Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Merging os and updates
by isdtor 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

I've been able to successfully kickstart CentOS 3.9 from the base repo, but no such luck after merging os and updates. I think I did everything right - updated base/comps.xml and regenerated hdlist/hdlist2. Updated the yum repo as well although I'm pretty sure it's not used by anaconda. This is difficult to debug. The setup is running under kvm on a CentOS 6.4 host, and for some reason, a completely headless install fails (--graphics none; virt-viewer complains loudly and dies). A graphical install with vnc looks quite different from newer OSes' ks installs, there is no VC showing package install progress or an interactive shell. I.e. I cannot tell what exactly fails. Yes, there is a specific legacy reason for using 3.9 here.

1 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 98, Issue 12
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 24 Apr '13

24 Apr '13

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2013:0765 CentOS 6 net-snmp Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2013:0766 CentOS 6 util-linux-ng Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2013:0744 Important CentOS 6 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:10:14 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0765 CentOS 6 net-snmp Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130423141014.GA13605(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0765 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0765.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 22c1b61ca29ffac0540e8c69ed4978b593397f073ceea488c214dc4de4e8d231 net-snmp-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 88978bb4f6ad83469a0957d004932e19bf01b3910a236a65add92c32db2d1cba net-snmp-devel-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm a6acd0ccbb1806b21613cb7627ecc11ed83c1fd4a6ae3734c55f1a6fb2e66315 net-snmp-libs-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 606d23836bdc0c847127bdd37356f1e4cf182f5272a93342661c8ff4cc2e5c42 net-snmp-perl-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 8c616a2a4033eaffac23e40b76c8254d8106b8a32f8aeb5fd86466b9df1a6de7 net-snmp-python-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 5f7ed7df1a117e0027bd3198d1b1ae4c10154499b3bd6b7e6e947fd5bc71cf52 net-snmp-utils-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm x86_64: 4264eb2c92145edda0ccc1ada4e0d7b7b81fffc5b54eba91a2837ffa56279114 net-snmp-5.5-44.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm 88978bb4f6ad83469a0957d004932e19bf01b3910a236a65add92c32db2d1cba net-snmp-devel-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 68dec725c4835a8b1be34ece1e5e2153e9563a4eaf5fadc532e7b2dcb8e7ef59 net-snmp-devel-5.5-44.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm a6acd0ccbb1806b21613cb7627ecc11ed83c1fd4a6ae3734c55f1a6fb2e66315 net-snmp-libs-5.5-44.el6_4.1.i686.rpm 79c82a07009f9d15605573bad352e879b0d3d5d9166ee11e6d509bdea8a7e705 net-snmp-libs-5.5-44.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm d7cdf7de602c930604deff186728abfb8759c2ef25cb5553fce570f273ee7598 net-snmp-perl-5.5-44.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm faed19a38db2c658c0d010d824c242075d54d9233766161856c3b78d0587e51e net-snmp-python-5.5-44.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm 69bcf2359656b3dba79b7802a30280a01630e1c7e6946b5b1c9dcbaa5272bbf1 net-snmp-utils-5.5-44.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: ae3a3629f3dc1f8c1bcf37d36ff22ad6d57672dd89da68624955bbacc1883efd net-snmp-5.5-44.el6_4.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:10:48 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0766 CentOS 6 util-linux-ng Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130423141048.GA13733(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0766 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0766.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6fb69c5d7e41f288a3b4c02a9781bf0862a31097c40a355e5a23258797de3084 libblkid-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm b2669e4e36e63ad5a9e340ce0db6fca86caeb1d1978d19de64a724e4503870b6 libblkid-devel-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm 456f4a115059614313d28e9e5e13e9277805fcb39b0360502a2403f387352801 libuuid-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm c3b963f7d6c5ce61ebc9d2a1352c2f916cd6fba5ce850cb834a06c96bd0a0809 libuuid-devel-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm 6a651304e6ff1797efbf9d5b4e5356000c165bb26b7d661947d973ae5676b6dd util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm a81db631b7ebd637acc0becbd927f1ec9ae5e9c806d3a1f996949c65483ac424 uuidd-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm x86_64: 6fb69c5d7e41f288a3b4c02a9781bf0862a31097c40a355e5a23258797de3084 libblkid-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm 894ae55e9711dbc12e3b5a65990fc5cb3cdc945ef7182bc85b4d65026ce04773 libblkid-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm b2669e4e36e63ad5a9e340ce0db6fca86caeb1d1978d19de64a724e4503870b6 libblkid-devel-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm 872a013b807fb8dec89e251028689ef722778ff569aa9ac0e17cfa5166a9ee8b libblkid-devel-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm 456f4a115059614313d28e9e5e13e9277805fcb39b0360502a2403f387352801 libuuid-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm d8c58a235fd689d3416a9c4941fd13b6ef5362561145dfc24847c2a5d5defed8 libuuid-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm c3b963f7d6c5ce61ebc9d2a1352c2f916cd6fba5ce850cb834a06c96bd0a0809 libuuid-devel-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm 988e5ad0313d34dfa229899c633495c410bbe028866c0363cf63058492cb1cee libuuid-devel-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm 6a651304e6ff1797efbf9d5b4e5356000c165bb26b7d661947d973ae5676b6dd util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.i686.rpm 4d07d78c8f710065d584337ce4efd2c82283c8e57046b2ae6c2fb05382233601 util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm 9d7075c85478dd6710445b5aaa9f4269b6c941670cd56e96b7fff5cff64679dc uuidd-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 7a43f000ddafc7dc5268ad186f532c982f9774578b3f532e8aa45d529a255224 util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.9.el6_4.2.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:13:29 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0744 Important CentOS 6 kernel Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20130424021329.GA16941(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0744 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0744.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 439e17faad94c61c4f2c3f437f15cf742163a2819dcd9c6cce1e94b03a4921b1 kernel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.i686.rpm 039d08cfab24d09b8350ebc3cbc4d0e847d8f3a1e52dceca4e9a224e6b85eecd kernel-debug-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.i686.rpm 06eccd3f952be194e8f0f49133b802a7e734d0b66526ca4edb0257dd9ee32bcf kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.i686.rpm 681f29711507e7779936096b79b12591176b85f313b7489d7608ed6f05631cc9 kernel-devel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.i686.rpm 391d8ef0dc3922a9ff62d5cb7806425f0eb7d66c9c78313c05e0214fd63cbfb0 kernel-doc-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.noarch.rpm 160d30d6e943c1a02840c5d102e8a61c71abfdef31b2815179387ca27bb9ed39 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.noarch.rpm 40ad40a7aacba9209b2bd7d0b892c379debcf722d66a0fca9d9c3e9cc40cb40f kernel-headers-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.i686.rpm bbe7265159046f0b339d1e41c4522f226d3682e88e305a9d385f57e8ee02e1dd perf-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.i686.rpm 23cb65220fa4b009f3b5ad11f02ebe9ba6a9a2de14bc1836be62686178ae344f python-perf-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.i686.rpm x86_64: c4e631d94bee6a81f07f0339827ac3bab4cc55fca97f00bef5ed2a709a7adf1f kernel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 5c29c152d27023a686f7e359e7db9b91fefc6f7953de8150ac8951849951d5c0 kernel-debug-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64.rpm f349205f711b98dba2da09084d76316517c1cce44974e949865d7706803b4e61 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 402a7a3ebc5d4301c5398aaf7da3129309dd56a4c9305eee2887f026117d7aa9 kernel-devel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 391d8ef0dc3922a9ff62d5cb7806425f0eb7d66c9c78313c05e0214fd63cbfb0 kernel-doc-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.noarch.rpm 160d30d6e943c1a02840c5d102e8a61c71abfdef31b2815179387ca27bb9ed39 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.noarch.rpm eb2f4bbe2637044e6069b0774e0dd0efbb95e55784feecf46be1a3ac95253d52 kernel-headers-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 2b8c41972e18369995d8760ad1f9186129c371ad2d672b8d051ba80c6c2da6ae perf-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 8a0d39a80049382ebc9dd00a3f6f2da7bb9800010ec3f221d19d11f6b0628cbb python-perf-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64.rpm Source: 777e2565c6d5d5d8175603c62cb6053421c1b5a0992538fd2fe5829a69ec5a2d kernel-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 98, Issue 12 ***********************************************

1 0

RAID 6 - opinions
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

I'm setting up this huge RAID 6 box. I've always thought of hot spares, but I'm reading things that are comparing RAID 5 with a hot spare to RAID 6, implying that the latter doesn't need one. I *certainly* have enough drives to spare in this RAID box: 42 of 'em, so two questions: should I assign one or more hot spares, and, if so, how many? mark

12 24

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 98, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 23 Apr '13

23 Apr '13

1 0

"Can't find root device" with lvm root after moving drive on CentOS 6.3
by Joakim Ziegler 22 Apr '13

22 Apr '13

I have an 8-core SuperMicro Xeon server with CentOS 6.3. The OS is installed on a 120 GB SSD connected by SATA, the machine also contains an Areca SAS controller with 24 drives connected. The motherboard is a SuperMicro X9DA7. When I installed the OS, I used the default options, which creates an LVM volume group to contain / and /home, and keeps /boot and /boot/efi outside the volume group. The machine is a couple of months old, and has been stable. While installing some new hardware, I decided to also clean up the cabling in the box, since it was a bit messy. In doing this, I probably moved the boot SSD disk to another port on the motherboard (it has a bunch, 2 SATA 6GBps and 6 SATA 3GBps). When I booted the box after this, I got a kernel panic, the typical "Can't find root device". I read some docs, and first tried to boot from a rescue disc and reinstal GRUB, but that didn't change anything. Further Googling got me the rdshell kernel parameter, and that dropped me to a shell when it failed to find the root device. Reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Dracut_problems , I did the following: # lvm vgscan # lvm vgchange -ay And then # ln -s /dev/mapper/<volumegroup>-<root_volume> /dev/root # exit After this, the box boots up normally, and everything works as it should. However, when I reboot, it again fails to find the root device. So, after all this, my question is, how do I make Dracut (I'm assuming) understand that this LVM volume is my root device and pick it up automatically? And, is there a way to avoid this problem in the future, if I move drives around? Surely it can't be normal for this to happen just because I connect a drive to another port? -- Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal joakim(a)terminalmx.com - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0864

4 21

Re: [CentOS] Supermicro & Boot Failures with DVD Centos 6.2
by Johan Vermeulen 22 Apr '13

22 Apr '13

verzonden m.b.v Android vandaar de beknoptheid.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] phpmyadmin location
by Software Toolz Authority 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

The Chinese probe for known vulnerabilities in phpmyadmin, so be sure and change the root directory name from that suggested by the installation. Todd Merriman Software Toolz, Inc.

8 14

virsh migrate
by Bazy 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

Hello, Short question about KVM migration. For doing on hytest1.test.lab: virsh migrate --live |/CentOStestbox1/|/|qemu+ssh://hytest2.test.lab/system do I need shared storage or will it copy the machine over via ssh? Unfortunately I don't have the hardware to test this on at the moment :( //cheers |/

2 1

Need help with gateways nd routing of 192.168.0.0/24 addresses
by James B. Byrne 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

Arch = x86_64 OS = CentOS-6.4 Problem: What is the correct gateway to specify for private IP addresses that may pass thorough NAT? Background: Our gateway is configured thus: #/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ificfg-eth1 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST="" DEFROUTE=yes DEVICE=eth1 DNS1=216.185.71.33 GATEWAY=216.185.64.53 IPADDR=216.185.71.1 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_PEERDNS=yes IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes MACADDR="" MTU="" NAME="LAN Link - eth1" NETMASK="" NETWORK="" NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes PREFIX=24 TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no and #/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ificfg-eth1:192006 NAME="eth1:192006 internal" BOOTPROTO=none MACADDR="" IPV6INIT=no DEVICE=eth1:192006 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 MTU="" BROADCAST=192.168.6.255 ONPARENT=yes IPADDR=192.168.6.1 NETWORK=192.168.6.0 On the gateway these are the routes present: 216.185.64.52/30 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 216.185.64.54 192.168.6.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.6.1 192.168.216.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.216.1 216.185.71.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 216.185.71.1 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1002 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link metric 1003 default via 216.185.64.53 dev eth0 Situation: I have a device configured thus: BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=255.255.255.255 DEVICE=eth0 DNS1=216.185.71.33 GATEWAY=216.185.71.1 IPADDR=192.168.6.9 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no MACADDR="" MTU="" NAME="eth0" NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.168.6.0 NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes PREFIX=24 TYPE=Ethernet When I try and ping this device I see this: PING 192.168.6.9 (192.168.6.9) 56(84) bytes of data. >From 216.185.71.1: icmp_seq=2 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 192.168.6.9) >From 216.185.71.1: icmp_seq=3 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 192.168.6.9) >From 216.185.71.1: icmp_seq=4 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 192.168.6.9) >From 216.185.71.1: icmp_seq=5 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 192.168.6.9) If I down eth1:192006 on the gateway then all ping packets are simply lost: PING 192.168.6.9 (192.168.6.9) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- 192.168.6.9 ping statistics --- 9 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 8277ms However, if leave eth1:192006 on the gateway up and I change the gateway on 192.168 device to 192.168.6.1 the problem goes away. I can see what works. My question is really is this the way things are supposed to be set up when one has private IP4 hosts on the same network segments as public IP4 hosts? Is there any way to configure the gateway so that it only requires one internal address [216.185.71.1] and can still route 192.168.6.0 addresses so that they stay on the LAN segment? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 98, Issue 10
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 19 Apr '13

19 Apr '13

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss