Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

exercising pam_cracklib from the command line
by James B. Byrne 20 Nov '14

20 Nov '14

CentOS-6.6 Is there any command line program that determines and reports what pam_cracklib.so returns for a given password; subject to variation in the command line options and values provided? For example, assuming a cli driver program called cli_driver_pgm: cli_driver_pgm pam_cracklib.so difok=8 minlen=14 dcredit=3 ucredit=3 lcredit=3 ocredit=3 minclass=2 maxrepeat=3 maxsequence=3 reject_username gecoscheck -- somepassword -> pam_cracklib calculated minlen value for somepassword My Google-fu appears to have deserted me. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

2 1

Please remove mirrors.skyshe.cn from mirror list,Thanks!
by Tom 20 Nov '14

20 Nov '14

Hi, This is a (new?) mirror in China, but I found this mirror hasn't enough bandwidth, I have tested in many server in China, this mirror has a low ping (smaller than 30ms), and a very low download speed(smaller than 10KB/s), so fastestmirror will let it to be the best mirror, but download very slow. I am really happy to see that skyshe.cn is willing to provide this service. However, I don't think their bandwidth is enough to handle this service. Tom

1 0

Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)
by Ian Pilcher 20 Nov '14

20 Nov '14

I'm creating a simple RPM for my 32-bit CentOS 6 server. When I build the RPM without specifying a target architecture (rpmbuild foo.spec), it successfully builds an i386 RPM. If I try to build an i686 RPM, I get nothing: $ rpmbuild --target i686 foo.spec Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 And I'm returned to command prompt with no error message. The SPEC file doesn't contain any architecture-related tags. I feel like I must be missing something really, really basic, but I'll be darned if I can figure out what it might be. Any ideas? -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno(a)gmail.com -------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" -------- ========================================================================

4 5

Re: [CentOS] Actual complaining: nixspam
by Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Am 19.11.14 um 15:31 schrieb m.roth(a)5-cent.us: > Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >> Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison: >>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: >>>> >>>> Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident. >>> >>> There is a legal term that applies to this use case: "extortion" >> >> AFAIK IX is not billing .... They do a great job for couple of years. > > They have NOT been doing a "great job" for many years. Back around 2000 or > 2001, Cogeco in Canada was using them... and they blocked Chicago > Roadrunner, which was *the* ISP for most of the city of Chicago, one of > the three largest cities in the US (competition? what's that?) Right now, > hostmonster, my hosting provider, uses a primary mailserver to send from > their literal millions of domains (I got that figure from their tech > support), and it was hostmonster's tech support that told me they were > paying something like $150 "per incident" to get themselves removed - I > assume this is when nixspam claims they've got too many complaints for me > to remove myself. In ANY large hosting provider, anyone can buy a domain > and start spamming in hours, if not minutes, and I challenge you to show > me a large hosting provider that does not have this problem. > So some tech support tells you something, and you believe him for 100%? Go and get some real prove. > Twenty years ago, when there were thousands of small ISPs, nixspam's > method made sense. With the mergers, and the near-death of small ISPs, > it's an *idiot's* idea. Plus, they don't offer a whitelist, to get one's > self listed, for love or money. If it is such and idiot's idea, why are they still so famous and widely used? > > No, they're assholes, using a methodology that's 15+ years out of date. > And, I'll note, even the CentOS list gets spam, in spite of nixspam. Uh. your rudeness gives an deep insight of your state of mind and your POV. masterstroke to be taken seriously! >> >> The problem might be m.roths provider, if they have a zombi spam system >> somewhere and dynamic IPs e.g. they can be put on the list. > > See above. Perhaps you don't understand the current business model of > large hosting providers, and the reality of what they have to deal with. I know that and a lot of them (still) suck. We hat all over Germany problems couple of years ago with phone companies like eplus and cable tv providers as ISPs getting an RBLs etc. Still web.de, 1&1 and gmx with ++45 millions of mail accounts suck in some ways (currently we are investigating such an issue.) >> >> http://www.heise.de/ix/NiX-Spam-DNSBL-and-blacklist-for-download-499637.html >> >> If your mail server is affected by our blacklist please ask your >> internet service provider or your network administrator to shut down the >> spam source in your network because this is the blacklisting reason. >> Follow the removal instructions on www.dnsbl.manitu.net if you need to >> speed up the delisting process. > > Wait, *YOUR* blacklist? Are you actually affiliated with nixspam? If so, > then add a significant number of curses and insults, because you have *NO* > answer to what I say, above. And, btw, when are you going to block, say, > yahoo's mailservers? //very confused head-shaking// Read all information provided, than start shouting ... if you where interested in a objective discussion and problem solving you would have opened the link and read the text and would have seen that this is a quote. sorry that I forgot to mark and underline and point this out that a .... like you can see this. Over and out. my last2cents on this. /Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reinicke(a)filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt

1 0

Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated
by Milos Blazevic 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Hi all, Long time, no speak. Shifting from private sector job to full-time freelance work took its toll. As a result, among other things, the Broadcom Wiki page http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom I "maintain" was neglected, and over the past couple of years I've been receiving e-mail inquiries about the Wiki and its applicability. I'm happy to say and let you all know that the Wiki page has been updated with instructions for compiling the latest Broadcom driver with the latest kernel release, and the driver was tested. The current instructions are applicable to CentOS 6 x86_64, but I'm hoping to expand that to CentOS 7 as well. CentOS 5 instructions were removed. Of course, I can post compilation instructions for 5 also, but it'd be tested on a VM and the driver module wouldn't actually go through proper testing. Your thoughts on this matter are certainly welcome. The page is still being reviewed/edited by myself and could use 'polishing', but again, your feedback is always more than welcome and even desired! -- *Kind regards,* *Milos Blazevic* Signature Cert. No: 805010564450148

3 2

Actual complaining: nixspam
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

John accused me of complaining about systemd... this here's *real* complaining. Several times every month, my email starts getting bounced by freakin' nixspam, because my giant hosting provider, that hosts millions of domains. Akemi has argued that nixspam works just fine (if so, then why did we get that spam a few weeks ago?). I've politely requested being put on a whitelist, and been politely ignored. I'd also be very surprised if that was not configurable. I've also argued that nixspam's idea of how to block spam is 15 years out of date. More than a dozen years ago, Cogeco was using them, and I was unable to email a close friend in Canada, because of that, and there was no way to get me off the list. And... at the time, my provider was roadrunner, a division of the multinational Time-Warner, and in my area of Chicago, like many areas of Chicago at the time, they were THE ONLY ISP, having bought up or driven out of business all others. This meant that not just me, but tens of thousands of others in Chicago couldn't get through to anyone whose provider chose to use nixspam. Now, almost all small ISPs are long gone, at least in the US, having been eaten or driven under by huge corporations. It is a common thing for ISPs and hosting providers to use a *single* domain for a mailhost, at least for some large subset of their domains. I have zero information, or confidence, that nixspam would not block Verizon, the giant telecom that provides my network access at home, for the same reason. For those reasons, I am once again urging the list owner to *change* spam blocking, and stop using nixspam. At the very least, I request that you *please* put me on a whitelist. Yes, I argue... but so do most of us, and I think that I've helped a number of folks with solutions to problems over the years, if I need to justify my presence on this list. mark

6 14

NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS does
by wwp 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Hello there, here on my CentOS 6 (up-to-date), since a recent update of the NTFS modules to ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-6 from EPEL repo, mounting my NTFS partitions simply doesn't work ("NTFS signature is missing"). Back to puias' 2011.4.12-5.puias6 and it works again. Such issue observed on several CentOS systems, while upgrading to 6.6. Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found nothing yet. Regards, -- wwp

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2014:1868 CentOS 5 device-mapper BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2014:1867 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CEEA-2014:1869 CentOS 6 oracleasm Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 6 libXfont Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 7 libXfont Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:05:22 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118140522.GA17324(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 13adbf882bc3119c5a28da78246e6cdc76244d871aa22cbe8e123cf011573768 tzdata-2014j-1.el5.i386.rpm d4c91d72a5e00be8e57982a675dec72ae9c42bcc8b425e265704c84cd97220b3 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: 89c23f9bbba8e12764ba6f99cd3914d4ded95ea0e913034aa87176d7d3f75db0 tzdata-2014j-1.el5.x86_64.rpm ddfaec7c260ada435204baea8ea8839c3549888ec25d53067c933c2eb3bc0d38 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 2fc45d4a04df98f734de68ce682d407deb472f02ca79099f57a91847b396043d tzdata-2014j-1.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:06:20 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1868 CentOS 5 device-mapper BugFix Update Message-ID: <20141118140620.GA17425(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1868 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1868.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4cb33df1c0ef17015e9bb009c956cd9f9a535036b4183878015d8150a271a6b9 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm 386754cd706bebd48282d305000984e6476f40cbba6da3ffe531426666eefad6 device-mapper-event-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm x86_64: 4cb33df1c0ef17015e9bb009c956cd9f9a535036b4183878015d8150a271a6b9 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm 3bc114d4788ea74db77c602fbba97626b17ac4ff3c3e8df8cc8377a591e67bb1 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.x86_64.rpm 6a1b527e304b8e2f4798cca3ca5c382041a407a33d3bb8b986daeae928f612d1 device-mapper-event-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.x86_64.rpm Source: fa705696164cbf5c7dc693e8d5a8668202568b146ff7ba61ab108346111d23f7 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:17:08 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1867 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update Message-ID: <20141118141708.GA20085(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1867 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1867.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 305b71ff15dc5ba36ace6b4d1606f0275714f81f29fe814b680d6fae9dbba2fa nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 40cf10d2757b150e8802e29492f0514edf27da85955faaf3111dd226a82ad3a2 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 5926791994ab63650cc72109865685e778bdd4c172b23e19700cd9565a62b9c4 nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 339ca1e102362ff6c50dd784a2d782fcf9a99a0534081a68920bec478f88316f nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: 305b71ff15dc5ba36ace6b4d1606f0275714f81f29fe814b680d6fae9dbba2fa nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 0d21406fb8860e671ddae976edefe82c8033a49e1a071df39359f7b042a99f50 nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 40cf10d2757b150e8802e29492f0514edf27da85955faaf3111dd226a82ad3a2 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm d0edcc698681d44e636093ffa108760867e9755713c467370bc5f489684388f7 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 5926791994ab63650cc72109865685e778bdd4c172b23e19700cd9565a62b9c4 nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 872ea19cefdbab59fbf10ba536055ab8544ab2c07501169280006874d5bd476a nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 339ca1e102362ff6c50dd784a2d782fcf9a99a0534081a68920bec478f88316f nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm eef496abfe4a8d8a44ff47f95ffab070e1ca92200c15e37622f9e08724aea272 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: 41ca911eef52dddb0ba8fbc9fbd847cc2ed3f7aba6f2b7e408427e320996d7ba nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:17:42 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118141742.GA20299(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 3e20e95f57fa81a1d0781678b01df6847d77f24c9c6c807a37a07c678f269429 tzdata-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm 529782b8a983414bc21bd5e8cec0add022d8cbb933ebb54753afe5b2e11ea837 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm x86_64: 3e20e95f57fa81a1d0781678b01df6847d77f24c9c6c807a37a07c678f269429 tzdata-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm 529782b8a983414bc21bd5e8cec0add022d8cbb933ebb54753afe5b2e11ea837 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm Source: 01050fef89d203565fee4ed6e0dea67db203df100aac4a6aa77356cea3607790 tzdata-2014j-1.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:18:10 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1869 CentOS 6 oracleasm Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118141810.GA20456(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1869 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1869.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 8e529bd839efa213af7a9d23677fe18f22a0ed2a64234bb48f5eaeae0fbf23d9 kmod-oracleasm-2.0.8-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: f985532fa70023e18280e2ba3ef627e9967652599f9da437c45de1014a134e7e oracleasm-2.0.8-4.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:18:34 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 6 libXfont Security Update Message-ID: <20141118141834.GA20687(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1870 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1870.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 13834a3e7436e041b8455eb295055e10d6eb636d0b63ca52ca923505a46b95ac libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm 17a24810e40317805a3f1d2b4cfb0a320c82dc5a65ce092f7e0c03e8c2a95e1a libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: 13834a3e7436e041b8455eb295055e10d6eb636d0b63ca52ca923505a46b95ac libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm fd0ab920b5579b750bf2bd6cf3314a1c967714e80182d169d6fb41bdb363a89a libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 17a24810e40317805a3f1d2b4cfb0a320c82dc5a65ce092f7e0c03e8c2a95e1a libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm 669eff421714a4f4eec43261923dbe7fb224dc0c96c5407c63bf16404cce2bbc libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: 0389c2ba2eb96e97f7c26798356dfbaec9e09aaf9106ab4599e194eadd2182de libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:33:30 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 7 libXfont Security Update Message-ID: <20141118183330.GA37348(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1870 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1870.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4db16b52f6e2005a48f611e2634fe0be85344f8fd63c8df546ac5aa805a146aa libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.i686.rpm 2bea9726aa656252acb5c4bd08b2f8c69faa67e64e138a6eca61d6370876a0ab libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.x86_64.rpm 0fd4d95b96ba54cf9f7a7313c38ece120f83451b169e69c83fd151ffa73ac315 libXfont-devel-1.4.7-2.el7_0.i686.rpm 90931cc19fe4bd908b2ea8265eec983c068743a0ffd2d6982387b1e7122ebac9 libXfont-devel-1.4.7-2.el7_0.x86_64.rpm Source: b96aa205cc865dd7a15ef79606271bf02f57a45be111f9c888ce2169497b9c97 libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:37:19 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118183719.GA37518(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 3c2392072374f63df6dcc1fa55adcfc99611803fdf51d55f2946fafa2fe1c1d6 tzdata-2014j-1.el7_0.noarch.rpm 4a54a7598e8390f93212bddcbf918c24c4d37640c841ef96383e01327c5647dc tzdata-java-2014j-1.el7_0.noarch.rpm Source: 52a2463bc19c552d1eee2bdc4d4f0afa93a648406704a1ef951ed1759b385723 tzdata-2014j-1.el7_0.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10 ************************************************

1 0

Upgrade to CentOS6.6: mpich dep error
by wwp 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Hello there, I'm checking if I can upgrade safely from CentOS6.5 to 6.6 using yum, and here's what it says: ===================== [snip] --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.centos.plus will be erased ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.centos.plus will be erased ---> Package mpich2.x86_64 0:1.2.1-2.3.el6 will be obsoleted --> Processing Dependency: libmpich.so.1.2()(64bit) for package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libmpichf90.so.1.2()(64bit) for package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: mpich2 for package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 Package mpich2 is obsoleted by mpich, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: mpich2 Removing: mpich2-1.2.1-2.3.el6.x86_64 (@base) mpich2 = 1.2.1-2.3.el6 Obsoleted By: mpich-3.1-4.el6.x86_64 (base) Not found Error: Package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: libmpichf90.so.1.2()(64bit) Removing: mpich2-1.2.1-2.3.el6.x86_64 (@base) libmpichf90.so.1.2()(64bit) Obsoleted By: mpich-3.1-4.el6.x86_64 (base) Not found Error: Package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: libmpich.so.1.2()(64bit) Removing: mpich2-1.2.1-2.3.el6.x86_64 (@base) libmpich.so.1.2()(64bit) Obsoleted By: mpich-3.1-4.el6.x86_64 (base) Not found You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest ===================== Those packages depend on mpich2.x86_64: boost-graph-mpich2 x86_64 1.41.0-18.el6 @base 440 k boost-mpich2 x86_64 1.41.0-18.el6 @base 353 k boost-mpich2-python x86_64 1.41.0-18.el6 @base 44 k hdf5-mpich2 x86_64 1.8.5.patch1-7.el6 @epel 6.8 M mpich2-devel x86_64 1.2.1-2.3.el6 @base 6.8 M I presume it's the dep from hdf5mich from epel which is blocking.. Any hint about what I could do now? Regards, -- wwp

2 3

Install CentOS7 on LVM over software RAID
by Владимир Ельцов 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Hello everyone. Is there possibility to install CenOS7 on LVM over software RAID? I wasn't able to do it... -- Владимир Ельцов

3 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss