Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

gdbm update and GDBM_File
by Stijn De Weirdt 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

hi all, i'm stuck debugging a problem that appeared after this update made it to our systems: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-January/020856.html GDBM_File fails simple operation (which works with 1.8.0-36 of gdbm) could someone with same perl and gdbm confirm the issue via simple script below? (would help me narrow down if this is something specific on our site or not) > # rpm -q perl gdbm glibc > perl-5.10.1-136.el6_6.1.x86_64 > gdbm-1.8.0-37.el6.x86_64 > glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.4.x86_64 > glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.4.i686 output of script with 1.8.0-37: > Adding data to tie > gdbm store returned -1, errno 0, key "1" at ./t.pl line 11. thanks stijn >>> SCRIPT #!/usr/bin/perl use GDBM_File; my $file = "/tmp/x.db"; my %out; tie(%out, 'GDBM_File', $file, &GDBM_WRCREAT, 0644) or print "can't tie $file DB: $!"; print "Adding data to tie\n"; $out{1}=2; print "Going to untie\n"; untie(%out) or print "can't untie $file DB: $!"; <<<< SCRIPT

1 0

DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue
by Boris Epstein 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Hello all, We have put a DNS server online running DJBDNS v1.06 (ndjbdns-1.06-1.el6.x86_64) on a 64-bit CentOS 6.6 server. We have done some limited testing on the machine which it passed - i.e., dnscache was talking to tinydns, the queries went through fine, etc. As soon as we put it online subjecting it to live load the following happened: 1) Within a short time period (about a minute) the dnscache process reached the CPU utilisation level of 100%. 2) The process would then die reporting the following message to the log: dnscache: BUG: out of in progress slots NOTE: Random sampling indicates that at no point sampled did the load exceed 200 requests per second. In tests conducted earlier the DNS server successfully demonstrated speeds in tens of thousands of requests per second. We then proceeded to edit the following parameters in the dnscache.conf as they seemed to be the only ones that seemed relevant: DATALIMIT and CACHESIZE. They are described as limints (in bytes) on the total data memory allocation and cache, default values are 80000000 and 50000000 respectively. Playing with these demonstrated some highly counterintuitive results: 1) Setting the values lower (say, an order of magnitude lower) made the dnscache process run longer. 2) Shortening the relative gap between the two values (for instance, setting DATALIMIT at 52000 and CACHE at 50000) made it run for about an hour vs about 1 minute, load seeming to be about the same. 3) Running it with DATALIMIT not set was possible though it eventually failed anyways. 4) Running it with CACHESIZE not set was not possible at all. So the issue is currently still not resolved and we are stuck. Any advice will be much appreciated. Cheers, Boris.

3 5

Hardware raid LSI Megaraid not working since Centos 6.6
by Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Happy new year ! We have a SuperMicro server with a LSI MegaRAID 9260-4i controller. Since Centos 6.6 update (kernel 2.6.32-504), the controller doesn't initialize at boot. Reverting to kernel 2.6.32-431 allows server to boot fine. The server can't boot due to a bug in LSI megaraid module. Boot log ends by a lot of lines: RESET_GEN2: retry=xxx, hostdiag=a4 I tried Centos 6.6 install disk and it also fails to find disks but Centos 7 install disk boot fine. It's annoying to be stuck at 2.6.32-431 kernel and I have no idea how to solve this issue :-( Thanks for any help. -- Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE AIME - Campus de l'INSA http://www.aime-toulouse.fr/ 135 av. de Rangueil Tél +33 561 559 885 31077 TOULOUSE Cedex 4 - FRANCE Fax +33 561 559 870

6 11

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update
by centoslistmail＠gmail.com 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

On Jan 14 10:37pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 > >Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html > >The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently >syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) I was surprised to find that these RPMs were modified and re-released with different sums yet identical version strings. Is this common practice?

3 3

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2015:0049 CentOS 6 tree FASTTRACK BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2015:0050 CentOS 6 device-mapper-multipath BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2015:0047 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CEBA-2015:0037 CentOS 7 systemd BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 7 xulrunner Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CESA-2015:0047 Important CentOS 5 thunderbird Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 11. Re: CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update (Karanbir Singh) 12. Re: CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 13. CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:12:30 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0049 CentOS 6 tree FASTTRACK BugFix Update Message-ID: <20150114141230.GA37347(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0049 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0049.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f85219f63b25669473ba195ec39cfebfed13f089563e33ce10b9962d1a7088c1 tree-1.5.3-3.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: 44d8a9b5f1929e5c961d855107009e65bea68e21a8761804f3e746ffa7f64554 tree-1.5.3-3.el6.x86_64.rpm Source: 8f3abb7d0f63e64aee74496ac3f0422dded1718e79892d8804f139d6efc9b6c9 tree-1.5.3-3.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:11:43 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update Message-ID: <20150114141143.GA37153(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5b14286a10d83a86c2f67afd0cc32587b33d8bd539ce49e216ea97f23faf1d4a nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm 6c6c9f9bbcd26f44758a20391383348e78a5b71d21abfe38048e75062d274d21 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm 26684b3d183aa1c0c04c48f12962a743b1d54c5c5bc9d9608a6cb93378aea83c nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm 7a7be0afc296176e65f61b3f8b6365f0cb045fc6aaa3c42f631497adbd5a66f5 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: 5b14286a10d83a86c2f67afd0cc32587b33d8bd539ce49e216ea97f23faf1d4a nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm 27020bae70f5ae25027119e0c4c941358f8f85d9870eb2bae78875833a66beba nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 6c6c9f9bbcd26f44758a20391383348e78a5b71d21abfe38048e75062d274d21 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm d96ef3631b8da97916d2da753f2f86f7ef5fa2fb04aea46540809c8310e18683 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 26684b3d183aa1c0c04c48f12962a743b1d54c5c5bc9d9608a6cb93378aea83c nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm 4e53684d386b3120a42c837777293c0df7d2d967701d06e8172522121eaaa9b2 nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 7a7be0afc296176e65f61b3f8b6365f0cb045fc6aaa3c42f631497adbd5a66f5 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm 8ae686401f495292eca45b72388728663a4d5ce72cb6c4e298d53e96c19a64f5 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: e7bb2d14f2a87ba9bfc5659dd0a5d65330bb385fad40a2de80435f265e3f1470 nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:13:23 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0050 CentOS 6 device-mapper-multipath BugFix Update Message-ID: <20150114141323.GA37590(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0050 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0050.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b9e0f3e6dde7d6b8479d9c14fbf55c72f8fbca90025bb71ee78974e84aad2cc7 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.i686.rpm aa9346cfe72528937636f1cde18c052d9f0ab162aa7cc18017531e3d66b4025a device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.i686.rpm b426e2f6aeabc3e928590854e9a2eb8c6e36442e78b8cb8a69d71ab00994c3c4 kpartx-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.i686.rpm x86_64: 06a6efd14ff575c68b86226612f514017e8676625ffcac18d274b4f47bf7fda6 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm aa9346cfe72528937636f1cde18c052d9f0ab162aa7cc18017531e3d66b4025a device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.i686.rpm eaa17409cda5e83b43f495dbb71cb6b2501de8a3b2882aa176aafd164f0ec491 device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm 5ecd6539c9d39c04cd3d2211af8abf4c493c449c6d75ed4efccf315db0f73a3c kpartx-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 27dfcc85eebb96c60f37c9297554d9f4c272c624ae0701f0ad23dd2483d40c88 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-80.el6_6.2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:52:57 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0047 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Security Update Message-ID: <20150114155257.GA40883(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0047 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0047.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 951a3775aca23a6b2f1f96591caa6452f8c23ec96e64a6178cb0ac6c12dc8ff8 thunderbird-31.4.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 39e05f99ce73fbfc97b0a72a1ff384cfa9f8b6c24d3781d72ebd56ebdd7e1c74 thunderbird-31.4.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 4d4d36a7f6f1f4c9e97487c6b8d4ed653d80c83f6eef4c6d1fcabf9f0fd8ef4b thunderbird-31.4.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:08:25 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20150114160825.GA41350(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5c53c88d0ef40ca5d8055af209e4fdad8c50b88504c42181a1ad57d11437b8d6 firefox-31.4.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 5c53c88d0ef40ca5d8055af209e4fdad8c50b88504c42181a1ad57d11437b8d6 firefox-31.4.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm 98e19c9018cd34449ff526a3fd5ecc94b257d69acbb1cbeaa5af408f2fbb3eb2 firefox-31.4.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 893daad5d7624e8945f609bae5120438b35e9b6d63c9045e4c2aecc415b69025 firefox-31.4.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:48:36 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0037 CentOS 7 systemd BugFix Update Message-ID: <20150114184836.GA56976(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0037 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0037.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 6555d15e263354edc5744bcf40ba15938f37c59f0d59988d19948e563132fd6c libgudev1-208-11.el7_0.6.i686.rpm 67c9e574ec5b49bbe55cbbb1a8a71b0e7dbeeb5f90228bc468396d02d2392de4 libgudev1-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm 1bda3c0b2b4ea0652aac2c73cde95a66ef4e3cd81686e70c407c52b9173e9a26 libgudev1-devel-208-11.el7_0.6.i686.rpm a164c8fd7527814fc71a87a72904bc9ae3f472d5a5eeda02f1b96417f26c1790 libgudev1-devel-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm 4f89630edf959129fc9f45a44a067ba77b9764124b27a9d72c6c552c17447c97 systemd-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm 81d5cf3173a42ab19979133e7e1dbadbe6b77405a403677a9e366a863435cc59 systemd-devel-208-11.el7_0.6.i686.rpm 0751a214e99b7ab6199fb72e6de5ff72e5dfdcc739bb58f648f82896fd2beb57 systemd-devel-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm 3462961d5e3833ee29aeec56006ad9f526643490dc03158cc64fc3c33b3b2398 systemd-journal-gateway-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm b42a15055294b897fbef3479ab1e00c06f8008e41cd147059e73722efbef3668 systemd-libs-208-11.el7_0.6.i686.rpm 4f935227b03afdc91e1ab8dc4b490c275d0514827eaec6621125ff8230f8c7ce systemd-libs-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm ab6054863aa45a97a73f618efab394b46d8836ce30def807929d553f44c2dcb1 systemd-python-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm 09afee85d7ecce997e5da21b620d169de7f7fd18868ac0dba5b52cb61fd39a80 systemd-sysv-208-11.el7_0.6.x86_64.rpm Source: 2be72b5666b836d43bf06c0bb51c9c6e3f171149e2c0e74bd900ed489e214971 systemd-208-11.el7_0.6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:49:00 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 7 xulrunner Security Update Message-ID: <20150114184900.GA57166(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: fb2527c63a823d19d5c7fe48879049f1aa34abd128676072195037a8e702611e xulrunner-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm 3ad1168572ea24666eebac8c37d747d0eed87df021cf76ebc1f86dec9bcd6ee8 xulrunner-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm bac4624b98877530450e959acc6156fc0f1eebe579c366e18559a7fba84c7f1b xulrunner-devel-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm aad6e204ff3f6bb929b14cfc78e4d07205a73515e2bdf4ac971af307be4ab869 xulrunner-devel-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: ede19fd8b6afdb8a452fb6a69d4a10813828e73bcb6dfcd8622db9b2738c9c19 xulrunner-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:49:19 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20150114184919.GA57382(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: fb2393878ca1b157a9804c2d42d3237568c956511d49320fea0b3ebc1665624b firefox-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm 0c0baca91c5849111abcc90173cf51995e8967f395a02e769c2a01635ec4a88f firefox-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: af767d1f2e23d4921201d56cddbebf906f7fe00cfda9d5f5113b4027ebc63320 firefox-31.4.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:20:02 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0046 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update Message-ID: <20150114162002.GA1237(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0046 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0046.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5b9c41289d5ff1c87c8d966a78d9b0c913006933e650aee8ff6a54e941c68efa firefox-31.4.0-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64: 5b9c41289d5ff1c87c8d966a78d9b0c913006933e650aee8ff6a54e941c68efa firefox-31.4.0-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm 1a96925b2ff471fdb890dcb6ac46910ff3ee80b172da04eb57843250e65cbf90 firefox-31.4.0-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 87b469e29f9498b8a6367466fb20edd1b41d2448c2309c03ef76c9e5c70dfd87 firefox-31.4.0-1.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:43:12 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0047 Important CentOS 5 thunderbird Security Update Message-ID: <20150114194312.GA11067(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0047 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0047.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e4a5ef8b030762b5d280948211fb7536e2374a3f9838f31b2832dfc18e52fb28 thunderbird-31.4.0-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64: d50ff4ff7baa048d1e90f34cb98a2282ee5ecdea6fa25f3eee96afb5f7046b69 thunderbird-31.4.0-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 985c582a527ef7643aacc1acb828bf720c7ed3b9584045c80681172cb7bfae78 thunderbird-31.4.0-1.el5.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:04:03 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update Message-ID: <54B6D9C3.40705(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/14/2015 02:11 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 > > Upstream details at : > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html > > The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) > > i386: > 5b14286a10d83a86c2f67afd0cc32587b33d8bd539ce49e216ea97f23faf1d4a > nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > 6c6c9f9bbcd26f44758a20391383348e78a5b71d21abfe38048e75062d274d21 > nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > 26684b3d183aa1c0c04c48f12962a743b1d54c5c5bc9d9608a6cb93378aea83c > nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > 7a7be0afc296176e65f61b3f8b6365f0cb045fc6aaa3c42f631497adbd5a66f5 > nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > > x86_64: > 5b14286a10d83a86c2f67afd0cc32587b33d8bd539ce49e216ea97f23faf1d4a > nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > 27020bae70f5ae25027119e0c4c941358f8f85d9870eb2bae78875833a66beba > nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm > 6c6c9f9bbcd26f44758a20391383348e78a5b71d21abfe38048e75062d274d21 > nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > d96ef3631b8da97916d2da753f2f86f7ef5fa2fb04aea46540809c8310e18683 > nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm > 26684b3d183aa1c0c04c48f12962a743b1d54c5c5bc9d9608a6cb93378aea83c > nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > 4e53684d386b3120a42c837777293c0df7d2d967701d06e8172522121eaaa9b2 > nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm > 7a7be0afc296176e65f61b3f8b6365f0cb045fc6aaa3c42f631497adbd5a66f5 > nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > 8ae686401f495292eca45b72388728663a4d5ce72cb6c4e298d53e96c19a64f5 > nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm > > Source: > e7bb2d14f2a87ba9bfc5659dd0a5d65330bb385fad40a2de80435f265e3f1470 > nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.src.rpm > > > Due to reports of this update causing issues for some users, we have withdrawn these packages from the centos mirror network as we investigate further. - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUttnDAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtVaUH/0pkcU9Iq3ZDc4vLJjxOhcDj WOo3C+qsO3QVO97uAoH1Vmqr3Sprd9e8GZryfh7p2wINCJc+201jqIsxox7O1ZYR HMfVhl4gY6nQsk4knVSJzSjkcgb/sWsTc0y7h79XdvKrAtISaeP5LXZB5CHEq53e taWgzruVIB6oE4IamS5N4k0vzhFd1p2GE/s/WFKtDzSO14RV+/1unzfH1GctgaKU wgWcQXWSSr2SgUSZ5ruA7Yw1cCqLp9+JCM0i5d4Tp3q+JBI42FCbJ9MG6nOHsqYF jiiE+XzY8OlMQnI82ZlAeJDk+dVonBZgjv1ktYdlwuqiCgFTGHGGrgVzYyTeNGk= =3Nsc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:27:12 -0600 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0048 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update Message-ID: <54B6ED40.3000104(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" On 01/14/2015 03:04 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/14/2015 02:11 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0048 > >> Upstream details at : >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0048.html > >> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently >> syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) > >> i386: >> 5b14286a10d83a86c2f67afd0cc32587b33d8bd539ce49e216ea97f23faf1d4a >> nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm >> 6c6c9f9bbcd26f44758a20391383348e78a5b71d21abfe38048e75062d274d21 >> nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm >> 26684b3d183aa1c0c04c48f12962a743b1d54c5c5bc9d9608a6cb93378aea83c >> nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm >> 7a7be0afc296176e65f61b3f8b6365f0cb045fc6aaa3c42f631497adbd5a66f5 >> nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm > >> x86_64: >> 5b14286a10d83a86c2f67afd0cc32587b33d8bd539ce49e216ea97f23faf1d4a >> nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm >> 27020bae70f5ae25027119e0c4c941358f8f85d9870eb2bae78875833a66beba >> nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm >> 6c6c9f9bbcd26f44758a20391383348e78a5b71d21abfe38048e75062d274d21 >> nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm >> d96ef3631b8da97916d2da753f2f86f7ef5fa2fb04aea46540809c8310e18683 >> nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm >> 26684b3d183aa1c0c04c48f12962a743b1d54c5c5bc9d9608a6cb93378aea83c >> nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm >> 4e53684d386b3120a42c837777293c0df7d2d967701d06e8172522121eaaa9b2 >> nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm >> 7a7be0afc296176e65f61b3f8b6365f0cb045fc6aaa3c42f631497adbd5a66f5 >> nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.i686.rpm >> 8ae686401f495292eca45b72388728663a4d5ce72cb6c4e298d53e96c19a64f5 >> nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-19.el6_6.x86_64.rpm > >> Source: >> e7bb2d14f2a87ba9bfc5659dd0a5d65330bb385fad40a2de80435f265e3f1470 >> nss-softokn-3.14.3-19.el6_6.src.rpm > > > > > Due to reports of this update causing issues for some users, we have > withdrawn these packages from the centos mirror network as we > investigate further. What we have seen is that because of the way the requires are done, it is possible to update some of these without updating others. As an example, using normal tools like yum, you can do 'yum update nss-softokn' and that will allow an older version of nss-softokn-freebl (as an example) to still be installed. This bug is not CentOS specific and an upstream bug is filed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182337 We are therefore going to re-release the packages as they are behaving as expected. Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

Red Hat Developer Toolset 3 for CentOS6?
by wwp 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hi all, I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid of a v3 of the toolset? I've just found that Qt 5.4 requires what's shipped in this v3 (gcc 4.9.1, binutils 2.24) and would prefer installing those from a repo. If not, the sources will rule. Any hint? Regards, -- wwp

2 5

SELinux-alert: aide wants to write to /var/run/winbindd/pipe
by Patrick Bervoets 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hi, does anyone know if aide should have access to this socket? SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/aide from write access on the sock_file /var/run/winbindd/pipe. Thanks Patrick (on CentOS6 if that matters)

2 1

After Crash dracut kernel
by Tim 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hello, I have two identical servers in hardware. I installed both with CentOS. I did LVM snapshots before updating to test LVM merging. On one server I merged all filesystem's during boot because they where mounted when I merged. The other server I did the snapshots, made my installations and configurations and made no merge because it worked on the other server. But I forgot to delete the snapshots and: n the night the server crashed. It rebooted to recovery kernel because it can't find the lvm volumes (module dm_snapshots was missing). Both servers have a difference. When they start one says CentOS (Core) at the end of the loading bar. The other with the crash says sth. about a dracut-Kernel while loading. What do I have to look for? Partitioning scheme on both servers: /boot: sda1 /: lvm /usr: lvm /var: lvm Swap: lvm Thanks in advance Tim

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
by James B. Byrne 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

On Mon, January 12, 2015 11:47, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:42 PM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb(a)harte-lyne.ca> > wrote: >> On Fri, January 9, 2015 17:36, John R Pierce wrote: >>> >>> Enterprise to me implies large business >> >> Enterprise literally means 'undertaking. > > Danger: Were starting to get into dictionary flame territory. But > the dictionary says is no substitute for thoughtful consideration, > realpolitik, or empathy. Is one to infer from that remark that the E in RHEL has no meaning whatsoever? And that it should be ignored? Or perhaps redefined to whatever is convenient for the moment and the POV of the definer? In which case is it anything more than noise? In any case, the point of the defining the word was to show that Enterprise != Large, nothing more. > > Just because the product has an enterprise label on it doesnt mean > it must behave according to rules set down by Merriam-Webster. Those > in control of RHEL get to say what enterprise means. This is, of which you are no-doubt quite cognisant, a straw-man augment. Nowhere in this discussion has anyone defined 'rules' or claimed that rules exist, in Merriam-Wester or elsewhere, in whatever form you imagine them to take. > > The time to argue about the merits of these changes is long past. > Muster whatever arguments you like, you cannot change the fact that > CentOS 7 includes these technologies. You only get a choice about > what to do about them, now. The earliest they could disappear again > is EL8, and thats both unlikely and 3 years away besides. This issue, as I see it, is not about CentOS-7 per se. It is about the path that RHEL seems to be following at the moment and what that might mean to current users sometime in the future. This forum is where I find those who share my interest in RHEL, albeit in the form of CentOS. I am seeking their views on the matter. I do not expect a solution here. Nor would I look for one on any of the multitudinous mailing lists associated with Fedora. A solution postulates a problem to solve. I am simply checking whether the RH environment suits our needs and whether it is likely to continue to suit; or is likely to change in ways that might prove most inconvenient, for us. We moved to RH5 (or 6 it was a long time ago, pre-RHEL) from HPUX. That change was driven equally by economics and a political change at HP with respect to its clients. It took the better part of five years to complete. If RHEL is changing such that 8 will be less useful than 7 or more considerably expensive to deploy than we can reasonably afford then we need to be looking now for a replacement. > >> I am not at all certain that >> back-porting security fixes to obsolescent software is a profitable >> activity when often for much the same effort, if not less, the most >> recent software could be made to run on the older release without >> adverse effects elsewhere. > > Please point to an example of an OS or OS-like software distribution > that does this. Why is that necessary? I am expressing my opinion about the value derived from the resources expended. I was not aware that I am not permitted to express such unless I can point to a representative distribution which somehow manifests an approach which affirms that opinion. That seems a little like saying only a tailor can comment on whether the emperor is wearing any clothes. In any case, it seems to me that the rather recent innovation of software collections indicates that perhaps I am not alone in that observation. As it happens a most useful, to me at least, piece of information was revealed in the course of this thread. That was the existence of a server based stream for Fedora. I have downloaded that ISO and intend to install it on a VM in the near future. If the results of that investigation prove satisfactory then that will go a long way to alleviating the doubts that my, admittedly limited, experience with CentOS-7 has engendered thus far. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

7 8

configure two bonding interfaces via kickstart
by Benninger Frédéric 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

hello, With CentOS 6.6, I try to configure two bonding interfaces via kickstart, but it works only with bond0, I don't understand why I can't configure bond1 the same way. I found this old post: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-March/133439.html I have exactly the same problem. Who found the trick? best regards Frédéric Benninger

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss