Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Why libnetfilter_queue is missing from CentOS, but available in, Fedora?
by Robert Moskowitz 10 Aug '13

10 Aug '13

I am asking this on behalf of the HIPL developers; http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ https://launchpad.net/hipl They have been working on getting their code consistant to the new libnetfilter architecture. Finally have Fedora 18 and 19 available, but have hit a stumbling block with Centos 6. They tell me they are not finding libnetfilter_queue. Here is their message to me: On 08/08/2013 02:03 PM, Miika Komu wrote: > Hi Robert, > > a bug fix exists in the trunk, thanks to Juhani. Do you know why > libnetfilter_queue is not available for CentOS? Do you know any CentOS > maintainers? > > On 13/03/13 15:00, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Here you go! >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: libipq and Fedora 18 >> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:45:13 -0600 >> From: Michal Jaegermann <michal(a)harddata.com> >> Reply-To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases >> <test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> >> To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases >> <test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:07:14AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> I am working with the HIPL project: http://infrahip.net/ and I am >>> the creator of the HIP protocol (see RFC 5201 and ID 5201-bis). >>> >>> On past Fedora releases, HIPL has relied on libipq, but the package >>> manager cannot find this in F18. >> That is what you can find, for example, in Wikipedia: "libipq is a >> development library for iptables userspace packet queuing. Libipq >> provides an API for communicating with ip_queue. >> >> Libipq has been deprecated in favour of the newer libnetfilter_queue in >> Linux kernel-2.6.14 onwards." >> >> See also >> http://www.netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_queue/index.html >> >> If you will try: >> >> yum provides '*/libnetfilter_queue.so*' >> >> then packages libnetfilter_queue-1.0.2-1.fc18 and >> libnetfilter_queue-devel-1.0.2-1.fc18 will show up. >> >> Michal >> -- >> test mailing list >> test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test >> >> >>

5 5

Autofs - can you mount only certain home dirs?
by Les Mikesell 09 Aug '13

09 Aug '13

Does autofs take completed control of directories mentioned in auto.master? The examples with /home show that you can specify individual users instead of * and &, but even then it seems to take over the whole /home level so you can't see or add local subdirs. I have a small group of users/hosts where I would like to at least temporarily mix/match who is automounted or not. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

3 3

What FileSystems for large stores and very very large stores?
by Eliezer Croitoru 09 Aug '13

09 Aug '13

I was learning about the different FS exists. I was working on systems that ReiserFS was the star but since there is no longer support from the creator there are other consolidations to be done. I want to ask about couple FS options. EXT4 which is amazing for one node but for more it's another story. I have heard about GFS2 and GlusterFS and read the docs and official materials from RH on them. In the RH docs it states the EXT4 limit files per directory is 65k and I had a directory which was pretty loaded with files and I am unsure exactly what was the size but I am almost sure it was larger the 65k files per directory. I was considering using GlusterFS for a very large storage system with NFS front. I am still unsure EXT4 should or shouldn't be able to handle more then 16TB since the linux kernel ext4 docs at: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt in section 2.1 it states: * ability to use filesystems > 16TB (e2fsprogs support not available yet). so can I use it or not?? if there are no tools to handle this size then I cannot trust it. I want to create a storage with more then 16TB based on GlusterFS since it allows me to use 2-3 rings FS which will allow me to put the storage in a form of: 1 client -> HA NFS servers -> GlusterFS cluster. it seems to more that GlusterFS is a better choice then Swift since RH do provide support for it. Every response will be appreciated. Thanks, Eliezer

7 13

MP3 Tagger
by Mark LaPierre 09 Aug '13

09 Aug '13

Is there any good tagger for CentOS 6? -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****

5 5

qemu-kvm package?
by Dave Johansen 09 Aug '13

09 Aug '13

I just did a clean net install of CentOS 6.4 and when I run virt-manager it says that qemu-kvm is missing, but when I try to install it with yum it says that there isn't a package with that name. Is something wrong with my configuration? Or what is causing this package to appear as not available? Thanks, Dave

3 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 09 Aug '13

09 Aug '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2013:1142 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CEBA-2013:1148 CentOS 6 talk FASTTRACK Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 07:30:59 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1142 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130809073059.GA30364(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1142 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1142.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a3bffc1a95511fe06c09eea91aa6b7613e151c217ed4114c2b321ccdb27afc0e thunderbird-17.0.8-5.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64: 3d1d21625f80c337c4bbce97675c1ead883579aea4186908b6ce11fc26ffcbac thunderbird-17.0.8-5.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm Source: 0f2ba7e315682bd634019c48982b5a8e25f2ff05889344db1cad7ed61382314f thunderbird-17.0.8-5.el6.centos.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:15:22 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1148 CentOS 6 talk FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130809111522.GA51119(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1148 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1148.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1c2d22271c9e88b0dd59bebaa9aff60be9da50e5742cd6304e13396be003d828 talk-0.17-36.el6.i686.rpm 39e50f422f835911c2bda7b5b5e9bf8adc11cb4f18139360adadb9578bcd8f1d talk-server-0.17-36.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: c74c947d9388242d4ce8e20c28d865de38dfa66df6e2565b6beabce2687c9bbd talk-0.17-36.el6.x86_64.rpm 265ebc517e11f51b320ab7155b220b54dbdae7789431e9e1865f2fe1e37171f8 talk-server-0.17-36.el6.x86_64.rpm Source: 1cedfb0ab97bdd5634ac7727d5a15523b52e227a58abf2f26349d0e7f8553f80 talk-0.17-36.el6.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7 ***********************************************

1 0

pppd + rp-pppoe: /sbin/ifup-local when ADSL re-up?
by Mihamina Rakotomandimby 09 Aug '13

09 Aug '13

Hi all, I set up an ADSL connection using rp-pppoe/pppoe-setup. The setting is to persist the connection, so that when the link goes down, it's re-up'd by pppd. The interface is "ppp0" and it appears "/sbin/ifup-local" is not called when re-uppping the ADSL link. It is a problem for me, as I have some routing tables which get cleared from the routes "via ppp0" when the ADSL is down and I need the routes to be added when "ppp0" is back. What's your suggestion in order to either launch "/sbin/ifup-local"or launch a script when "pppd" gets "ppp0" back? -- RMA.

1 0

Cisco DPC3825 - Web Server
by Fidel Dominguez 08 Aug '13

08 Aug '13

Friends I have the following Cisco DPC3825. Enter the settings and put in the DMZ web server that I have, but when I try to access it from another network I get the error code 504, which is the gateway problem. I can access the server via ssh without problems. Research on google for 3 days and can not find the solution to my problem. This router is different compared to the ones I had. The IP to access my router via web from the local network is 192.168.100.1, and the IP of the server I put in the DMZ is 192.168.0.17. No other information could you provide to clarify my problem. Sincerely Fidel Dominguez

3 5

forcing linux kernel 3 to recognize cdrom as hdX
by Oguz Yilmaz 08 Aug '13

08 Aug '13

Hello, I have a problem with older version of anaconda linux installer. I have upgraded kernel in my distro, but, when this anaconda boot with new 3.4.52 kernel, can NOT find cdrom. As far as I understand, this is because the new kernel recognize cd drive as srX, scdX instead of older hdX with 2.6.18. At the moment I can not upgrade anaconda and forced this kernel to recognize it as before. Are there any kernel command line argument, kernel config or something else for kernel 3.4.52 to recognize this cdrom as hdX? Best Regards, -- Oguz YILMAZ

5 7

Re: [CentOS] repoforge :: is it still active?
by Adrian Sevcenco 08 Aug '13

08 Aug '13

On 08/07/2013 08:27 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 07.08.2013 19:12, schrieb Adrian Sevcenco: >> On 08/07/2013 06:41 PM, Patrick Flaherty wrote: >>> They off up their SRC rpms right? Grab the .spec file and have a go at >> i already did this (for el6 - see below) .. i have the rpms, but at this >> moment would be for me too time consuming to learn how to make a repo > > what do you need to learn? > > * yum install createrepo > * createrepo /path/to/your/existing/rpms/ > * let point any httpd/ftpd server point to /path/to/your/rpms/ > * copy a .repo-file from /etc/yum.repos.d/ and modify it for your needs > > this does not take longer than 10 minutes at all thanks a lot!!! easier than i thought! Adrian

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss