Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Firefox-31 STARTTLS cipher strengh degraded?
by James B. Byrne 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

Has anyone else experienced a degraded symmetric key exchange when using FF-31 vice FF24? When I use FF24 then I get a symmetric type of AES-256 (Very Strong) rating in Calomel 0.62. When I switch to FF31 and connect to exactly the same server host and url then in Calomel 0.62 I see this instead: TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (Very Weak). I am not altering any of the configuration options in FF between version trials. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

Help test OpenStack on CentOS 7
by Rich Bowen 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

CentOS/OpenStack enthusiasts, please come help us test OpenStack on CentOS7, October 1 & 2. There's more detail in this blog post: http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/09/rdo-juno-test-day/ The test day details are at https://openstack.redhat.com/RDO_test_day_Juno_milestone_3 We'll be using #RDO on the Freenode IRC network for discussion/questions during the event. Thanks! -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com OpenStack Community Liaison http://openstack.redhat.com/

1 0

Re: [CentOS] process identification
by kqt4at5v＠gmail.com 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 19.09.2014 um 15:58 schrieb kqt4at5v(a)gmail.com: >> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> Am 19.09.2014 um 15:45 schrieb kqt4at5v(a)gmail.com: >>>> I am running CentOS 6.5. I know this is not a CentOS specific problem. >>>> Netstat shows several open ports and no pid. >>>> >>>> tcp 0 0 *:48720 *:* LISTEN - tcp 0 0 *:43422 >>>> *:* LISTEN - >>>> udp 0 0 *:50216 *:* >>> >>> alias netstat='/bin/netstat --numeric-hosts --numeric-ports --notrim --programs -u -t' >>> /bin/netstat >>> >>> [root@openvas:~]$ /bin/netstat --numeric-hosts --numeric-ports --notrim --programs -u -t -l >>> Aktive Internetverbindungen (Nur Server) >>> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name >>> tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9390 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 5454/openvasmd >>> tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9391 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 5473/openvassd >>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 5438/gsad >>> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:10022 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1177/sshd >> >> This netstat show exactly the same > > boah then call it as root, for a unprivileged user it shows only > executeable and PID of own processes for good reasons > >> Lsof does not show these ports > > because you just have no permissions > > My bad I should have said. My original commands were sudo netstat -tulpn | less sudo lsof | less I have several CentOS 6.5 machines and only one shows these odd ports. I have also run chkrootkit and used clamscan to check filesystems. It may be harmless but my curiosity is killing me.

5 5

Re: [CentOS] process identification
by kqt4at5v＠gmail.com 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 19.09.2014 um 15:45 schrieb kqt4at5v(a)gmail.com: >> I am running CentOS 6.5. I know this is not a CentOS specific problem. >> Netstat shows several open ports and no pid. >> >> tcp 0 0 *:48720 *:* LISTEN - tcp 0 0 *:43422 >> *:* LISTEN - >> udp 0 0 *:50216 *:* > > alias netstat='/bin/netstat --numeric-hosts --numeric-ports --notrim --programs -u -t' > /bin/netstat > > [root@openvas:~]$ /bin/netstat --numeric-hosts --numeric-ports --notrim --programs -u -t -l > Aktive Internetverbindungen (Nur Server) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9390 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 5454/openvasmd > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9391 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 5473/openvassd > tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 5438/gsad > tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:10022 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1177/sshd > > This netstat show exactly the same. Lsof does not show these ports.

3 4

process identification
by kqt4at5v＠gmail.com 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

I am running CentOS 6.5. I know this is not a CentOS specific problem. Netstat shows several open ports and no pid. tcp 0 0 *:48720 *:* LISTEN - tcp 0 0 *:43422 *:* LISTEN - udp 0 0 *:50216 *:* - How can I identify what application is using these ports? Richard

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2014:1254 CentOS 7 firefox BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2014:1257 CentOS 7 NetworkManager BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2014:1259 CentOS 7 ca-certificates BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:58:42 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1254 CentOS 7 firefox BugFix Update Message-ID: <20140918135842.GA22650(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1254 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1254.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: d5883d98b4afbe17851eec1aff24b677565ca51581d11f6c1cdc1824d236d5ca firefox-31.1.0-6.el7.centos.i686.rpm b6c334bdc9e6c8daf4e9fffcebcbb6e9e9d348764d02dd5e365be316557c072f firefox-31.1.0-6.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 59d180c8a5d7d8c194ee94b12c780cf93675b0042a0a099ffdac616da2c7550f firefox-31.1.0-6.el7.centos.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:59:02 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1257 CentOS 7 NetworkManager BugFix Update Message-ID: <20140918135902.GA22751(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1257 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1257.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 847bb9d768c39421827c2906611d03fc6f811eb7264032ce8a461cf1961ebc39 NetworkManager-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.i686.rpm e8fad07ad86f86e69d5a06898ff884152bd7cd54e5b96a62c171d20c9a59508d NetworkManager-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.x86_64.rpm 1bc47d61149154e854a4d90488df629a19d1ff203ecda0214c2e1f78e3c73312 NetworkManager-config-server-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.x86_64.rpm 2aa752e78b331768104bd32cb0d49e24d8cba8b09621b923a726409e91d7a434 NetworkManager-devel-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.i686.rpm ee3f61a7b18284635bd92ef0b95b72c48278f5f5b29a5beb6ef051bd26fabae0 NetworkManager-devel-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.x86_64.rpm 7b628f57542bad4a4860cbb298711ed97560efaea4982485defd34fc45e7690b NetworkManager-glib-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.i686.rpm 4e31f1a50413f9047642845218c4475a9c383b1f1c26667c5d3ab42f5b42af70 NetworkManager-glib-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.x86_64.rpm d5925d1984ca51520afb521cacdb6c3f1cc62eb0223b730cdb7d0abace3847cc NetworkManager-glib-devel-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.i686.rpm 17357f3eaafadf84557a15fefebbcaa90dbdfe3a8d42a2d9780748f050e25f23 NetworkManager-glib-devel-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.x86_64.rpm 919fe4f311bb44defc1894b9c021b97db6e9349ab1527722b91879684b45f57e NetworkManager-tui-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.x86_64.rpm Source: 8f2b7cd94bf5a5aec803edac9fa12e5c5251bbd414ba3d542ee404f16d1cd952 NetworkManager-0.9.9.1-26.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:59:14 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1259 CentOS 7 ca-certificates BugFix Update Message-ID: <20140918135914.GA22814(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1259 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1259.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: cf41b6841eb8f29c1fda67c24f7fbdcb3a9aea8c5711267776bfa4f2638f7fa8 ca-certificates-2014.1.98-70.0.el7_0.noarch.rpm Source: beaf1e658a826f8261087129c3049e43a0f571f1d58e5477b7c98885ddd7525a ca-certificates-2014.1.98-70.0.el7_0.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 13 ************************************************

1 0

repos...
by John R Pierce 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

is rpmforge now considered 'friendly' with EPEL? I normally only use EPEL as an addition repo, but one package I want to install on this one system is ffmpeg, and I'm finding it on rpmforge only... but its install wants to mix epel and rpmforge packages... Installing: ffmpeg x86_64 0.6.5-1.el6.rf rpmforge 2.7 M Installing for dependencies: a52dec x86_64 0.7.4-8.el6.rf rpmforge 89 k dirac-libs x86_64 1.0.2-4.el6 epel 335 k faac x86_64 1.26-1.el6.rf rpmforge 140 k ffmpeg-libpostproc x86_64 0.6.5-1.el6.rf rpmforge 24 k libdc1394 x86_64 2.1.2-3.4.el6 base 117 k librtmp x86_64 2.3-1.el6.rf rpmforge 106 k libva x86_64 1.0.15-1.el6 epel 53 k opencore-amr x86_64 0.1.2-1.el6.rf rpmforge 417 k orc x86_64 0.4.16-6.el6 epel 146 k schroedinger x86_64 1.0.10-1.el6.rf rpmforge 591 k x264 x86_64 0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf rpmforge 1.0 M which to me seems kinda scary, as I remember getting into conflicts between these in the past. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast

4 5

Re: [CentOS] Advice on CentOS 7, software raid 1, lvm, 3 TB
by SilverTip257 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Jeff Boyce <jboyce(a)meridianenv.com> wrote: > Sorry for breaking the threading, as I only get the daily digest. My > comments (interspersed) begin with the **. > > <...snipped...> > > > Arch Linux create soft-raid - > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Software_RAID_and_LVM > > ** I had not found this one. My first impression scanning through it is > that it looks to have a lot of the other subjects I am interested in (mbr > vs. gpt, XFS filesystem, EUFI vs BIOS mode). > > > repairing - http://www.thomas-krenn.com/en/wiki/Mdadm_recovery_and_resync > repairing - http://ethertubes.com/repair-md-mdadm-raid/ > repairing - > http://blog.laimbock.com/2014/04/01/how-to-replace-a-failed- > disk-with-linux-software-raid-mdadm/ > > ** Yes, thanks for these also. I am planning on outlining and testing my > disaster recovery process when I set this up so I don't have to figure it > out in a crisis when/if it happens. > > ** Thanks for your time. > Jeff > You're most welcome. Happy I could point you in the direction of at least one (worthwhile) resource you didn't previously find. ;-) Oh and a lot of time, the Gentoo Wiki (and Handbook) is a great resource as well (in addition to the Arch Linux Wiki for example). http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_installation_tips_and_tricks http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Complete_Handbook/Software_RAID I don't often document where I read what. Though I try to keep notes of what commands I needed for this or that, but not all of them. -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //

1 0

KVM Remote
by Matt 18 Sep '14

18 Sep '14

Have a few Supermicro based CentOS boxes at remote date center. Is there anyway to do a remote KVM over TCP to them for the case when they do not seem to come back after a reboot?

4 3

Re: [CentOS] pxebooting
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 18 Sep '14

18 Sep '14

Sorry 'bout breaking threading. Paul, you write: > The gPXE bootloader can fetch files from an arbitrary network host > using TFTP, NFS, HTTP, etc, but the standard syslinux PXE bootloader > cannot. > On CentOS 6, the syslinux-nonlinux package includes both. If you > specify "filename gpxelinux.0" in your DHCP setup, and ensure that the > gpxelinux.0 image is in your tftp root directory, you should be OK. Are you saying that I only need to change the dhcpd configuration, from allow booting; allow bootp; filename "pxelinux.0"; <...> to allow booting; allow bootp; filename "gpxelinux.0"; and have my menus called by pxelinux.cfg/default point to the http://myurl/images? mark

3 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss