 Important CentOS 5 bind Security Update Message-ID: <20161021220043.GA28805(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:2093 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2093.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1c7927fec6b2966dd9e0b8c9c28bc8e384638db4dabea4f216f5fe649b65424e bind-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm f05787e1d6d3824b875923a91f9b71c73342190fcacdf34ed7e426f88eda16d1 bind-chroot-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm 8328c709e2ac7203f2a33f5bc591262900fa4c3a4715f5224ed3fbe1848bc2d3 bind-devel-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm ac09b6c1a8368ed464a8bae61f4a2025b2e617c8f77bdd90b14ce5a3cd5010c3 bind-libbind-devel-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm 73318c5eb63ea15dc6e31cf23fbb23e0012d860e9e3726c18a9bbec99df7a485 bind-libs-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm 1b06ccd1b79c863c7459cb4cfa1a6d5cf18b06b20d141dbceac8be23275c3606 bind-sdb-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm e5f0a486cb2b6808f3f1d5b81f42ebab2927d5e2d12abcf21a22d44106cac52e bind-utils-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm 592201761602a121208cefad75f7d955df9a89d58be06c0b9db978322f47fb94 caching-nameserver-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm x86_64: 3cff5f207d927f99e5d342397badeb1513485699ae0aefda9a5562f99a51f560 bind-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm 5d41ef95a0fc3a3635421def7792c4971aef60fa968e31f050805998bdf530f6 bind-chroot-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm 8328c709e2ac7203f2a33f5bc591262900fa4c3a4715f5224ed3fbe1848bc2d3 bind-devel-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm 73ea232936f464e5eb90aff556e7b72d5fc43809596b7ba3edf006fa0c8ffd37 bind-devel-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm ac09b6c1a8368ed464a8bae61f4a2025b2e617c8f77bdd90b14ce5a3cd5010c3 bind-libbind-devel-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm 6f7dfba454de9f05434380cfc30dc19558d7b5ea1b2e68688cd642140858b793 bind-libbind-devel-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm 73318c5eb63ea15dc6e31cf23fbb23e0012d860e9e3726c18a9bbec99df7a485 bind-libs-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.i386.rpm a8233281551c9185260b88df6c0b5c0279986edfbf68042b46d2e023595f41ed bind-libs-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm c503f14920c2853330733ab283c2e9099fc77a0815f6264f554fb61f77825f90 bind-sdb-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm a4e2bc74b6044ce313b9897c2d9f2fbd1ebe372426e54db186125ac08669d2ef bind-utils-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm 47ca6185600538c59be505ecdbf0dd837344ca19ff68bef651a988b20f71cde4 caching-nameserver-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.x86_64.rpm Source: a87cf41ad9e8b99cd2f3fa1641d82d570b4b9ff81a35ca92c64549a08b7ef16a bind-9.3.6-25.P1.el5_11.10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:01:10 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:2094 Important CentOS 5 bind97 Security Update Message-ID: <20161021220110.GA28943(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:2094 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2094.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: bbb7a04f44606083f62ae69cea90bb29360a7e75716b3cc05f681d34b8e907a7 bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.i386.rpm 01a297bc02856208edd495ef3eb03a754b8d63a4944547150a75a3293ec2cdb7 bind97-chroot-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.i386.rpm 339429fe3711f3a9f3f8cb00b5486286fc76c519eae1fa8c8f1bf52b62591aba bind97-devel-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.i386.rpm 908f02de2180a6c483046992fafd710f7361c3785d3606a479ba74e4b27f1ee8 bind97-libs-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.i386.rpm 9787163334d94a88b3cea8f1fb434ea0395787edb61307510a1aa0d249bcdb45 bind97-utils-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.i386.rpm x86_64: 1b2296acb71cb6ee456daeb7a957aaa9bc3c573ba7151778f8132b466c80752e bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.x86_64.rpm aa9f002b79ce397438391b00c945cca4124bb70f034fd774572d771f14ee182f bind97-chroot-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.x86_64.rpm 339429fe3711f3a9f3f8cb00b5486286fc76c519eae1fa8c8f1bf52b62591aba bind97-devel-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.i386.rpm 61ce23c7b9f3765239a389a1543c3f85ac862084325e6f6c10297de933294630 bind97-devel-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.x86_64.rpm 908f02de2180a6c483046992fafd710f7361c3785d3606a479ba74e4b27f1ee8 bind97-libs-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.i386.rpm 18771645ae922c3bebe44aaf1e9376105509432713eaa37d6fcc07fd87dbeb1a bind97-libs-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.x86_64.rpm f9526dbaa32e4d74e071d72255363b4fa53a92fabd5d8af00765c5f435fae840 bind97-utils-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.x86_64.rpm Source: 4ddc9ccf10398546bfd8ed635e531368e4d02030de807b355f0b53f28bff1784 bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5_11.8.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:01:41 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:2096 CentOS 5 tzdata BugFix Update Message-ID: <20161021220141.GA29044(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:2096 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2096.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5f017688459d59931f6c59681406b5a2b064a12fa713668a487f62e039b32d3e tzdata-2016h-1.el5.i386.rpm 5dfb4fb30451fe97d0b897615d3cafd3d6e0893dd8d5ec88bcd6253778b9d90f tzdata-java-2016h-1.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: 3d8b6021853f1f6b10da37209f7a27405118bd479aeb6e1f6a2f5b73da023dcf tzdata-2016h-1.el5.x86_64.rpm 94f250609aa3c4ef1a0f24e4dba952bb116664392878e9f9833ae2a0880de426 tzdata-java-2016h-1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 5a7f8a9b948ad2fba327aebeec1bb4e6d894c104f83ae540e4f1a65802fcce30 tzdata-2016h-1.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net Twitter: JohnnyCentOS ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 140, Issue 8 ***********************************************

1 0

Announcement: new yum repos
by Richard Grainger 22 Oct '16

22 Oct '16

Hi I've created a couple of new public yum repos suitable for CentOS 7: ergel (Extra Ruby Gems for Enterprise Linux) repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/ergel/7/x86_64/ homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/ergel epmel (Extra Perl Modules for Enterprise Linux) repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/epmel/7/x86_64/ homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/epmel The repos are designed to work in conjunction with EPEL, so you will need this installed first and they should be "safe" (they don't upgrade packages in base). Feedback and requests for additions welcome! Cheers Richard

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss