Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Re: [CentOS] can't enable selinux CentOS 6.5
by James B. Byrne 31 Dec '14

31 Dec '14

On Tue, December 30, 2014 03:18, Digimer wrote: > What possible reason could they have for that? > > On 30/12/14 02:17 AM, Laurent Dumont wrote: >> By any change, is it a VPS? I know that my CloudAtCost (very cheap but >> extremely unreliable provider) prevents you from using SeLinux on their >> Centos image. No mysterious breakages == lower support costs. The same reason MicroSoft shipped everything on and open for years and thereby built up the malware industry from scratch. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

4 4

sound oddity on C6
by Fred Smith 31 Dec '14

31 Dec '14

I just encountered an oddity... it may have been this way for millennia :) but somehow I've never noticed it before... say I'm using X (which is pretty normal these days) and I have VLC playing a "radio" station. I do CTRL-ALT-Fx to switch to a text console THAT HAS NO ONE LOGGED IN on it, and voila: no sound! as soon as I log in, the audio returns. what gives here? -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart." ---------------------------- Hebrews 4:12 (niv) ------------------------------

2 2

Documentation for upstart
by Robert Nichols 31 Dec '14

31 Dec '14

Is there any documentation for the upstart-0.6.5 used in CentOS 6? All I can find online is for much newer versions. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Secret incantations for virt-viewer?
by Bill Gee 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

On Tuesday, December 30, 2014 16:15:45 m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: > Bill Gee wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 30, 2014 13:01:57 SilverTip257 wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Marcelo Roccasalva < > >> > >> marcelo-centos(a)irrigacion.gov.ar> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Bill Gee <bgee(a)campercaver.net> > >> > >> wrote: > <snip> > > > Thanks! I changed the qemu.conf file to listen on 0.0.0.0. That works - > > I can connect to the virtual machines using a VNC client. > > <snip> > Eeek! > > I'd change that, if I were you, to something on your own network - > 192.168.0.0/24, or whatever. I don't think you want somebody, in, say, > North Korea or Brazil getting in there. > > mark, the unpostable Hi Mark My understanding is that 0.0.0.0 in this context really means "all public network interfaces". There is no man page for qemu.conf, so all I can go by is the comments in the file. There are NAT routers in front of all of this. Bill Gee

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
by James B. Byrne 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

On Mon, December 29, 2014 21:04, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 29, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Warren Young <wyml(a)etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> the world where you design, build, and deploy The System is disappearing >>> fast. >> >> Sure, if you don't care if you lose data, you can skip those steps. > > How did you jump from incremental feature roll-outs to data loss? There is no > necessary connection there. > Having written the Cucumber Backgrounder guide I believe that I am well aware of some of the current fashions in software development. The idea of incremental feature enhancement that you introduced is at once orthogonal to my original point and yet forms an ironic counterpoint that highlights the problem. The issue of data integrity is a separate matter entirely. I raised the issues of needless incompatibility and the avoidable costs of retraining and re-implementation of existing, satisfactory, solutions. You reply with a comment extolling incremental featurism. I am all in favour of incrementalism in software development. The problem being that RedHat does not do that. Instead RedHat freezes the product two years before release and then sets about creating a new, equivalent, but significantly different, replacement that you are forced to accept every seven years. In fact, the freeze, release, support and deprecate schedule that RedHat embraces as a corporate policy bears more than a passing similarity to the 'waterfall' process you, evidently prematurely, consigned to the grave. If RedHat actually adopted incremental rollout of new features to their distribution I would be most happy because, incremental rollouts are NOT SUPPOSED TO BREAK ANYTHING ALREADY IN PRODUCTION. And that condition is most certainly not met in every case of RHELx+1 I have dealt with. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

Gnome rebase in 7.2?
by Dave Johansen 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109302 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174442 >From those two bugzillas it looks like Gnome is going to be rebased in 7.2. I understand that that's a "RHEL thing" but does anyone here have any insight to what this will mean. Will applications have to rebuilt? Or what other implications are there? Thanks, Dave

1 0

can't enable selinux CentOS 6.5
by Tim Dunphy 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

Hey guys, For some reason I can't seem to enable SELinux on this one host. Here's my SELinux config file: [root@beta-new:~] #cat /etc/sysconfig/selinux # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system. # SELINUX= can take one of these three values: # enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced. # permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing. # disabled - No SELinux policy is loaded. SELINUX=enforcing # SELINUXTYPE= can take one of these two values: # targeted - Targeted processes are protected, # mls - Multi Level Security protection. SELINUXTYPE=targeted And when I check if it's enabled this is what I get: [root@beta-new:~] #getenforce Disabled But when I go to set SELinux to enabled, even with the config file set as you see it above, I get this result: [root@beta-new:~] #setenforce 1 setenforce: SELinux is disabled And nothing I can do enables it on this host. So how, can I solve this problem? I would definitely appreciate any advice you may have. Thanks Tim -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B

5 5

connect an iphone 5 to centos
by Patrick Bervoets 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

Does anyone know if you can connect an iphone 5 with ios 8.1.2 to either Centos 6 or 7? I've installed libimobiledevice but there's nothing happening. Thanks Patrick

1 0

ifcfg-br options
by Steve Clark 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

Hi, Does anyone know if there is an option for the ifcfg-br file that matches the brctl setageing parameter? I am using KVM and am running a DPI guest and need this parameter set to 0 to get mirrored span port data to cross the bridge to the guest vnet device. Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark(a)netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com

2 2

where to get python-dbus?
by ken 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

When trying to use some third-party software (from HP written in python), it says "python-dbus not installed". Yet, there's $ rpm -q dbus-python dbus-python-0.70-9.el5_4 Are there really two such distinct libraries...? or is this a coding error? (Obviously I'm no python coder.) $ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.11 (Final) tnx

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss