Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

2 participants
34758 discussions

nmcli: unwanted secondary ip-address
by Felix Kölzow 24 Sep '20

24 Sep '20

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE eno2 cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0 ethernet eno2 eno4 dbd95c24-1ed7-4292-8dba-3934bd1476a0 ethernet eno4 eno1 1e382037-fec9-493d-a4f2-ace7d73a1e7b ethernet eno1 eno3 bea2db0f-d366-4f1b-bec8-4fbfb3c0b6d2 ethernet eno3 enp5s0f0 23f56b9f-4625-471e-9ce4-6fe7b8832310 ethernet -- enp5s0f1 f25b9a10-1584-4233-89dd-2dda7c774f0d ethernet -- From time to time, a secondary ip-address is assigned to an interface as show below: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:26:b9:78:87:d1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.90/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global noprefixroute eno1 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::226:b9ff:fe78:87d1/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:26:b9:78:87:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.10.100.205/24 brd 10.10.100.255 scope global noprefixroute eno2 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet 10.10.100.72/24 brd 10.10.100.255 scope global secondary dynamic eno2 valid_lft 56158sec preferred_lft 56158sec inet6 fe80::226:b9ff:fe78:87d3/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: eno3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:26:b9:78:87:d5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.4.11/24 brd 192.168.4.255 scope global noprefixroute eno3 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::e98b:e064:50d2:535d/64 scope link noprefixroute valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 6: eno4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:26:b9:78:87:d7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.2.98/24 brd 192.168.2.255 scope global noprefixroute eno4 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet *192.168.137.223/24* brd 192.168.137.255 scope global dynamic eno4 <<----- THIS IS UNWANTED valid_lft 604778sec preferred_lft 604778sec inet6 fe80::9257:5654:b211:8dea/64 scope link noprefixroute valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 7: enp5s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:15:17:59:96:44 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8: enp5s0f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:15:17:59:96:45 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 11: wwp0s29f7u1i4: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/none Furthermore, systemctl status NetworkManager says: systemctl status NetworkManager ● NetworkManager.service - Network Manager Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Mon 2020-09-21 17:25:21 CEST; 17h ago Docs: man:NetworkManager(8) Main PID: 1752062 (NetworkManager) Tasks: 3 (limit: 204496) Memory: 8.2M CGroup: /system.slice/NetworkManager.service └─1752062 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1341] agent-manager: agent[0047d0145168a5f3,:1.4726/nmcli-connect/0]: agent registered NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1360] device (eno4): Activation: starting connection 'eno4' (dbd95c24-1ed7-4292-8dba-3934bd1476a0) NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1361] audit: op="connection-activate" uuid="dbd95c24-1ed7-4292-8dba-3934bd1476a0" name="eno4" pid=31215> NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1363] device (eno4): state change: disconnected -> prepare (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1371] device (eno4): state change: prepare -> config (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1523] device (eno4): state change: config -> ip-config (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1552] device (eno4): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1582] device (eno4): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1586] device (eno4): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed') NetworkManager[1752062]: <info> [1600751941.1637] device (eno4): Activation: successful, device activated. This behaviour is really! unwanted. What is the reason for this behavior. Packages like keepalived or ctdb are not installed on this machine. Any help is appreciated how to figure out the reason for this behavior. Thanks in advance. Felix

4 9

Chromium 85 does not load any pages
by H 24 Sep '20

24 Sep '20

I just upgraded chromium on my CentOS 7 system and ended up with nothing loading. I tried to downgrade using yum downgrade chromium but there does not seem to be an older version on my system, nor does EPEL seem to have version 84 which is what I ran before. First, does anyone know why chromium 85 does not load /anything/? Firefox runs fine. Second, why is chromium 84 not available in EPEL? Thanks.

4 8

ZFS and encryption on CentOS 7
by H 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

Can I ask what the prevailing opinion is on ZFS and encryption on CentOS 7? Is encryption in ZFS stable? If so, I would use it on a new naked drive I just added. If not, I might stick with LUKS and XFS for now. The drive is a 2 Tb SSD. Thanks.

1 0

Forefox on C7 - uses wrong program to view download folder
by Gary Stainburn 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

I've got a C7 laptop using the default repo's (installed plus epel). My firefox has decided to use the wrong program to view the downloads folder. If I download and save a file, then click on the Downloads icon and click on view folder containing the file, it opens the MP3 editor EasyTag instead of Dolphin or Konquror. How do I change it back.

1 0

A Request to Add module to CentOS Linux (3.10.0-1127.18.2.el7.x86_64) 7 (Core)
by Dedoep 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Hello, Is it possible to add the mac802154_hwsim module to CentOS Linux (3.10.0-1127.18.2.el7.x86_64) 7 (Core), so that its part of the OS? Thanks Dan

5 9

iptables & voip
by Gregory P. Ennis 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Everyone, I would like to use our gateway linux machine to give bandwidth preference to voip udp packets. Can anyone point me to a tutorial about the use of voip and iptables? I usually prefer to use iptables instead of firewalld. iptables is more intuitive, and easier to understand. Thanks much!!! Greg Ennis

2 1

CentOS Linux updates released (RSS Feeds)
by Johnny Hughes 21 Sep '20

21 Sep '20

As you may or may not know, we do not have the ability to currently announce CentOS Linux 8 announcements on the CentOS Annonuce Mailing List. We would like to add this in the future. For now, what we do have is an RSS feed for all updates that get released. Use your favorite RSS Feed Tool (I use Thunderbird .. lots of other things available). https://feeds.centos.org/ Subscribe to the xml file you are interested in .. for example, for normal CentOS Linux 8 x86_64 arch installs .. you would subscribe to: https://feeds.centos.org/centos-8-x86_64-BaseOS.xml https://feeds.centos.org/centos-8-x86_64-AppStream.xml This is for people who have asked about what rpms are updated and how to see when new updates happen on CentOS Linux 8. But it works for all versions of CentOS (There are xml files for all repos of CentOS Linxui 6. 7, and 8 .. Also CentOS Stream). Thanks, Johnny Hughes

2 1

CentOS 8 LSI SAS2004 Driver
by William Markuske 20 Sep '20

20 Sep '20

Hello, I've recently been given domain over a number of supermicro storage servers using Broadcom / LSI SAS2004 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 [Spitfire] (rev 03) to run a bunch of SSDs. I was attempting to do fresh installs of CentOS 8 and have come to find out that RedHat deprecated support for a number of HBAs for 8 including all running the SAS2004 chip. Does anyone know if there is a driver available for this chip from a third party repo? My google searches have led me to believe that EPEL 8 has a kmod-mpt3sas package but it does not seem to exist though multiple blogs have stated otherwise. If anyone knows if there is a solution for CentOS 8 that would be great or if I have to roll back to CentOS 7 for card support. Thanks, William

5 8

Drive failed in 4-drive md RAID 10
by Kenneth Porter 20 Sep '20

20 Sep '20

I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are my options? Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). mdadm.conf: # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid10] md127 : active raid10 sdf1[2](F) sdg1[3] sde1[1] sdd1[0] 1949480960 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 near-copies [4/3] [UU_U] bitmap: 15/15 pages [60KB], 65536KB chunk smartctl reports this for sdf: 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 1 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 6 So it's got 6 bad blocks, 1 pending for remapping. Can I clear the error and rebuild? (It's not clear what commands would do that.) Or should I buy a replacement drive? I'm considering a WDS100T1R0A (2.5" 1TB red drive), which Amazon has for $135, plus the 3.5" adapter. The system serves primarily as a home mail server (it fetchmails from an outside VPS serving as my domain's MX) and archival file server.

2 4

storage for mailserver
by Michael Schumacher 19 Sep '20

19 Sep '20

hi, I am planning to replace my old CentOS 6 mail server soon. Most details are quite obvious and do not need to be changed, but the old system was running on spinning discs and this is certainly not the best option for todays mail servers. With spinning discs, HW-RAID6 was the way to go to increase reliability and speed. Today, I get the feeling, that traditional RAID is not the best option for SSDs. I am reading that all RAID members in SSD-arrays age synchronously so that the risk of a massive failure of more than one disk is more likely than with HDDs. There are many other concerns like excessive write load compared to non-raid systems, etc. Is there any common sense what disk layout should be used these days? I have been looking for some kind of master-slave system, where the (one or many) SSD is taking all writes and reads, but the slave HDD runs in parallel as a backup system like in a RAID1 system. Is there any such system? Any thoughts? best regards Michael Schumacher

8 10

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss