Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Systemd Adding Its Own Console To Linux Systems
by Les Mikesell 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 10.10.2014 um 22:38 schrieb Les Mikesell: > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Chris Adams <linux(a)cmadams.net> wrote: >>> >>> Once upon a time, Marko Vojinovic <vvmarko(a)gmail.com> said: >>>> >>>> I don't really see how systemd violates the "do one thing and do it >>>> well" philosophy. >>> >>> >>> systemd (as PID 1) is not necessarily the problem. The problem IMHO is >>> the systemd _project_ that appears to have a severe case of scope creep. >>> They have swallowed up other projects (udev, dbus), reinvented wheels >>> (logging, ntp, network configuration), and appear to still be growing >>> without bounds. When people don't like some of the decisions of systemd >>> developers, and the systemd project keeps taking over more of the core >>> OS functionality, it is frustrating to watch. >> >> >> There's probably nothing wrong with these things in the context of a >> new/different OS oriented to servicing a single user who is assumed to >> own the world as a side effect of logging into a magical console >> device and starting a GUI where things can pop into existence and chat >> with other things easily. But it doesn't have much to do with >> unix-like concepts > > > bullshit proven by running servers with systemd over 3 years *headless* with > multiple users for > > * vpn > * sftp with mysqld based users and groups > * rdp > * http > * smtp > * pop3 > * imap > * smb > * afp > * dns > * epp > * dhcp > * ftp > * ntp > * mysqld > * firewalls / gateways > * routers > > and well, worksations too > > so *just shut up* thelling abody shit about "a single user" What happens to ownership of a DVD or audio device when a different user logs in at the console - even if some other remote user wants to access them? The magic is more about ConsoleKit and PolicyKit than specifically systemd but the underlying dbus gunk seems to be merging together. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Wrong file permissions in CentOS 7
by Alan Stern 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Sorry if this question has been asked many times before. On a new CentOS 7 system, when I create files they end up with strange permissions. For example, as root: [root@server ~]# umask 0000 [root@server ~]# touch a [root@server ~]# ls -l a -r--r----- 1 root root 0 Oct 10 11:45 a As a regular user: [stern@server ~]$ umask 0000 [stern@server ~]$ touch b [stern@server ~]$ ls -l b -rw------- 1 stern stern 0 Oct 10 11:47 b In both cases the permsissions should have been -rw-rw-rw-. What on earth is going on, and how can I fix it? Thanks, Alan Stern

3 5

redhat-lsb
by Les Mikesell 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

I've noticed that some systems don't have redhat-lsb or even redhat-lsb-core installed and as a side effect, the ocsinventory agent reports them as 'linux' instead of Centos with the release version. Also, where it is installed and ocsinventory does pick up the name, it doesn't include Centos (pre-7.x) in the 'all Linux' grouping because the name is just CentOS and unlike 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux, or 'SUSE Linux Enterprise Server' which include Linux in the name. Anyway, a few questions: Is there some reason to omit redhat-lsb-core from any of the install groups? Why is there such a big list of dependencies? (glibc-devel, gdbm-devel, perl-CGI, etc., seem odd as 'standard requirements'). Even more so for the full redhat-lsb package? Why are things like qt and ghostscript pulled in by dependencies? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

CentOS 7 docs, tutorials, etc...
by Igal ＠ getRailo.org 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

hi all, after many years of working almost exclusively with Windows servers I am trying to switch to CentOS. I have a couple of books which were written for CentOS 5, but many (basic) things do not apply to CentOS 7 anymore, which is very confusing. Internet resources suffer from the same problem. for example, one of the books shows a Services configuration tool, which should be accessible from System > Administration > Server > Services, but I don't even have a System top menu anymore. the closest thing I have is Applications > System Tools but there is no Services applet there. also, I am trying to set some shortcuts to the Desktop, and preferably pin them to the Taskbar if such an option exists, but in vain. using Gnome 3.8.4 BTW. any ideas? advice? TIA!

7 16

arsh840@gmail.com has indicated you're a friend. Accept?
by arsh840＠gmail.com 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Hi, arsh840(a)gmail.com wants to follow you. ****** Is arsh840(a)gmail.com you friend? ****** If Yes please follow the link below: http://invites.infoaxe.net/signup_e.html?fullname=&email=centos@centos.… If No please follow the link below: http://invites.infoaxe.net/signup_e.html?fullname=&email=centos@centos.… Follow the link below to remove yourself from all such emails http://invites.infoaxe.net/uns_inviter.jsp?email=centos@centos.org&iid=…

9 11

Re: [CentOS] Systemd Adding Its Own Console To Linux Systems
by Always Learning 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:51 -0400, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: > Always Learning wrote: > > Systemd should be been much more widely discussed with the general > > Linux / Red Hat and clones community. I am sure beneficial improvements > > would have been proposed and, hopefully, implemented prior to Red Hat's > > adoption. > Absolutely. As a computer person of nearly 50 years experience (wish I was 20 again), I have long recognised the essential fact .... * That if one gets it Right the first time, one inevitably saves an awful lot of time and an awful lot of effort subsequently trying to get it Right or even to "improve" the less than perfect item. A little critical and constructive effort into the architecture and functionality of systemd would have brought considerable benefit. Perhaps the Fedora and RedHat persons might remember this advice when the next "wonder" is proposed. No reason not to want *genuine* perfection for all. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

1 0

named log entries - Are any of these a problem?
by Bill Gee 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Hello everyone - I run bind version 9.8.2 on CentOS 6.5. The daily logwatch run sends me the following items. Are any of these a real problem? ============ checkhints: extra NS 'A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns1.dnslibre.info' in hints: 147 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns1.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns10.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns2.dnslibre.info' in hints: 147 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns2.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns3.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns4.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns5.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns6.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns7.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns8.opennic.glue' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: unable to find root NS 'ns9.opennic.glue' in hints: 147 Time(s) clients-per-query decreased to 10: 2 Time(s) (repeated many time with various numbers) =================== The hints file DOES contain two entries for each of the ROOT-SERVERS. One is the ipv4 address and the other is the ipv6 address. I use the hints file downloaded from http://www.internic.net/domain/named.root . The hints file does NOT contain any entries for the opennic.glue or dnslibre.info servers. However, when I run "rndc -all", the output shows that bind has entries for those servers. The names will resolve and answer ping. I searched all over trying to find information on the clients-per-query setting. My named.conf file does not contain an entry for clients-per-query. Is there some detailed documentation on this setting? What does it really do? Three more notes: 1) I see no problems in daily operation. All web browsing works as does resolution for local machines. 2) This bind server does not get queries from outside my local network. 3) I use OpenNIC as the "forwarders" servers. I used to use OpenDNS until they stopped handling Yahoo email correctly. Thanks - Bill Gee

2 4

file system replication
by Jason T. Slack-Moehrle 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Hi Everyone, I need to keep 2 systems identical. Mostly e-mail directories, web directories, mysql, etc. The goal here is to have a 2nd system ready to go it the first one starts to exhibit hardware issues. What are options to have this happen? I'm going out on a limb and thinking rsync but I haven't used it past just simple use cases. Can anyone provide some insight for me? CentOS 6.5. Jason

8 15

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 116, Issue 6
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Infra - CentOS Wiki instance migration (Fabian Arrotin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:44:57 +0200 From: Fabian Arrotin <arrfab(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] Infra - CentOS Wiki instance migration Message-ID: <54368349.8020106(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We have to do some hardware/software maintenance on the machine actually hosting the Wiki service (http://wiki.centos.org) Instead of just taking the wiki instance down during that maintenance, we've decided to relocate it to a temporary host, proceed to maintenance, and then migrate it back to the previous node. Migration is scheduled for Friday October 10th, 11:00 am UTC time. You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2014-10-10 11:00 UTC') Migration will happen in several steps: 1 - we "freeze" the wiki on the actual node, transfer data, update the A record, restore the service on the temporary node (disruption ~ 30min) 2 - we proceed to the needed maintenance on first node (no disruption in service, but no estimated time) 3 - depending on time needed for step [2], and assuming we have no hardware issue, we proceed like step [1], but in reverse (so disruption ~30 minutes again) Thanks for your comprehending and patience. on behalf of the Infra team, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQ2g0kACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4flACfc1IjPeHelBntwt4eNTd6SBvM wXAAnAqtOg4Ko4nqd0QVUfX7ZcQevD5K =v15z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 116, Issue 6 ***********************************************

1 0

Testing packages for Xen, Xen Kernel, and centos-release-xen
by Johnny Hughes 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

For those of you who use xen4centos, but are not on the centos-virt mail list (shame on you if you do that :D) .. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2014-October/004132.html If you can test the auto update functionality of the kernel as outlined in that post and report the results (hopefully to the virt mail list :D), it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss