Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2014:0127 Moderate CentOS 6 librsvg2 Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2014:0126 Moderate CentOS 6 openldap Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2014:0125 CentOS 6 tigervnc Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 05:35:04 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0127 Moderate CentOS 6 librsvg2 Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140204053504.GA49218(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0127 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0127.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 7f582307cabadd730387b49d93e454ab8e9007a98c991210ed3b86f67b9f29f9 librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 4632e3a6c32f7e6979ea467548f33f24fa1bfb3ade3de46fb8377864346098bf librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.i686.rpm x86_64: 7f582307cabadd730387b49d93e454ab8e9007a98c991210ed3b86f67b9f29f9 librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 664950eb6b1cb297982ebf569a537b80c8c5605b01ab996dbfe41287a1aa553c librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 4632e3a6c32f7e6979ea467548f33f24fa1bfb3ade3de46fb8377864346098bf librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.i686.rpm d7e7d9a1a0ff23aa4807542f22960580d0e81571af316dc168acf077097e6171 librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 59a805614f98312172e2a467079481f9eda8dc05d8438b1be852879e51b2a4d0 librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 05:35:44 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0126 Moderate CentOS 6 openldap Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140204053544.GA49526(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0126 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0126.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 07c4f6e0049e9e53255b3effe63421d64d48de4eafc116b28c9b77c63a8e24ec openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.i686.rpm 26dde0c2324e45b0b7aad2eca7c018f5bc78e49465b96ce281ab729d9c0a71ab openldap-clients-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.i686.rpm f4e3a08cb06c1c7442b176cabcd3f2dc3f9a2d7eaebae1cf0a927a2065ebad17 openldap-devel-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.i686.rpm fe828f57493fb60f8fe5f9dcda25e2ed1980fdf1df42f3cefdcca68f2ff34a63 openldap-servers-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.i686.rpm 500ae2b4280dd4f638524cfe24cc374232c5e4faca262a37dc3d3446e69a7b9a openldap-servers-sql-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 07c4f6e0049e9e53255b3effe63421d64d48de4eafc116b28c9b77c63a8e24ec openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.i686.rpm 27cae8bc3e94267b8b319c6cb1d49ba556130d72a983aa6cd27b7289d47d2d42 openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm ca6194ef492b2e1c193c80d84f0103570c878e5a19007b631d21350cbeceb92d openldap-clients-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm f4e3a08cb06c1c7442b176cabcd3f2dc3f9a2d7eaebae1cf0a927a2065ebad17 openldap-devel-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.i686.rpm 44f458b7ddd91937668fc183dea40c6204a5837de35d26301d9a8c872fe4ca8e openldap-devel-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm 42fe4524d0a74da980db54284b506b2a97a3753b6ba971c90694d5176aba5381 openldap-servers-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm 915b474fe581b42c960562f078926899ba437333a78012610e85d6efbff16a15 openldap-servers-sql-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 0260ef91950e6c640ab0399d17d22f7a6658916a8409f97f75f381710bbd8bd6 openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 05:36:08 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:0125 CentOS 6 tigervnc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140204053608.GA49772(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0125 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0125.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 11180f5ea56476c6a5a7dff53aeee0c3dc054346312950b9ed431aa38045097e tigervnc-1.1.0-8.el6_5.i686.rpm 12cd6349f8d16539b6580eaaffbfe59af7b26ca27083bfa5305290e299dbfb00 tigervnc-server-1.1.0-8.el6_5.i686.rpm 9b10dab6c2925c3ede850bf842580bbc4fe5f154325b477c3161fa7fd88893ef tigervnc-server-applet-1.1.0-8.el6_5.noarch.rpm e6f5988b2a2392f27e28beb3faadeaf4623cb1f2a7359fbbd45fee05ba8a2db2 tigervnc-server-module-1.1.0-8.el6_5.i686.rpm x86_64: e3baf476de9b2366f466419c798402537aa7f26b66658e7c334d9e3cb87d8a4f tigervnc-1.1.0-8.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 606bf9bdd96eac93db1bb17b7433a1d06ab4de53af6e2e9c62745b4598a525a8 tigervnc-server-1.1.0-8.el6_5.x86_64.rpm 9b10dab6c2925c3ede850bf842580bbc4fe5f154325b477c3161fa7fd88893ef tigervnc-server-applet-1.1.0-8.el6_5.noarch.rpm e971b66241ac9a736e0c2d2ab2db2f8ca4aa41cf1d28dc285a90771d9bb93c68 tigervnc-server-module-1.1.0-8.el6_5.x86_64.rpm Source: 1bc4aeb1d6878af61b4ae7544adc985a039467229db3cb2f767a9a54f8c94492 tigervnc-1.1.0-8.el6_5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 2 ***********************************************

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Password hash rounds solved - important security implications
by george.shaffer＠comcast.net 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

A member of the scientific-linux-users(a)fnal.gov wrote: On 01/14/2014 04:19 PM, George Shaffer wrote: > > If anyone has gotten password hash rounds using hash_rounds_min and > > hash_rounds_max in libuser.conf, or the counter part in login.defs > > (SHA_CRYPT_MIN_ROUNDS, SHA_CRYPT_MAX_ROUNDS), to work on any RHEL related > > distribution, I would appreciate knowing how you did it, because this does > > not seem to work as the documentation I've found says it should. I know > > the crypt method must be SHA256 or SHA512. > > This has an additional PAM setting that might be pertinent. > http://blog.myconan.net/posts/3567 Thank you. This is just what I needed. The hash rounds control is now working, mostly. At the maximum rounds setting it took 14 to 19 seconds depending on which PC I was on. I needed to bring the delay down to around 1 to 2 seconds. It's not working as the documentation describes. With both libuser.conf and login.defs set to ranges of 900000000 to 999000000 and pam.d/password-auth-ac set to 900000000, the actual rounds on both SL and CentOS were 9999999 or < 1.1% of what it should have been. This doesn't matter to me, as I need it faster, not slower. In pam.d/ both password-auth and system-auth are links to password-auth-ac and system-auth-ac respectively. These files clearly state: # This file is auto-generated. # User changes will be destroyed the next time authconfig is run. which is sometimes, but not always true. If a rounds number remains in both password-auth and system-auth after authconfig --updateall is run, that is the number which is used, except the maximum value is 9999999 and not 999999999. I got 1000000 to work on both SL 6.3 and CentOS 5.10, and authentication took just about 2 seconds on both systems. On CentOS 5.10 I could find no PAM documentation anywhere that described the rounds option; I had to rely entirely on the brief blog brought to my attention by the S-L-users list member. On SL 6.3 the PAM rounds option is documented in man 8 pam_unix. If I'm reading this correctly, the proper file to edit would be /etc/pam.d/login where the line "password sufficient pam_unix.so sha512 rounds=1000000 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok" should be added. Password hash rounds control seems to be almost unused. I got no responses in the CentOS 5 Security forum or on the general CentOS email list. People do not seem to understand how important this can be to password security. According to the oclHashcat (hashcat.net) documentation on the fastest GPU enabled PC they have tested, they get 797 million CPS (cracks per second) against SHA512. If the super fast PC is compared to the single CPU PC with no GPU, using the only algorithm common to all tests (NTLM), there is a speed difference of 1981 times. This suggests roughly 400,000 CPS against SHA512 on the single CPU PC they tested. (Each hashing algorithm interacts differently with the various hardware test configurations, so using one algorithm to estimate how another will perform on a different machine is only a crude estimate. Below, the numbers are discussed like reliable estimates, but until empirical evidence establishes the actual rates in a specific situation, none are reliable.) The Hashcat single CPU machine has an AMD Phenom II X6 1090T clocked at 3.8 GHz. The test times of single CPU PCs without GPUs are relevant because the GPU enabled, oclHashcat, cannot run a simple dictionary word list with no transformations. oclHashcat must have, brute force characters added to either or both ends of the words in a list. To run a list of the 10,000 most common passwords, without transformations, you need to use the single CPU Hashcat or the deprecated GPU oclHashcat-plus. It seems there is no efficient way to make use of a massively parallel architecture using a simple word list. oclHashcat also cannot process the "Rule-based Attack" which corresponds with the transformations found in John the Ripper. Again one must use the single CPU Hashcat or the deprecated oclHashcat-plus. So, oclHashcat is blindingly fast with a GPU on brute force and related attacks but cannot process the most obvious dictionary or do the most productive transformations of a dictionary containing real words and names. The most productive transformation is checking the first character, and only the first character, for upper and lower case, in combination with appending 1, 2, or 3 digits to the end of the word. The third digit would be very low yield compared to the first, but still very high compared to any pure brute force attack. If these issues are indicative of a problem that does not fit well with a massively parallel architecture, and not limitations of the oclHashcat developers, there are significant implications for password security. Simply put, password hash round controls can be used to deny crackers most of the space where modified dictionary attacks get the weak, but not blatantly bad, passwords. If Hashcat is run against the default configuration of SHA512 on my desktop PC, roughly 240,000 CPS seems plausible. Unless there is a fast implementation of SHA512, the use of 1,000,000 hash rounds, which takes about 2 seconds to authenticate on an AMD Phenom II X6 1090T, should slow the the cracking process down to about 0.5 CPS, or more than a five orders of magnitude difference. A simple list of the 10,000 most common passwords might take perhaps 5.5 hours with a million round SHA512, rather than about 5 seconds against the default SHA512. On most systems, the top 10,000 passwords, should get 70% to 95% of the passwords. Five hours isn't very long but it's a lot longer than 5 seconds. Where the slowdown really hurts the cracker is in the subsequent runs of reduced efficiency but still productive dictionaries and transformations. One option might be to use the next next million most common passwords. A PC 4 times as fast as the Hashcat single CPU PC should approximate a current, high end PC, and run about 4 CPS against the million rounds SHA512. The million words takes just under 70 hours; that should crack another few percent. Next might be a small 35,000 word dictionary of common names and and mostly common words. The most productive transformations should be both upper and lower case on the first letter, plus 1 through 3 digits appended to the end. That's 77.7 million test passwords taking just about 225 days. If a PC is 4 times faster than the Hashcat test PC against the standard configurations of SHA512, that is 1.6 million CPS. The million rounds configuration takes 228 days for the first 78.7 million test passwords; the default SHA512 configuration is 49 seconds. One is doable but takes commitment, patience, and resources; the other is trivial. Each successive dictionary plus transformations tends to get larger with a lower positive result rate. Any sane person will stop earlier, with regards to how many dictionaries are used, when they see they are faced with an abnormally high number of hash rounds; it shows up very plainly in the hash, just after the "$6$" as "rounds=1000000". A two second delay for logins or su's may seem like a lot, but we wait longer many times a day for various computer events, none of which get us the added security that a million rounds on a sound hashing algorithm with good salts gets us. A one to two second delay is quite perceptible. If this is not acceptable, then a target time between 0.1 and 0.2 seconds should not be noticeable, but still imposes a massive penalty on the cracker. This is a security freebie. For a fairly minor configuration change, system administrators can role back cracking times 2 or more decades. They only need to determine what is an acceptable delay for authentication on their systems, and how may hash rounds it takes to get in that range. Decent 8 character passwords become almost uncrackable. George Shaffer

1 0

Missing Announcement
by Markus Falb 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

Hi, I do see a kernel update to 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5 but I am missing the announcement. -- Kind Regards, Markus

4 4

what is difference between ifconfig and ifup?
by mcclnx mcc 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

I and testing command line to up and down ethernet connection. if I perform following, client can not re-connect. ifconfig eth0 down ifconfig eth0 up if I use following, client can re-connect: ifconfig eth0 down ifup eth0 What difference between "ifconfig up" and "ifup"? thanks.

2 1

[solved] filesystem read only after logrotate CentOS 5
by Helmut Drodofsky 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Helo, the solution was now found in dmesg. I/O error for the journal. dmesg was updated, /var/log/messages not. I think because of read only file system. Best regards Helmut Helo, up to 04:02 the root file system was OK. With the logrotate activities there are messages: read only. Last entry in /var/log/messages is the sendmail entry from logrotate. less /etc/mtab gives: /dev/sda1 / ext3 rw 0 0 proc /proc proc rw 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0 sunrpc /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw 0 0 What has happend? Is this problem related with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947149 Best regards Helmut -- Viele Grüße Helmut Drodofsky Internet XS Service GmbH Heßbrühlstraße 15 70565 Stuttgart Geschäftsführung Dr.-Ing. Roswitha Hahn-Drodofsky HRB 21091 Stuttgart USt.ID: DE190582774 Tel. 0711 781941 0 Fax: 0711 781941 79 Mail: info(a)internet-xs.de www.internet-xs.de _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

filesystem read only after logrotate CentOS 5
by Helmut Drodofsky 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Helo, up to 04:02 the root file system was OK. With the logrotate activities there are messages: read only. Last entry in /var/log/messages is the sendmail entry from logrotate. less /etc/mtab gives: /dev/sda1 / ext3 rw 0 0 proc /proc proc rw 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs rw 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0 sunrpc /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs rpc_pipefs rw 0 0 What has happend? Is this problem related with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947149 Best regards Helmut -- Viele Grüße Helmut Drodofsky Internet XS Service GmbH Heßbrühlstraße 15 70565 Stuttgart Geschäftsführung Dr.-Ing. Roswitha Hahn-Drodofsky HRB 21091 Stuttgart USt.ID: DE190582774 Tel. 0711 781941 0 Fax: 0711 781941 79 Mail: info(a)internet-xs.de www.internet-xs.de

1 0

How to contribute to CentOS
by Fabrizio Di Carlo 02 Feb '14

02 Feb '14

Hello to all, I'm in love with CentOS from several months and I want to contribute to the project, unfortunately I'm not a developer, so how is possible to contribute to the project? Regards, Fabrizio

4 4

Fosdem
by Fabrizio Di Carlo 02 Feb '14

02 Feb '14

Hello to all, who of you are at fosdem?

3 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 02 Feb '14

02 Feb '14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEEA-2014:0115 CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEEA-2014:0116 CentOS 5 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2014:0108 Moderate CentOS 5 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:15:23 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:0115 CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140130231523.GA18771(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:0115 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0115.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4dcbffbec6c8b418ba0707e3adf3ba51432253324d2d29011b76f847f4a4e259 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.i386.rpm 0643eb015493bc407fb970919ce094b38e9ee98729384fee9b4493cb6bea73f4 java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.i386.rpm ecf069fb964cdecf60c8470e455443abb3685a668798a059a180597b90db525a java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.i386.rpm 151e1a5835c68a8ceaae413856dd7c6c98f4d50900456d3c9029118501be3042 java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.i386.rpm 7a59e6bd0d051e2a629e873f52d72798d4229cf2046982d18eaec5c946390a10 java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.i386.rpm x86_64: 8527c44fc595ed44940a72b6f77c9d1d2034ff9a24e261432839706efff5d932 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 3823f88f3485b7b584505cea467da90b2c43be8729fe9c5a383805740558beeb java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 5f12454f2b926d6dc4cfceeb02a2ff8bccf13a4ccc13be03aa029647927713c8 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.x86_64.rpm b9045468cd6f3c871e0c668f8a5c9f38e76c346414f0e4156734f5715d91055c java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.x86_64.rpm ec8926f22aeab828099bd4c0c9aa3aef452408b2bee6202fcb3dbde235c04c5d java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.x86_64.rpm Source: b432e26b56e871d1a37c2e7dd1eefc736ea924fd93dcc292539b16ea79759519 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.2.el5_10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:15:56 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:0116 CentOS 5 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140130231556.GA18805(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:0116 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0116.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 762e64fcc24500f6f403800b97427e86b6b930aa03d0d0ef33b8978382b4f508 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.i386.rpm bfc8dad84d360467c7bc49a06fd3bb236ccee19e1b1eec1e6b06d4ee831385e7 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 686487cff278b948e3831674471407f2a9488476826415685c3e93668a7f070a java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.i386.rpm 85ba811f5b351431d71042569970501c1de1cc39c06a63465db7cf8c810b84b0 java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.i386.rpm bb4b5ce7ef3369070e6ca587b0cba38754e8f35c9ce0c6c577b3f4f96296087f java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.i386.rpm x86_64: b0819f2452fb32a10c2c9f28a23ef45e00cca4768f3d6e45a16b189148ea6512 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm b5db22d78df02eb8d0a6a1fcc74fb12914132d24fd524d26f378ceceacf68a86 java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 2b51d324d30c3a059dc92079d568dce656d9531d8599ac96c5b06e84f4fc8a6c java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm de06ff91f6ca1c44beb098242b9fa19a2e52aeae9bcc056104dd58bfc280df6c java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm 03dc8e9b81bf6148222775a368279916c05e5b5ed07a50f38a1f755825acd8f8 java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm Source: 9f70b671a41dc2e51f8530c4016a319859dcfc5b4df8f76224641c1d90852c0a java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-4.1.13.1.el5_10.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:16:20 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0108 Moderate CentOS 5 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20140130231620.GA18835(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0108 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0108.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d74238e3602c13a3207c146c28b69012bdfb7a2f9788a1d89376ef06a26983d9 kernel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm 11b3cf3eea6732f2f08dedb7baea22070776f7bebb78b6b4ce3b106b9ba19776 kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm 35d460a7b875c28fdef48feb36bce6ab1f2e7fbbc4291389080122baf0176a12 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm 0d423d996dc8591571371f42190ac60bda099885d8a45f8202f6c35fe8d7979a kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm 80fcbdf9cc96c558bf3ff16a4e91f2208080ded230d0202d27b2f56235940a20 kernel-doc-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.noarch.rpm d465d0af5afb9763be6903777d8cf1c7e78dfcd1ddf14ed353e56cfe3461fed1 kernel-headers-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i386.rpm e8abb4f5e64ab5deb8dd46836c078fac411d4503cb0eeac71070d39f7bd46b31 kernel-PAE-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm c4ad7c0768cbc108d968c1f2ea40794fb31ca9c15c06d4a2afe3a911ff130f9c kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm 6722c19f53526ddfc4b9534fd614c5573a85aedfd646e248f6f8b1e0be23f812 kernel-xen-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm 4199617157b203bf104cbd4c9bdf0e62630aa56ac3899806ad6dc2336da72460 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.i686.rpm x86_64: 28db579af6dd4accedfc11118cf212e040e41c3ffa4b65192ec4b043f622ac9e kernel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 77bc6d8ddd451273f025e6b5fd1c7d08ba6f054c67d43a411b5e46f0d3f12525 kernel-debug-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm cfe41cfe5cc81e304ed22cf5c448ff64709d6d8e67d4dbb1054413c6b69c7fd9 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm aa4d52e0fcd19ba1169593e426654d9e58c642f9cecba426852b2b6076d5a7df kernel-devel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 80fcbdf9cc96c558bf3ff16a4e91f2208080ded230d0202d27b2f56235940a20 kernel-doc-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.noarch.rpm 0f033ef397b688c1f470eb7d83fabb639d3a99b59672f3fee8faa3982428d27c kernel-headers-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 353acecacaf577c4e06cec22941a2fa4389b09b379017d719f38b78c4f7084b4 kernel-xen-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm 453c78b1611cb8725b99fc481266ccba4a8035624fa939a4f05cd654ca7b9e28 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: fca0fcf245ce34e872dba0319a3ce11f302f51dcf3228662bb33c167794440bd kernel-2.6.18-371.4.1.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 1 ***********************************************

1 0

CentOS Tshirt ideas
by Karanbir Singh 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

hi, We have, like in the years past, a table at Fosdem and I'd like to get some tshirts printed to hand out. In the past, the Linux Ninja's and Beards ones got quite a bit of attention ( and both were not brand spammy, which is always nice ). Reaching out to the mailing list for ideas on what we can do this year, with the caveat that I need to finalise by this weekend if we are to get anything in by Fosdem. thanks in advance, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

9 9

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss