- Discuss - lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] changing openoffice defaults
by Janez Kosmrlj 19 Jan '10

19 Jan '10

anyone? On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Janez Kosmrlj <postnalista(a)googlemail.com>wrote: > > > Hi, > I am trying to change some OpenOffice defaults. First of all I would like > to change the default open/save directory. > First I tried to change *$work* in */opt/ > openoffice.org/basis3.1/share/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Paths.xcu > * but it hadn't had any impact on the users. > Then I tried to change the file */opt/ > openoffice.org/basis3.1/share/registry/schema/org/openoffice/Office/Common.… > * > I tried to change : > *<prop oor:name="Work" oor:type="xs:string"> > <info> > <desc>Specifies the path of the work folder, which can be > modified according to the user's needs. The path specified here can be seen > in the Open or Save dialog.</desc> > </info> > <value>$(work)</value> > </prop>* > > to > > *<prop oor:name="Work" oor:type="xs:string"> > <info> > <desc>Specifies the path of the work folder, which can be > modified according to the user's needs. The path specified here can be seen > in the Open or Save dialog.</desc> > </info> > <value>/opt/documents</value> > </prop> > > *But instead of pointing to /opt/documents the default save dialogue now > opens at / and in the properties i can now see that it points nowhere (see > attached picture) > > Has anyone an idea what I am doing wrong. > > BR > Janez > > >

3 6

SSH slow
by ML 19 Jan '10

19 Jan '10

Hi All, All of my systems are running 5.4 x64. The are all AMD x64 processors with at least 2gb of RAM in each. I am running SSH on a non standard port. When I SSH into ANY of my systems, I get prompted for my password right away, but after entering, it takes 30+ seconds to get logged in and get a prompt so I can work. I dont quite know what to look for here Does anyone have thoughts? -Jason

5 5

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 18 Jan '10

18 Jan '10

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2010:0044 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 pidgin Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2010:0044 Important CentOS 5 i386 pidgin Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CEBA-2010:0042 CentOS 5 i386 dhcp Update (Karanbir Singh) 4. CEBA-2010:0042 CentOS 5 x86_64 dhcp Update (Karanbir Singh) 5. CESA-2010:0020 Important CentOS 4 i386 kernel - security update (Tru Huynh) 6. CESA-2010:0020 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 kernel - security update (Tru Huynh) 7. CESA-2010:0029 Critical CentOS 3 i386 krb5 - security update (Tru Huynh) 8. CESA-2010:0029 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 krb5 - security update (Tru Huynh) 9. CESA-2010:0029 Critical CentOS 4 i386 krb5 - security update (Tru Huynh) 10. CESA-2010:0029 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 krb5 - security update (Tru Huynh) 11. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 gcc - security update (Tru Huynh) 12. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 gcc - security update (Tru Huynh) 13. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gcc and gcc4 - security update (Tru Huynh) 14. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gcc and gcc4 - security update (Tru Huynh) 15. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 16. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 17. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 18. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 php - security update (Tru Huynh) 19. CESA-2010:0044 Important CentOS 4 i386 pidgin - security update (Tru Huynh) 20. CESA-2010:0044 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 pidgin - security update (Tru Huynh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:33:39 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0044 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 pidgin Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114213339.GA12554(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0044 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0044.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 1221ab24081392b69bae28f6b4b533ad finch-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 8cba54281abbe945df9164fa412778f7 finch-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm 978760fff874cd3a4351679004797c3e finch-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 40ebfef30c6250192ad5413ff87e6937 finch-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm e5089a568d3ce05620a37b4b062538fa libpurple-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 4c15e005e59284cbf77f9f495d9bdaf5 libpurple-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm b23777f802586f9072dbd6bc04bf9069 libpurple-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm bc92ea36a30b0b6a906d171f63ebe20c libpurple-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm ae44e040fd541324f40d25a697b47073 libpurple-perl-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm c14481a01798337827189a1a2204c681 libpurple-tcl-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm ce654f763f047bbd3de785bc36d19125 pidgin-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 68dee0c23923abb9e6996091b15eeef4 pidgin-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm 383b35c74a6e5f7e737b3cdb6e281f58 pidgin-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 2ee0a568b3ded75a19f1d359f958c728 pidgin-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm 1f5422d884d633a4dee4eba83a4e6060 pidgin-perl-2.6.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: c0c56243029e012955d018cf570380e7 pidgin-2.6.5-1.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:33:39 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0044 Important CentOS 5 i386 pidgin Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114213339.GA12539(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0044 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0044.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 40c87ffc0355023b1999217e04664464 finch-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 03b71c9f69ed67ec19b5ca014d77a7a9 finch-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm f50d3e8b5f2c3077006e78f18333d213 libpurple-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 16ca8bc0d60e139ef3e7a84ef9f4e528 libpurple-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm b0302933c99fe9b1b319b577108d8868 libpurple-perl-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 1fac467902bf184b5484e6647c376a22 libpurple-tcl-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 7ca0d792cc02e89018fc51c98273a058 pidgin-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm ab8e3020059e5cada5448e2211838d9e pidgin-devel-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm 49a8e79cf97ebaf13fd500bb937cd80f pidgin-perl-2.6.5-1.el5.i386.rpm Source: c0c56243029e012955d018cf570380e7 pidgin-2.6.5-1.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:35:00 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0042 CentOS 5 i386 dhcp Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114213500.GA12653(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0042 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0042.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 75c3d86012ed835fdd8e6adf4a7b46d5 dhclient-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm f8e9e8c6db0cfab67119d5dd22b207f1 dhcp-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 10065731e1acbad938b60a01a2d4437c dhcp-devel-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 9c40a772d00bce2a90a28ed07341e98c libdhcp4client-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm bbcc62d259d5c4887d23cefba25f35c5 libdhcp4client-devel-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm Source: 5c26195f93824372091a9cf3e61abdb3 dhcp-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:35:00 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0042 CentOS 5 x86_64 dhcp Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114213500.GA12666(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0042 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0042.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 32672fb7dbafbecb0ccf441f015368c5 dhclient-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 610d6149189098bdbdf661a1cdc2c84d dhcp-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm d805d93a182511ad4a2e42bcc7daa4d8 dhcp-devel-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm ab8732b8365a326a6b6d87eb559ffc71 dhcp-devel-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 9d54e68d4916ebe59b364f3ce796c368 libdhcp4client-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 40a7cb1fa6c080bd72da450cd2df081f libdhcp4client-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm 81e911190a8b52c7de2ab8325e6251d7 libdhcp4client-devel-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.i386.rpm 888c92f5798b5f3738daf3a3bf67caa5 libdhcp4client-devel-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 5c26195f93824372091a9cf3e61abdb3 dhcp-3.0.5-21.el5_4.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:48:52 +0100 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0020 Important CentOS 4 i386 kernel - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114234852.GA32361(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0020 kernel security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0020.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-xenU-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-doc-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.noarch.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update kernel\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

2 1

USB Mounting Problem
by JohnS 18 Jan '10

18 Jan '10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550590 This also applies to Suns VirtualBox

1 0

Mediatomb compile from svn - centos 5.4
by Tom Bishop 18 Jan '10

18 Jan '10

Anyone compiled Mediatomb from svn on centos 5.4 and had success? Trying to do this and want to make sure I have all of the dependencies met, thanks.

2 1

CentOS 5 and webex wrf files?
by Scott Ehrlich 18 Jan '10

18 Jan '10

Anyone have experience playing back a Webex wrf file on their CentOS 5.x system? I have a newly installed CentOS 5.4 i386 system and want to play such a file, but the Webex.com web site says it only supports Windows and MacOS for playback. Any other options next to creating a VM of Windows (I'm not buying a Mac for this). Thanks. Scott

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Jussi Hirvi 18 Jan '10

18 Jan '10

On 13.1.2010 12:04, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Hi all, > > I've built a new backup server for our linux-clients. > > Is Amanda the way to go for a backup-solution? > > It seems to be pretty powerful, if a bit finickety to set up initially. > > The way we currently do backups is to use rsync from the clients to two > folders on an older server that rolls over every other week. This worked fine > for a while, but the rsync is cumulative and the users generate a tremendous > amount of data every day after having had a client upgrade with newer and > hilariously fast computers for calculation. The previous *nix-admin set it up > this way with rsync, meaning that we in the long run have data that is way > obsolete and get increasingly difficult to maintain. > > As the backup solution must be next to free, ie "free beer", Amanda looks > suitable. > > What do you use for backing up data? I think nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. I have very good experiences with it. Easy to setup and control (only remember first to install the required packages, and I think rsync-devel was not mentioned but is required). Rdiff-backup keeps up an exact copy of the source director(ies), plus it maintains a separate directory for deleted/changed items. With an appropriate command you can restore the source directory as it was at a given point of time. Very neat, and space-saving. http://rdiff-backup.nongnu.org/ - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi(a)greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi "Remember that if you can't understand an answer, it's okay, we'll just keep going forward as if you do." -- Peter Gulutzan, "MySQL 5.0 Stored Procedures"

4 3

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Benjamin Franz 18 Jan '10

18 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >> Of Benjamin Franz >> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:26 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >> >> I was thinking about your long term here. Make sure to use LVM to >> create your underlaying partition. Then you can add disk space in the >> future without having to reformat everything and can just grow your >> ext3/ext4 partition instead. >> > > With six drives installed, there is no more space to add more drives in the > chassis. But thanks for the hint! > Ok. Oh, one last thing. Don't forget to use the '-E stride=XX,stripe-width=YY (where XX and YY are replaced with the appropriate values) options creating your filesystem on the RAID. Otherwise your disk drive usage will have 'hot spots' and slower than optimal speed. Do a man mke2fs to understand how to use them correctly. -- Benjamin Franz

4 4

unison versus rsync
by Joseph L. Casale 17 Jan '10

17 Jan '10

Anyone got any actual comparisons between unison and rsync specifically related to the performance of synchronization of large data sets over slow links? I have a huge tree to start replication of Friday and know that if I sync the root paths it will take ages and with the lack of any overall state of progress this won't be optimal as its likely to fail for whatever reason before it can finish. Initially I just thought I would break it down to several smaller jobs but that becomes a burden to maintain... We use bacula internally but sending the diffs would be cumbersome as the individual files would be rather large... Thanks! jlc

8 23

problems trying to download sme server
by Ivan Arteaga 17 Jan '10

17 Jan '10

2 1

Centos and RadeonHD 4570
by Lucian ＠ lastdot.org 17 Jan '10

17 Jan '10

Hi guys, Recently I've done a bad bad thing, buying a laptop with an ATI card. The card itself is supposed to be quite decent performance wise, but the ATI drivers still suck a lot. I haven't yet tried booting Centos on this laptop, but I used a Fedora 12 LiveCD. Fedora displays things nicely, but no 3D accel (I like to play OpenArena/Tremulous every now and then). After some serious googling I learned that I cannot even install ATI Catalyst driver on Fedora, because of too new Xorg. Do you have any success stories with running Centos and have 3D acceleration on this video card? lspci reports: 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RS780M/RS780MN [Radeon HD 3200 Graphics] 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc M92 [MobilityRadeon HD 4500 Series] Yes, 2 gpus. I think it's this hybrid thing: http://ati.amd.com/technology/hybridgraphics/technology.html Your feedback will be appreciated. I will not end up using Win7.

2 1

OT TTW Email Interface
by Susan Day 17 Jan '10

17 Jan '10

Hi; I don't know what these things are called so that I can look for an OS solution. I want to install an email server interface like Hotmail where people can check their email TTW. What is this called? Any recommendations? TIA, Susan

6 6

Dual Gateways, Dual IPs on the same net
by Mr Gabriel 17 Jan '10

17 Jan '10

If I configure a second virtual ip address on a device, will it always send packets to the gateway configured, or to it's primary gateway. For example, two ISPs configured, two firewalls configured, gateway IP's 192.168.1.1 and .2. Internal server has IP 192.168.1.100 with gateway .1. Incoming packets that have been forwarded from outside, (for instance an SSH session), will be returned to .1 for routing back to the internet. If a virtual adapter is configured with ip 192.168.1.101 and a gateway of .2 will traffic that is destined to 101, always be returned .2???

2 2

Get Me Outta Here! Web site security issue
by Slack-Moehrle 17 Jan '10

17 Jan '10

Hi All, I have a CentOS 5.4 web server. I have some stuff that runs on 443. When I hit https://<the site> The user gets a warning saying that site identity could not be verified and the user can add an exception if they want. How do I stop this from happing? Do I need to buy an SSL cert? Aren't these really expensive per server and I have 5 servers I would need to do this too. Can anyone provide advice? -Jason

8 8

/var/www/html/stats/index.php?
by hadi motamedi 17 Jan '10

17 Jan '10

Dear All I have installed an application on my CentOS 5.0 server but when I want to login to the gui I got the following error message : "*Warning*: make sure zend_optimizer.license_path is properly configured in php.ini! in */var/www/html/stats/index.php* on line *0"* But that index.php file is not editable via vi text editor . Can you please let me know how I can correct it according to the warining message received? Thank you

4 5

raid1 creation :: not large enough to join array
by Adrian Sevcenco 16 Jan '10

16 Jan '10

Hi! I have 2 identical hdd (1002FBYS) with the same firmware, etc .. really identical! when i try to add the second hdd to this raid1 array i have the message that /dev/sdb is not large enough to join array!! on the first hdd i have 100 mb unpartitioned at the end of disk (as i understood that mdadm put there some info...) Anyone, any idea what can be wrong? i already done this procees several times and this is first time i encounter this and i have no idea what can be the problem .. Thanks! Adrian

4 6

yum install -y gcc?
by hadi motamedi 16 Jan '10

16 Jan '10

Dear All I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5 server as the followings : #yum install -y gcc But in the middle of the installation , my server went down from sudden power cut . After power recovery , I tried again but I am facing with the following error : "Error:Missing dependency : libstdc++-devel = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-c++" Can you please let me know what is its meaning and how I can proceed to re-install it ? Thank you

5 5

configure: error: You MUST have the libxml2 (aka gnome-xml) library installed
by Anas Alnaffar 16 Jan '10

16 Jan '10

I need to install application on our Centos5.4 final, every time get this message configure: error: You MUST have the libxml2 (aka gnome-xml) library installed and I tried to run yum install libxml2 and get this message Package libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.8.i386 already installed and latest version Please help

1 1

Problems loading drbd after upgrade
by robert mena 16 Jan '10

16 Jan '10

Hi, I've upgrade the kernel to the latest version (C5) and after the update the drbd is not being loaded at reboot time. My previous running kernel was 2.6.18-164.el5. I've checked the /lib/modules/ and /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5/weak-updates/drbd82/drbd.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko And /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko exists 2004 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2047377 Jan 12 22:52 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko And the contents (at least the size) is the same of the kmod-drbd82 rpm -ql kmod-drbd82 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/drbd82 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko ls -lsa /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko 2004 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2047377 Oct 3 2008 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko If I insmod the drbd I can load it and if I start (service drbd start) I can access the shares so something is wrong :)

2 4

php update
by Helmut Drodofsky 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Hi, according to [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 5 I made an update to php. The Server is running apache in fastcgi mode. Up to yesterday all was OK. Now as far as I see the php script is not further running with the correct user: but the suexec is startet with correct uid and gid! Any help? Suggestions? Helmut

1 1

quotacheck question
by Aggelis Aggelis 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

i want to implement disk quota on my /home filesystem (it is going to be a mail server) so i read tha appropriate how to's edited limits for the users and everything is fine but then for quota meintenance i stuck into quotacheck the man page says quotacheck should be run each time the system boots and mounts non- valid filesystems. This is most likely to happen after a system crash. AND It is also unwise to run quotacheck on a live filesystem as actual usage may change during the scan. To prevent this, quotacheck tries to remount the filesystem read-only before starting the scan. After the scan is done it remounts the filesystem read-write. but the 7.2.3 paragraph (Managing disk quotas) of centos 5 deployment guide ...... However, quotacheck can be run on a regular basis, even if the system has not crashed. Running the following command periodically keeps the quotas more accurate ....... i have looked also on the web and some suggest to run quotacheck only at boot time and others to run quotacheck regularly but i ahve not found a clear answer i wonder what are the comments of centos community on hte subject

2 2

how to send mail from console
by Roland Roland 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Hi all, i'm trying to get a script to send me an email whenever a certain condition takes place.. i'm afraid i dont have experience with mail command nor anything else related to sending emails for that matter.. i googled a bit and tried using mutt and mail ... though i do not recieve any email in my inbox... the command im using is the following : mail -s “disk space report” R_O_L_A_N_D(a)hotmail.com should i setup a default smtp to use? where can i check for the errors that are taking place?

12 11

Yum update worrisomeness
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

I went to do an update a bit ago (10:30 or 10:45 EST), and first, it got to rhel-i386-server-5/filelists | 14 MB 02:23 and was running at 2Kb/sec to 4Kb/sec, then, when I killed it and restarted it about 20 min later, it went at about 28Kb/sec, then died, reporting: Error: failed to retrieve repodata/filelists.xml.gz from rhel-i386-server-5 error was [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum This makes me *very* nervous. Anyone know anything? mark

2 2

how to startup snmpd on debug mode
by mcclnx mcc 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

I tried to startup "snmpd" on debug mode but NOT successful (CENTOS 5.4). I have been tried following way: /etc/init.d/snmpd start -D /etc/init.d/snmpd -D start service snmpd -D restart any ideal??? ___________________________________________________ 您的生活即時通－溝通、娛樂、生活、工作一次搞定！ http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/

3 3

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> >> Yes, but if you use the epel rpm, either mount it at /var/lib/BackupPC or > put a >> symlink there before the install. If you install from the sourceforge > source >> there is an install script that modifies the location so you can put things >> where you want, but the rpm packages have already done that. The next > version >> will make this easier to change but the current one needs to stay in the >> location set when the package was built. > > Ran into some problems and couldn't login to the web interface. The above > helped, when tracking down the paths and symlinks. Thanks! > > So far, BackupPC looks good. Will start configuring it now and do some test > backups later this afternoon. Darn users can't let me work in peace... ;-) You might want to join the mail lists: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/info.html#lists if you have any specific questions about it. There are several users with a lot of experience and the author still participates. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> So you need to be able to walk the fine line >> between these two. > > I'm trying. Something it just isn't enough. Although the boss has a soft spot > for linux, as he also heads the CADD (Computer Aided Drug Design)-group. > >> To put it into perspective, ask the manager how much it would cost the >> business if this data was unrecoverable? After that, if they still >> don't want to spend a few hundred $$s on the insurance, get it in >> writing that your manager understands the risk and print it out and >> post it on your office wall. > > Rather confrontative isn't it? Me being a Swede, I try to avoid those > situations if possible, and find a compromise instead that both parties can > live with. 8-} Oh, and I'm a government employee, so the money I spend is > tax-payers money. Got to be careful there. Being careful with the money is the point. Someone has to understand the risks. > You know how that saying goes? You can chose between good, fast and cheap. But > you're only ever allowed to pick any two. For me that's IT in a nutshell. ;-) The other question to ask is whether an offsite copy is needed. After a fire or other site disaster some businesses might collect the insurance money and disappear - others might want to be able to rebuild and continue. Government operations would probably need to continue and need a plan for that. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
by Boris Epstein 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Hello everyone, This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage volume would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any recommendations as far as hardware? Thanks. Boris.

36 129

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Benjamin Franz 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Today I have five 500GB-disks raided on linux machine. Remove one for parity > and I have 2TB of real space available. Doing a 0+1, ie 1TB, would indeed be > better as performance goes, but 1TB of space, well, it just isn't enough > unfortunately. > > As it is now, the 2TB shebang is mounted as /backup. Does that count as a > single filesystem? > I was thinking about your long term here. Make sure to use LVM to create your underlaying partition. Then you can add disk space in the future without having to reformat everything and can just grow your ext3/ext4 partition instead. -- Benjamin Franz

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > >>> I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but you >>> never >>> know... >> There's a big write performance hit from raid5 (software or not). It >> may not be enough to be a showstopper but I wouldn't recommend it. Can >> you reconfigure to a 0+1 or some other type that has better performance >> without losing too much space? The archive does have to be on a single >> filesystem, though, and if you use the epel RPM it makes things easier >> if you mount the volume at /var/lib/BackupPC before the install. >> See 'how to change archive directory' from: >> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/backuppc/index.php?title=Tips_and_Tri… >> to do it after the install. > > I know, but in linux it's still a lot better than Windows, which I today > regret I ever introduced it in... Don't get me wrong, reliability is fine, but > the recheck on every restart is kinda' bothersome and takes like forever > > Today I have five 500GB-disks raided on linux machine. Remove one for parity > and I have 2TB of real space available. Doing a 0+1, ie 1TB, would indeed be > better as performance goes, but 1TB of space, well, it just isn't enough > unfortunately. If you have any opportunity to change things, I'd get some larger drives and use raid1 or 0+1. If you want offsite copies, a workable approach in the 2TB scale is to make a 3-member raid1 where you periodically swap the 3rd drive (in an internal or external swappable sata enclosure). If you don't need that, a 4 drive 0+1 raid of 1.5 TB drives would give you 3TB and better performance. What you have will work - but it will limit performance. > As it is now, the 2TB shebang is mounted as /backup. Does that count as a > single filesystem? Yes, but if you use the epel rpm, either mount it at /var/lib/BackupPC or put a symlink there before the install. If you install from the sourceforge source there is an install script that modifies the location so you can put things where you want, but the rpm packages have already done that. The next version will make this easier to change but the current one needs to stay in the location set when the package was built. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 2

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by nate 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though. I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even joined the lawsuit at the time(and got booted by the judge because I was in another state), had probably an 80% failure rate on those disks. I got a PDF on a CD somewhere that has all kinds of internal IBM docs(from the lawsuit) showing how they knew what the problems were but refused to fix them. OT but reminded me of that.. nate

4 5

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

On 1/14/2010 9:08 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> Go to the vendor's web site, enter their serial numbers and get an RMA for a >> free replacement. Every vendor has had bad batches. > > Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though. Unfortunately, the only way commodity priced things get large scale real-world testing is after a large number of them have been sold. If the first one sold had to be perfect none of us could afford to buy it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Brian Mathis 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu(a)orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >>Of Benjamin Franz >>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM >>To: CentOS mailing list >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >> >>If you have any budget at all, invest in bigger drives. 7200 RPM 1 TB >>RAID rated drives can be bought for $160 each. Desktop rated 5900 RPM >>1.5 TB drives (which you can probably get away with in a dedicated >>backup server since you don't care a lot about speed and can tolerate >>long pauses for sector repair) can be bought for $110 each. Check Newegg. > > I haven't got a budget really. Today I asked for a new group-printer today and > the boss looked pained... 8-} > > I opted for the proven 500GB-sized disks and got more of those instead. I've > had a handful of 750GB-drives die on me recently. Somehow it feels the > technology isn't quite there yet for the bigger drive-sizes. Anybody remember > the IBM Deskstars in the early 00's...? > > Also, my experience is the more smaller disks you have, the faster they get. > Less to write to each I guess. > > >>Second, to maximize 'depth' of backups you should use a 'Tower of >>Hanoi'-like backup system. > > Good advice, thanks! > -- > /Sorin There seems to be a persistent conception among managers that anything "IT related" is a huge capital expenditure (as it used to be), and there's all sorts of resistance to buying anything new. However, you probably spend more on printer paper in 1 week than it costs to buy a 1TB drive. This kind of equipment is a disposable commodity, even though the accounting department still prefers to write it off over 7 years. However, IT also has a reputation of always wanting to buy new toys. Many times these toys are not needed, even though the IT person insists that they are. So you need to be able to walk the fine line between these two. To put it into perspective, ask the manager how much it would cost the business if this data was unrecoverable? After that, if they still don't want to spend a few hundred $$s on the insurance, get it in writing that your manager understands the risk and print it out and post it on your office wall.

5 6

Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
by Mathieu Baudier 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Hi, we want to upgrade our infrastructure and are considering renting two different types of server by a provider: - A: one is with 80 GB SSD (and 12 GB memory) http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_ssd.xml - B: the other with 750 GB SATA2 (and 8 GB memory). http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_best_of.xml The target infrastructure will host: - a few public web sites (PHP / MySQL) - a development infrastructure (subversion, bugzilla, automated builds) This will use KVM virtualization with Cent OS 5.4 hosts and guests. On the long run we will probably rent quite a few of type B depending on our needs of space and computing power. My question is whether it is worth using one of type A (with SSD drives) in order to host the critical data such as the web sites and the subversion repository (critical in the sense that these services should be fast, always available, and the related data as safe as possible). This critical server will be more read oriented than write. We will probably use a hardware RAID 1 with battery backed unit on it. My understanding is that SSD are much much faster. Is it really true in the real world? Are SSD drives also safer? (that is, less likely to crash under load) Or to the contrary? I have read/heard conflicting opinions so far and I'll be happy to hear opinions/experiences on SSD drives in a server settings from people on the list. More general comments about our plans are always welcome of course! Cheers, Mathieu PS: we will actually rent them in France, but I put links to the equivalent in Britain in order to have the description in English. For reference and for the French-speaking people, here are the actual servers we consider: http://www.ovh.com/fr/produits/eg_ssd.xml http://www.ovh.com/fr/produits/eg_best_of.xml (they are exactly the same)

7 10

[story] Thank goodness for links and caching DNS
by Michael A. Peters 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Right in the middle of doing something important on my Ubuntu box, the web quit working. However, I could get to sites in my /etc/hosts file. Sure enough, all three of my ISPs nameservers were down. I'm not a DNS guy, but on my CentOS boxes I always installed a caching DNS out of the box since it was part of the obvious install options. So I set the DNS to one in my Ubuntu box, and of course the port was closed. So I ssh'd on in, opened 53 in the firewall, and the port was still closed. Tried running Firefox from the CentOS box via X forwarding over ssh but oddly, that seemed to lauch local Ubuntu firefox which didn't work. All of my CentOS boxes are headless, so all my boxes with working nameserver resolution thus only had text internet, which I haven't used in years. locate named.conf only showed some file in dbus that I knew wasn't right, but I was able to use links and find what I needed on google, the caching nameserver conf file has a slightly different filename than standard bind named.conf. I followed the warning, installed the system config utility for modifying it, but damn - for someone who doesn't know bind, that tool is scary looking, intimidating, I was afraid I was going to break my working caching nameserver if I messed around in it. So I backed up the file and hand edited it to add the IP to listen on, restarted bind, and am back in business. This is the second time in the last 6 months that all three of my ISP's nameservers have gone down, I wonder if they really are the same physical box, maybe even same network interface. What's the point of them having three if they all go down at same time? Ah well, I don't need them anymore for that. Thankfully the caching nameservers were already installed on my CentOS boxes, two of them now listens on their external interface, never again will I use my ISPs nameserver.

2 2

High load since passing from rhas3 to centos4.8
by fortin.pierre＠bell.ca 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of 15-20 instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to. I searched a lot for information on such an issue. Iostat, vmstat, top, ps. But I don't get significant hint. Cpu usage remains low, IO wait remains low, no disks are lagging, no swap usage. Are there some tool / other way to diagnose why the load average is high? Like which processes are waiting, where they are stuck. Are there calls to drivers or system process that are slow? Thanks

5 7

NetworkManager won't save wireless keys
by Kevin Kempter 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Hi all; I'm running KDE 3.5 on CentOS 5.4 I have wireless working however every time I boot I have to enter the wireless key. Anyone know how to get NetworkManager to save the keys? I've tried going to the 'edit connections' and adding the key there as well with no luck. Thanks in advance

3 3

Bonding modes
by Paras pradhan 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

I have a bonded interface running in mode 1 which is active/passive and no issue with this. I need to change it to mode 0 for active/active setup. Does mode 0 is dependent on the switches configuration? My setup is: 2 links from bonded interface is connected to different switches. When I change to mode0 from mode1 , bond0 is not coming up. These are the steps I performed 1) changed to options bond0 mode=0 miimon=100 from options bond0 mode=0 miimon=100 2) modprobe bonding 3) service network restart Thanks ! Paras.

6 18

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 php Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 php Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gcc Update (Karanbir Singh) 4. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gcc Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:42:15 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 php Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100113224215.GA27822(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0040 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0040.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 5cd17da5232b015fe531f139c163eaf1 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 431cea89c185369e22a45c05d5b14a18 php-bcmath-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm e28369af3d6bd3b6b51a94ceea490270 php-cli-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm bd716a0a02c4d686679d467771657464 php-common-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 66c38aff54c3d0f077ed2a08dec222e4 php-dba-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 81c7dc49634f12762e56e6bd6ed421d4 php-devel-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm ff3d4139ffc14d4350948e73521804f5 php-gd-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 00bf5859d2b767c81a99c282d8d0a6a8 php-imap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm a7b2c45736400db2b2a73dfda9dd810a php-ldap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 59d72f03dd3de3f42c6148be98234400 php-mbstring-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm bf156e5e9f8e88c478de0dec584139f2 php-mysql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 3cd776b156375616756bec953913dfff php-ncurses-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 866948e4860941ac67204f76324fc6f2 php-odbc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm bcca0b445d638308882d7a1c4051065c php-pdo-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 4a70f8a3276fc4b6638c99147e2ab924 php-pgsql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 3c81787381fa13ebf758e503f2e6f1f6 php-snmp-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 4c17909723fd08320c95ad334e6dd7b9 php-soap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 9792c5cbbe22b4dcb78f0ed898e3d72c php-xml-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 278dffef21ff50aabd735292eb9ee819 php-xmlrpc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm Source: 7ca20e4ffcb1ebf0eed39ba78ccf8f54 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:42:15 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 php Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100113224215.GA27806(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0040 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0040.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: e59e61f43fa3855eceb0e8c8e84127b3 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 68a09d207e980fd377b20cc8352db157 php-bcmath-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 4174a6e1cf6a6af326c78070704f4fe5 php-cli-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm b343c0e3a85ce8882849f80d783022e4 php-common-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm a0cd41173bc5f9c6ceefb29bf68633c6 php-dba-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 3eab85411e3266c9943f71204ce8638d php-devel-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm ba100af79d25cb9530832e685b79f159 php-gd-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm b098c376512c7a30380c95022a3e9358 php-imap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 631bc9b94a9bfa98e63e8aa459c0af8c php-ldap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 78fa8812a08e88bf9dbbbdc09ed377b3 php-mbstring-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 88fb42de93dd26bed95dbab132bed232 php-mysql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm f66cd74e508b4f80da6d9ce3099e5559 php-ncurses-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 4ebe1de9bcc9793075a6460881284ec5 php-odbc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm abf6a5bb122cf61a4c6ae14a0861c638 php-pdo-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm c25b93c166e385f09f058a343d72bbd7 php-pgsql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 065f6f16125c88f00e9d3dfb21bc79f6 php-snmp-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 198456949527d00976ab0c98da1a228a php-soap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 5a6f289140ae0c55337083dba1bd878c php-xml-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm cd3a2014610ec4b20f2648249ecb1a8e php-xmlrpc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm Source: 7ca20e4ffcb1ebf0eed39ba78ccf8f54 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:58:41 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gcc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114125841.GA3276(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0039 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 5a9045330d1c6d9d4e282cafa71c9bbf cpp-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 1d120e1f6704c46a5d290f0f3475ecea gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 78f3de0f9675c5e339f223a2b05706ee gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm b3c24d32ac817d57de77436616d75f3e gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm b7f5bdecd19110927fd8510008542904 gcc-gnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 827b85a1f02d2fa031ede7f1337ab8c6 gcc-java-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 45341e07eb7828276f75ebca2104f4b7 gcc-objc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 1a68d123353a302d0fdb6356910cca43 gcc-objc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 6656c1b8c515a451556cb8136c2eb391 libgcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 5c17a2d964b19428c1660a5306110107 libgcj-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 07f32a1fc3769ce0f138cae584e05a24 libgcj-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 72ef255fb5cb744e08e53358b1428336 libgcj-src-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 9db8edd06d4a64a665d1bd3b8f55309a libgfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 3bd3b3e6965e32699f82e95ee36b4697 libgnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm bd34e570ef6525459fd0a205b2d43547 libmudflap-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 250e4ecdb192699244033000d38007be libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 4e2da968723faa5c2e78ce8c81cc3346 libobjc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm c2583ad254d639f820e0b2594430db96 libstdc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 121f46b683d24a23783a8660ab19c02a libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm Source: 9c93513a48170b999bf6c4aa5be6e206 gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:58:42 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gcc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114125842.GA3291(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0039 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 974d27def9772e424700074459935c1f cpp-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm e6638eaeb51d70acc8128c519088fe61 gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 67742532682d2047042a14d67718877d gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 2722a3993f130c4db1c1c9e1aa61b6d7 gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 9783f6ee8aa1ee004993b091ccb3fff2 gcc-gnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm fa4b92cd5895f4c119d6060f911706e6 gcc-java-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 0f4fef6bfebf0b3a968a36a6beaa3f53 gcc-objc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm e672d2ac33f097e15be72d4496dbc7ae gcc-objc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 6e0ed17da32aacc26dde8b3523a4d13c libgcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 36cee10846448b5b64fef295ebed0e38 libgcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 0fb54147bf3a79d1e68e3b82ae40bd20 libgcj-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm a20923f25fee6ae1d713aa6c53399e47 libgcj-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 69746869f13a913df3c360e3570f6c51 libgcj-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 04b5ffc2752e70456617e3225974283a libgcj-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm a0042ba7c13d5de3991cae28f049ce0a libgcj-src-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 2d50c14a553be0da95515daac697435d libgfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 976b921a281cf5c623843901e76c634d libgfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm ce041e76484f00459a76134e4127120a libgnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 8c041cbc179ecd772ab4e2b2defb42f8 libgnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 795e196934185ab295669d5ceef31211 libmudflap-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 6a5214191870265bb2de040ce00b4ade libmudflap-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 47f54b736a9719193489e686f9deecbd libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm ed87733a08c34fd903b41c12674e52c9 libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 337baefc27c70ce9609d223c04d6c7f6 libobjc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 6434651eb0bedf00568bd1ecf2d75847 libobjc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 9df3bd7d1547322920edc180b1da397a libstdc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm ababd9dda6a8b7cc1eff1f5956a7af43 libstdc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 140ac8f889e76a36a0d62cb61b4c6a7f libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm fafb82178bd90f65f6bf4f098d1f1d9d libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 9c93513a48170b999bf6c4aa5be6e206 gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 5 **********************************************

1 0

Problem with checkinstall
by Bob McConnell 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

I installed checkinstall 1.6.2 on CentOS 5.4 VM (VMWare Server on WinXP). After getting the dependencies installed it compiled with no errors. But when I run it in its own source directory, I keep getting an error that I can't track down. The message is: install: cannot change ownership of '/usr/local/lib/installwatch.so': No such file or directory. But not only does the file exist, it has the correct permissions and creation time. I am running this as root. I did change the permissions on both make and install to 0755, but that did not help. The command line is: checkinstall -R --install=no Any suggestions? Bob McConnell N2SPP

2 2

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >> Of Benjamin Franz >> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >> >> If you have any budget at all, invest in bigger drives. 7200 RPM 1 TB >> RAID rated drives can be bought for $160 each. Desktop rated 5900 RPM >> 1.5 TB drives (which you can probably get away with in a dedicated >> backup server since you don't care a lot about speed and can tolerate >> long pauses for sector repair) can be bought for $110 each. Check Newegg. > > I haven't got a budget really. Today I asked for a new group-printer today and > the boss looked pained... 8-} SATA disks fit into 'office supply' budgets. > I opted for the proven 500GB-sized disks and got more of those instead. I've > had a handful of 750GB-drives die on me recently. Go to the vendor's web site, enter their serial numbers and get an RMA for a free replacement. Every vendor has had bad batches. > Somehow it feels the > technology isn't quite there yet for the bigger drive-sizes. Anybody remember > the IBM Deskstars in the early 00's...? They replace them too, within the warranty period. This is the reason you are making backups, remember. Things break. > Also, my experience is the more smaller disks you have, the faster they get. > Less to write to each I guess. That's true when the heads seek independently. With raid5 you lock onto the slowest of the set unless you have a very large number of drives. >> Second, to maximize 'depth' of backups you should use a 'Tower of >> Hanoi'-like backup system. > > Good advice, thanks! Backuppc will take care of that for you. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Benjamin Franz 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > Today I have five 500GB-disks raided on linux machine. Remove one for > parity > and I have 2TB of real space available. Doing a 0+1, ie 1TB, would indeed be > better as performance goes, but 1TB of space, well, it just isn't enough > unfortunately. > > As it is now, the 2TB shebang is mounted as /backup. Does that count as a > single filesystem? If you have any budget at all, invest in bigger drives. 7200 RPM 1 TB RAID rated drives can be bought for $160 each. Desktop rated 5900 RPM 1.5 TB drives (which you can probably get away with in a dedicated backup server since you don't care a lot about speed and can tolerate long pauses for sector repair) can be bought for $110 each. Check Newegg. Second, to maximize 'depth' of backups you should use a 'Tower of Hanoi'-like backup system. For example: 1 day 2 days 4 days 8 days 16 days etc If your selected backup software supports either hardlinking or plain old incremental backups that will keep the size of backups down a lot while giving you history. -- Benjamin Franz

2 1

more kickstart - saving %pre decisions for %post
by Alan McKay 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Hey again folks, How can I save answers to questions in %pre, for use in %post? I'm assuming (though have not yet tried) that variables won't live that long. Could I save them off to /tmp in a file, and retrieve them? e.g. %pre echo "VARNAME=$VARNAME" >> /tmp/varfile %post grep ^VARNAME= /tmp/varile Or some such ... -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"

4 16

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by John Doe 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

From: Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu(a)orgfarm.uu.se> > My google searches would have me believe that Amanda is the more popular > choice for backup on linux. On this list it seems Backuppc is. Strange... amanda was created in 1991... BackupPC in 2001. That would explain it a bit... Also if tapes are the backup media, which was mainly the case a 'few' years ago (still?), Backuppc won't be an option afaik... JD

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf >> Of Barry Brimer >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:15 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >> >> I use rsnapshot .. which manages sets of rsync backups using hardlinks. >> IT may be similar to what you are using already .. > > Somewhat similar, thanks. I think however I need to get away from this sort > of backups. They're just to space-consuming. Between compression and pooling, I get about 10x the raw data being archived with backuppc - it beats juggling tapes and you can let the users access the backups of their own machine through a web interface. There are some down sides to plan around though: the compression takes some CPU and is slower than a stock rsync run, and the pooling is done with hardlinks which forces the archive to be on a single filesystem and makes it hard to duplicate for offsite copies. There's an RPM in epel that is easy to install on Centos. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

6 9

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

On 1/13/2010 8:51 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> >> Between compression and pooling, I get about 10x the raw data being archived >> with backuppc - it beats juggling tapes and you can let the users access the >> backups of their own machine through a web interface. There are some down >> sides >> to plan around though: the compression takes some CPU and is slower than a >> stock >> rsync run, and the pooling is done with hardlinks which forces the archive to >> be >> on a single filesystem and makes it hard to duplicate for offsite copies. >> There's an RPM in epel that is easy to install on Centos. > > Sound very interesting indeed! > > I don't think the performance will be a problem, the server's a calculation > machine that has now been scrapped running a dual-xeon@2,something GHz and > some 4GB RAM IIRC. Do you think the software-raid5 array used, would be a > problem in this case? > > I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but you never > know... There's a big write performance hit from raid5 (software or not). It may not be enough to be a showstopper but I wouldn't recommend it. Can you reconfigure to a 0+1 or some other type that has better performance without losing too much space? The archive does have to be on a single filesystem, though, and if you use the epel RPM it makes things easier if you mount the volume at /var/lib/BackupPC before the install. See 'how to change archive directory' from: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/backuppc/index.php?title=Tips_and_Tri… to do it after the install. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Gabriel Rosca 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

I like better Bacula ... Personal I have Bacula ... configure to backup mac, windows, and linux servers ... Gabe -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:53 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Alan McKay >Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 3:01 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server > >BackupPC over here - very happy with it for Linux and Windoze, at home >and work My google searches would have me believe that Amanda is the more popular choice for backup on linux. On this list it seems Backuppc is. Strange... ;-) -- /Sorin

4 4

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Max Hetrick 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > Sound very interesting indeed! > > I don't think the performance will be a problem, the server's a calculation > machine that has now been scrapped running a dual-xeon@2,something GHz and > some 4GB RAM IIRC. Do you think the software-raid5 array used, would be a > problem in this case? > > I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but you never > know... The reason I really like BackupPC is the compression you can get. It really helps me out since I have a smaller dedicated backup server. For my instance, since I have a dedicated server, I'd trade performance for the space compression saves me. Regards, Max

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Brian Mathis 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu(a)orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf >>Of Barry Brimer >>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:15 PM >>To: CentOS mailing list >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >> >>I use rsnapshot .. which manages sets of rsync backups using hardlinks. >>IT may be similar to what you are using already .. > > Somewhat similar, thanks. I think however I need to get away from this sort > of backups. They're just to space-consuming. > -- > /Sorin Do you currently need that disk space for something else? If not, then there is no reason to get rid of the old files. An empty disk is a wasted disk, so you would be creating free space on a perfectly good disk that you already paid for. Having blank space gains you nothing, but deleting a file that you could need in 6 months might cost you. Pick a percentage of the disk that you are comfortable using for backups, and then let the backups grow to that size. Only when you reach that size or need the space for something with a higher priority should you worry about recovering the space.

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Gabriel Rosca 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

They have open source www.bacula.org Gabe -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:20 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Gabriel Rosca >Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:09 PM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server > >I like better Bacula ... > >Personal I have Bacula ... configure to backup mac, windows, and linux >servers ... Isn't Bacula payware? -- /Sorin

2 1

centos on vmware worstation not mounting cdrom
by Ivan Arteaga 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss