Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

yum - package version database
by neubyr 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

When I query for installed package on the system, I get following result: # yum list installed openssl Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify, versionlock Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Installed Packages openssl.x86_64 1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4 @updates/$releasever When I try to install already installed package (just playing with yum), I get following result: # yum install openssl Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, tsflags, verify, versionlock Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Setting up Install Process Package matching openssl-1.0.0-27.el6_4.2.x86_64 already installed. Checking for update. Nothing to do Note, the version reported in both commands is different. Are they referring to different rpmdb state? Appreciate any information on this discrepancy. - thanks, N

4 6

package conflict with libmodplug in rpmforge and in rpmforge and epel
by centos＠kcburns.com 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

On 04/16/2014 05:33 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: > And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have > conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging. Does the use of yum priorities take care of this concern? Thanks, Ken

5 5

package conflict with libmodplug in rpmforge and epel
by Chris 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Dear All, there's a security update for libmodplug: This update is needed to fix a security vulnerability with this package. This notification was issued on 2011-05-10 and last updated on 2011-05-09. Update to upstream version 0.8.8.3 (CVE-2011-1574, CVE-2011-1761). I've the following priorities configured: priority = 1 [base] priority = 1 [extras] priority = 1 [updates] priority = 2 [centosplus] priority = 2 [contrib] priority = 10 [adobe-linux-x86_64] priority = 13 [epel] priority = 16 [rpmforge] priority = 16 [rpmforge-extras] priority = 19 [rpmfusion-nonfree-updates] I got this conflict: Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package libmodplug.x86_64 0:0.8.7-1.el6.rf will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) for package: gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.19-3.el6.rf.x86_64 ---> Package libmodplug.x86_64 1:0.8.8.3-2.el6 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.19-3.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge) Requires: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) Removing: libmodplug-0.8.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge) libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: 1:libmodplug-0.8.8.3-2.el6.x86_64 (epel) Not found You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest gstreamer-plugins-bad is not available in a newer version in epel. How to solve this conflict? - Chris

8 13

semi-OT:R and rkhunter
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

The latest version of rkhunter is complaining about "suspicious file types" in /dev/shm. Thing is, they're being created on the fly by R, and then seem to be a random name (5d1f...), and I have zero expectation that R will only create shm files beginning with those characters. For those running rkhunter, if you've run into something like this, how have you handled it - told rkhunter to ignore /dev/shm, or lived with the regular complaints in the logs, or...? I note that of the three files created by R, one ends in _counter, and another starts with sem.(same long random name as the other files)_counter_mutex. The third has neither prefix nor postfix. mark "and googling on rkhunter "R language" keeps getting me repos, since both R and rkhunter are under the letter r.... mark "brought to you by Arrrghh...."

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2014:0406 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2014:0408 Important CentOS 6 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2014:0408 Important CentOS 5 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2014:0407 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:14:43 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0406 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140416131443.GA21834(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0406 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0406.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d50ec1c824cd6a189842b97d9870c7bb4f66252530d0adf2f7e279bd852183b6 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.i686.rpm ad80828534a58359b2e7b77b9bc0460e3575a064f77273f67f955a291d4d923e java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.i686.rpm 6bc573252eb5988fb9cb995a3df5d741240d4e347d4e09791b4afa2495ee4c39 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.i686.rpm cd069dbd3bcd087d10da73295a98fff700e13777227992bc32b70af473c9dec1 java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.noarch.rpm b182e2624bc258a8c9ee8d03aad76d1f3cd69ddce49ab9a6cbb7da2ba61ad5c9 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.i686.rpm x86_64: 5201bce8d3b62b62fb3f7df28d247d1084b59bd051fed16d82351746f9daee83 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm a62f3f5ebfd36eed3cb52dbd6797897f12bd099e8d9560733368ff2093053a0b java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 69106d55248c0975e99013aa8d27e0da755e0846a2ec605134bae70c5b26577e java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm cd069dbd3bcd087d10da73295a98fff700e13777227992bc32b70af473c9dec1 java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.noarch.rpm 7467a247f82b14666451f815511f22ee1a6e369cacbe07200455993a65e8033e java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm Source: 3ad14bc01031e23caf4f6f083c142ddb4c8bc1b46c4b88b81de013a4925f6cdd java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el6_5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:16:06 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0408 Important CentOS 6 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140416131606.GA22109(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0408 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0408.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: cf83b4f3d3eb471fd97a93a94d83eafe2b2cfb9e69616623496b09dafb953a1e java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.i686.rpm 51f0661f697b9d8da5c07efc9dfcdbabe6bc649fd626af78e757dc430d872e7a java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.i686.rpm b6b06ba8c7b21a9ab08bbc8d592f2dc9d11c4a7d87a31ce0c464f4da49cc74cc java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.i686.rpm 1ded3333abf2e1f97ed1e01e444ee93d70bf1b2fa5521de3937b33d179379d4c java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.i686.rpm 4a4b64021978468dc9aa38367eeea4542d936cdc99086aca8c25a6ecf562c995 java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.i686.rpm x86_64: 4383f083a11fa38906c6cf451ba5ca91188d8dcc39726f2a569184c2a0638ab8 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 5090af1cfb179c3024861a8951255a03f183ace336d7d7e9cfcaf59aca448d09 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 77ed0fe1307a2e384f381cccc1d34b64d6977e77bded06e66ffd6c64a04d1602 java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 0d281625b3ab5b979d90daca716431c3394a959a5b9541fb448f0d0be0d1974b java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 50df52a63126988ee2a50293e4b6addf733a2bdb8c88a7ffdbddc84b7e162ceb java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.x86_64.rpm Source: d71ed5724a04b204cac5b374bf63bacc765f2ada8a00fb0ce3c77ae3af4a38d7 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el6_5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:25:29 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0408 Important CentOS 5 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140416132529.GA18309(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0408 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0408.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: ff1617acfad3c5aa07deaffea6b786146213575a3daebc12eda53d95f58fec6b java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.i386.rpm c23434ba9c70330f205ad194c35ba14b802bf85b1c3a9c107acd9d0cbfcd4e35 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.i386.rpm 87f9e181b4b92b2927cb0b3a33037a6f4d848f42664a967030b38865d090e9dc java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.i386.rpm 40487cfbc631f67870684159ea67bb76745967cdc4ee1614805415fbe8d0cd22 java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.i386.rpm bb8b24cd06518658bcaddb9c586fd220faf6022f0f599454c32015358a04233e java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.i386.rpm x86_64: 64b14f78360ae9e609fcf0386171701aa2a9f8ab0c170861a25b34855764826d java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 27541c3c7b0d4eb4beaa073ff9df93a1341037845675111360a60dd582e2ad41 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.x86_64.rpm f0e90ec50ea4a45ee4c5e34e97578d8697351d4c82433e202e29d46e14b25771 java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.x86_64.rpm b79eb8eeb95ad4c055349533ccb4faa7ea084843402711accea326f635031698 java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.x86_64.rpm c0627b7b0d21f4a6ad6c1e202853f51cb433a5c7b35b92cd17968f796a7ee250 java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.x86_64.rpm Source: df1b83bee7c5cd0931836d5931349afde19651151148f3d720171ae2195a92db java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-5.1.13.3.el5_10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:38:30 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0407 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140416133830.GA19763(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0407 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0407.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: da26f63cc89aeaa970ad820f06d4ad37268a7c32f01245b14139d6ce7836bdfe java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 529df05deee1168c78a73e8de43e1fba513471cd74f41d878df5c1c1082b7aa3 java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 1bb4cfe9d344e4f4d6967874adff15a01d5fb84670737c11e2925e6487692110 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 1758c83b48f5c26c97f24e5620dcc881ecb02e2304bf3db2ac8c839f5e7b1296 java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 0c530480a3fa0ed2f4b17e9dc765ff774674fd0ab4f30d915049485531c313fa java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.i386.rpm x86_64: 163a523682d6fff7a856fc4bafb6bbc600d7f20f58c33fd118b770276315b82e java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm ba12a2d94c64eb8b70c4910236e8ff3786cb9b78a761c1b62c9afc63286bb648 java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 359cb83c3e6ad686e6c2fbf53286419873a77e92e8338b03e4a1475121a50a32 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 981455fd587024853ae7f93dd04fcda686532f82d533dc6671966488f60c05ca java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 6c4a0ec1aeeff89ff090e6613cbdcbd8e0cfcfd92ffbd704ff803fc4f0d07994 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm Source: 40a0d5d06553d104ce108b1415aa3e415a8444d23201915706549169c3523247 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.55-2.4.7.1.el5_10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 8 ***********************************************

1 0

A naive question respecting x.509 logins
by James B. Byrne 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

I have been looking at replacing our current login systems with a single login solution. In the process I managed to get sidetracked into investigating pam_pkcs11. My question, which no doubt reveals the depth of my ignorance, is: Can a simple USB flash memory stick be configured to work with this or some similar module of which I as yet know nothing? Everything I have managed to find about this method of loging on to CentOS implies that either a special smart-card and dedicated reader or a purpose-built usb smart-token is required. Is this in fact so? Is there no way to just use a standard usb flash memory 'key' to achieve the same effect? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

3 3

docker image updates for CentOS
by Jim Perrin 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We've been working with the docker community to get official CentOS images into the index. We've now got CentOS 6.5 (as of 12 april) into the index, and we'll be keeping things updated as we go forward. The structure looks a bit like this: centos:latest = The most recent build of the most recent major release. centos:centos6 = the most recent build of CentOS 6. We've also had requests for a CentOS 5 based docker image, so we'll start on that in the very near future. For more information, have a look at http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/Docker or https://www.docker.io/ - -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTTu1pAAoJEBbHyC76Ca13FyMP/27PvRLry9Lq1UqCAFJS1fof NNFeFTiEtVeqRxaknCWVx7sFOFoM5RG8+EARTrggsvei4DwEWPwu8ZCme3Ay9aNF fmhB4l1SsxrFd87GTwob9QSTkAXYXn8X0l2Ni0qs87R2ZP4RIQcRxXLNMSAyrZHu WsZCVX663JsrUHU/rPtQ4KeN9zeS+WnoDs50qyGR1ZArrGt2qhWFCuSrRoPdXTvj ZH77q+rkXWTKPhSokcOWNYp4pot1SD+iRgLSABikArxaZEMm92sFwxJRLYAf0gXJ EcujU+/XdWSqY1QluPm0FojY5WMh8/KJuixEAC9Y6rxU3Hres6MoUCNByjcYmXlC jNPLFX4St3ndKfcE7FLQczL4Rd+aKL/YLRDROEQJHm0QAgd5nH1m5Xje+FqaFtiU XP0DOIClxvDycfqyG4gfxktcA52u5kWGhFvuGuBeLApz6UWJehj/msalu/QOHatb 4Shc2AIRle7cwZFH1QAPanhDA7jOQ4c2QbzOKk6EQyqu7kw5hsAhf76Ndpd+Z4rm 0hZAd17XWoySV6C40954M1zZ93yuQt/sMDeOBaQea53W0Z77GIdmA3IiVvnS3Asy 44TCJK5NaQnIjRdFdn8sNft9zicYlL4I+vwJkMOCW4clJQsqCJqRukeO9RP75D8Y 6pO4SI/jVGMIJ2F2+lR+ =93PS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

TRD like tool for linux?
by zep 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

so I found that one of my VM hosts seems to have been compromised in some way; I've shut it down, isolated it, found a few odd things like gibberish comments and odd hostnames that I don't recognise pointed back to 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts. I tried TRD and it seems mildly useful, but has more of a windowsy feel for what it wants to be able to fix. does anyone know of something with more linux rootkit detection as a focus? I could just rebuild this machine, but I'd like to know for sure what all/how bad this was broken so I can avoid it for next time. thanks.

4 6

CentOS 5/6 random system freezes
by Andrii Zinchenko 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

I am working on high load daemon development, which listens on UDP and processes packets. Last few months I noticed some strange issue when it takes 500-700 ms to answer packet, while usually it takes 20 ms. I've run strace on all daemon processes and found this thing: 13:35:36.979887 stat("/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2309, ...}) = 0 13:35:36.979944 write(3, "[2014-04-15 13:35:36,979] WARNING WORKER 26 - [pkt#105132/AUTH] loadPresets - memory used: 0 kb\n", 99) = 99 13:35:37.599793 sendto(10, "Q\0\0\0\rSELECT 1\0", 14, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 14 13:35:37.599865 poll([{fd=10, events=POLLIN|POLLERR}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=10, revents=POLLIN}]) You can see that between write and sendto passed around 600 ms. At this time server was not overloaded (LA = 0.4, 16 cores). There were free memory. There were no load on disks. So I took straces of other daemon processes plus database processes. And then did: grep '13:35:37.4' * grep '13:35:37.3' * grep '13:35:37.2' * None of commans show any lines. So I guess the system was just doing nothing during this 600 ms. Is there any way to diagnose this issue? What it might be? -- Andrii Zinchenko mail(a)zinok.org

2 1

Difference between ruby193 CentOS SCL and ruby193 softwarecollections.org SCL
by Filip Bartmann 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

I've found that in https://softwarecollections.org/repos/rhscl/ruby193/epel-6-x86_64/ is passenger included but in http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ruby193/ is not. What is the differences between this two repos? Thanks, Filip Bartmann

2 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss