Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Thank You To The CentOS Team
by diegors＠gmail.com 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=23 Sorry for TP ------Mensaje original------ De: EGO.II-1 Remitente: centos-bounces(a)centos.org Para: CentOS mailing list Responder a: CentOS mailing list Asunto: Re: [CentOS] Thank You To The CentOS Team Enviado: 2 de dic de 2013 07:42 On 12/02/2013 01:54 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier(a)aol.com> wrote: >> Hey all you dedicated folks out there who support the CentOS project. >> Thank you all for your dedicated effort and the great deal of work to >> get the 6.5 release up and running. >> >> Thank you all! >> > +100 > > + 1 - CEntOS is "Da Bomb"!.....LoL! EGO II _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Diego Sanchez Sent from my mobile

1 0

centos at windows network
by Igor Littig 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

Hello everyone. When I try to view the windows network which I connected, the error "unable to mount share list from server" pops up. Once I tuned my firewall off, everything works fine. Does anyone know how to configure iptables in order to don't disable them. My current configuration of iptables is following: # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Sat Nov 16 11:06:35 2013 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [6:360] -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.2.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.2.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.2.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 137 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.2.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 138 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.2.0/24 -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 139 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT

2 1

Error in 6.5 release notes?
by Stephen Harris 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.5 Here it says "In addition to the samba4 RPM mentioned above" but, except for that line, samba isn't mentioned at all. Is this a legacy comment, or is information missing? -- rgds Stephen

3 4

Best way to install mock package
by H 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

Newcomer to Linux and Centos 6.4. What would be the best way to install mock on my Centos server? yum install mock does not recognize the package. Have already installed 'Developer tools' using yum groupinstall. Looking forward to recommendations, thank you.

3 2

Two queries: samba and usb
by Rajagopal Swaminathan 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

Greetings, I have two distinct queries 1. How to detect removal of external usb hard disk within a script and stop backup? 2. How to emulate vfs_recycle functionality of samba for bare metal linux box using script? -- Regards, Rajagopal

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Old hardware, newer kernels
by Andrew Holway 30 Nov '13

30 Nov '13

Unless you are just running some home server or something the general idea of servers is to provide uptime. Servers usually start dying after about 3 to 6 years* and, if you are trying to provide uptime, searching around on ebay for someone that has a PATA hard drive, DDR memory or some ancient pcix controller will severely dent this objective. I agree that its a shame that so much of this ends up in landfill. The fact that chassis are not normally immediately reusable is a tragedy in my eyes but running old, junk equipment is even more of a tragedy when it breaks and people are relying on it. *I work a lot in HPC where servers are hammered to death. On 30 November 2013 14:33, Steve Clark <sclark(a)netwolves.com> wrote: > On 09/24/2013 03:55 PM, Lists wrote: >> On 09/19/2013 08:26 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >>> It works for what it does. And I'm completely prepared to freeze it as far >>> as software goes. I was just curious what may have happened after that >>> particular version of the kernel, and whether there's something else I can >>> do, or call it done, slap a red sticker on it that read, "DON'T EVER >>> UPGRADE ANYMORE" and call it done. >>> >> For what it's worth, we have a single-core P3 running the latest >> Centos6/32 without issue. I realize that from a processing power stand >> point my SIP phone is probably faster, but like Ashley, it does a job >> and very well at that. (network monitor) >> >> [root@edison ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo >> processor : 0 >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel >> cpu family : 6 >> model : 7 >> model name : Pentium III (Katmai) >> stepping : 3 >> cpu MHz : 498.456 >> cache size : 512 KB >> fdiv_bug : no >> hlt_bug : no >> f00f_bug : no >> coma_bug : no >> fpu : yes >> fpu_exception : yes >> cpuid level : 2 >> wp : yes >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 mtrr pge mca cmov >> pse36 mmx fxsr sse up >> bogomips : 996.91 >> clflush size : 32 >> cache_alignment : 32 >> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 32 bits virtual >> power management: >> >> [root@edison ~]# cat /proc/version >> Linux version 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.i686 >> (mockbuild(a)c6b10.bsys.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red >> Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 28 14:27:42 UTC 2013 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS(a)centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > What is with people these days? Why if something works but it is old do people > want to say OMG you need new hardware? > > -- > Stephen Clark > *NetWolves* > Director of Technology > Phone: 813-579-3200 > Fax: 813-882-0209 > Email: steve.clark(a)netwolves.com > http://www.netwolves.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

Old hardware, newer kernels
by Ashley M. Kirchner 30 Nov '13

30 Nov '13

I have an old server (old hardware) that's been running 6.4 with kernel 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.i686, no problem. Except, any kernel update after that causes it not to boot anymore. All I get is a blinking cursor on the screen, nothing else. Is this the end of this hardware, no more kernel updates after this? For reference, these are all the options that kernel is booting up with (lines wrapped on purpose): title CentOS (2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.i686) root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.i686 ro \ root=UUID=3f79e6b6-7845-499f-b708-aef782602673 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM \ rd_NO_MD rd_NO_DM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 \ KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us noapic apm=off ide=nodma acpi=off \ crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet selinux=0 initrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.i686.img

8 13

Multicast routing daemon
by Ian Pilcher 30 Nov '13

30 Nov '13

Is there a multicast routing daemon included in CentOS or EPEL? (Seems like a weird question to even have to ask, but I can't seem to find one.) Thanks! -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno(a)gmail.com Sent from the cloud -- where it's already tomorrow ========================================================================

1 0

Filesystem labeling confusion or mess up
by Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator 29 Nov '13

29 Nov '13

Hi, I do have an iscsi storage with two raidsets. I'm logged in to the target and get two devices: /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc. After formatting the devices with ext4 I realised, that I had used a wrong label, so I tried to relabel the devices. But now I'm confused: doing a e2label /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc returns always the same label name for both devices. so I did "e2label /dev/sdb students" and "e2label /dev/sdc staff" and now mounting the devices shows the same filesystem under sdb and sdc! Looks like sdc (an empty device) is gone... Any suggestions or explanations? Thanks and best regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reinicke(a)filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt

3 4

Machine check events
by Glenn Eychaner 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

On my new Haswell-based machines, I am occasionally seeing entries like the following in /var/log/messages: kernel: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged (I would not have even noticed them, except that they get flagged by logwatch.) These messages always occur alone, and don't seem to have a corresponding entry in any other log file in /var/log. How can I get more info about these messages? Thanks, -G. -- Glenn Eychaner (geychaner(a)lco.cl) Telescope Systems Programmer, Las Campanas Observatory

7 11

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss