Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Problem with wireless router
by Joseph Hesse 21 Feb '14

21 Feb '14

Hello, I am using wireless N on a DLink-655 wireless router. It is the "A" hardware version with the latest firmware. I am using a channel that no one in my vicinity is using, according to iwlist. I checked the Statistics from the router web interface and they are shown below for a period of less than an hour. It looks like the errors are excessive, especially the "RX Packets Dropped" Is this par for the course and TCP takes care of it or am I having hardware problems with my router? Thank you, Joe Wireless Statistics Sent :138143 TX Packets Dropped :41 Received :99485 RX Packets Dropped :50911 Errors :27

2 1

bridge network question
by Jerry Geis 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

I have centos 64 6.5 I installed bridge-utils I installed tunctl I added BRIDGE=br0 to ifcfg-eth0 I created ifcfg-br0 with correct settings I did service network restart and I get an error about br0 not present. When I plug in the second network (USB to ethernet) It detects as eth1 What do I need to change to get this to work. Thanks, jerry

5 4

Old harware (intel 82845G card) stopped working after update (centos 6)
by Alain.Cochard＠unistra.fr 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

Hello. I apology in advance if I am not reporting things correctly, but my knowledge about these things is very limited. I have five Transtec computers, approximately born in July 2005; they have an intel 82845G video card. The last 'yum update' was on January 30, 2014. I did not reboot the machines at that time. I cannot be sure about the date of the 'yum update' preceding that one, but I think is was on September 7, 2013. Last Friday (February 14, 2014), 4 of those 5 computers stopped working properly after some action on them. The problem is: black screen with only the arrow of the mouse (mouse is working correctly :-). Apart from that, the computers are OK: one can use Ctrl-Alt-F1, etc. For sure, one of the action which led to the problem was a reboot. I cannot be 100% sure about the action, which was simply a change of screen: the machine was OK; then I changed the screen; it did not work any more; then I rebooted. But my experience is that, sometimes, even under normal condition, it does not work right away, or perhaps not at all, after changing the screen. The 5th computer, on which nothing has been done, is still working just fine. NB: for sure, there has been at least one reboot on at least one of the 5 machines between September (or whatever date at which the previous 'yum update' has been performed) and January, and the problem did not show up. For what it's worth, the following 2 packages are installed: xorg-x11-drv-intel-devel-2.21.12-2.el6.i686 xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.21.12-2.el6.i686 Also, here is the output of 'lspci | grep 82845': 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE/PE DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 01) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 01) Based on the data, my best guess is that the problem I have is due to some recent change in the centos packages. Perhaps it was supposed to be so? (I.e., no longer supporting old hardware?). If so, at any rate, I'll be grateful if someone can suggest a workaround, or perhaps a hint towards that goal. Regards, Alain -- EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre) IPG (Institut de Physique du Globe) | alain.cochard(a)unistra.fr 5 rue René Descartes [bureau 106] | Phone: +33 (0)3 68 85 50 44 F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France | Fax: +33 (0)3 68 85 01 25 -- EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre) IPG (Institut de Physique du Globe) | alain.cochard(a)unistra.fr 5 rue René Descartes [bureau 106] | Phone: +33 (0)3 68 85 50 44 F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France | Fax: +33 (0)3 68 85 01 25

3 4

Dug myself into a hole
by Styma, Robert E (Robert) 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

I just build a CentOS 6 machine to replace my old machine which broke to where I could not fix it. In attempting to get the applications running which had worked on the old machine, I did updates from several repos such as rpmforge, atrpms, livna, epel, etc. Some of the attempts ended going down blind alleys. Now I have a mix of rpm's from various sites that I do not need, but they are listed as dependencies of other rpm's. The rpmforge rpm's are marked with "rf". Is there a process to check which of these rpm's are also in the base libraries and force them back in? I really do not want to go back to square 1 and reload the system from scratch. Bob S

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2014:0186 Moderate CentOS 5 mysql55-mysql Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. Software Collections for CentOS-6 (x86_64 only) (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2014:0173 Moderate mysql55-mysql SCL Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. Updates Included in CentOS Software Collections (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:53:22 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0186 Moderate CentOS 5 mysql55-mysql Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140219135322.GA16318(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0186 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0186.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5aea344ecba1099443217fea54e15c7c2ad85922ca93bcead50c57a1a8714145 mysql55-mysql-5.5.36-2.el5.i386.rpm 9291da5286222e844abf55c89051593ac38347889c56036e79907f3f3b96f453 mysql55-mysql-bench-5.5.36-2.el5.i386.rpm 76e37b949b2d43589e645daf13b35899fee7ad17a0e95b4c0a4612663cffdab7 mysql55-mysql-devel-5.5.36-2.el5.i386.rpm 105fe958561c38b751139aa1d43c3f82f2eda4c38f214803f5163b661f2e90f1 mysql55-mysql-libs-5.5.36-2.el5.i386.rpm f44593fd893778ed9c1642020f438e0d0497ae2d7d833fee685ca3637539c8a4 mysql55-mysql-server-5.5.36-2.el5.i386.rpm 8343922201ed50377377849f1cacc098c49e7a5b80f07cbed0a84018dd1082ed mysql55-mysql-test-5.5.36-2.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: d3adaf28e281d5fccc9ff5889b7214abe57499d8f8bc88c32c5af2c88cc424f1 mysql55-mysql-5.5.36-2.el5.x86_64.rpm 93967d07b987bb2a6eebbf4a8c4eca6768658a3cde5f3e9d056388daff7c08a3 mysql55-mysql-bench-5.5.36-2.el5.x86_64.rpm 76e37b949b2d43589e645daf13b35899fee7ad17a0e95b4c0a4612663cffdab7 mysql55-mysql-devel-5.5.36-2.el5.i386.rpm 3fb686d421e18f1390b478f6b5e3b09ac3c7b032a9202c0aea2e3265e8b9eb08 mysql55-mysql-devel-5.5.36-2.el5.x86_64.rpm da98ca57de9d5252f0a8bf532cdc3675060c955998869b5c4b372141ca7e2829 mysql55-mysql-libs-5.5.36-2.el5.x86_64.rpm 63bfff4879c7f34cdd297c33fc1cbf022feb42107b5f4f5b7db3b5f5709efc28 mysql55-mysql-server-5.5.36-2.el5.x86_64.rpm 07661872b2a08cba956e6435b860469f037b7a543a170c1aa5effe96aaa88ac4 mysql55-mysql-test-5.5.36-2.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: ee393cede335aa6587445a8866cef1e9d04d22834f17f0bec88aadc8ab06844c mysql55-mysql-5.5.36-2.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:53:15 -0600 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] Software Collections for CentOS-6 (x86_64 only) To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <5304C55B.3090806(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" The CentOS Project wants to announce that we have released the Software Collections (SCL) for CentOS-6 x86_64. Software collections only work with CentOS-6.4 and CentOS-6.5 .. earlier versions of CentOS-6 may not work with some SCL packages. Information about SCLs can be found here: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Software_Collect… Sections of the upstream documentation that discuss RHN for delivery or reporting bugs to the upstream bugzilla are not applicable to CentOS (that is Section 2.1, Section 2.8 and all of Chapter 3 of the Revision 1.0-17.400 of the linked Release Notes). To get Software Collections for CentOS, you need to do: yum install centos-release-SCL After installation of the release file, to get specific SCL packages the linked upstream release notes can be used (ie, yum install php54 mariadb55). All bugs for the CentOS Software Collections should be made via http://bugs.centos.org/

1 0

CLAMAV problem: Error message "outdated version" although "yum list installed" reports correct version
by Jobst Schmalenbach 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

Hi. I posted this on the clamav list as well, as I do not know whether this is a rpm issue or clamav issue. Strange problem indeed: [root /tmp] #>yum list installed "clamav*" Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Installed Packages clamav.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed clamav-db.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed clamav-milter.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed [root /tmp] #> [root /tmp] #>su clamav -c /usr/bin/freshclam ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb 20 12:37:52 2014 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.98 Recommended version: 0.98.1 DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq I have checked the following: - all configuration files point to the same database directory - there is only one binary for each of the clamav things on the system - freshclam updates with no problems - clamconf report correct databases but also: Software settings ----------------- Version: 0.98 Any ideas? It has been complaining about this one for some time. Jobst -- My software never has bugs; it just develops random features. | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jobst(a)barrett.com.au, General Manager | | |0| Barrett Consulting Group P/L & The Meditation Room P/L |0|0|0| +61 3 9532 7677, POBox 277, Caulfield South, 3162, Australia

5 7

OpenSSL in CentOS 7
by Kristoffer Rath Hansen 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

Hello, What version of OpenSSL will CentOS 7 ship with? Mvh. / Best regards Kristoffer Rath Hansen Teknisk chef Serverfruit https://www.serverfruit.com/

2 1

Dual boot on win 8 notebook
by Nikos Gatsis - Qbit 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

Hello list. I need suggestions or tutorial of installing centos on an notebook with win 8.1 already installed. Than you in advance. -- Untitled Document ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Γατσής Νίκος - Gatsis Nikos* Web developer tel.: 2108256721 - 2108256722 fax: 2108256712 email: ngatsis(a)qbit.gr http://www.qbit.gr

2 1

Language support annoyance
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 20 Feb '14

20 Feb '14

I've got a user that wants Japanese language support in firefox... our *stock* CentOS firefox, 24.3. I've yum installed i18, and i10, and no joy. Looked at firefox addons, and there's one, 27.0. Won't install, "not compatible". Neither is either 24.0, or 25.0. Anyone have a link to a compatible version? mark

5 12

Java versions in CentOS
by Tom Cartwright 19 Feb '14

19 Feb '14

Hi All, Following the latest security updates from Oracle, the version of OpenJDK package is currently listed as: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm The Redhat security advisory lists these packages: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0026.html but it makes no reference to the build number, which it turns out is important. The build on the package in centos 6.5 is currently listed as b02: [........]$ java -version java version "1.7.0_51" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.4.4.1.el6_5-x86_64 u51-b02) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.45-b08, mixed mode) However changes were being made in at least b10: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028111 I guess this raises three questions: 1. How is the build of the JDK selected for a security update in RHEL/CentOS? 2. Could the b number be made more clear in the release information given its importance? 3. Is it possible to JDK package be updated to the latest build number, given the current one has missing backports? Thanks, Tom ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------

4 6

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss