Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Yum errors
by me＠tdiehl.org 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 01.07.2013 15:36, schrieb me(a)tdiehl.org: >> I have a machine that recently had some file system corruption. fsck was able >> repair the file system but I am getting the following error when I try to >> do yum update: >> >> [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/var/lib/yum/yumdb/e/2f883c08e3b596b66fcc19c6b4d73b11c9aaa43e-e2fsprogs-1.41.12-14.el6_4.2-x86_64/checksum_type' >> >> In searching Google, some suggested renaming the yumdb but that just results >> in a traceback when I run yum > > you can do *without any issue* > > rm -rf /var/lib/yum/yumdb/* > rm -rf /var/lib/yum/history/* > > and after *twice* "yum history new" there are no longer tracebacks > been there, done that on a *lot* of machines mutiple times to > get rid of this tons of old metadata with no benefit > > After doing a little more poking around, I moved /var/lib/yum/rpmdb-indexes out of the way and the issue seems to be solved. Yum seems to have recreated that directory and appears happy now. Does anyone know of a downside to doing this? Regards, -- Tom me(a)tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me123(a)tdiehl.org

1 0

Yum errors
by me＠tdiehl.org 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi, I have a machine that recently had some file system corruption. fsck was able repair the file system but I am getting the following error when I try to do yum update: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/var/lib/yum/yumdb/e/2f883c08e3b596b66fcc19c6b4d73b11c9aaa43e-e2fsprogs-1.41.12-14.el6_4.2-x86_64/checksum_type' In searching Google, some suggested renaming the yumdb but that just results in a traceback when I run yum. There are some files in lost+found but I am not sure what the above file should look like and inode numbers are not useful to me. Anyone have an idea how to fix this without reloading the machine? Regards, -- Tom me(a)tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me123(a)tdiehl.org

2 1

Setting up dovecot under CentOS-6.4
by Timothy Murphy 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

I want to set up dovecot on a CentOS server. I did this before, some time ago, but it seems to have become much more complicated, involving postfix, amavisd-new and clamav (for spamassassin). What puzzles me is the role, if any, of procmail and .procmailrc in this new system. Is procmail no longer used/needed? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 100, Issue 14
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

1 0

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.4 samba password sync problem
by Krzysztof Szarlej 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

you are suggesting that i cant find in logs any info about declared passwd program? i would be very thankfull for some feedback about syncing. still trying to do it but i ran out of ideas already. 2013/6/30 Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> > > > Am 30.06.2013 02:20, schrieb Krzysztof Szarlej: > > I have a problem with unix-samba password sync. It just doesnt work, > when i > > use smbpasswd it changes only samba password, and not the unix password. > In > > logs i cant find any error about passwd. Samba ver is 3.6.9-151 > > so what - they are independent since forever > otherwise "smbpasswd" would not be needed at all > >

1 0

centos 6.4 samba password sync problem
by Krzysztof Szarlej 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

I have a problem with unix-samba password sync. It just doesnt work, when i use smbpasswd it changes only samba password, and not the unix password. In logs i cant find any error about passwd. Samba ver is 3.6.9-151. Here is [global] in my smb.conf [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP security = user encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New password* %n\n *new password* %n\n *success* debug level = 100 passwd chat debug = yes

1 0

OT: About rebuilding RHS and RHEV
by C. L. Martinez 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

HI all, Somebody had tried to do a rebuild of RedHat Storage Server 2.0 and RHEV 3.2 hypervisor with CentOS? Mock is an option to accomplish this? Thanks.

2 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 100, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2013:0988 CentOS 6 suitesparse FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2013:0987 CentOS 6 xfsprogs Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2013:0986 CentOS 6 libnl Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEBA-2013:0989 CentOS 6 python-dmidecode Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CEBA-2013:1000 CentOS 6 selinux-policy Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:56:22 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0988 CentOS 6 suitesparse FASTTRACK Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130628015622.GA49298(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0988 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0988.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 35f5f6123c3f12d11fc675f50f698c7bbb8e4cad6fd339222d41e7a7c591cf21 suitesparse-3.4.0-8.el6.i686.rpm 7d327ba6e92f55f5082df2ab679515c2e2880f57e6f644b6087c920c83084ac4 suitesparse-devel-3.4.0-8.el6.i686.rpm 9636dd34ef9aedcb205f58c81fdf0001d13b522a7360a5f0efeb32bdb9591af5 suitesparse-doc-3.4.0-8.el6.noarch.rpm dcc997afb72117d9865702f5a74bf3c6878c0c67e3becbbc7f0a47544bd1b3ec suitesparse-static-3.4.0-8.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: 8b9a1c9aca4ba97870617120a0986a8e0e37e6c2d0518bfc4b49313163f072b0 suitesparse-3.4.0-8.el6.x86_64.rpm e90c469cc8b9c0cd476c623397f2e8ff5ea740149509ba4d68c5b7d89bcb133d suitesparse-devel-3.4.0-8.el6.x86_64.rpm 9636dd34ef9aedcb205f58c81fdf0001d13b522a7360a5f0efeb32bdb9591af5 suitesparse-doc-3.4.0-8.el6.noarch.rpm 2b4d308e77aa58db4263e5afe3c55026edb5d2a6e4f04e27c9a9ee14a9563337 suitesparse-static-3.4.0-8.el6.x86_64.rpm Source: 42b75ae4fb6a3243ce3ff7993d7f28f3082bbebd7529b3d5ea340f30ad50097c suitesparse-3.4.0-8.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:56:43 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0987 CentOS 6 xfsprogs Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130628015643.GA49396(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0987 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0987.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 913a469fcb72eb3de668ae39c1cfa33b57e45b341d353e2ede3ca8aed09e13d1 xfsprogs-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 46aa543ea99dc5691288a318a2b9b13a7549b5495966ecabf831c5883815a0c2 xfsprogs-devel-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 3e24d6ea9f25349cd5fe121aa3f41b567a5a86c38bace2ee0801cfd5a41b74e3 xfsprogs-qa-devel-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 913a469fcb72eb3de668ae39c1cfa33b57e45b341d353e2ede3ca8aed09e13d1 xfsprogs-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 704223966b55ea1d496aeab6b0b37346a3284a9cebbe2b0d610712a7a94e13fc xfsprogs-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm 46aa543ea99dc5691288a318a2b9b13a7549b5495966ecabf831c5883815a0c2 xfsprogs-devel-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 1e3cd8d60c848769c0ddb99edbcb94f558048aa8ba2fc2df8dce255c24732973 xfsprogs-devel-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm 3e24d6ea9f25349cd5fe121aa3f41b567a5a86c38bace2ee0801cfd5a41b74e3 xfsprogs-qa-devel-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm b2bbb28ddda200acbb227dc2b5bdabfe817afbbbee9e8490bc1c7bf131248040 xfsprogs-qa-devel-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: d59b36a2e01d642fa9686e2965c8733719593a3b96f493671554c6746fb2ff97 xfsprogs-3.1.1-10.el6_4.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:56:57 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0986 CentOS 6 libnl Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130628015657.GA49503(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0986 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0986.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8446769f2d8d32ede0d35015b701780f947c563f79443d8d1bdc0aa5973f7d62 libnl-1.1.4-1.el6_4.i686.rpm 00c64f222792b8074d79c4d012a8953e6436670c82b3bbaff0940e60c20ba67c libnl-devel-1.1.4-1.el6_4.i686.rpm x86_64: 8446769f2d8d32ede0d35015b701780f947c563f79443d8d1bdc0aa5973f7d62 libnl-1.1.4-1.el6_4.i686.rpm 236e77e88553c5d4b76e30d65aaa42208671554e7f755ec155212dbe6254fa78 libnl-1.1.4-1.el6_4.x86_64.rpm 00c64f222792b8074d79c4d012a8953e6436670c82b3bbaff0940e60c20ba67c libnl-devel-1.1.4-1.el6_4.i686.rpm ff01762cd1061bdf93800705ce4b490792e2ccf42a7aea4c8ec53176c89f4cfb libnl-devel-1.1.4-1.el6_4.x86_64.rpm Source: 2e475e640d90a4de760eb6818384c254c6c95130533e59fc3d42f0fb1fd2b6e6 libnl-1.1.4-1.el6_4.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:57:22 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0989 CentOS 6 python-dmidecode Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130628015722.GA49578(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0989 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0989.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: ec8625fbf908361af91cffc693a6adf0e81a0f77674bc40f1fea8c595bad9d63 python-dmidecode-3.10.13-3.el6_4.i686.rpm x86_64: 3ee47dd167703e0c274e8bdf5783d5e771b0fdfcf04f85caa7c9fc6a82bfa210 python-dmidecode-3.10.13-3.el6_4.x86_64.rpm Source: 7a6e92f5df874d84b7f71ef5b177fa69781c35a6f83d8238b4154f06f75b3426 python-dmidecode-3.10.13-3.el6_4.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:57:46 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1000 CentOS 6 selinux-policy Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130628015746.GA49695(a)n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1000 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1000.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b34414f3b32e305cd44d67ee6e8b0133d562c34a00fd4523ed3d0525c3355741 selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm f9ded549547d6917c2c5821dc83f051781c01ad08577052250672daaec824ca7 selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm c4c0c09190718a73a035e3762052eaddcc124746218e47987488f17d186b9f87 selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm 6c036b5074c6d82d046e249694e2948d110366d59ad82600d09aaf6d471e4d10 selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm 9037e512390c08d09df340afda9f5884005d1b7e9b56a2c620966142d972ab85 selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm x86_64: b34414f3b32e305cd44d67ee6e8b0133d562c34a00fd4523ed3d0525c3355741 selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm f9ded549547d6917c2c5821dc83f051781c01ad08577052250672daaec824ca7 selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm c4c0c09190718a73a035e3762052eaddcc124746218e47987488f17d186b9f87 selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm 6c036b5074c6d82d046e249694e2948d110366d59ad82600d09aaf6d471e4d10 selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm 9037e512390c08d09df340afda9f5884005d1b7e9b56a2c620966142d972ab85 selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.noarch.rpm Source: fa9f0b1019814f9bbcb36843b63cc6baf0b7a6e4a949c8c073c0999f3960eab1 selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.12.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 100, Issue 13 ************************************************

1 0

setxkbmap not accepting layout "de"
by Dirk 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Hi all, when I try to use Xnest with setxkbmap to force a Germany keyboard layout, I get the error > Error loading new keyboard description The complete command I am using is > ssh -X -C -l $USER $HOST -n "Xnest :1 -ac -geometry 1440x850 -once > -query localhost & setxkbmap -layout de" I also tried with "setxkbmap de" in the end, but no difference. So this might have been the right syntax to set a different keyboard layout, but somehow it did not work - do I understand the error message right? There is no error or hint in the Xorg log file(s). Any hint or help is appreciated. Dirk

2 1

CentOS 5.9 and google-authenticator
by Stephen Harris 27 Jun '13

27 Jun '13

I'm playing with google-authenticator libpam https://code.google.com/p/google-authenticator/ It appears to be failing the "make test" on CentOS 5.9 32bit. ./pam_google_authenticator_unittest Testing base32 encoding Testing base32 decoding Testing HMAC_SHA1 Loading PAM module Running tests, querying for verification code Testing failed login attempt Testing required number of digits Testing a blank response Test handling of missing state files Testing successful login Testing WINDOW_SIZE option Testing DISALLOW_REUSE option Testing RATE_LIMIT option Testing TIME_SKEW pam_google_authenticator_unittest: pam_google_authenticator_unittest.c:137: verify_prompts_shown: Assertion `num_prompts_shown == expected_prompts_shown' failed. Invalid verification code make: *** [test] Error 1 Playing with the code... // Test TIME_SKEW option puts("Testing TIME_SKEW"); for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) { set_time((12000 + i)*30); char buf[7]; response = buf; sprintf(response, "%06d", compute_code(binary_secret, binary_secret_len, 11000 + i)); assert(pam_sm_open_session(NULL, 0, targc, targv) == (i >= 2 ? PAM_SUCCESS : PAM_SESSION_ERR)); verify_prompts_shown(expected_good_prompts_shown); } Up to here works fine... set_time(12010 * 30); char buf[7]; response = buf; sprintf(response, "%06d", compute_code(binary_secret, binary_secret_len, 11010)); assert(pam_sm_open_session(NULL, 0, 1, (const char *[]){ "noskewadj", 0 }) == PAM_SESSION_ERR); verify_prompts_shown(0); This is where it fails. The same code works correctly without error on CentOS 6.4 64bit. Has anyone else managed to pass the tests on 5.9 32bit? -- rgds Stephen

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss