Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

systemd private tmp dirs
by Les Mikesell 16 Apr '15

16 Apr '15

Is there a generic way that processes written to share files with (say) apache in /tmp can figure out that they are running on an OS with systemd and in that case, where the daemon in question thinks /tmp is? For example, twiki has a backup/restore add-in where the backup part is normally done from cron with a command line script but the resulting archives that go in /tmp are supposed to be seen in the web interface where you can choose and restore from them. How should that have been written so the file lands where systemd has remapped /tmp for httpd if it happens to be running on a host with systemd? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

4 13

Where's the debuginfo?
by Eric Millbrandt 16 Apr '15

16 Apr '15

Hello all, According to [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64: "Debuginfo packages are also being signed and pushed. Yum configs shipped in the new release file will have all the context required for debuginfo to be available on every CentOS Linux install." Specifically, I'm looking for kernel-debuginfo-3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64, but the latest debuginfo file is kernel-debuginfo-3.10.0-123.13.2.el7.x86_64.rpm, which isn't even the most recent release from 7.0.1406. Is my Google-fu failing me or is http://debuginfo.centos.org/7/x86_64/ no longer the current debuginfo repo? e

3 4

Modifying files of NFS
by Dennis Jacobfeuerborn 16 Apr '15

16 Apr '15

Hi, I have an NFS storage system and want to run jpegoptim on several GB's of jpeg images and I'm wondering what the best approach is. Is it ok to run this operation on the Server itself while the clients have it mounted or will this lead to problems like e.g. the dreaded "stale filehandle"? Regards, Dennis

2 2

Update to 1503 release problem
by Alessandro Baggi 16 Apr '15

16 Apr '15

Hi there, Yesterday I've updated from 7 to 7.1 and today I've noticed on 2 server that postgresql systemd file was replaced with default values. This make postgres to no start and webserver give me problem. This problem was fixed and now all works good. It's normal that on major update I can get this problem? If so, I've ridden release change but I have not ridden about postgresql problem. Someone had the same issue?

3 5

Related to the new laptop question: CentOS on a netbook?
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 16 Apr '15

16 Apr '15

I've got a netbook, circe 2009. When I got it, not that I was wild about ubuntu, but there was specifically an ubuntu netbook remix. Well, it's a few years later - has anyone put CentOS (6, preferably) on a netbook, and were there any problems? mark

6 8

Routing setup questions
by James B. Byrne 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

I am experimenting with routing tables to obtain a little understanding of how things work. I have a kvm hypervisor host (KVM1) with two physical Ethernet nics configured as bridges (br0 and br1). KVM1 br0 is configured with a public ipv4 address [x.y.z.42/24] and br1 is configured with a private ipv4 address [192.168.216.42/24]. A second kvm hypervisor, KVM2, is similarly configured albeit with different IPv4 addresses of course. Packet forwarding is enabled on both hypervisor hosts and both have IPTABLES configured, albeit not for masquerading. Guest systems on each of the two kvm hosts are also configured with two virtual nics, eth0 and eth1, mapped to br0 and br1 respectively. Guests on KVM2 usually have eth0 downed and eth1 configured with a private ipv4 address in this address space, [192.168.216.0/24]. Guests on KVM1 usually have eth0 configured with a public ipv4 and always have eth1 configured with a private address also belonging to [192.168.216.0/24]. The KVM1 hypervisor host has its br1 connected via x-over cable to the br1 port of the KVM2 hypervisor host. The reason for the X-over is to allow matching guests on the different KVM systems to conduct large network transfers between themselves without hitting the LAN. We have a gateway router whose eth1 faces the LAN with the public address [x.y.z.1/24] and the WAN with an address in the form [x.y.A.0/30]. The ASCII diagram below represents the situation. You will need to view this part with a monospaced font. <pre> ~ ISP ethx[x.y.A.2/30] >-----< eth0[x.y.A.3/30] | ISP GWAY | eth1[x.y.z.1/24] >----------< | GWAY | | br0[x.y.z.42/24] >---------------------------------< | KVM2 | br0[x.y.z.42/24] >-----< | KVM1 ~ br1[192.168.216.43/24] >--X--< br1[192.168.216.42/24] KVM2 KVM1 | | | | >-----< eth1[192.168.216.21/24] | | >-----< eth1[192.168.216.25/24] | | eth1[192.168.216.221/24] >-----< | eth1[192.168.216.223/24] >-----< | </pre> This setup works as intended. However, it is sufficiently oddball that I consider it a good candidate to discover for myself the practical issues surrounding network routing, a field of knowledge of which I readily admit profound ignorance. My trial is to allow a ping from eth1[192.168.216.221/24] to reach any other public addressed [x.y.z.0/24]i/f on the LAN and successfully be returned. The questions are: 1. What additional (virtual) network i/f(s) needsbe configured to get this to happen? 2. Do any systems require static routes to be preconfigured? If so, which systems and what is that configuration? 3. Is masquerading required or not? My thoughts so far: The default gateway for all of the public hosts on our LAN is eth1[x.y.z.1/24] so it seems necessary that eth1 on GWAY must have some interface that recognizes [192.168.216.0/24] and a route that will send the ping back to the public i/f from which it originates, br0[x.y.z.42/24]. The KVM1 host must have a route to allow [192.168.216.221/24] out onto the LAN via br0[x.y.z.42/24] for all destinations other than [192.168.216.0/24] and route that netblock via br1[192.168.216.42/24]. If this is anywhere near the actual requirements then I think something like this is required on GWAY eth1[x.y.z.1/24]: ifcfg-eth1:192168 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=192.168.255.255 DEVICE=eth1:192168 IPADDR=192.168.0.1 IPV6INIT=no NETMASK=255.255.0.0 NETWORK=192.168.0.0 #ONBOOT=yes ONPARENT=yes route-eth1 192.168.216.0/24 via x.y.z.42 dev eth1 And on KVM1 I would need: ifcfg-br0 BOOTPROTO="none" DEFROUTE="yes" DEVICE="br0" GATEWAY="x.y.z.1" IPADDR="x.y.z.42" IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL="no" IPV6INIT="no" NAME="System br0" NETMASK="255.255.255.0" NETWORK="x.y.z.0" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT="yes" TYPE="Bridge" USERCTL="no ifcfg-br1 BOOTPROTO="none" DEVICE="br1" GATEWAY="x.w.z.42" IPADDR="192.168.216.42" IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL="no" IPV6INIT="no" NAME="System br1" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT="yes" PREFIX="24" TYPE="Bridge" USERCTL="no" How far off am I in these musings? I would like to have some clue of the trouble I am in for before I go and break something. Your comments and suggestions are welcome. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

Independent dual monitors on CentOS 7
by Devin Reade 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

Does anyone have the magic incantation required to getting *independent* multi-monitors going under CentOS 7? Ideally under xfce or trinity, but I'm interested about GNOME/KDE observations as well. I'm trying to move my main workstation from CentOS5 to CentOS7 and while the spanned desktop works, not having independent monitors really cuts into my productivity. i.e.: I couldn't care less about dragging things from one screen to another, but not having a 3x3 virtual desktop grid on each monitor independently really sucks. Devin

4 3

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 122, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2015:0808 Important CentOS 7 java-1.6.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2015:0806 Critical CentOS 7 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2015:0809 Important CentOS 7 java-1.8.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2015:0808 Important CentOS 6 java-1.6.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2015:0806 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2015:0809 Important CentOS 6 java-1.8.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CEEA-2015:0811 CentOS 6 kexec-tools Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CEBA-2015:0810 CentOS 6 ksh BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2015:0808 Important CentOS 5 java-1.6.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CEBA-2015:0812 CentOS 6 krb5-auth-dialog FASTTRACK BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 11. CESA-2015:0807 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:08:38 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0808 Important CentOS 7 java-1.6.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415110838.GA30696(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0808 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0808.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 844cd83ebefa8ad4844aee5a07d0fefb8a44a0916c73c62d364369bd2bd64f84 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm d184dfdfd856c93c9e54d9eb347a124718e2e656b5295d549aba7b19647224fd java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm a2eadd37ce5bd0f2cd10dc8c6587f6b2e2e7612c51b715dd9aabede0ade312e3 java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm f00feeadf2f692a8095cc2af0789e790c19b843b90f924d9982d2414a6b20803 java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm af418b4182b45bb4c23ba2eb72b3b53f142fabbc633915341766ee76d9c4558e java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm Source: 68853180f59f896a6a4c1c1b1c3e19a9f4c82d5012be997d5c73b7dea69afb27 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el7_1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:09:51 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0806 Critical CentOS 7 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415110951.GA30778(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0806 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0806.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 3772306c9458162045f953d1c1f1bb073cc6f2b05778856deedca5d3c456c30e java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm da2eae1a4aa31a11352b586c3b36d0d248c4b62d4b48bc6165ab5135c7a26896 java-1.7.0-openjdk-accessibility-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm 072c254722c68435c007fbcd6b15c8ef7595a6647c6a6cc0f59b4fa3a7b3739e java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm 019597dd0350a05bbdf49194cddf65e06acde1ea2c1109aa2435fb6808fce4be java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm 96afe4565e002283cd6b323ef9da34ea92c1f7015219659c0b4c0f4b52dc6f97 java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm b122486abe1c1e213230cc6c066735cdcadc28befba487b928ad1a3d9eb11eae java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.noarch.rpm e910eff029a7cbe2e0cfa6fa5e0f88d6587c824a0ef611fee59c08afc3ba6393 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.x86_64.rpm Source: bbb55aa6ab09fbea475f0e5f01cd89963786a6a1e7dc7cce72491adf6cf8d38e java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el7_1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:10:56 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0809 Important CentOS 7 java-1.8.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415111056.GA30885(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0809 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0809.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4fa9c6c27b9ade68bdb5f88352b1e5e059cb8d4a4f688407bfbb1ac2c32f9e0c java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.x86_64.rpm c6d6da9b95f180e1655d7532b765c9753a70d824f2b5f55d4cfaacfb4c31be15 java-1.8.0-openjdk-accessibility-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.x86_64.rpm 293d25deb49b678f7514ffd0fb84fd9569cd6e836c10ac4e1248129964b4a160 java-1.8.0-openjdk-demo-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.x86_64.rpm 98566fd5085ea3f1873de2322253b16bd894f7e64f6567b58275cc4cd52f62df java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.x86_64.rpm 6aa191183d4b109185c934cf14aace6887a1fffca8359a268e6e68f47fc51dce java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.x86_64.rpm de1bb75f5758fb82381677a1d980433e8cfbf6f1284a049c4621518ca0983ad3 java-1.8.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.noarch.rpm 08a2e3e436427c70c93f2c61290d553308b31cfd82ce1e23765d73b1db82e079 java-1.8.0-openjdk-src-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.x86_64.rpm Source: 8fd105a45ca283d2fc041d899a73bb0f3420968c7d3fec5e76c047629e67a74c java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.45-30.b13.el7_1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:15:16 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0808 Important CentOS 6 java-1.6.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415111516.GA31277(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0808 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0808.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 734f51daa5ee6ac45da8bf6a135b6cd01505e43c4f895ab46b844a766e6789a3 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.i686.rpm ab840a44017638bda10795821bfdb77aa63493a1136dd696dc6e5097c4872d43 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.i686.rpm b36e89dd4daafc45e34ddcecb2cd085f654654ae27cab29a3337846e6fd66d45 java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.i686.rpm 9b96d015f36a6c57bff731c40412071407dea6514e3c70bf8a7a2dfadc52b5ad java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.i686.rpm 9e11f5e19b2e288b1e6063d6054c86928918608dc7939a1b9f3a1c2f180fa1be java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: ac6d4b3116e0180b1aff56ab60763933aac765ac88a9d1924104346d057d2af7 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 2fac3ea6b6b70b8d4e5e3726aa4ae3ecbdf4ed33c761d70b8cf150564496debb java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm f9225d64d4d2db83316ac34d52e5c57282bbb272f4094ce51eb517693151b727 java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm e2c18070a1de815abf475c97d1a47afccdcb4b34a74a5cc13758cd79907d731a java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 9e2ea69fa8fa1753f9ef47e06630ee8e0f7241dddb861049992bb795ad686c46 java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: bd748064a4d0d7634d5324a62b28cb5bf7f5ccb60e89cad21eb2a0c2eeed8547 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:16:47 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0806 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415111647.GA31548(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0806 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0806.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4d882912e311cb1b5a57c10908a5c155430dbb6c5ffbb34e173c3f5cd6b193ef java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm 416562dc0b4e66180032e6d1d902edfcba1c5d8e3a56c275ba5e22ece36480a0 java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm 23712df4b8126ae49937f2f770ba65f85a1926fe010670f5e70fa0d12418ecb9 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm a9eb8909d7cc965888d511409519a2382a41da6835f0ac8e49b8d93c2c33771b java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.noarch.rpm 37a62164417f4aa471b3efa748ae7316c92aa0fead1bf58666f88c2c5e12fe21 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: 924e7d46a1ea7cb34ccba0331551243ea49c70f7bca4cb0fd412b42b5796e4be java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 2cb718cd3972967182fd58f2ae527ffaf4547c46ff39e018e2bab01071ac9ebe java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm a5f1010bd14311f84fb58dacbe92ed4e6bb66c3c2df6146582787f59bb2146a2 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm a9eb8909d7cc965888d511409519a2382a41da6835f0ac8e49b8d93c2c33771b java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.noarch.rpm 3186e489a0120ed2adfa4a122320e0744444b207f02926cc4def45dbf44036a3 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: c30dd1b02a626d1bc885d04ee0e15ebc2bd6a0b2fee0f00bd2d1077847f79dce java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.1.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:19:16 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0809 Important CentOS 6 java-1.8.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415111916.GA31841(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0809 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0809.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: cff7d3cbb25e2e0e999b343ba892345e868b2e20898b3aad9c5f8cfb72345c33 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.i686.rpm 6ec8a7cd86d7a1f53d7fe0f3691df446ad1d9d0d200b295504e9a5201c08d451 java-1.8.0-openjdk-demo-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.i686.rpm 0e8aa816a1837740528b0a00bf7c1fd10a23f2bc604c3d4894abd9556fedcf70 java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.i686.rpm 13005f6b79f818357110aec322b631250d49dfc146b897fa8e499329b6dd67f9 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.i686.rpm 6513e5d4dc260b842b4b61c41850101aa2821ce75fc401c17f2e5b3521f2ff39 java-1.8.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.noarch.rpm 02468627de2bb5817bfd44567beb328312a23f59153f07735e65be6c3cfea537 java-1.8.0-openjdk-src-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: 29608f96bdb4f6324be8d19d9226e3b8989852f27e0d4dcb5da0d40a5948c27f java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 5962df773e7cd9ae5de8ddef95ca2026fc494755b1eada647df7d675cfe956d5 java-1.8.0-openjdk-demo-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 8f636c1c6b66b3c3688aa2f4fb3ab58debfae382ece1784093c11f46e4fe0c85 java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm bd1d0ecf927f2577a44ac4a65e37314006a98cb2e9713cbda2011c619b7578ec java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 6513e5d4dc260b842b4b61c41850101aa2821ce75fc401c17f2e5b3521f2ff39 java-1.8.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.noarch.rpm bfeffcc965fd085eb2b8113637f42054a38a3c1998ecfa048c08ceed1c7cde1a java-1.8.0-openjdk-src-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: 3ace0d4173f2107c86e9c4edc402b36b7e2b10b25810ae301426103c71c99f60 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.45-28.b13.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:24:37 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2015:0811 CentOS 6 kexec-tools Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20150415112437.GA32112(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0811 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0811.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5fe787017ef60a72d46b1925893c432ef595f0f91ce36edc67229acb1c58b13c kexec-tools-2.0.0-280.el6_6.2.i686.rpm 50aac3bf0cd86c05fb96b347054e7a564ecb8b05c4e67a15d03d804e4b106847 kexec-tools-eppic-2.0.0-280.el6_6.2.i686.rpm x86_64: 9d64559a045266b97adac5b19011515548ef45d93d398a32151743f2a6549c13 kexec-tools-2.0.0-280.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm 99f8d29718340e567339a50dafe671ca3580af1ee13a1b1d6a346e01af9e66be kexec-tools-eppic-2.0.0-280.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm Source: a42d102b2009cc0e130f7ccf54bdb9eb4921198fe53f7309b17b170f6bc94974 kexec-tools-2.0.0-280.el6_6.2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:25:51 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0810 CentOS 6 ksh BugFix Update Message-ID: <20150415112551.GA32325(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0810 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0810.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 7e43bcb54b94b31fdf7559e7c3ca441e57eca1a820b13d8eb98f08d40a2b2dcb ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.3.i686.rpm x86_64: 57d055dce543b23fef97fa0f0f6294eb0b875a1d447db991e15c125f7f316a21 ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.3.x86_64.rpm Source: b7c8c8e5f7efbf6f3e834818628a3a178c6b3aa27ec949c332da4fd927340130 ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.3.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:35:10 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0808 Important CentOS 5 java-1.6.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415113510.GA19551(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0808 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0808.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 94527f01d611574d9b2d7c4ec5ce34bcaaa2628d88d751b493f529176544857f java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.i386.rpm 8b945d708d75b489a02dc8019c5c0600b646ec5ca64bfa65a947439791b9ecc3 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.i386.rpm d0889ea84dea8f2362de130675cb51538e33ad4ebb31d9b2d31acb7b07eba773 java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.i386.rpm e6c52e1cbd82ae5a7a6e3ea93d7d7b52e7035590aaa80432c4b284b74935ba79 java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.i386.rpm 40162c1c601d2d57eb64fd36f7eb3d8f57777afdae5c4421c1c5b7330b4d7da6 java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.i386.rpm x86_64: 9e9f6bc4153c4fd7ebd66ab02f39d49f448bbcf8fc121bba6a39c52f8dc0170f java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.x86_64.rpm 940aaff61cdc0dbf2b30c785756afb58b7b7159406728fc61694407888eedb69 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.x86_64.rpm adfaceffb66a1d2b0095647a51e7db12f0cdc4096de17e96015158cd7bcbaa7b java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.x86_64.rpm bf03dee54885553c258e0092a55d09e04a44f32472d358e4a0fd18801b1b3f5f java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.x86_64.rpm ad5bc2b1947e944a526dc81479c480c7c3efe6673a57228d5cfb0784f44aa259 java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.x86_64.rpm Source: 00dd9376ed38852a3d0de335bd0e19433b9e295602232cbf3a8eb175f78f4eb8 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.35-1.13.7.1.el5_11.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:41:26 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0812 CentOS 6 krb5-auth-dialog FASTTRACK BugFix Update Message-ID: <20150415114126.GA45688(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0812 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0812.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8c6823f3927e853f1cf9823081c76ce21b12978a95b68417f28a8df6542af76b krb5-auth-dialog-0.13-5.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: cffdcacbc4b7dcdea35916388adf0ea43b77a57fc7721c60fd08a4c9043a57c1 krb5-auth-dialog-0.13-5.el6.x86_64.rpm Source: 5364d927d948a242603be645f251deb739fe513d59adcb4681014709df8e508c krb5-auth-dialog-0.13-5.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:47:27 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0807 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20150415114727.GA20085(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0807 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0807.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0cf980fd7fde5bd25a6fb47174ee5418c6db9c2b13f50df5f70a36788575c441 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.i386.rpm a3861c84ddfc2b19b985dedb13c7bee8f7bbbb900b0546a861bebff9ec8cf747 java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.i386.rpm 95949dd1a55f4f33634aa1077a24707d0123a45368c4a49c7f5fba2f3867a29b java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.i386.rpm da1f1afd73c0b67eb42b20134b41118ea16abbb20016ce20cffa787cae9c7985 java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.i386.rpm 5dd41c0ac127a765a14fd18eb20f56d368845a73ed110b874a00cfd62a5e8bc1 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.i386.rpm x86_64: 18c0fc5ac390ff7b933656678bdcfadeda579d912c7e58ddd042df08160a7978 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.x86_64.rpm c2c6e7f7e5182d03197bd6a162e9f6765aa46105e9776809b835bbe4669152d0 java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.x86_64.rpm aa5554836ea4b60cf21121be73eab015f4c563d061af1dc202f9adbc833738e6 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.x86_64.rpm 89c80eb2e2e3f41c170909af41f6d90b4c3aa64c7b4c9e34392bbad077502226 java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.x86_64.rpm 4042cd5dca28a2a032e487236e82d9f1f73310f1d7304f1c6c4dbe99288e7288 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.x86_64.rpm Source: ec9d5e133bcd36fa3e26e5723804bf4619fc8c0815313fe66284ac2abfde0de0 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.79-2.5.5.2.el5_11.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 122, Issue 8 ***********************************************

1 0

Access Problem after update to CentOS 7.1
by Gregory P. Ennis 14 Apr '15

14 Apr '15

Everyone, This morning I did a manual yum update on our a mail server to 7.1 without any incident or problems. A new kernel was installed, and I rebooted after the update. When I rebooted the machine I could not gain ssh access to it from an external ip address. I was able to ssh to this mail server through a different machine on the local network. At first I thought the problem was related to the firewall. I stopped firewalld, and fail2ban, and clear all firewall rules without being able to gain access. I disabled firewalld, and fail2ban. I enabled iptables and started it without a problem, but I could still not gain access. I removed all entries in the host.allow and host.deny files, and this did not make a difference either. On one of the various reboots I tried to use the previous kernel before today's update, but there was no success. I can scan the mail server and reach it without a problem from the internal network but I am not able to reach it from outside the local network. I have the mail server behind a Centso 5.11 machine that is the gateway router for the internal network, and the mail server is nat addressed with it's external ip address to the internal machine. I have had this configuration set up for over 7 years. I tweaked the Gateway router to nat address the mail server's ip address to a different machine inside the network and everything worked perfectly like it should, and then re-adjusted the gateway router again back to the mail server and am not able to gain access from outside the local network. "traceroute" does not get to the mail server from outside the local network, but works fine inside the local network. Bottom line, this does not look like a host.deny, host.allow problem, nor does it look like a firewalld or iptables problem. And it does not appear to be a problem with the gateway server. Is there another feature of CentOs 7.1 that I need to evaluate? Has anyone else had this problem after the 7.1 update? Thank you for your help!!!! Greg Ennis

8 19

state of IPSec VPN on CentOS 7: Openswan, strongSwan, RPM packages
by Florin Andrei 14 Apr '15

14 Apr '15

I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. What is the current consensus w.r.t. building an IPSec VPN "server" (concentrator, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site connections with Cisco hardware at the other end? Is any of the *swan apps still considered the best option for that? Any guidelines w.r.t. IPSec VPN in general on this platform? Thanks. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

3 6

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss