- Discuss - lists.centos.org

Named, logging of requests
by Jussi Hirvi 20 Apr '11

20 Apr '11

This is not really CentOS-specific - sorry. On a name server, I would like to log ns queries (specifically, queries which result with no answer) regarding one domain (for which my ns is authoritative). Is this possible? I know you can turn on logging "globally" using the logging section of named.conf. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Suvilahdenkatu 1 B 78 * 00500 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi(a)greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

1 0

Cant find out MCE reason (CPU 35 BANK 8)
by Vladimir Budnev 20 Apr '11

20 Apr '11

Hello community. We are running, Centos 4.8 on SuperMicro SYS-6026T-3RF with 2xIntel Xeon E5630 and 8xKingston KVR1333D3D4R9S/4G For some time we have lots of MCE in mcelog and we cant find out the reason. "Ordinary" mce message looks like: CPU 51 BANK 8 TSC 8511e3ca77dc MISC 274d587f00006141 ADDR 807044840 STATUS cc0055000001009f MCGSTATUS 0 decode with mcelog --ascii --cpu p4(cause there is no xeon56xx in list): HARDWARE ERROR. This is *NOT* a software problem! Please contact your hardware vendor CPU 53 BANK 8 TSC 1982d8f72b1f MISC e1742eac00006242 ADDR 7ffd78a80 MCG status: MCi status: Error overflow MCi_MISC register valid MCi_ADDR register valid MCA: MEMORY CONTROLLER RD_CHANNELunspecified_ERR Transaction: Memory read error STATUS cc0002000001009f MCGSTATUS 0 The global question is it possible to find out the exact hw which causes those messages? First we thought that according to /* A machine check record */ struct mce { __u64 status; /* bank status register */ __u64 misc; /* misc register (always 0 right now) */ __u64 addr; /* address or 0 */ __u64 mcgstatus; /* global MC status register */ __u64 rip; /* Program counter or 0 for silent error */ __u64 tsc; /* cpu time stamp counter */ __u64 res1; /* for future extension */ __u64 res2; /* dito. */ __u8 cs; /* code segment */ __u8 bank; /* machine check bank */ __u8 cpu; /* cpu that raised the error */ __u8 finished; /* entry is valid */ __u32 pad; }; cpu is the cpu rised the exception, but we have 2 quadro cpus with HT so maximum cpu number should be 16 and in logs we see 53 etc. So no we r not sure about what cpu value is :)Does anyone know what the CPU number means exactly? One more interesting thins is the following output: [root@zuno]# cat /var/log/mcelog |grep CPU|sort|awk '{print $2}'|uniq 32 33 34 35 50 51 52 53 Those numbers are always the same. Ok.Supposed we have problem in RAM, since i dont really know what those cpu numbers mean we suppose that cpu+bank can point the problem hw.Is it possible? According to our "broken ram theory" we suppose that those numbers 32,33,34,45 and 50,51,52,53 indicate some simetric problem with ram/or slots or smth else.Is it correct? Thanks in advance.

5 19

Can anyone post a working pppd config?
by johhny_at_poland77 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

I just need a "temporary" pppoe server, that only uses PAP ___Can someone post a howto, just in a few lines, what to do?___ If I just do "pppd require-pap" then it gives this error: pppd: The remote system is required to authenticate itself pppd: but I couldn't fin any suitable secret (password) for it to use to do so. pppd is by default installed. and there are just a few modifications needed to start it with only using PAP auth.. what am I missing? It's not needed, that the clients actually log in through pppoe, I just need a pppoe server that enforces PAP, so that we could get the passwords of the clients... Thank you in anticipation..!!

6 7

cross-platform email client
by Florin Andrei 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

I'm a Thunderbird user almost since day one, but now I'm looking for something else. For whatever reason, it doesn't work well for me - every once in a while it becomes non-responsive (UI completely frozen for several seconds, CPU usage goes to 100%) and I just can't afford to waste time waiting for the email software to start working again. My main desktop platform is Linux, but I need a client that works the same and looks the same on Windows too. Email server is IMAP with a pretty hefty account: over a hundred folders, hundreds of thousands of messages total (server-side filtering with Sieve). Typically it's a remote session, over VPN. So the client better work well, and be glitch-free. The issues with Thunderbird might be related to the size of my IMAP account, plus the VPN latency - but frankly, I don't care, the client needs to hide all that stuff from me, do the updates or whatever in the background, instead of blocking the UI until it's done. Ironically, it blocked when I was done with this paragraph and I hit Enter. Sticking it to the man one last time, I guess. Any suggestions? Thanks. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

10 17

/etc/bashrc help!
by Roland Roland 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

Dear all, i've appended the below to /etc/bashrc it works like a charm with ssh connections though SFTP sessions fail since the below is being sent to the intiator. any way of limiting the below to none sftp sessions? or any other idea for it to work? # If id command returns zero, you’ve root access. if [ $(id -u) -eq 0 ]; then # you are root, set red colour prompt echo "###############################################" echo "### You are now working as ROOT. ###" echo "### Pay attention to what you type. ###" echo "###############################################" PS1="\\[$(tput setaf 1)\\]\\u@\\h:\\w #\\[$(tput sgr0)\\]" else # normal echo echo " ###########################################################" echo "Welcome $(whoami), here's something to start your day with:" echo echo `sh /etc/lines.sh /etc/quotes.txt` echo " ############################################################" echo PS1="[\\u@\\h:\\w] $" fi Thanks, --Roland

5 5

Centos 5.3, Firefox, and JRE
by Eric Kaufmann 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

I can't get java applets to run in Firefox. We are using centos 5.3, firefox 3.0.11. Java version 1.6.0_24 is installed. java version "1.6.0_24" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) I know there has been allot written about this issue. I did look and there is no jre plug in installed for Firefox. I tried to reinstall java and this did not work either. Any ideas? Eric -- Eric Kaufmann | Application Support Analyst - Advanced Technology Group | Saint Louis University | 314-977-2257 | kaufmann(a)slu.edu | Interested in High Performance Computing? Visit us at http://rocks64.slu.edu/atg .

3 2

Intel DH67BL + CentOS 5.5 IRQ #177 nobody cared
by Drew Weaver 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) report bad irq, references CPU idle then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr then it disables the add-on PCI E1000 card and disconnects itself from the network. I'm assuming what is happening here is the USB controller and the add-on E1000 controller we put in are having an old school IRQ conflict, the question is why and how can I avoid it? I have tried disabling all of the extra stuff in the BIOS that I could, and this still happens fairly frequently. Any advice would be great. thanks, -Drew

9 24

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 74, Issue 5
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

centos-announce-request(a)centos.org wrote: > > Today's Topics: > > 1. CEBA-2011:0454 CentOS 5 i386 xorg-x11-server-utils Update > (Karanbir Singh) > 2. CEBA-2011:0454 CentOS 5 x86_64 xorg-x11-server-utils Update > (Karanbir Singh) > 3. CESA-2011:0432 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 x86_64 xorg-x11 Update > (Johnny Hughes) *wow* After all the bitching and moaning about 5.6, that was a *fast* fix, one I don't think anyone can complain about. mark PS: DNSORBS MUST DIE! Thermite in their computers, and rip their 'Net connections out of the wall. ->TWO<- rejections of this email, in 10 min....

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 74, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2011:0454 CentOS 5 i386 xorg-x11-server-utils Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CEBA-2011:0454 CentOS 5 x86_64 xorg-x11-server-utils Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CESA-2011:0432 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 x86_64 xorg-x11 Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:52:07 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:0454 CentOS 5 i386 xorg-x11-server-utils Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110419115207.GA25652(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0454 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0454.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 0d84f1cddd122e4acd07ff97d6aa77b6 xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.2.i386.rpm Source: 31e595799f2a3c6350bd606f11720ec2 xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:52:07 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:0454 CentOS 5 x86_64 xorg-x11-server-utils Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110419115207.GA25665(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0454 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0454.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a53d9622b017125cd7750fdb4ba831fa xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 31e595799f2a3c6350bd606f11720ec2 xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:15:11 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0432 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 x86_64 xorg-x11 Update To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4DAD8ADF.3030002(a)centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0432 xorg-x11 security update for CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0432.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-doc-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-font-utils-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-sdk-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-tools-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-twm-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-xauth-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-xdm-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Xdmx-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-xfs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Xnest-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Xvfb-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm x86_64: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-doc-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-font-utils-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.2-1.EL.67.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-sdk-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-tools-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-twm-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-xauth-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-xdm-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Xdmx-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-xfs-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Xnest-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Xvfb-6.8.2-1.EL.67.x86_64.rpm src: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.67.src.rpm

1 0

kernel panic on 5.6
by Jerry Geis 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

I am getting: kernel panic unable to mount root fs on unknown block (0,0) This is just a normal box that I have use many a time to test install. Basic one disk SATA 160G. Been using it for at least a year. Is this that glibc issue hitting me? or something else? Thanks, Jerry

5 11

OT: Cute penguin video
by Kenneth Porter 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

Looks like a distro mascot in the making: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GILA0rrR6w>

1 0

Heads up: Bugged update xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1 upcoming
by Leonard den Ottolander 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

Hi, Reading http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37 I noticed a warning about an upcoming bugged update xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1 I would advise everyone to add exclude=xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1 to their updates repo config. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

6 12

rpmbuild: definition of the %prep script
by Volker Poplawski 19 Apr '11

19 Apr '11

Hi all, in which file is the %prep script defined? www.rpm.org says its a build-in script. Does that mean its defined in some binary? I wonder how %prep handles the setup of locale. TIA .....Volker

4 6

cents 5.6 ..... futur
by Michel Donais 18 Apr '11

18 Apr '11

To pass from Centos 5.5 to 5.6 it was easy as an upgrade. Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better. --- Michel Donais

11 13

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
by Steven Vishoot 18 Apr '11

18 Apr '11

http://us-andeville.fr/cool01.11.php?ID=006

5 12

unrar rpm package
by Kaplan, Andrew H. 18 Apr '11

18 Apr '11

Hi there -- I am running a server with the 5.6 64-bit distribution, and I am looking for an unrar rpm package. I have several repositories set up on the server which are the following: base updates extras centosplus contrib c5-testing All are enabled. When I do a yum search for unrar, nothing comes up. Is there another repository that I should add to the list, or is there a particular website that I can go to get the package? Thanks. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.

9 11

40TB File System Recommendations
by Matthew Feinberg 18 Apr '11

18 Apr '11

Hello All I have a brand spanking new 40TB Hardware Raid6 array to play around with. I am looking for recommendations for which filesystem to use. I am trying not to break this up into multiple file systems as we are going to use it for backups. Other factors is performance and reliability. CentOS 5.6 array is /dev/sdb So here is what I have tried so far reiserfs is limited to 16TB ext4 does not seem to be fully baked in 5.6 yet. parted 1.8 does not support creating ext4 (strange) Anyone work with large filesystems like this that have any suggestions/recommendations? -- Matthew Feinberg matthew(a)choopa.com AIM: matthewchoopa

32 83

Gnome Notification Applet
by Ron Blizzard 18 Apr '11

18 Apr '11

I tried out Scientific Linux 6 Live to see (basically) what I can expect with CentOS 6 and was pleased to find that everything looks pretty familiar and is easily customizable to make it look and feel like 5.6 -- except for one thing that I also noticed in Ubuntu's newest beta (my Dad uses Linux Mint). For whatever reason, Gnome has decided to put the Volume Control and Network Manager in the Notification Applet. (It's worse with Ubuntu, they've put four applets there by default.) On my desktop I don't display the Network Manager, but I like the Volume Control to be there (on the very right beside the clock). I spent most of my "trial time" with SL 6 trying to figure out how to separate these two applets from the Notification Applet -- without success. Is there a configuration file I can change or a configuration program I can run to customize this? I realize it's not a huge deal, but it's an irritant. Why does Gnome want to limit the ability to customize? Thanks for any pointers. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6

6 8

Script Problem
by Matt 17 Apr '11

17 Apr '11

I have a script I put in /etc/cron.fiveminutes graphs.sh #!/bin/sh env LANG=C mrtg /home/admin/domains/my---server.com/public_html/traffic/load/mrtg.cfg --logging /dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 env LANG=C mrtg /home/admin/domains/my---server.com/public_html/traffic/eth0/mrtg.cfg --logging /dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 #exit 0; Problem is there is some bug that raises an error even though mrtg still graphs fine. [root@server cron.fiveminutes]# env LANG=C mrtg /home/admin/domains/my---server.com/public_html/traffic/eth0/mrtg.cfg --logging /dev/null Subroutine SNMPv1_Session::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at /usr/bin/../lib64/mrtg2/SNMP_Session.pm line 594 Subroutine main::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at /usr/bin/mrtg line 97 /usr/bin/rateup: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: no version information available (required by /usr/lib64/libgd.so.2) The issue is it tries to alert root every time this script is run. I thought adding the ">/dev/null 2>&1" would stop that but it does not. Is there anyway to get the script to ignore the error and not alert root? Another solution is to install a newer version of mrtg from source which supposedly resolves the issue but I would rather just ignore the error for now until a newer 64bit rpm comes out since its not hurting anything except the annoying warning messages.

1 0

2 encrypted VG's on 1 disk - HOW?
by johhny_at_poland77 17 Apr '11

17 Apr '11

I don't think it's a "distro related" issue, so i'm posting it here too: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/11289/how-to-install-fedoraubuntu-w… what am i missing? why doesn't GRUB offer the 2 distros@boot, why is it only offering only 1?? why doesn't it sees the other one?? Thanks for any help...

2 1

ksplice within CentOS
by Marian Marinov 17 Apr '11

17 Apr '11

Hello guys, I saw that a few days back there was a talk about encorporating the ksplice toolchain into CentOS and creating rebootless upgrades to the CentOS kernel. I'm really interested in helping for that. Where/how we can start work ? Best regards, Marian Marinov

3 2

timezone issue
by Tim Dunphy 17 Apr '11

17 Apr '11

hey list! having a slightly odd time issue on one host... can I get some help with this? This is the current time from a working system: Sun Apr 17 00:28:18 EDT 2011 However from the problem system this is the time: Sat Apr 16 20:30:01 EDT 2011 I have set the time zone as such: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Apr 16 19:41 /etc/localtime -> /usr/share/zoneinfo/EST But when I run ntpdate it returns the wrong time: 16 Apr 19:46:13 ntpdate[1968]: step time server 204.235.61.9 offset 14408.651330 sec [root@VIRTCENT08:/etc] #date Sat Apr 16 19:46:42 EST 2011 can someone hit me upside the head with the cluehammer? tx!

3 3

To PAE or not to PAE...
by John Doe 16 Apr '11

16 Apr '11

Hi, I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...? I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain those exta 700MB... In the past, I heard that these 700MB were normally reserved for bios or chipset stuff... And that running in PAE would slow down some processes. By the way, I know 64 bits would solve this dilemn but right now I am 32bits... Thx, JD

13 22

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by Christopher Chan 16 Apr '11

16 Apr '11

> > As matter of interest, does anyone know how to use an SSD drive for cach > purposes on Linux software RAID drives? ZFS has this feature and it > makes a helluva difference to a storage server's performance. You cannot. You can however use one for the external journal of ext3/4 in full journaling mode for something similar.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by Ross Walker 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi(a)SoftDux.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Ross Walker <rswwalker(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi(a)SoftDux.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Christopher Chan <christopher.chan(a)bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: >> On Friday, April 15, 2011 07:24 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: >> > On 04/14/2011 09:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: >> >> >> >> Wanna try that again with 64MB of cache only and tell us whether there >> >> is a difference in performance? >> >> >> >> There is a reason why 3ware 85xx cards were complete rubbish when used >> >> for raid5 and which led to the 95xx/96xx series. >> >> _ >> > >> > I don't happen to have any systems I can test with the 1.5TB drives >> > without controller cache right now, but I have a system with some old >> > 500GB drives (which are about half as fast as the 1.5TB drives in >> > individual sustained I/O throughput) attached directly to onboard SATA >> > ports in a 8 x RAID6 with *no* controller cache at all. The machine has >> > 16GB of RAM and bonnie++ therefore used 32GB of data for the test. >> > >> > Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- >> > --Random- >> > Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- >> > --Seeks-- >> > Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP >> > /sec %CP >> > pbox3 32160M 389 98 76709 22 91071 26 2209 95 264892 26 >> > 590.5 11 >> > Latency 24190us 1244ms 1580ms 60411us 69901us >> > 42586us >> > Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random >> > Create-------- >> > pbox3 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- >> > -Delete-- >> > files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP >> > /sec %CP >> > 16 10910 31 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 29293 80 +++++ +++ >> > +++++ +++ >> > Latency 775us 610us 979us 740us 370us >> > 380us >> > >> > Given that the underlaying drives are effectively something like half as >> > fast as the drives in the other test, the results are quite comparable. >> >> Woohoo, next we will be seeing md raid6 also giving comparable results >> if that is the case. I am not the only person on this list that thinks >> cache is king for raid5/6 on hardware raid boards and the using hardware >> raid + bbu cache for better performance one of the two reasons why we >> don't do md raid5/6. >> >> >> > >> > Cache doesn't make a lot of difference when you quickly write a lot more >> > data than the cache can hold. The limiting factor becomes the slowest >> > component - usually the drives themselves. Cache isn't magic performance >> > pixie dust. It helps in certain use cases and is nearly irrelevant in >> > others. >> > >> >> Yeah, you are right - but cache is primarily to buffer the writes for >> performance. Why else go through the expense of getting bbu cache? So >> what happens when you tweak bonnie a bit? >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >> As matter of interest, does anyone know how to use an SSD drive for cach purposes on Linux software RAID drives? ZFS has this feature and it makes a helluva difference to a storage server's performance. > > Put the file system's log device on it. > > -Ross > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Well, ZFS has a separate ZIL for that purpose, and the ZIL adds extra protection / redundancy to the whole pool. > > But the Cache / L2ARC drive caches all common reads & writes (simply put) onto SSD to improve overall system performance. > > So I was wondering if one could do this with mdraid or even just EXT3 / EXT4? Ext3/4 and XFS allow specifying an external log device which if is an SSD can speed up writes. All these file systems aggressively use page cache for read/write cache. The only thing you don't get is L2ARC type cache, but I heard of a dm-cache project that might provide provide that type of cache. -Ross

1 0

Two cleanly installed CentOS 5.6 servers but with different Xen kernel versions
by Hans Vos 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

Hello, Earlier this week I installed a test server with CentOS 5.6 with Virtualization enabled during the installer. Today I installed another server using the same method (they are identical servers). I just did a yum update and I found something curious. Both servers have a different kernel. Server 1 is at 9.1 version and server 2 at 5.1. How can this be? How to I get the latest version on server 2? If I run yum update there are none available. If I input xm info I get this one server 1: host : server1 release : 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5xen version : #1 SMP Tue Apr 12 18:53:56 EDT 2011 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 4 nr_nodes : 1 sockets_per_node : 1 cores_per_socket : 4 threads_per_core : 1 cpu_mhz : 2400 hw_caps : bfebfbff:20100800:00000000:00000940:0000e3bd:00000000:00000001 total_memory : 4095 free_memory : 383 node_to_cpu : node0:0-3 xen_major : 3 xen_minor : 1 xen_extra : .2-238.9.1.el5 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_pagesize : 4096 platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_changeset : unavailable cc_compiler : gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-50) cc_compile_by : mockbuild cc_compile_domain : centos.org cc_compile_date : Tue Apr 12 18:01:03 EDT 2011 xend_config_format : 2 And on server 2 it is this: host : server2 release : 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5xen version : #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 19:35:13 EDT 2011 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 4 nr_nodes : 1 sockets_per_node : 1 cores_per_socket : 4 threads_per_core : 1 cpu_mhz : 2400 hw_caps : bfebfbff:20100800:00000000:00000940:0000e3bd:00000000:00000001 total_memory : 4095 free_memory : 383 node_to_cpu : node0:0-3 xen_major : 3 xen_minor : 1 xen_extra : .2-238.5.1.el5 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_pagesize : 4096 platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_changeset : unavailable cc_compiler : gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-50) cc_compile_by : mockbuild cc_compile_domain : centos.org cc_compile_date : Fri Apr 1 18:30:53 EDT 2011 xend_config_format : 2 -- Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards, Hans Vos

3 10

[OT] ups advice
by admin lewis 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

Hi I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ? a simple "smart ups 1000" could be enough ? thx so much!! lewis.

12 22

php53 and MSSQL
by John Beranek 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

[Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out] Hi, I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to PHP 5.3. Unfortunately it seems I can't. On the machine I have php-mssql installed, and it appears that there is no php53-mssql. php-mssql is built from the php-extras SRPM, so is there going to be a php53-extras SRPM? I've checked upstream, and they also don't have a php53-mssql package, so if there _were_ to be solved it'd have to be in the 'Extras' repository I guess... Cheers, John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake

2 3

php53 and mcrypt
by Geoff Galitz 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

More PHP fun! I can see in the spec files that php-mcrypt support was removed by Redhat. I tried to find out why but I don't have sufficient access to redhat bugzilla. I am wondering if it is actually necessary as I have also run across a post or two that indicates applications that rely on mcrypt still work with the new php53. Perhaps mcrypt was superceded by another module or PHP core code?

3 2

php53 and eacclerator
by Geoff Galitz 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it? Thanks.

5 6

Expanding RAID 10 array, WAS: 40TB File System Recommendations
by Emmanuel Noobadmin 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

On 4/13/11, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi(a)softdux.com> wrote: >> to expand the array :) > > I haven't had problems doing it this way yet. I finally figured out my mistake creating the raid devices and got a working RAID 0 on two RAID 1 arrays. But I wasn't able to add another RAID 1 component to the array with the error mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/md/mdr1_3 as 2: Invalid argument Googling up this indicates that it's the expected result trying to add a new device to a RAID 0 array. Could you or anybody else please share what's the trick to achieving this?

7 17

CentOS on SSDs...
by John Doe 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

Hi, I was just wondering if there are specific steps to take to install CentOS on SSDs... By example, no swap partition? Format with a flash fs? Sysctl parameters? Thx, JD

5 5

speed-tuning samba?
by Les Mikesell 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

What's the current state of the art with this black magic? It looks like there are a vast number of tuning options and the ones that typically show up in advice are: socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY read raw = yes write raw = yes oplocks = yes max xmit = 65535 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes some of which may be the defaults anyway. One thing in particular that I'd like to make faster is access to a set of libraries (boost, etc.) that are in a directory mapped by several windows boxes (mostly VM's on different machines)used as build servers. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Xorg
by Michel Donais 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

For a few days I can't boot a server in graphical mode. The screen goes black and a have a CUI login. I can login a user and at this point 'startx' get the graphical interface up in /etc/inittab/ x: 5:respawn: /etc.X11/prefdm -nodaemon and xdmcp is alivre On this server we have 12 stations drived by LTSP as a terminal server. We can boot the stations to a point where the X graphical interface doesn't come up and the terminal stays with a grey screen with a big X in the center. Do somebody can drive me to a solution? --- Michel Donais

1 0

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by John Jasen 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

One was 32 bit, the other 64 bit. Christopher Chan <christopher.chan(a)bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: >On Thursday, April 14, 2011 07:26 AM, John Jasen wrote: >> On 04/12/2011 08:19 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:36 PM, John Jasen wrote: >>>> On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan >>>>> <alain.pean(a)lpp.polytechnique.fr >>>>> <mailto:alain.pean@lpp.polytechnique.fr>> wrote: >>>> >>>> <snipped: two recommendations for XFS> >>>> >>>> I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous >>>> employer, two cases involving XFS resulted in irrecoverable data >>>> corruption. These were on RAID systems running from 4 to 20 TB. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> What were those circumstances? Crash? Power outage? What are the >>> components of the RAID systems? >> >> One was a hardware raid over fibre channel, which silently corrupted >> itself. System checked out fine, raid array checked out fine, xfs was >> replaced with ext3, and the system ran without issue. >> >> Second was multiple hardware arrays over linux md raid0, also over fibre >> channel. This was not so silent corruption, as in xfs would detect it >> and lock the filesystem into read-only before it, pardon the pun, truly >> fscked itself. Happened two or three times, before we gave up, split up >> the raid, and went ext3, Again, no issues. > >32-bit kernel by any chance? >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

Re: [CentOS] [OT] ups advice
by Brent L. Bates 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

apcupsd doesn't work with new APC UPS's. APC has changed to some proprietary protocol, microlink?, for talking to their UPS's, so apcupsd doesn't work any more or at least not fully. There has been some discussion about this issue on the apcupsd users email list.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] [OT] ups advice
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

Kevin Thorpe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, admin lewis <adminlewis(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> I have a Dell PowerEdge T310 *tower* server.. I have to buy an ups by apc... anyone could help me giving an hint ? >> a simple "smart ups 1000" could be enough ? > > It depends on how long you want it to run. Your choice is a small UPS to give your server just enough time to shut down or a big UPS to allow you to > carry on working for some time. And it depends on what you're trying to deal with: if it's occasional brown or blackouts, or power flickers (let's not talk about Chicago, for example), then you need enough power to provide all it will draw for a couple minutes at most. If you're looking at longer power outages, you'll need something a lot bigger, though one suitable for the above purpose would usually allow it to shut down gracefully; it's not like Linux takes a long, long time to shutdown. <snip> > people have laptops. If you're running big processes on the server then you need long enough to let them complete or shut down gracefully. Heh. Depends on your definition of "big processes", says the guy whose users normally are running jobs that run for *days*, if not weeks. mark

1 0

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:37:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote: >> I used XFS extensively when I was running mail server farms for the mail queue filesystem and I only remember one or two incidents when the filesystem was marked read-only for no reason (seemingly - never had the time to find out why) but a reboot fixed those. > > I've had that happen, recently, with ext3 on CentOS 4. I've had that happen, also. It usually indicates a drive dying. mark

1 0

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by Lars Hecking 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

> OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it rather > practical for regular plain vanilla partitions, but for more advanced stuff and > filesystems, fdisk is probably better. For filersystems > 2TB, you're better off grabbing a copy of GPT fdisk.

5 6

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by Peter Kjellström 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:15:10 PM Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > >Behalf Of Peter Kjellström > >Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 3:31 PM > >To: centos(a)centos.org > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations > > > >On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote: > >> > OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it > >> > rather practical for regular plain vanilla partitions, but for more > >> > advanced stuff and filesystems, fdisk is probably better. > >> > >> For filersystems > 2TB, you're better off grabbing a copy of GPT fdisk. > > > >Even better, use LVM and stay away from partitioning completely. > > Wasn't there some gotchas' regarding LVM's and ext4?? I might be imagining > things things... If you can't find anything better than "I might be imagining things" then maybe, for the sake of singnal to noise, either don't contribute or chase down some additional data first... Then again, the thread is about 40T fs size and ext4 tops out at 16T at the moment so... /Peter

1 0

CentOS 5.5 yum update with reference to 5.6
by Bernard Fay 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

Hello group, I have a CentOS 5.5 server freshly installed. When I do a yum updated package_name, I have referenced to 5.6. Why? Here is an example: yum update vsftpd --changelog Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror, security addons/other | 192 B 00:00 base/other_db | 11 MB 00:50 extras/other_db | 442 kB 00:01 updates/other_db | 2.8 MB 00:11 http://centos.arcticnetwork.ca/*5.6*/updates/x86_64/repodata/other.sqlite.b…: [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum Trying other mirror. updates/other_db | 2.7 MB 00:22 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirror.science.uottawa.ca * base: mirror.science.uottawa.ca * extras: mirror.science.uottawa.ca * updates: mirror.science.uottawa.ca Skipping security plugin, no data Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies Skipping security plugin, no data --> Running transaction check ---> Package vsftpd.x86_64 0:2.0.5-16.el5_6.1 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Changes in packages about to be updated: vsftpd-2.0.5-16.el5_6.1.x86_64 * Fri Mar 4 17:00:00 2011 Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> - 2.0.5-16.el5_6.1 - Resolves: #681893 - CVE-2011-0762 vsftpd: remote DoS via crafted glob pattern * Thu Apr 8 18:00:00 2010 Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> - 2.0.5-16.el5_5.1 - Resolves: #580055 - vsftpd prematurely closes connection just before processing of post-auth command - Resolves: #580396 - vsftpd issues in RHEL5 Dependencies Resolved ======================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================================================================== Updating: vsftpd x86_64 2.0.5-16.el5_6.1 updates 139 k Transaction Summary ======================================================================================================================================== Install 0 Package(s) Upgrade 1 Package(s) Total download size: 139 k The version installed is 5.5: [root@future_qljnl51p yum.repos.d]# lsb_release -a LSB Version: :core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch Distributor ID: CentOS Description: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Release: 5.5 Codename: Final -- Bernard

3 3

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by Christopher Chan 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:54 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >> Of Christopher Chan >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:49 PM >> To: centos(a)centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations >> >>>> While we are at it, disks being directly connected to the raid card will >>>> mean there won't be bus contention from nics and what not whereas >>>> software raid 5/6 would have to deal with that. >>> >>> Could that really be an issue as well? What kind of traffic levels are we >>> speaking of now? Approximately? That is to say, in as much this can be >>> quantified at all. >>> >>> I've never really seen this problem. >> >> Oh yeah, we are on PCIe and NUMA architectures now. I guess this point >> no longer applies just like hardware raid being crap no longer applies >> because they are not underpowered i960/tiny cache boards anymore. > > I'm sorry, I can't quite "read you". Is your reply meant to be sarcastic? If I > misunderstood it, I apologize. > > Anyway, what I meant before was that I haven't really the problem with smaller > systems, like for eg department backups. Maybe up to 10TB-file systems, with not > too many user's homefolders, in the hundreds maybe, but still a lot of data > being transferred each day. I know what you meant...and yes, the bus has plenty of bandwidth to not have to worry unless you are sticking it on a 1x lane slot.

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
by Hendrik 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

2011/4/5 Dag Wieers <dag(a)wieers.com>: >> You are one of the few who care to give updates, so thanks for that. > > Nobody else really can give an update, the process is pretty much closed to > the general public. So if the only person why can provide information is off > by 2 months, I'd rather have no information at all. Now is the time to change that. Maybe CentOS just needs a new leadership? -- Hendrik

36 166

bizarre system slowness
by Florin Andrei 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

Running v5 64bit on a Dell 1950. A cluster of 3 DB machines, identical hardware. One of them suddenly became slower 2 weeks ago. tar -zxf with a large file on this machine takes 1.5 minutes, but takes only 10 seconds on any of its siblings. CPU usage seems high while untarring, with lots of user and sys cycles being used, but almost no wait cycles. It doesn't matter whether I untar on a local disk, or on a fiber channel SAN volume, it's slow anyway. scp a file over the network is slow too: 6 MB/s to this machine, 70 MB/s to its siblings. However, this is just as fast on all systems, including the "sick" one: # time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100000 100000+0 records in 100000+0 records out 104857600000 bytes (105 GB) copied, 2.59213 seconds, 40.5 GB/s real 0m2.600s user 0m0.025s sys 0m2.550s /proc/cpuinfo looks fine. Nothing suspect in dmesg. Reboot doesn't fix it. Power off / power on doesn't fix it. Single mode is slow too, and I tried a couple different kernels. Dell's online diagnostics program could find nothing wrong with it. /var/log/messages was full of "ntpd[7313]: frequency error -1707 PPM exceeds tolerance 500 PPM" messages. There was a lot of messages about "the system limit for the maximum number of semaphore sets has been exceeded"; there was indeed a lot of leftover semaphores created by NRPE (owned by the nagios user); I deleted them but nothing has changed, so they were a symptom, not the cause. I'm still kind of hoping it's a software issue, but chances are slim. OTOH, I can't imagine any hardware problem that would exhibit these symptoms. Any idea what to test? -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

7 8

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
by Christopher Chan 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:32 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >> Of Christopher Chan >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:45 PM >> To: centos(a)centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations >> >> While we are at it, disks being directly connected to the raid card will >> mean there won't be bus contention from nics and what not whereas >> software raid 5/6 would have to deal with that. > > Could that really be an issue as well? What kind of traffic levels are we > speaking of now? Approximately? That is to say, in as much this can be > quantified at all. > > I've never really seen this problem. Oh yeah, we are on PCIe and NUMA architectures now. I guess this point no longer applies just like hardware raid being crap no longer applies because they are not underpowered i960/tiny cache boards anymore.

2 1

a pc running centos 5.5 x64 (yum update to 5.6), can't hibernate, from shutdown menu.
by zoge 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

from the gnome menu, system->shutdown, then press the hibernate button on the popup window. during the process, the system stoped ,after shrink memory and free many pages. any suggest? tnks.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Got no login screen with the new 5.6 kernel
by Stanley A. Klein 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

On Wed, April 13, 2011 12:00 pm, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: > Message: 30 > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:10:52 -0400 > From: m.roth(a)5-cent.us > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Got no login screen with the new 5.6 kernel > > Phil Schaffner wrote: >> Stanley A. Klein wrote on 04/12/2011 01:55 PM: >>> I did the 5.6 update yesterday. When I started the machine today, I >>> did >>> not get a login screen -- it was just a blank screen with no cursor or >>> anything. I shut down, restarted and when grub came up selected the >>> previous kernel. The system came up as usual, presented a login >>> screen, >>> and is working OK. >>> >>> There is apparently something buggy related to the new kernel >>> (2.6.18-238.5.1.el5). >> >> How far did it get during the boot - to where the GUI login should have >> been displayed, or did it die earlier? Anything enlightening in >> /var/log/messages or /var/log/Xorg.0.log? Did you try a boot to >> runlevel 3 or 1 to debug? > > My reaction, also: on boot, edit the kernel line to either runlevel 3, or > s (single user mode), and I'll wager you see the screen. If so, then your > problem is the video driver used by X. HOPEFULLY, there's > system-config-display, otherwise, you screw with /etc/X11/xorg.conf and > startx until you get something, then you can use the GUI tools. > > mark Problem solved, but rather strange. When I first booted with the previous kernel I looked at /var/log/messages and didn't see anything useful. Today, I selected the previous kernel from the grub screen and looked at /var/log/Xorg.0.log. The date in the file was today, so that was from the current boot, not from the time it failed to give the login screen. I edited inittab to default to runlevel 3. I got the runlevel 3 login prompt, did startx, and the GUI came up. I restored the runlevel 5 default in inittab and rebooted letting the new kernel get selected by default. The login screen came up. It must have had something to do with the initialization of X on the first boot under 5.6. Your suggestions helped. Thanks. Stan Klein

2 1

Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.
by Antaryami Khuda 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild. Dag how much monies you do need? I make contribution of 5.000 rupee if other join. Ant

16 25

status of 5.6 updates
by William Warren 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6. I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:)

4 4

Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box
by Kaushal Shriyan 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

Hi, I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box. *Its not detected.* Details are as below :- [root@asterisk ~]# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge 00:04.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge 00:05.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI Bridge 00:12.0 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 Serial ATA Controller 00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 USB Host Controller 00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 USB Host Controller 00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 USB2 Host Controller 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 SMBus Controller (rev 10) 00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 IDE Controller 00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 PCI-ISA Bridge 00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 PCI-PCI Bridge 00:14.5 Multimedia audio controller: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01) 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 [Radeon Xpress 200G Series] 01:05.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Xpress Series (RS480) 02:00.0 PCI bridge: PLX Technology, Inc. PEX8112 x1 Lane PCI Express-to-PCI Bridge (rev aa) 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 20) 05:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Accton Technology Corporation EN-1216 Ethernet Adapter (rev 11) [root@asterisk ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.5 (Final) [root@asterisk ~]# asterisk -v Asterisk 1.6.2.11, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2010 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer <markster(a)digium.com> Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'core show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'core show license' for details. ============================== =========================================== Asterisk already running on /var/run/asterisk/asterisk.ctl. Use 'asterisk -r' to connect. [root@asterisk ~]# Please suggest/guide Thanks Kaushal

7 11

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss